管材自由胀形时胀形区轮廓形状的影响因素

doi:10.3724/SP.J.1037.2010.00020

金属学报

2010, Vol. 46

Issue (6): 729-735 DOI: 10.3724/SP.J.1037.2010.00020

论文

本期目录 | 过刊浏览

管材自由胀形时胀形区轮廓形状的影响因素

林艳丽;何祝斌 ;苑世剑

哈尔滨工业大学材料科学与工程学院; 哈尔滨 150001

THE FACTORS AFFECTING THE PROFILE OF MIDDLE BULGE REGION DURING TUBE BULGE TEST

LIN Yanli; HE Zhubin; YUAN Shijian

School of Materials Science & Engineering; Harbin Institute of Technology; Harbin 150001

引用本文:

林艳丽何祝斌苑世剑. 管材自由胀形时胀形区轮廓形状的影响因素[J]. 金属学报, 2010, 46(6): 729-735.
, , . THE FACTORS AFFECTING THE PROFILE OF MIDDLE BULGE REGION DURING TUBE BULGE TEST[J]. Acta Metall Sin, 2010, 46(6): 729-735.

全文: PDF(1078 KB)

摘要:

基于中间自由胀形区为椭圆形轮廓线的假设, 对管材自由胀形过程进行了理论分析, 研究了影响椭圆形状的主要因素及其对测试结果的影响. 结果表明, 影响椭圆形状的主要因素是管材胀形区长度和约束模具圆角半径. 在其它条件一定时, 椭圆的长短半轴比值随管材胀形区长度的减小或约束模具圆角半径的增大而减小, 即管材胀形后的轮廓线形状从椭圆形逐渐变化为圆形然后又变为扁椭圆形. 由胀形实验所得的应力--应变曲线随胀形区长度和约束模具圆角半径的不同而不同,但基本低于单向拉伸所得结果; 而且在胀形区长度减小或约束模具圆角半径增大时,这种差别更大.

关键词 ：液压成形, 应力-应变曲线, 管材胀形实验, 力学性能

Abstract：

Tube bulge test is one novel method of determining the stress-strain relations of tubular materials, compared with the traditional tension test, which can give better description of the mechanical properties of tube. Based on the ellipstical surface assumption of the middle free bulge region during hydrobulging, the tube hydrobulge process is analyzed first. The main factors that affect the shape of the tube were determined and analyzed. Results show that the length of tube bulge region and the entrance radius of the die are two key factors that determine the profile of the middle free bulge region. When other conditions are fixed, the ratio of the two semi-radii will decrease as the decrease of the initial length of tube bulge region or the increase of the die radius. It means that the profile of the middle free bulge region after hydrobulging will change from long ellipsoid to sphere and then to flat ellipsoid. The stress-strain curves determined by tube bulge test differ for different length of tube bulge region and the entrance radius of the die, but are all lower than that of traditional tension test along axial direction. The smaller the length of tube or the bigger the entrance radii of the die, the bigger is the difference.

Key words： tube hydroforming stress-strain curve tube bulge test mechanical property

收稿日期: 2010-01-11

基金资助:

国家杰出青年科学基金项目50525516, 黑龙江省自然科学基金项目E200804和中国博士后科学基金特别项目200801285资助

作者简介: 林艳丽, 女, 1982年生, 博士生

	服务

	把本文推荐给朋友
	加入引用管理器
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	作者相关文章
	林艳丽
	何祝斌
	苑世剑
44.8K

链接本文:

https://www.ams.org.cn/CN/10.3724/SP.J.1037.2010.00020 或 https://www.ams.org.cn/CN/Y2010/V46/I6/729

