Please wait a minute...
金属学报  2014, Vol. 50 Issue (5): 531-539    DOI: 10.3724/SP.J.1037.2013.00709
  论文 本期目录 | 过刊浏览 |
低碳高强钢合金元素配分行为对残余奥氏体和力学性能的影响
田亚强1), 张宏军1), 陈连生1), 宋进英1), 徐勇1,2), 张士宏2)
1) 河北联合大学河北省现代冶金技术重点实验室, 唐山063009
2) 中国科学院金属研究所, 沈阳110016
EFFECT OF ALLOY ELEMENTS PARTITIONINGBEHAVIOR ON RETAINED AUSTENITE ANDMECHANICAL PROPERTY IN LOW CARBONHIGH STRENGTH STEEL
TIAN Yaqiang 1), ZHANG Hongjun 1), CHEN Liansheng 1), SONG Jinying 1), XU Yong 1, 2),
ZHANG Shihong 2)
1) Hebei Key Laboratory of Modern Metallurgy Technology, Hebei United University, Tangshan 063009
2) Institute of Metal Research, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shenyang 110016
全文: PDF(18013 KB)   HTML
摘要: 

采用双相区保温+奥氏体化淬火+低温退火的热处理工艺, 研究了合金元素配分行为对C-Si-Mn系高强钢微观组织和力学性能的影响. 结果表明, 在760 ℃随着保温时间的延长, 双相区中奥氏体相的体积分数逐渐增多直至达到饱和, 而铁素体向奥氏体扩散的Mn元素含量也逐渐增多直至在两相间达到化学势平衡, 后加热至930 ℃保温120 s, 再淬火至220 ℃, 配分过程中发生了C从马氏体向奥氏体中的扩散偏聚. 经该工艺处理后实验用钢的抗拉强度为1310 MPa, 延伸率可达12%, 强塑积达到15720 MPa·%, 相比传统淬火+碳配分工艺, 双相区保温+奥氏体化淬火+低温退火的热处理工艺过程中Mn配分和C配分共同作用能够显著提高钢中残余奥氏体的含量和稳定性, 从而提高高强钢的室温成形能力.

关键词 高强钢双相区保温Mn配分C配分残余奥氏体力学性能    
Abstract:The C content in high strength steel must be controlled at a lower level for the good weldability. However, the lower level of C content will reduce the C partitioning efficiency and influence the stability of retained austenite, which leads to the decrease of the product of tensile strength and elongation of high strength steel. A novel preparation mechanism of high strength steel is to employ some kind of substitutional alloying elements, for example Mn, instead of C to partitioning to enhance the austenitic stability, which would not remarkably reduce the weldability of the steel. One low alloy C-Si-Mn steel was used in present work. The Mn partitioning behavior and its effect on the stability of the retained austenite and the mechanical property were studied by means of intercritical annealing, subsequent austenitizing, then quenching and partitioning process (I&Q&P). The results show that in the process of intercritical annealing at 760 ℃, by extending the annealing time, austenite volume fraction increases gradually until it reaches the saturation, meanwhile the Mn partitioning behavior occurs and Mn content increases gradually from ferrite to austenite until it reaches the chemical potential balance in two phases. The sample is heated to 930 ℃ for 120 s, then rapidly quenching to 220 ℃, the carbon diffuses from martensite to austenite phase in the process of partitioning. After I&Q&P process, the tensile strength of experimental steel is 1310 MPa, elongation up to 12%, the product of strength and elongation up to more than 15000 MPa·%. The steel only contains a small amount of retained austenite by only C partitioning after traditional Q&P process, while the steel contains more Mn-rich retained austenite after I&Q&P process. Hence, the content and stability of retained austenite of steel can be improved significantly, which enhance the formability at room temperature.
Key wordshigh strength steel    intercritical annealing    Mn partitioning    C partitioning    retained austenite    mechanical property
收稿日期: 2013-11-07      出版日期: 2014-05-20
ZTFLH:  TG156  
基金资助:* 国家自然科学基金项目51254004和51304186及河北省自然科学基金项目E2014209191资助
Corresponding author: CHEN Liansheng, professor, Tel: (0315)2597151, E-mail: kyc@heuu.edu.cn   
作者简介: 陈连生, 男, 1968年生, 教授, 博士

