Please wait a minute...
金属学报  2014, Vol. 50 Issue (5): 531-539    DOI: 10.3724/SP.J.1037.2013.00709
  本期目录 | 过刊浏览 |
低碳高强钢合金元素配分行为对残余奥氏体和力学性能的影响
田亚强1, 张宏军1, 陈连生1(), 宋进英1, 徐勇1,2, 张士宏2
1 河北联合大学河北省现代冶金技术重点实验室, 唐山063009
2 中国科学院金属研究所, 沈阳110016
EFFECT OF ALLOY ELEMENTS PARTITIONING BEHAVIOR ON RETAINED AUSTENITE AND MECHANICAL PROPERTY IN LOW CARBON HIGH STRENGTH STEEL
TIAN Yaqiang1, ZHANG Hongjun1, CHEN Liansheng1(), SONG Jinying1, XU Yong1,2, ZHANG Shihong2
1 Hebei Key Laboratory of Modern Metallurgy Technology, Hebei United University, Tangshan 063009
2 Institute of Metal Research, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shenyang 110016
引用本文:

田亚强, 张宏军, 陈连生, 宋进英, 徐勇, 张士宏. 低碳高强钢合金元素配分行为对残余奥氏体和力学性能的影响[J]. 金属学报, 2014, 50(5): 531-539.
Yaqiang TIAN, Hongjun ZHANG, Liansheng CHEN, Jinying SONG, Yong XU, Shihong ZHANG. EFFECT OF ALLOY ELEMENTS PARTITIONING BEHAVIOR ON RETAINED AUSTENITE AND MECHANICAL PROPERTY IN LOW CARBON HIGH STRENGTH STEEL[J]. Acta Metall Sin, 2014, 50(5): 531-539.

全文: PDF(18013 KB)   HTML
摘要: 

采用双相区保温+奥氏体化淬火+低温退火的热处理工艺, 研究了合金元素配分行为对C-Si-Mn系高强钢微观组织和力学性能的影响. 结果表明, 在760 ℃随着保温时间的延长, 双相区中奥氏体相的体积分数逐渐增多直至达到饱和, 而铁素体向奥氏体扩散的Mn元素含量也逐渐增多直至在两相间达到化学势平衡, 后加热至930 ℃保温120 s, 再淬火至220 ℃, 配分过程中发生了C从马氏体向奥氏体中的扩散偏聚. 经该工艺处理后实验用钢的抗拉强度为1310 MPa, 延伸率可达12%, 强塑积达到15720 MPa.%, 相比传统淬火+碳配分工艺, 双相区保温+奥氏体化淬火+低温退火的热处理工艺过程中Mn配分和C配分共同作用能够显著提高钢中残余奥氏体的含量和稳定性, 从而提高高强钢的室温成形能力.

关键词 高强钢双相区保温Mn配分C配分残余奥氏体力学性能    
Abstract

The C content in high strength steel must be controlled at a lower level for the good weldability. However, the lower level of C content will reduce the C partitioning efficiency and influence the stability of retained austenite, which leads to the decrease of the product of tensile strength and elongation of high strength steel. A novel preparation mechanism of high strength steel is to employ some kind of substitutional alloying elements, for example Mn, instead of C to partitioning to enhance the austenitic stability, which would not remarkably reduce the weldability of the steel. One low alloy C-Si-Mn steel was used in present work. The Mn partitioning behavior and its effect on the stability of the retained austenite and the mechanical property were studied by means of intercritical annealing, subsequent austenitizing, then quenching and partitioning process (I&Q&P). The results show that in the process of intercritical annealing at 760 ℃, by extending the annealing time, austenite volume fraction increases gradually until it reaches the saturation, meanwhile the Mn partitioning behavior occurs and Mn content increases gradually from ferrite to austenite until it reaches the chemical potential balance in two phases. The sample is heated to 930 ℃ for 120 s, then rapidly quenching to 220 ℃, the carbon diffuses from martensite to austenite phase in the process of partitioning. After I&Q&P process, the tensile strength of experimental steel is 1310 MPa, elongation up to 12%, the product of strength and elongation up to more than 15000 MPa.%. The steel only contains a small amount of retained austenite by only C partitioning after traditional Q&P process, while the steel contains more Mn-rich retained austenite after I&Q&P process. Hence, the content and stability of retained austenite of steel can be improved significantly, which enhance the formability at room temperature.