[1] Dohamnn F, Bohm A, Dudziak K U. In: Wang Z R ed., Advanced Technology of Plasticity 1993–Proc 4th Int Conf on Technology of Plasticity, Beijing: International Academic Publishers, 1993: 447
[2] Yuan S J, Liu G, He Z B, Wang X S, Han C, Teng B G, Xu Y C. Digital Manuf Sci, 2008; 6(4): 2
(苑世剑, 刘钢, 何祝斌, 王小松, 韩聪, 滕步刚, 徐永超. 数字制造科学, 2008; 6(4): 2)
[3] Sokolowski T, Gerke K, Ahmetoglu M, Altan T. J Mater Process Technol, 2000; 98: 34
[4] Price E G. Can Metall Q, 1972; 11: 129
[5] Arsene S, Bai J B. J Test Eval, 1996; 24: 386
[6] Wang H, Bouchard R, Eagleson R. J Test Eval, 2002; 30: 382
[7] He Z B, Yuan S J, Cha W W, Liang Y C. Acta Metall Sin, 2008; 44: 423
(何祝斌, 苑世剑, 查微微, 梁迎春. 金属学报, 2008; 44: 423)
[8] Woo D M. J Eng Mater Technol, 1973; 95: 219
[9] Woo D M, Hawkes P J. J Inst Met, 1966; 96: 357
[10] Fuchizawa S. In: Lange K ed., Advanced Technology of Plasticity 1987–Proc 2th Int Conf on Technology of Plasticity, Berlin: Springer Verlag, 1987: 727
[11] Fuchizawa S, Narazaki M, Yuki H. In: Wang Z R ed., Advanced Technology of Plasticity 1993–Proc 4th Int Conf on Technology of Plasticity, Beijing: International Academic Publishers, 1993: 488
[12] Koc M, Aue–u–lan Y, Altan T. Int J Mach Tool Manuf, 2001; 41: 761
[13] Hwang Y M, Lin Y K. J Mater Process Technol, 2002; 126: 821
[14] Hwang Y M, Lin Y K, Altan T. Int J Mach Tool Manuf, 2007; 47: 343
[15] Hwang Y M, Lin Y K. J Eng Mater Technol, 2007; 129, 414
[16] Strano M, Altan T. J Mater Process Technol, 2004; 146: 92
[17] Bortot P, Ceretti E, Giardini C. J Mater Process Technol, 2008; 203: 381

[1]	张雷雷, 陈晶阳, 汤鑫, 肖程波, 张明军, 杨卿. K439B铸造高温合金800℃长期时效组织与性能演变[J]. 金属学报, 2023, 59(9): 1253-1264.
[2]	宫声凯, 刘原, 耿粒伦, 茹毅, 赵文月, 裴延玲, 李树索. 涂层/高温合金界面行为及调控研究进展[J]. 金属学报, 2023, 59(9): 1097-1108.
[3]	郑亮, 张强, 李周, 张国庆. 增/降氧过程对高温合金粉末表面特性和合金性能的影响：粉末存储到脱气处理[J]. 金属学报, 2023, 59(9): 1265-1278.
[4]	张健, 王莉, 谢光, 王栋, 申健, 卢玉章, 黄亚奇, 李亚微. 镍基单晶高温合金的研发进展[J]. 金属学报, 2023, 59(9): 1109-1124.
[5]	李景仁, 谢东升, 张栋栋, 谢红波, 潘虎成, 任玉平, 秦高梧. 新型低合金化高强Mg-0.2Ce-0.2Ca合金挤压过程中的组织演变机理[J]. 金属学报, 2023, 59(8): 1087-1096.
[6]	陈礼清, 李兴, 赵阳, 王帅, 冯阳. 结构功能一体化高锰减振钢研究发展概况[J]. 金属学报, 2023, 59(8): 1015-1026.
[7]	丁桦, 张宇, 蔡明晖, 唐正友. 奥氏体基Fe-Mn-Al-C轻质钢的研究进展[J]. 金属学报, 2023, 59(8): 1027-1041.
[8]	袁江淮, 王振玉, 马冠水, 周广学, 程晓英, 汪爱英. Cr₂AlC涂层相结构演变对力学性能的影响[J]. 金属学报, 2023, 59(7): 961-968.
[9]	吴东江, 刘德华, 张子傲, 张逸伦, 牛方勇, 马广义. 电弧增材制造2024铝合金的微观组织与力学性能[J]. 金属学报, 2023, 59(6): 767-776.
[10]	侯娟, 代斌斌, 闵师领, 刘慧, 蒋梦蕾, 杨帆. 尺寸设计对选区激光熔化304L不锈钢显微组织与性能的影响[J]. 金属学报, 2023, 59(5): 623-635.
[11]	张东阳, 张钧, 李述军, 任德春, 马英杰, 杨锐. 热处理对选区激光熔化Ti55531合金多孔材料力学性能的影响[J]. 金属学报, 2023, 59(5): 647-656.
[12]	刘满平, 薛周磊, 彭振, 陈昱林, 丁立鹏, 贾志宏. 后时效对超细晶6061铝合金微观结构与力学性能的影响[J]. 金属学报, 2023, 59(5): 657-667.
[13]	吴欣强, 戎利建, 谭季波, 陈胜虎, 胡小锋, 张洋鹏, 张兹瑜. 耐Pb-Bi腐蚀Si增强型铁素体/马氏体钢和奥氏体不锈钢的研究进展[J]. 金属学报, 2023, 59(4): 502-512.
[14]	李述军, 侯文韬, 郝玉琳, 杨锐. 3D打印医用钛合金多孔材料力学性能研究进展[J]. 金属学报, 2023, 59(4): 478-488.
[15]	王虎, 赵琳, 彭云, 蔡啸涛, 田志凌. 激光熔化沉积TiB₂ 增强TiAl基合金涂层的组织及力学性能[J]. 金属学报, 2023, 59(2): 226-236.

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed