Effect of Dilution Ratio of the First 309L Cladding Layer on the Microstructure and Mechanical Properties of Weld Joint of Connecting Pipe-Nozzle to Safe-End in Nuclear Power Plant

doi:10.11900/0412.1961.2019.00449

Acta Metall Sin

2020, Vol. 56

Issue (8): 1057-1066 DOI: 10.11900/0412.1961.2019.00449

Current Issue | Archive | Adv Search

Effect of Dilution Ratio of the First 309L Cladding Layer on the Microstructure and Mechanical Properties of Weld Joint of Connecting Pipe-Nozzle to Safe-End in Nuclear Power Plant

ZHANG Maolong¹^,², LU Yanhong¹, CHEN Shenghu³, RONG Lijian³(

), LU Hao²

1 Shanghai Electric Nuclear Power Equipment Co. Ltd. , Shanghai 201306, China
2 School of Materials Science and Engineering, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai 200240, China
3 Key Laboratory of Nuclear Materials and Safety Assessment, Institute of Metal Research, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shenyang 110016, China

Cite this article:

ZHANG Maolong, LU Yanhong, CHEN Shenghu, RONG Lijian, LU Hao. Effect of Dilution Ratio of the First 309L Cladding Layer on the Microstructure and Mechanical Properties of Weld Joint of Connecting Pipe-Nozzle to Safe-End in Nuclear Power Plant. Acta Metall Sin, 2020, 56(8): 1057-1066.

Download:

HTML

PDF(5339KB)
Export: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

Abstract

The transition joint between austenitic stainless steel pipe and low alloy steel nozzle of the pressure vessel has attracted much attention due to the occurrence of failure during application. Usually, the low alloy steel vessel nozzle should be firstly buttered with several layers of austenitic stainless steel and then welded to the austenitic stainless steel pipe. Cracking phenomenon in the austenitic cladding layer sometimes occurs during fabrication of the transition joint, and the cracking mechanism is not very clear. It is worth noting that microstructure in the first buttering layer is largely dependent on the welding condition, because the variation of the buttering welding parameters would lead to different dilution ratios in the cladding layer. Therefore, it is essential to investigate the effect of dilution ratio of the cladding layer on the mechanical properties of the weld joint. In this work, microstructure of the 309L cladding layer under two kinds of buttering welding parameters was analyzed using OM, SEM, XRD, EPMA and EBSD, and its effects on the mechanical properties of the weld joints were further studied. The results show that duplex microstructure (austenite+martensite) are present in the 309L cladding layers under two kinds of buttering welding parameters, but the dilution ratio could determine the morphology and amount of martensite phase. Microstructure consisting of austenite and lath martensite is found in the 309L cladding layer with a lower dilution ratio. A higher dilution ratio could increase the amount of lath martensite. The formation of needle-like martensite occurs when the dilution ratio exceeds a critical value. The dilution ratio in the 309L cladding layers directly affects the mechanical properties of weld joint. For the weld joint with a lower dilution ratio, no cracking phenomonen is observed during three-point bending test, and the specimens fracture at the weld fusion zone after tensile test. For the weld joint with a higher dilution ratio, cracking phenomenon initiated at the 309L cladding layer is present during three-point bending test, and a significat reduction in the tensile strength and elongation is observed. During deformation, the strain incompatibility between needle-like martensite and austenite is produced, leading to the formation of microcracks at the interfaces. The preferential cracking at the 309L cladding layer with a higher dilution ratio leads to the degradation of mechanical properties of the weld joint.

Key words: buttering welding dilution ratio microstructure mechanical property cracking mechanism

Received: 25 December 2019

ZTFLH:

TG44

Fund: National Natural Science Foundation of China(51871218);Program of Key Laboratory of Nuclear Materials and Safety Assessment, Chinese Academy of Sciences(2019NMSAKF03)

	Service

	E-mail this article
	Add to citation manager
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	（）
	Articles by authors
	Maolong ZHANG
	Yanhong LU
	Shenghu CHEN
	Lijian RONG
	Hao LU

URL:

https://www.ams.org.cn/EN/10.11900/0412.1961.2019.00449 OR https://www.ams.org.cn/EN/Y2020/V56/I8/1057

Table 1 Chemical compositions of each material in the safe-end joint

Fig.1 Schematic of the dissimilar metal welded safe-end joint (a) and macro-morphologies of austenitic stainless steel cladding layer of S1 (b) and S2 (b)

Fig.2 Schematics of bending sample (a) and tensile sample (b)
Color online

Fig.3 OM (a~d) and SEM (e, f) images of microstructures of the 309L cladding layer of S1 (a, c, e) and S2 (b, d, f) (The red dashed lines in Fig.3c and d show the interfaces of martensite and austenite)
Color online