Key wordshigh strength steel    intercritical annealing    Mn partitioning    C partitioning    retained austenite    mechanical property
收稿日期: 2013-11-07     
ZTFLH:  TG156  
基金资助:* 国家自然科学基金项目51254004和51304186及河北省自然科学基金项目E2014209191资助
作者简介: null

陈连生, 男, 1968年生, 教授, 博士

图1  
图2  
图3  
图4  
图5  
图6  
图7  
图8  
图9  
Process Rm / MPa Rp0.2 / MPa A / % Rm·A / (MPa·%)
Original 640 505 26.0 16640
Q&P 1560 1150 8.3 12948
I&Q&P 1310 975 12.0 15720
  
图10  
[1] Hayami S, Furukawa T. Microalloying 75. New York: Union Carbide Corp, 1977: 311
[2] Raabe D, Ponge D, Dmitrieva O, Sander B. Scr Mater, 2009; 60: 1141
[3] Matsumura O, Sakuma Y, Takechi H. ISIJ Int, 1992; 32: 1014
[4] Matsumura O, Sakuma Y, Takechi H. ISIJ Int, 1987; 27: 570
[5] Sugimoto K, Misu M, Kobayashi M, Shirasawa H. ISIJ Int, 1993; 33: 775
[6] Bouaziz O, Guelton N. Mater Sci Eng, 2001; A319-321: 246
[7] Barnett M R. Mater Sci Eng, 2007; A464: 1
[8] Rizzo F, Martins A R, Speer J G. Mater Sci Forum, 2007; 539-543: 4476
[9] Andrade H L, Akben M G, Jonas J J. Metall Trans, 1983; 14A: 1967
[10] Hashimoto S, Ikeda S, Sugimoto K I, Miyake S. ISIJ Int, 2004; 44: 1590
[11] Speer J G, Matlock D K, De Cooman B C, Schroch J G. Acta Mater, 2003; 51: 2611
[12] Edmonds D V, Rizzo F C, De Cooman B C, Matlock D K, Speer J G. Mater Sci Eng, 2006; A438-440: 25
[13] De Cooman B C, Speer J G. In: Lee H C ed., The 3rd Int Conf on Advanced Structural Steels, Gyeongju: The Korean Institute of Metals and Materials, 2006: 798
[14] Speer J G, Rizzo F C, Matlock D K, Edmonds D V. Mater Res, 2005; 8: 417
[15] Matlock D K, Bräutigam V E, Speer J G. Mater Sci Forum, 2003; 426: 1089
[16] Xu Z Y. Mater Sci Forum, 2007; 561-565: 2283
[17] Wang X D, Zhong N, Rong Y H, Xu Z Y. J Mater Res, 2009; 24: 261
[18] Zhong N. PhD Dissertation, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, 2009
[18] (钟 宁. 上海交通大学博士学位论文, 2009)
[19] De Moor E, Lacroix S, Clarke A J, Penning J, Speer J G. Metall Mater Trans, 2008, 39A: 2586
[20] Dong X C, Zhang X, Chen Y Q. Iron Steel Vanadium Titanium, 2011; 32: 62
[20] (董现春, 张 熹, 陈延清. 钢铁钒钛, 2011, 32: 62)
