Please wait a minute...
金属学报  2014, Vol. 50 Issue (6): 707-714    DOI: 10.3724/SP.J.1037.2014.00003
  论文 本期目录 | 过刊浏览 |
锻态TC18钛合金棒材中b相组织和织构特征研究*
李凯1), 杨平1), 沙爱学2), 颜孟奇2)
1) 北京科技大学材料科学与工程学院, 北京 100083
2) 中航工业北京航空材料研究院, 北京 100095
INVESTIGATION OF MICROSTRUCTURE ANDTEXTURE OF b PHASE IN A FORGED TC18TITANIUM ALLOY BAR
LI Kai 1), YANG Ping 1), SHA Aixue 2), YAN Mengqi 2)
1) School of Materials Science and Engineering, University of Science and Technology Beijing, Beijing 100083
2) Beijing Institute of Aeronautical Materials, Aviation Industry Corporation of China, Beijing 100095
全文: PDF(9449 KB)   HTML
摘要: 

针对a /b型TC18钛合金大型锻棒中心与边部的性能差异, 利用EBSD技术研究了b相的组织差异、织构差异及形变程度差异, 并考察了b相的这些差异对遵循Burgers关系的ap相取向及球化速率的影响. 结果表明, 锻态TC18钛合金中的b相处于不同程度的形变状态, 随位置不同而具有不同的织构, 中心位置b相具有再结晶织构<100>的特点, 并且存在显著的晶粒尺寸不均匀性, 这些因素对中心与边部的性能差异有主要贡献. ap相的球化过程主要在b相晶内亚晶界上完成, 前期随形貌由片状向方块状的变化, 取向关系变化很小; 后期向球形过渡时, 取向关系偏差较大. b相晶粒内的取向差是衡量加工硬化对强度贡献的有效参数, 而a /b两相的取向关系与理想Burgers关系的偏差是揭示球化速度和形变b相晶粒回复程度的有效参数.

关键词 钛合金锻造织构相变    
Abstract:To understand the differences in the mechanical properties between the center and surface regions of large size forged TC18 titanium alloy bar, electron backscatter diffraction (EBSD) technique is applied to reveal the differences in textures and strains in b phase in addition to the microstructures observation. The influence of the states of b phase on the deviation to the Burgers orientation relationship (OR) between a /b phases is also analyzed according to the acquired EBSD information. It is found that the b phases in different positions of forged bar are in different states of strain, textures and grain sizes. The b phase in the center shows strong <100> texture and coarse and inhomogeneous grain sizes which all contribute to the difference in properties. The spheroidization of ap phase proceeded mainly within b grains at subgrain boundaries and the OR between two phases changed slightly as the lamella ap phase transforms into block-like ap phase, but changed strongly during transforming to globular morphology. The misorientation in b phase is an effective parameter to evaluate the contribution of work-hardening state for the enhancement of strength, whereas the level of the deviation to Burgers OR is an effective parameter to evaluate the spheroidizing rate and the recovery extent.
Key wordstitanium alloy    forging    texture    phase transformation
收稿日期: 2014-01-02     
ZTFLH:  TG146.23  
Corresponding author: YANG Ping, professor, Tel: (010)82376968, E-mail: yangp@mater.ustb.edu.cn   
作者简介: 李 凯, 男, 1989年生, 硕士生

引用本文:

李凯, 杨平, 沙爱学, 颜孟奇. 锻态TC18钛合金棒材中b相组织和织构特征研究*[J]. 金属学报, 2014, 50(6): 707-714.
LI Kai, YANG Ping, SHA Aixue, YAN Mengqi. INVESTIGATION OF MICROSTRUCTURE ANDTEXTURE OF b PHASE IN A FORGED TC18TITANIUM ALLOY BAR. Acta Metall Sin, 2014, 50(6): 707-714.

链接本文:

https://www.ams.org.cn/CN/10.3724/SP.J.1037.2014.00003      或      https://www.ams.org.cn/CN/Y2014/V50/I6/707