Fig.4 XRD spectra of the 309L cladding layers of S1 and S2

Fig.5 EPMA results of the 309L cladding layers of S1 (a) and S2 (b)
Color online

Fig.6 Macro-morphologies of the weld joint of S1 (a) and S2 (b) after the 180° bending test

Fig.7 Tensile stress-strain curves of the weld joints of S1 and S2 at room temperature

Fig.8 Morphologies of side surfaces of the fractured samples of S1 (a) and S2 (b), and fracture surfaces of the weld joint of S2 (c~f)
Color online

Fig.9 Low (a) and high (b) magnified OM images of cross-sectional microstructures near the tensile fracture surface of the weld joint of S2 (The arrows show the micro-cracks)

Fig.10 Prediction of microstructure for the cladding layer according to the Schaeffler diagram (The microstructures of the 309L cladding layer are indicated by black arrows with the increased dilution ratio (D), and microstructures of the 309L cladding layer of S1 and S2 according the chemical composition are indicated; A—austenite, M—martensite, F—ferrite)^[18]
Color online

Fig.11 EBSD phase distributions of the 309L cladding layers of S1 (a) and S2 (b)
Color online

Table 2 Alloy element contents of 309L cladding layer of weld joints of S1 and S2 and their calculated dilution ratios

Fig.12 Microhardness distributions across the 316LN/NiCrFe-7/309L along the dissimilar weld joints of S1 and S2