引用本文:

田亚强, 张宏军, 陈连生, 宋进英, 徐勇, 张士宏. 低碳高强钢合金元素配分行为对残余奥氏体和力学性能的影响[J]. 金属学报, 2014, 50(5): 531-539.
TIAN Yaqiang , ZHANG Hongjun , CHEN Liansheng , SONG Jinying , XU Yong , ZHANG Shihong . EFFECT OF ALLOY ELEMENTS PARTITIONINGBEHAVIOR ON RETAINED AUSTENITE ANDMECHANICAL PROPERTY IN LOW CARBONHIGH STRENGTH STEEL. Acta Metall, 2014, 50(5): 531-539.

链接本文:

http://www.ams.org.cn/CN/10.3724/SP.J.1037.2013.00709      或      http://www.ams.org.cn/CN/Y2014/V50/I5/531

[1] Hayami S, Furukawa T. Microalloying 75. New York: Union Carbide Corp, 1977: 311
[2] Raabe D, Ponge D, Dmitrieva O, Sander B. Scr Mater, 2009; 60: 1141
[3] Matsumura O, Sakuma Y, Takechi H. ISIJ Int, 1992; 32: 1014
[4] Matsumura O, Sakuma Y, Takechi H. ISIJ Int, 1987; 27: 570
[5] Sugimoto K, Misu M, Kobayashi M, Shirasawa H. ISIJ Int, 1993; 33: 775
[6] Bouaziz O, Guelton N. Mater Sci Eng, 2001; A319-321: 246
[7] Barnett M R. Mater Sci Eng, 2007; A464: 1
[8] Rizzo F, Martins A R, Speer J G. Mater Sci Forum, 2007; 539-543: 4476
[9] Andrade H L, Akben M G, Jonas J J. Metall Trans, 1983; 14A: 1967
[10] Hashimoto S, Ikeda S, Sugimoto K I, Miyake S. ISIJ Int, 2004; 44: 1590
[11] Speer J G, Matlock D K, De Cooman B C, Schroch J G. Acta Mater, 2003; 51: 2611
[12] Edmonds D V, Rizzo F C, De Cooman B C, Matlock D K, Speer J G. Mater Sci Eng, 2006; A438-440: 25
[13] De Cooman B C, Speer J G. In: Lee H C ed., The 3rd Int Conf on Advanced Structural Steels, Gyeongju: The Korean Institute of Metals and Materials, 2006: 798
[14] Speer J G, Rizzo F C, Matlock D K, Edmonds D V. Mater Res, 2005; 8: 417
[15] Matlock D K, Br?utigam V E, Speer J G. Mater Sci Forum, 2003; 426: 1089
[16] Xu Z Y. Mater Sci Forum, 2007; 561-565: 2283
[17] Wang X D, Zhong N, Rong Y H, Xu Z Y. J Mater Res, 2009; 24: 261
[18] Zhong N. PhD Dissertation, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, 2009(钟 宁. 上海交通大学博士学位论文, 2009)
[19] De Moor E, Lacroix S, Clarke A J, Penning J, Speer J G. Metall Mater Trans, 2008, 39A: 2586
[20] Dong X C, Zhang X, Chen Y Q. Iron Steel Vanadium Titanium, 2011; 32: 62(董现春, 张 熹, 陈延清. 钢铁钒钛, 2011, 32: 62)