[1] Zhang Y Q, Guo H Z, Sun H L, Yao Z K. Mater Heat Treatment, 2012; 41(6): 147
(张永强, 郭鸿镇, 孙红兰, 姚泽坤. 热加工工艺, 2012; 41(6): 147)
[2] Huang X, Zhu Z S, Wang H H. Advanced Aeronautical Titanium Alloys and Applications. Beijing: National Defence Industry Press, 2012: 92
(黄 旭, 朱知寿, 王红红. 先进航空钛合金材料与应用. 北京: 国防工业出版社, 2012: 92)
[3] Qiao E L, Feng Y Q, Li W Q, Xie R P, Zhang S B, Chen R J. Met World, 2013; (4): 72
(乔恩利, 冯永琦, 李渭清, 谢仁沛, 张少波, 陈瑞菁. 金属世界, 2013; (4): 72)
[4] Glavicic M G, Goetz R L, Barker D R. Metall Mater Trans, 2008; 49A: 887
[5] Lonardelli I, Gey N, Wenk H R. Acta Mater, 2007; 55: 5718
[6] Gurao N P, Ali AA, Suwas S. Mater Sci Eng, 2009; A504: 24
[7] Cayron C. Scr Mater, 2008; 59: 570
[8] Salem A A, Glavicic M G, Semiatin S L. Mater Sci Eng, 2008; A494: 350
[9] Obasi G C, Moat R J, Prakash D G L. Acta Mater, 2012; 60: 7169
[10] Thomas M J, Wynne B P, Rainforth W M. Mater Charact, 2005; 55: 388
[11] Markovsky P E, Matviychuk Y V, Bondarchuk V I. Mater Sci Eng,2013; A559: 782
[12] Semiatin S L, Kinsel K T, Pilchak A L, Sargent G A. Metall Mater Trans, 2013; 44A: 3852
[13] Sargent G A, Kinsel K T, Pilchak A L. Metall Mater Trans, 2012; 43A: 3570
[14] Obasi G C, Birosca S, Quinta D F J. Acta Mater, 2012; 60: 1048
[15] Obasi G C, Quinta D F J, Rugg D. Mater Sci Eng, 2013; A576: 272
[16] Semiatin S L, Fagin P N, Glavicic M G, Ivasishin O M. Mater Sci Eng, 2001; A299: 225
[17] Jackson M, Dashwood R, Christodoulou L. Metall Mater Trans, 2005; 36A: 1317
[18] Karthikeyan T, Dasgupta A, Khatirkar R. Mater Sci Eng, 2010; A528: 549
[19] He D, Zhu J C, Zaefferer S, Raabe D. Mater Sci Eng, 2012; A549: 20
[20] Li C, Zhang X, Zhou K. Mater Sci Eng, 2012; A558: 668
[21] Germain L, Gey N, Humbert M. Acta Mater, 2008; 56: 4298
[22] Gey N, Bocher P, Uta E. Acta Mater, 2012; 60: 2647
[23] Leo Prakash D G, Honniball P, Rugg D. Acta Mater, 2013; 61: 3200
[24] Glavicic M G, Miller G D, Semiatin S L. Scr Mater, 2006; 54: 281
[25] Gey N, Humbert M. Acta Mater, 2002; 50: 277
[26] Shao H, Zhao Y Q, Ge P, Zeng W D. Mater Sci Eng, 2013; A586: 215
[27] Lütjering G. Mater Sci Eng, 1998; A243: 32
[28] Zhang Z, Wang Q J, Mo W. Titanium Metal Science and Heat Treatment. Beijing: Metallurgical Industry Press, 2009: 86
(张 翥, 王群骄, 莫 畏. 钛的金属学和热处理. 北京: 冶金工业出版社, 2009: 86)
[29] Zhao D H, Wang L, Zhi M S, Xu F. Chin J Stere Image Analy, 2013; 18: 356
(赵登辉, 王 琳, 智茂盛, 徐 峰. 中国体视学与图像分析, 2013; 18: 356)
[1] 张阳, 邵建波, 陈韬, 刘楚明, 陈志永. Mg-5.6Gd-0.8Zn合金多向锻造过程中的变形机制及动态再结晶[J]. 金属学报, 2020, 56(5): 723-735.
[2] 柯林达,殷杰,朱海红,彭刚勇,孙京丽,陈昌棚,王国庆,李中权,曾晓雁. 钛合金薄壁件选区激光熔化应力演变的数值模拟[J]. 金属学报, 2020, 56(3): 374-384.
[3] 陈翔,陈伟,赵洋,禄盛,金晓清,彭向和. 考虑塑性变形和相变耦合效应的NiTiNb记忆合金管接头装配性能模拟[J]. 金属学报, 2020, 56(3): 361-373.
[4] 王世宏,李健,葛昕,柴锋,罗小兵,杨才福,苏航. γ/ε双相Fe-19Mn合金在拉伸变形过程中的组织演变和加工硬化行为[J]. 金属学报, 2020, 56(3): 311-320.
[5] 于雷,罗海文. 部分再结晶退火对无取向硅钢的磁性能与力学性能的影响[J]. 金属学报, 2020, 56(3): 291-300.
[6] 程超,陈志勇,秦绪山,刘建荣,王清江. TA32钛合金厚板的微观组织、织构与力学性能[J]. 金属学报, 2020, 56(2): 193-202.
[7] 杜金辉,吕旭东,董建新,孙文儒,毕中南,赵光普,邓群,崔传勇,马惠萍,张北江. 国内变形高温合金研制进展[J]. 金属学报, 2019, 55(9): 1115-1132.
[8] 邓丽萍,崔凯旋,汪炳叔,向红亮,李强. AZ31镁合金室温多道次压缩过程微观组织和织构演变的研究[J]. 金属学报, 2019, 55(8): 976-986.
[9] 李鑫,董月成,淡振华,常辉,方志刚,郭艳华. 等通道角挤压制备超细晶纯Ti的腐蚀性能研究[J]. 金属学报, 2019, 55(8): 967-975.
[10] 李学雄,徐东生,杨锐. 双相钛合金高温变形协调性的CPFEM研究[J]. 金属学报, 2019, 55(7): 928-938.
[11] 杜随更,高漫,徐婉婷,王喜锋. TC11/TC17钛合金线性摩擦焊接头界面研究[J]. 金属学报, 2019, 55(7): 885-892.
[12] 黄森森,马英杰,张仕林,齐敏,雷家峰,宗亚平,杨锐. α+β两相钛合金元素再分配行为及其对显微组织和力学性能的影响[J]. 金属学报, 2019, 55(6): 741-750.
[13] 刘征,刘建荣,赵子博,王磊,王清江,杨锐. 电子束快速成形制备TC4合金的组织和拉伸性能分析[J]. 金属学报, 2019, 55(6): 692-700.
[14] 刘后龙,马明玉,刘玲玲,魏亮亮,陈礼清. 热轧板退火工艺对19Cr2Mo1W铁素体不锈钢织构与成形性能的影响[J]. 金属学报, 2019, 55(5): 566-574.
[15] 高钰璧, 丁雨田, 陈建军, 许佳玉, 马元俊, 张东. 挤压态GH3625合金冷变形过程中的组织和织构演变[J]. 金属学报, 2019, 55(4): 547-554.