EFFECT OF HIGH TEMPERATURE PRE-AGEING AND LOW-TEMPERATURE RE-AGEING ON MECHANICAL PROPERTIES AND INTERGRANULAR CORROSION SUSCEPTIBILITY OF Al-Mg-Si-Cu ALLOYS
LI Hai1,3(), MAO Qingzhong1, WANG Zhixiu1,2,3, MIAO Fenfen1, FANG Bijun1, SONG Renguo1,3, ZHENG Ziqiao2
1 School of Materials Science and Engineering, Changzhou University, Changzhou 213164 2 School of Materials Science and Engineering, Central South University, Changsha 410083 3 Jiangsu Key Laboratory of Materials Surface Technology, Changzhou University, Changzhou 213164
Cite this article:
LI Hai, MAO Qingzhong, WANG Zhixiu, MIAO Fenfen, FANG Bijun, SONG Renguo, ZHENG Ziqiao. EFFECT OF HIGH TEMPERATURE PRE-AGEING AND LOW-TEMPERATURE RE-AGEING ON MECHANICAL PROPERTIES AND INTERGRANULAR CORROSION SUSCEPTIBILITY OF Al-Mg-Si-Cu ALLOYS. Acta Metall Sin, 2014, 50(11): 1357-1366.
It is well known that in peak-aged conditions age-hardenable aluminum alloys usually have high strength but low corrosion resistance. Low corrosion resistance of peak-aged Al alloys limits their applications in some corrosive conditions. In order to enhance the corrosion resistance, over-ageing treatments are often carried out but at the expense of strength. Therefore, it is of great industrial value to improve both strength and corrosion resistance of Al alloys simultaneously. In the present work, a novel two-step ageing treatment consisted of high-temperature pre-ageing and low-temperature re-ageing was proposed to improve both the tensile properties and intergranular corrosion (IGC) resistance of Al-Mg-Si-Cu alloys simultaneously. Furthermore, the effects of pre-ageing time at 180 ℃ and re-ageing time at 160 ℃ on the mechanical property and IGC susceptibility of the 6061 Al alloy were investigated by tensile testing and immersion corrosion testing. It was shown that after the optimized two-step ageing treatment of 180 ℃, 2 h+160 ℃, 120 h, the 6061 Al alloy had slightly higher strength than that of the conventional peak-aged samples and no susceptibility to intergranular corrosion. TEM observation revealed that the microstructures of the two-step treated 6061 Al alloy were consisted of high density of b″ phase along with small amount of Q' phase in the matrix and discontinuously distributed, spherical grain boundary precipitates, which led to high strength and IGC resistance of the 6061 Al alloy, respectively. The formation of the characteristic microstructures were attributed to the different decreased level of atomic diffusion rate between the matrix and grain boundary when decreasing from relatively high pre-ageing temperature to low re-ageing temperature, which resulted in the relatively slow growth of the matrix pre-precipitates and rapid coarsening of the grain boundary pre-precipitates, simultaneously.