[21] Zhu B K, Li S B, Zhou H, Yang P. Welding Joining, 2007; (4): 40(朱丙坤, 李少兵, 周 浩, 杨 澍. 焊接, 2007; (4): 40)
[22] Saleh M H, Prietner R. Mater Proc Technol, 2001; 113: 587
[23] Toji Y, Yamashita T, Nakajima K, Okuda K, Matsuda H, Hasegawa K, Seto K. ISIJ Int, 2011; 51: 818
[24] Lee S, Lee S J, De Cooman B C. Sci Mater, 2011; 65: 225
[25] Lee S J, Lee S, De Cooman B C. Sci Mater, 2011; 64: 649
[26] Krauss G. In: Rohatgi P K, Yust C S eds., Tribology of Composite Materials, Materials Park, Ohio: ASM International, 1990: 56
[27] Koistinen D P, Marburger R E. Acta Metall, 1959; 7: 59
[28] Fan X. Metallic X-ray Physics. Beijing: Mechanical Industry Press, 1989: 159(范 雄. 金属X射线学. 北京: 机械工业出版社, 1989: 159)
[1] 李天瑞, 刘国怀, 徐莽, 牛红志, 付天亮, 王昭东, 王国栋. Ti-43Al-4Nb-1.5Mo合金包套锻造与热处理过程的微观组织及高温拉伸性能[J]. 金属学报, 2017, 53(9): 1055-1064.
[2] 侯陇刚, 刘明荔, 王新东, 庄林忠, 张济山. 高强7050铝合金超低温大变形加工与组织、性能调控[J]. 金属学报, 2017, 53(9): 1075-1090.
[3] 刘国怀, 李天瑞, 徐莽, 付天亮, 李勇, 王昭东, 王国栋. 累积叠轧TC4钛合金的组织演化与力学性能[J]. 金属学报, 2017, 53(9): 1038-1046.
[4] 张文奇, 朱海红, 胡志恒, 曾晓雁. AlSi10Mg的激光选区熔化成形研究[J]. 金属学报, 2017, 53(8): 918-926.
[5] 李细锋, 陈楠楠, 李佼佼, 何雪婷, 刘红兵, 郑兴伟, 陈军. 温度与应变速率对Invar 36合金变形行为的影响[J]. 金属学报, 2017, 53(8): 968-974.
[6] 郭廷彪, 李琦, 王晨, 张锋, 贾智. 单晶Cu等通道转角挤压A路径形变特征及力学性能[J]. 金属学报, 2017, 53(8): 991-1000.
[7] 刘晓云,王文广,王东,肖伯律,倪丁瑞,陈礼清,马宗义. 片层石墨尺寸对片层石墨/Al复合材料的强度和热导率的影响[J]. 金属学报, 2017, 53(7): 869-878.
[8] 杨建海,张玉祥,葛利玲,程晓,陈家照,高杨. 焊前混合表面纳米化对2A14铝合金搅拌摩擦焊接头微观组织和力学性能的影响[J]. 金属学报, 2017, 53(7): 842-850.
[9] 张洪伟,秦学智,李小武,周兰章. 一种高硼定向凝固合金的初熔行为及其对力学性能的影响[J]. 金属学报, 2017, 53(6): 684-694.
[10] 孙磊,陈明和,张亮,杨帆. Sn-Ag-Cu钎料焊接显微组织演化和性能研究[J]. 金属学报, 2017, 53(5): 615-621.
[11] 张清东,林潇,曹强,卢兴福,张勃洋,胡树山. 冷轧高强钢板淬火过程板形瓢曲缺陷演变规律研究[J]. 金属学报, 2017, 53(4): 385-396.
[12] 张志强,董利民,关少轩,杨锐. TC16钛合金辊模拉丝过程中的显微组织和力学性能[J]. 金属学报, 2017, 53(4): 415-422.
[13] 黄龙,邓想涛,刘佳,王昭东. 0.12C-3.0Mn低碳中锰钢中残余奥氏体稳定性与低温韧性的关系[J]. 金属学报, 2017, 53(3): 316-324.
[14] 刘丰刚,林鑫,宋衎,宋梦华,韩一帆,黄卫东. 激光修复300M钢的组织及力学性能研究[J]. 金属学报, 2017, 53(3): 325-334.
[15] 康举,梁苏莹,吴爱萍,李权,王国庆. 2219铝合金搅拌摩擦焊中的局部液化现象及对接头力学性能的影响[J]. 金属学报, 2017, 53(3): 358-368.