SLIP SYSTEM DETERMINATION OF DISLOCATIONS IN a-Ti DURING IN SITU TEM TENSILE DEFORMATION
Jing SHI,Zhenxi GUO,Manling SUI()
Insitute of Microstructure and Properties of Advanced Materials, Beijing University of Technology, Beijing 100124, China
Cite this article:
Jing SHI,Zhenxi GUO,Manling SUI. SLIP SYSTEM DETERMINATION OF DISLOCATIONS IN a-Ti DURING IN SITU TEM TENSILE DEFORMATION. Acta Metall Sin, 2016, 52(1): 71-77.
Fund: Supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China (No.11374028), Key Project of Beijing Natural Science Foundation and the Cheung Kong Scholar Programme
Fig.1 Schematics of bimetallic extensor in TEM (a), crystallographic orientation and loading direction (b) and SEM image of a-Ti sample prepared by focused ion beam (FIB) (c) (Inset in Fig.1c corresponds to EBSD image of the rectangle area)
Fig.2 TEM video frames of a-Ti single crystal with strains of 0% (a), 3.43% (b), 7.31% (c) and 4.63% (d) during tensile deformation (Sample marks are indicated by the arrows)
Fig.3 SAED patterns along crystal zone axis of [112ˉ3] (a), [011ˉ2] (b) and two-beam diffraction contrast images under diffraction vectors g= [1ˉ100] (c), g= [01ˉ11] (d), g= [1ˉ011] (e) and g= [202ˉ1ˉ] (f) of a-Ti single crystal after TEM tensile deformation
Fig.4 TEM video frames for <a> dislocation slip in a-Ti single crystal with strains of 0% (a), 0.44% (b), 1.44% (c), 2.84% (d), 5.21% (e) and 7.31% (f) during tensile deformation (Arrows show the movement of the dislocation)
Fig.5 Initial TEM image (a) and TEM video frames for dislocation No.2 <c+a> slip in a-Ti single crystal with strains of 0% (b), 0.71% (c), 1.00% (d), 3.43% (e) and 5.21% (f) during tensile deformation and schematic of loading direction and crystal orientation (g) (Arrows show the movements of the dislocations)
Fig.6 Initial TEM image (a) and TEM video frames for dislocation No.3 <c+a> slip in a-Ti single crystal with strains of 0% (b), 4.87% (c), 5.21% (d) and 7.31% (e) during tensile deformation and schematic of loading direction and crystal orientation (f) (Arrows show the movements of the dislocations)
[1210]
m
[2110]
m
[1213]
m
[2113]
m
[121 3]
m
[21 13]
m
(1010)
0.433
(0110)
0
(011 1)
0
(1011)
0.405
(0111)
0
(101 1)
0.405
(0002)
0
(0002)
0
(1101)
0.203
(1101)
0.405
(1101)
0.203
(1101)
0.405
(1011)
0.380
(0111)
0
(1212)
0.113
(2112)
0.451
(1212)
0.113
(2112)
0.451
(101 1)
0.380
(011 1)
0
(112 1)
0.127
(1121)
0.254
(1121)
0.127
(112 1)
0.254
(2111)
0.255
(1211)
0.254
(2111)
0.255
(1211)
0.254
Table 1 The slip directions, possible slip planes and corresponding Schmid factors (m) for the visible dislocations under [1ˉ100] diffraction condition
[1]
Zherebtsov S V, Dyakonov G S, Salem A A, Sokolenko V I, Salishchev G A, Semiatin S L. Acta Mater, 2013; 61: 1167
[2]
Zong H X, Lookman T, Ding X D, Luo S N, Sun J. Acta Mater, 2014; 65: 10
[3]
Zeng Z P, Jonsson S, Roven H J. Acta Mater, 2009; 57: 5822
[4]
Tirry W, Nixon M, Cazacu O, CogheL F, Rabet L. Scr Mater, 2011; 64: 840
[5]
Gurao N P, Kapoor R, Suwas S. Acta Mater, 2011; 5: 3431
[6]
Kim I, Kim J, Shin D H, Liao X Z, Zhu Y T. Scr Mater, 2003; 48: 813
[7]
Salem A A, Kalidindi S R, Doherty R D. Acta Mater, 2003; 51: 4225
[8]
Cai S Q, Li Z R, Xia Y M. Physica, 2008; 403B: 1660