Fund: National Natural Science Foundation of China (No.51301027), National Basic Research Program of China (No.2005CB623705) and Natural Science Foundation of the Jiangsu Higher Education Institutions of China (No.14KJB430002)
Fig.1 Tensile properties of the 6061 alloy pre-aged at 180 ℃ for 15 min, 2 h and 8 h (sb—ultimate tensile strength,ss—yield strength, d—elongation)
Fig.2 Tensile properties of the 6061 alloy re-aged at 160 ℃ after pre-ageing at 180 ℃ for 15 min (a), 2 h (b) and 8 h (c)
Fig.3 Corrosion morphologies of the 6061 alloy pre-aged at 180 ℃ for 15 min (a), 2 h (b) and 8 h (c)
Fig.4 Corrosion morphologies of the 6061 alloy processed by two-stage aging treament of 180 ℃, 15 min+160 ℃, 120 h (a), 180 ℃, 15 min+160 ℃, 360 h (b), 180 ℃, 2 h+160 ℃, 72 h (c), 180 ℃, 2 h+160 ℃, 120 h (d), 180 ℃, 8 h+160 ℃, 120 h (e) and 180 ℃, 8 h+160 ℃, 360 h (f)
Ageing treatment
Corrosion mode
Corrosion depth / mm
180 ℃, 15 min
IGC
180
180 ℃, 15 min+160 ℃, 24 h
IGC
210
180 ℃, 15 min+160 ℃, 72 h
IGC
220
180 ℃, 15 min+160 ℃, 120 h
IGC
250
180 ℃, 15 min+160 ℃, 240 h
IGC
210
180 ℃, 15 min+160 ℃, 360 h
IGC
190
180 ℃, 2 h
IGC
230
180 ℃, 2 h+160 ℃, 24 h
IGC
150
180 ℃, 2 h+160 ℃, 72 h
IGC
120
180 ℃, 2 h+160 ℃, 120 h
UC
-
180 ℃, 2 h+160 ℃, 240 h
UC
-
180 ℃, 2 h+160 ℃, 360 h
UC
-
180 ℃, 8 h
IGC
360
180 ℃, 8 h+160 ℃, 24 h
IGC
310
180 ℃, 8 h+160 ℃, 72 h
IGC
240
180 ℃, 8 h+160 ℃, 120 h
IGC
190
180 ℃, 8 h+160 ℃, 240 h
IGC
120
180 ℃, 8 h+160 ℃, 360 h
UC
-
Table 1 Corrosion mode and corrosion depth of the 6061 alloy after different heat treatments
Fig.5 TEM images of matrix (a, c, e) and grain boundary precipitation (b, d, f) after pre-ageing treatment of 180 ℃, 15 min (a, b), 180 ℃, 2 h (c, d) and 180 ℃, 8 h (e, f) (Insets show the <100> Al SAED patterns, PFZ—precipitation free zone)
Fig.6 TEM images of matrix (a, c, e) and grain boundary precipitation (b, d, f) of the 6061 Al alloy after two-stage ageing treatment of 180 ℃, 15 min+160 ℃, 120 h (a, b), 180 ℃, 2 h+160 ℃, 120 h (c, d) and 180 ℃, 8 h+160 ℃, 120 h (e, f)
[1]
Williams J C, Starke E A. Acta Mater, 2003; 51: 5775
[2]
Pogatscher S, Antrekowitscha H, Leitner H, Ebner T, Uggowitzer P J. Acta Mater, 2011; 59: 3352
[3]
Zhang X M. Acta Metall Sin, DOI: 10.11900/0412.1961.2013.00835
(张新明. 金属学报, DOI: 10.11900/0412.1961.2013.00835)
[4]
Yang W C, Wang M P, Sheng X F, Zhang Q, Wang Z A. Acta Metall Sin, 2010; 46: 1481
(杨文超, 汪明朴, 盛晓菲, 张 茜, 王正安. 金属学报, 2010; 46: 1481)
[5]
El-Menshawy K, El-Sayed A W A, El-Bedawy M E, Ahmed H A, El-Raghy S M. Corros Sci, 2012; 54: 167
[6]
Svenningsen G, Lein J E, Bjørgum A, Nordlien J H, Yu Y, Nisanciouglu K. Corros Sci, 2006; 48: 226
[7]
Svenningsen G, Larsen M H, Nordlien J H, Nisanciouglu K. Corros Sci, 2006; 48: 258
[8]
Svenningsen G, Larsen M H, Nordlien J H, Nisanciouglu K. Corros Sci, 2006; 48: 3969
[9]
Svenningsen G, Larsen M H, Walmsley J C, Nordlien J H, Nisancioglu K. Corros Sci, 2006; 48: 1528
[10]
He L Z, Chen Y B, Cui J Z, Sun X F, Guan H R, Hu Z Q. Corros Sci Protect Technol, 2004; 16: 129