[1]	Dai P K. Materials and Welding of the Main Equipment in Pressurized Water Reactor [M]. Shanghai: Shanghai Scientific and Technological Literature Press, 2008: 227
	(戴佩琨. 压水堆核电站核岛主设备材料和焊接 [M]. 上海: 上海科学技术文献出版社, 2008: 227)
[2]	Li G F, Yang W. Cracking of dissimilar metal welds in nuclear power plants and methods to evaluate its susceptibility to stress corrosion cracking [J]. Nucl. Saf., 2003, (2): 37
	(李光福, 杨武. 核电站异材焊接件的破裂问题与应力腐蚀评价方法 [J]. 核安全, 2003, (2): 37)
[3]	Lundin C D. Dissimilar metal welds—Transition joints literature review [J]. Weld. Res. Suppl., 1982, 61: 58
[4]	Liu Z Q, Liu K. Guide for Welding of Dissimilar Metals [M]. Beijing: China Machine Press, 1997: 7
	(刘中青, 刘凯. 异种金属焊接技术指南 [M]. 北京: 机械工业出版社, 1997: 7)
[5]	Ding J, Zhang Z M, Wang J Q, et al. Micro-characterization of dissimilar metal weld joint for connecting pipe-nozzle to safe-end in Generation III nuclear power plant [J]. Acta Metall. Sin., 2015, 51: 425 doi: 10.11900/0412.1961.2014.00299
	(丁杰, 张志明, 王俭秋等. 三代核电接管安全端异种金属焊接接头的显微表征 [J]. 金属学报, 2015, 51: 425) doi: 10.11900/0412.1961.2014.00299
[6]	Li G F, Li G J, Fang K W, et al. Stress corrosion cracking behavior of dissimilar metal weld A508/52M/316L in high temperature water environment [J]. Acta Metall. Sin., 2011, 47: 797 doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1037.2011.00316
	(李光福, 李冠军, 方可伟等. 异材焊接件A508/52M/316L在高温水环境中的应力腐蚀破裂 [J]. 金属学报, 2011, 47: 797) doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1037.2011.00316
[7]	Ming H L, Zhang Z M, Wang J Q, et al. Microstructure and local properties of a domestic safe-end dissimilar metal weld joint by using hot-wire GTAW [J]. Acta Metall. Sin., 2017, 53: 57 doi: 10.11900/0412.1961.2016.00135
	(明洪亮, 张志明, 王俭秋等. 国产核电安全端异种金属焊接件的微观结构及局部性能研究 [J]. 金属学报, 2017, 53: 57) doi: 10.11900/0412.1961.2016.00135
[8]	Xiong Q, Li H J, Lu Z P, et al. Characterization of microstructure of A508III/309L/308L weld and oxide films formed in deaerated high-temperature water [J]. J. Nucl. Mater., 2018, 498: 227 doi: 10.1016/j.jnucmat.2017.10.030
[9]	Li G F, Congleton J. Stress corrosion cracking of a low alloy steel to stainless steel transition weld in PWR primary waters at 292 ℃ [J]. Corros. Sci., 2000, 42: 1005 doi: 10.1016/S0010-938X(99)00131-6
[10]	Wang H T, Wang G Z, Xuan F Z, et al. Fracture mechanism of a dissimilar metal welded joint in nuclear power plant [J]. Eng. Fail. Anal., 2013, 28: 134 doi: 10.1016/j.engfailanal.2012.10.005
[11]	Joseph A, Rai S K, Jayakumar T, et al. Evaluation of residual stresses in dissimilar weld joints [J]. Int. J. Press. Vessels Pip., 2005, 82: 700 doi: 10.1016/j.ijpvp.2005.03.006
[12]	Wang H T, Wang G Z, Xuan F Z, et al. Local fracture behavior in an alloy 52M dissimilar metal welded joint in nuclear power plants [J]. Nucl. Tech., 2013, 36(4): 040628
	(王海涛, 王国珍, 轩福贞等. 核电52M镍基合金异种金属焊接接头的局部断裂行为 [J]. 核技术, 2013, 36(4): 040628)
[13]	Ming H L, Zhu R L, Zhang Z M, et al. Microstructure, local mechanical properties and stress corrosion cracking susceptibility of an SA508-52M-316LN safe-end dissimilar metal weld joint by GTAW [J]. Mater. Sci. Eng., 2016, A669: 279
[14]	Sireesha M, Albert S K, Shankar V, et al. A comparative evaluation of welding consumables for dissimilar welds between 316LN austenitic stainless steel and Alloy 800 [J]. J. Nucl. Mater., 2000, 279: 65 doi: 10.1016/S0022-3115(99)00275-5
[15]	Santosh R, Das S K, Das G, et al. Three-dimensional thermomechanical simulation and experimental validation on failure of dissimilar material welds [J]. Metall. Mater. Trans., 2016, 47A: 3511
[16]	Lei F, Tan J H, Xu C J. Studies on the shedding behavior of the surfacing layer on the inner wall of the safety and nozzle of the steam generator nozzle [J]. Technol. Innov. App., 2019, (5): 49
	(雷凡, 谭晶华, 许春军. 蒸汽发生器下封头接管内壁堆焊层脱落问题的研究 [J]. 科技创新与应用, 2019, (5): 49)
[17]	Lu Y H, Zhang M L, Tang W B, et al. Research on microstructure evolution and interfacial disbonding mechanism during dissimilar weld between 18MND5 and 309L [J]. Press. Vessel Technol., 2017, 34(9): 21
	(鲁艳红, 张茂龙, 唐伟宝等. 18MND5/309L焊接过程中组织演变以及界面剥离机理研究 [J]. 压力容器, 2017, 34(9): 21)
[18]	Schaeffler A L. Constitution diagram for stainless steel weld metal [J]. Met. Prog., 1949, 56: 680
[19]	Kotecki D J, Siewert T A. WRC-1992 constitution diagram for stainless steel weld metals: A modification of the WRC-1988 diagram [J]. Weld. Res. Suppl., 1992, 71: 171s
[20]	Ming H L, Zhang Z M, Wang J Q, et al. Microstructural characterization of an SA508-309L/308L-316L domestic dissimilar metal welded safe-end joint [J]. Mater. Charact., 2014, 97: 101 doi: 10.1016/j.matchar.2014.08.023
[21]	Dupont J N, Kusko C S. Technical note: Martensite formation in austenitic/ferritic dissimilar alloy welds [J]. Weld. Res., 2007, 86: 51s
[22]	Chung W C, Huang J Y, Tsay L W, et al. Microstructure and stress corrosion cracking behavior of the weld metal in alloy 52-A508 dissimilar welds [J]. Mater. Trans., 2011, 52: 12 doi: 10.2320/matertrans.M2010294
[23]	Wang Q Y, Chen S H, Rong L J. δ-Ferrite formation and its effect on the mechanical properties of heavy-section AISI 316 stainless steel casting [J]. Metall. Mater. Trans., 2020, 51A: 2998
[24]	Azuma M, Goutianos S, Hansen N, et al. Effect of hardness of martensite and ferrite on void formation in dual phase steel [J]. Mater. Sci. Technol., 2012, 28: 1092
[25]	Jin X J, Chen S H, Rong L J. Effect of Fe₂Zr phase on the mechanical properties and fracture behavior of Fe-Cr-W-Zr ferritic alloy [J]. Mater. Sci. Eng., 2018, A722: 173
[26]	Feng G C. Affecting factors of the dilution rate during buttering deposition and its controlling methods [J]. Weld. Technol., 1996, (1): 22
	(冯国昌. 堆焊稀释率的影响因素和控制措施 [J]. 焊接技术, 1996, (1): 22)