[21] Zhu B K, Li S B, Zhou H, Yang P. Welding Joining, 2007; (4): 40
[21] (朱丙坤, 李少兵, 周 浩, 杨 澍. 焊接, 2007; (4): 40)
[22] Saleh M H, Prietner R. Mater Proc Technol, 2001; 113: 587
[23] Toji Y, Yamashita T, Nakajima K, Okuda K, Matsuda H, Hasegawa K, Seto K. ISIJ Int, 2011; 51: 818
[24] Lee S, Lee S J, De Cooman B C. Sci Mater, 2011; 65: 225
[25] Lee S J, Lee S, De Cooman B C. Sci Mater, 2011; 64: 649
[26] Krauss G. In: Rohatgi P K, Yust C S eds., Tribology of Composite Materials, Materials Park, Ohio: ASM International, 1990: 56
[27] Koistinen D P, Marburger R E. Acta Metall, 1959; 7: 59
[28] Fan X. Metallic X-ray Physics. Beijing: Mechanical Industry Press, 1989: 159
[28] (范 雄. 金属X射线学. 北京: 机械工业出版社, 1989: 159)
[1] 张雷雷, 陈晶阳, 汤鑫, 肖程波, 张明军, 杨卿. K439B铸造高温合金800℃长期时效组织与性能演变[J]. 金属学报, 2023, 59(9): 1253-1264.
[2] 郑亮, 张强, 李周, 张国庆. /降氧过程对高温合金粉末表面特性和合金性能的影响:粉末存储到脱气处理[J]. 金属学报, 2023, 59(9): 1265-1278.
[3] 宫声凯, 刘原, 耿粒伦, 茹毅, 赵文月, 裴延玲, 李树索. 涂层/高温合金界面行为及调控研究进展[J]. 金属学报, 2023, 59(9): 1097-1108.
[4] 张健, 王莉, 谢光, 王栋, 申健, 卢玉章, 黄亚奇, 李亚微. 镍基单晶高温合金的研发进展[J]. 金属学报, 2023, 59(9): 1109-1124.
[5] 陈礼清, 李兴, 赵阳, 王帅, 冯阳. 结构功能一体化高锰减振钢研究发展概况[J]. 金属学报, 2023, 59(8): 1015-1026.
[6] 丁桦, 张宇, 蔡明晖, 唐正友. 奥氏体基Fe-Mn-Al-C轻质钢的研究进展[J]. 金属学报, 2023, 59(8): 1027-1041.
[7] 李景仁, 谢东升, 张栋栋, 谢红波, 潘虎成, 任玉平, 秦高梧. 新型低合金化高强Mg-0.2Ce-0.2Ca合金挤压过程中的组织演变机理[J]. 金属学报, 2023, 59(8): 1087-1096.
[8] 袁江淮, 王振玉, 马冠水, 周广学, 程晓英, 汪爱英. Cr2AlC涂层相结构演变对力学性能的影响[J]. 金属学报, 2023, 59(7): 961-968.
[9] 吴东江, 刘德华, 张子傲, 张逸伦, 牛方勇, 马广义. 电弧增材制造2024铝合金的微观组织与力学性能[J]. 金属学报, 2023, 59(6): 767-776.
[10] 张东阳, 张钧, 李述军, 任德春, 马英杰, 杨锐. 热处理对选区激光熔化Ti55531合金多孔材料力学性能的影响[J]. 金属学报, 2023, 59(5): 647-656.
[11] 侯娟, 代斌斌, 闵师领, 刘慧, 蒋梦蕾, 杨帆. 尺寸设计对选区激光熔化304L不锈钢显微组织与性能的影响[J]. 金属学报, 2023, 59(5): 623-635.
[12] 刘满平, 薛周磊, 彭振, 陈昱林, 丁立鹏, 贾志宏. 后时效对超细晶6061铝合金微观结构与力学性能的影响[J]. 金属学报, 2023, 59(5): 657-667.
[13] 吴欣强, 戎利建, 谭季波, 陈胜虎, 胡小锋, 张洋鹏, 张兹瑜. Pb-Bi腐蚀Si增强型铁素体/马氏体钢和奥氏体不锈钢的研究进展[J]. 金属学报, 2023, 59(4): 502-512.
[14] 李述军, 侯文韬, 郝玉琳, 杨锐. 3D打印医用钛合金多孔材料力学性能研究进展[J]. 金属学报, 2023, 59(4): 478-488.
[15] 王虎, 赵琳, 彭云, 蔡啸涛, 田志凌. 激光熔化沉积TiB2 增强TiAl基合金涂层的组织及力学性能[J]. 金属学报, 2023, 59(2): 226-236.