[1]	WANG Lei, LIU Mengya, LIU Yang, SONG Xiu, MENG Fanqiang. Research Progress on Surface Impact Strengthening Mechanisms and Application of Nickel-Based Superalloys[J]. 金属学报, 2023, 59(9): 1173-1189.
[2]	ZHANG Jian, WANG Li, XIE Guang, WANG Dong, SHEN Jian, LU Yuzhang, HUANG Yaqi, LI Yawei. Recent Progress in Research and Development of Nickel-Based Single Crystal Superalloys[J]. 金属学报, 2023, 59(9): 1109-1124.
[3]	ZHANG Leilei, CHEN Jingyang, TANG Xin, XIAO Chengbo, ZHANG Mingjun, YANG Qing. Evolution of Microstructures and Mechanical Properties of K439B Superalloy During Long-Term Aging at 800^oC[J]. 金属学报, 2023, 59(9): 1253-1264.
[4]	LU Nannan, GUO Yimo, YANG Shulin, LIANG Jingjing, ZHOU Yizhou, SUN Xiaofeng, LI Jinguo. Formation Mechanisms of Hot Cracks in Laser Additive Repairing Single Crystal Superalloys[J]. 金属学报, 2023, 59(9): 1243-1252.
[5]	GONG Shengkai, LIU Yuan, GENG Lilun, RU Yi, ZHAO Wenyue, PEI Yanling, LI Shusuo. Advances in the Regulation and Interfacial Behavior of Coatings/Superalloys[J]. 金属学报, 2023, 59(9): 1097-1108.
[6]	ZHENG Liang, ZHANG Qiang, LI Zhou, ZHANG Guoqing. Effects of Oxygen Increasing/Decreasing Processes on Surface Characteristics of Superalloy Powders and Properties of Their Bulk Alloy Counterparts: Powders Storage and Degassing[J]. 金属学报, 2023, 59(9): 1265-1278.
[7]	DING Hua, ZHANG Yu, CAI Minghui, TANG Zhengyou. Research Progress and Prospects of Austenite-Based Fe-Mn-Al-C Lightweight Steels[J]. 金属学报, 2023, 59(8): 1027-1041.
[8]	LIU Xingjun, WEI Zhenbang, LU Yong, HAN Jiajia, SHI Rongpei, WANG Cuiping. Progress on the Diffusion Kinetics of Novel Co-based and Nb-Si-based Superalloys[J]. 金属学报, 2023, 59(8): 969-985.
[9]	CHEN Liqing, LI Xing, ZHAO Yang, WANG Shuai, FENG Yang. Overview of Research and Development of High-Manganese Damping Steel with Integrated Structure and Function[J]. 金属学报, 2023, 59(8): 1015-1026.
[10]	LI Jingren, XIE Dongsheng, ZHANG Dongdong, XIE Hongbo, PAN Hucheng, REN Yuping, QIN Gaowu. Microstructure Evolution Mechanism of New Low-Alloyed High-Strength Mg-0.2Ce-0.2Ca Alloy During Extrusion[J]. 金属学报, 2023, 59(8): 1087-1096.
[11]	YUAN Jianghuai, WANG Zhenyu, MA Guanshui, ZHOU Guangxue, CHENG Xiaoying, WANG Aiying. Effect of Phase-Structure Evolution on Mechanical Properties of Cr₂AlC Coating[J]. 金属学报, 2023, 59(7): 961-968.
[12]	SUN Rongrong, YAO Meiyi, WANG Haoyu, ZHANG Wenhuai, HU Lijuan, QIU Yunlong, LIN Xiaodong, XIE Yaoping, YANG Jian, DONG Jianxin, CHENG Guoguang. High-Temperature Steam Oxidation Behavior of Fe22Cr5Al3Mo-xY Alloy Under Simulated LOCA Condition[J]. 金属学报, 2023, 59(7): 915-925.
[13]	ZHANG Deyin, HAO Xu, JIA Baorui, WU Haoyang, QIN Mingli, QU Xuanhui. Effects of Y₂O₃ Content on Properties of Fe-Y₂O₃ Nanocomposite Powders Synthesized by a Combustion-Based Route[J]. 金属学报, 2023, 59(6): 757-766.
[14]	GUO Fu, DU Yihui, JI Xiaoliang, WANG Yishu. Recent Progress on Thermo-Mechanical Reliability of Sn-Based Alloys and Composite Solder for Microelectronic Interconnection[J]. 金属学报, 2023, 59(6): 744-756.
[15]	WU Dongjiang, LIU Dehua, ZHANG Ziao, ZHANG Yilun, NIU Fangyong, MA Guangyi. Microstructure and Mechanical Properties of 2024 Aluminum Alloy Prepared by Wire Arc Additive Manufacturing[J]. 金属学报, 2023, 59(6): 767-776.

No Suggested Reading articles found!

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed