Please wait a minute...
金属学报  2025, Vol. 61 Issue (11): 1638-1652    DOI: 10.11900/0412.1961.2024.00090
  研究论文 本期目录 | 过刊浏览 |
固溶后处理对GH4706合金时效析出相演化及力学性能的影响
王冲1, 王磊1(), 段然2, 田强2, 黄烁2(), 赵光普2
1 东北大学 材料科学与工程学院 材料各向异性与织构教育部重点实验室 沈阳 110819
2 北京钢研高纳科技股份有限公司 北京 100081
Effects of Solution Post-Treatment on Precipitation Evolution During Aging of GH4706 Alloy and Its Mechanical Properties
WANG Chong1, WANG Lei1(), DUAN Ran2, TIAN Qiang2, HUANG Shuo2(), ZHAO Guangpu2
1 Key Laboratory for Anisotropy and Texture of Materials, Ministry of Education, School of Materials Science and Engineering, Northeastern University, Shenyang 110819, China
2 Gaona Aero Material Co. Ltd., Beijing 100081, China
引用本文:

王冲, 王磊, 段然, 田强, 黄烁, 赵光普. 固溶后处理对GH4706合金时效析出相演化及力学性能的影响[J]. 金属学报, 2025, 61(11): 1638-1652.
Chong WANG, Lei WANG, Ran DUAN, Qiang TIAN, Shuo HUANG, Guangpu ZHAO. Effects of Solution Post-Treatment on Precipitation Evolution During Aging of GH4706 Alloy and Its Mechanical Properties[J]. Acta Metall Sin, 2025, 61(11): 1638-1652.

全文: PDF(8139 KB)   HTML
摘要: 

针对大尺寸涡轮盘固溶后处理冷却速率受限的问题,以直径1500 mm的GH4706合金盘锻件为对象,研究了980 ℃固溶4 h后分别进行空冷(AA)、炉冷至825 ℃稳定化处理后空冷(FSA)、炉冷至825 ℃后空冷(FA)和炉冷至825 ℃后石棉冷却(FAs) 4种固溶后处理对合金时效析出相演化特征及力学性能的影响。结果表明,降低980~825 ℃间的冷速,促进了晶界η相的析出和长大,消耗了Ni、Ti元素,抑制了大尺寸η相周围γ'/γ"相析出,形成了胞状组织;降低825~600 ℃间的冷速,显著加速了γ'/γ"相长大呈立方状;FSA、FA和FAs处理后胞状组织体积分数分别为4.1%、1.0%和1.8%。AA和FA处理基本不影响合金的室温拉伸性能,FSA处理小幅降低了合金的拉伸塑性,FAs处理大幅损害了合金的室温屈服强度。胞状组织加速了室温冲击时合金中裂纹的形成和扩展,造成FSA处理合金冲击韧性较AA处理降低64%。但胞状组织可阻碍合金650 ℃持久实验过程中裂纹扩展并抑制微孔长大聚集,提高了合金的持久寿命。FAs处理时由于大尺寸γ'/γ"相降低了合金强度,从而缩短持久寿命。FA处理使合金析出了适量的胞状组织,显著提高了合金持久寿命,同时保持良好的室温拉伸和冲击性能,具有优异的综合性能。

关键词 GH4706合金固溶后冷却胞状组织冲击韧性持久性能    
Abstract

GH4706 alloy is used for industrial gas turbine disks owing to its excellent properties, including high creep resistance, tensile strength, toughness, and microstructural stability up to approximately 650 oC. However, the increasing weight and size of large turbine disks have limited the cooling rate following the solution treatment, which hinders the control of the microstructure and mechanical properties of large GH4706 alloy disks. Herein, four solution post-treatments were conducted on a 1500-mm-diameter disk manufactured from GH4706 alloy after being treated at 980 oC for 4 h: air cooling + air cooling (AA), furnace cooling to 825 oC and stabilization treatment followed by air cooling (FSA), furnace cooling to 825 oC followed by air cooling (FA), and furnace cooling to 825 oC followed by asbestos cooling (FAs). The evolution of precipitates during aging (including for γ'/γ" coprecipitation and η phase) and their effects on mechanical properties were analyzed. Results indicated that reducing the cooling rate from 980 oC to 825 oC promoted the precipitation and growth of the η phase, leading to Ni and Ti consumptions. This inhibited γ'/γ" coprecipitation around the large η phase, thereby favoring the formation of a cellular microstructure. Further reduction in cooling rate from 825 oC to 600 oC substantially accelerated the growth of γ'/γ" coprecipitates into cubic forms. The volume fractions of the cellular microstructure in the FSA, FA, and FAs treatments were 4.1%, 1.0%, and 1.8%, respectively. The AA and FA treatments had negligible effects on the tensile properties of GH4706 alloy at room temperature; meanwhile, the FSA treatment slightly decreased tensile ductility. The FAs treatment led to a notable reduction in yield strength at room temperature. In impact testing at room temperature, the cellular microstructure accelerated crack initiation and propagation, resulting in a 64% lower impact toughness of GH4706 alloy for the FSA treatment compared to that for the AA treatment. However, during stress rupture testing at 650 oC, the cellular microstructure effectively hindered crack propagation and the growth and aggregation of micropores, thereby extending the rupture life. However, the FAs treatment reduced the rupture life due to strength loss caused by the large γ'/γ" coprecipitates. The FA treatment fostered an optimal level of cellular microstructure, thereby increasing the rupture life while maintaining excellent tensile and impact properties at room temperature, demonstrating remarkable overall mechanical properties.

Key wordsGH4706 alloy    cooling after solution treatment    cellular microstructure    impact toughness    stress rupture property
收稿日期: 2024-03-24     
ZTFLH:  TG156.1  
基金资助:国家重点研发计划项目(2022YFB3705102)
通讯作者: 王 磊,wanglei@mail.neu.edu.cn,主要从事高温合金微观组织控制与强韧化研究;
Corresponding author: HUANG Shuo, senior engineer, Tel: (010)62188063, E-mail: shuang@cisri.com.cn
作者简介: 王 冲,男,1997年生,博士生
图1  GH4706涡轮盘取样位置示意图
图2  GH4706合金固溶后处理工艺示意图
图3  不同固溶后处理和双级时效后GH4706合金晶粒组织形貌的OM像和EBSD晶界重构图
Solution post-treatmentΣ3Σ9Σ27
AA34.60.60.3
FSA37.60.80.2
FA36.30.60.1
FAs34.80.70.2
表1  不同固溶后处理和双级时效后GH4706合金重位点阵(CSL)晶界的体积分数 (%)
图4  不同固溶后处理和双级时效后GH4706合金析出相形貌的SEM像
图5  不同固溶后处理和双级时效后GH4706合金析出相形貌的TEM像和选区电子衍射(SAED)花样
图6  胞状组织中η相的高角环形暗场(HAADF)像和EDS面扫描图
图7  胞状组织中几何必需位错(GND)的透射Kikuchi衍射(TKD)像及GND密度正态分布统计图
Solution post-treatmentfc / %d1 / nmf1 / %d2 / nmf2 / %
AA---21.526.5
FSA4.115.412.021.124.2
FA1.018.816.821.724.8
FAs1.821.314.950.724.7
表2  不同固溶后处理和双级时效后GH4706合金中胞状组织的体积分数和γ'/γ''相的尺寸及体积分数
图8  不同固溶后处理和双级时效后GH4706合金力学性能对比
图9  不同固溶后处理和双级时效后GH4706合金冲击断口表面形貌的SEM像
图10  不同固溶后处理和双级时效后GH4706合金持久试样断口表面形貌的SEM像
图11  JMatPro模拟计算和不同固溶后处理实测的连续冷却转变(CCT)图
图12  不同固溶后处理和双级时效后GH4706合金室温冲击试样断口纵截面组织的局部取向差(KAM)图和SEM像
图13  不同固溶后处理和双级时效后GH4706合金的冲击载荷-位移曲线和冲击吸收功-位移曲线

Solution

post-treatment

EeEpEc
AA5.9518.5752.26
FSA6.915.6914.68
FA6.1414.4435.59
FAs6.3917.7933.77
表3  不同固溶后处理和双级时效后GH4706合金冲击吸收功各组成对比 (J)
图14  不同固溶后处理和双级时效后GH4706合金持久试样断口纵截面组织的KAM图和SEM像
[1] Mukherji D, Gilles R, Barbier B, et al. Lattice misfit measurement in Inconel 706 containing coherent γ′ and γ″ precipitates [J]. Scr. Mater., 2003, 48: 333
[2] Wanderka N, Naundorf V, Banhart J, et al. Microstructural characterization of Inconel 706 alloy [J]. Surf. Interface Anal., 2004, 36: 546
[3] Schilke P W, Schwant R C. Alloy 706 use, process optimization, and future directions for GE gas turbine rotor materials [A]. Superalloys 718, 625, 706 and Various Derivatives [C]. Warrendale: TMS, 2001: 25
[4] Fesland J P, Petit P. Manufacturing Alloy 706 forgings [A]. Superalloys 718, 625, 706 and Various Derivatives [C]. Warrendale: TMS, 1994: 229
[5] Petit P, Fesland J P. Manufacturing of large In 706 and In 718 forging parts [A]. Superalloys 718, 625, 706 and Various Derivatives [C]. Warrendale: TMS, 1997: 153
[6] Kim C, Park J, Hong H U, et al. Role of stabilization heat treatment inducing γ′-γ″ co-precipitates and grain boundary η phase on tensile and creep behaviors of Inconel 706 [J]. J. Alloys Compd., 2022, 900: 163479
[7] Zhang S, Zeng L R, Zhao D Q, et al. Comparison study of microstructure and mechanical properties of standard and direct-aging heat treated superalloy Inconel 706 [J]. Mater. Sci. Eng., 2022, A839: 142836
[8] Oh H, Kim S, Kim J G, et al. Low cycle fatigue behavior of Inconel 706 at 650 oC [J]. J. Mater. Res. Technol., 2022, 17: 2624
[9] Del Genovese D, Strunz P, Mukherji D, et al. Microstructural characterization of a modified 706-type Ni-Fe superalloy by small-angle neutron scattering and electron microscopy [J]. Metall. Mater. Trans., 2005, 36A: 3439
[10] Shibata T, Takahashi T, Shudo Y, et al. Effect of cooling rate from solution treatment on precipitation behavior and mechanical properties of Alloy 706 [A]. Superalloys 718, 625, 706 and Various Derivatives [C]. Warrendale: TMS, 1997: 379
[11] Geng L, Na Y S, Park N K. Continuous cooling transformation behavior of Alloy 718 [J]. Mater. Lett., 1997, 30: 401
[12] Huang S, Wang L, Zhang B J, et al. Effect of stabilization time on precipitation behavior and mechanical properties of GH4706 alloy [J]. Rare Met. Mater. Eng., 2015, 44: 219
[12] 黄 烁, 王 磊, 张北江 等. 稳化处理时间对GH4706合金显微组织演化及力学性能的影响[J]. 稀有金属材料与工程, 2015, 44: 219
[13] Kim H, Oh H, Bae H J, et al. Effect of heat treatment conditions on the plastic deformation behavior of the Inconel 706 alloy [J]. J. Mater. Res. Technol., 2022, 21: 2145
[14] Shibata T, Shudo Y, Takahashi T, et al. Effect of stabilizing treatment on precipitation behavior of Alloy 706 [A]. Superalloys 1996 [C]. Warrendale: TMS, 1996: 627
[15] Zhang S, Zhang A W, Chang L T, et al. Effect of phosphorus on the stress rupture properties of IN706 superalloy [J]. Mater. Sci. Eng., 2019, A761: 137981
[16] Mukherji D, Strunz P, Del Genovese D, et al. Investigation of microstructural changes in Inconel 706 at high temperatures by in-situ small-angle neutron scattering [J]. Metall. Mater. Trans., 2003, 34A: 2781
[17] Heck K A. The time-temperature-transformation behavior of Alloy 706 [A]. Superalloys 718, 625, 706 and Various Derivatives [C]. Warrendale: TMS, 1994: 393
[18] Shibata T, Shudo Y, Yoshino Y. Effects of aluminum, titanium and NioBium on the time-temperature-precipitation behavior of Alloy 706 [A]. Superalloys 1996 [C]. Warrendale: TMS, 1996: 153
[19] Pickering E J, Mathur H, Bhowmik A, et al. Grain-boundary precipitation in Allvac 718Plus [J]. Acta Mater., 2012, 60: 2757
[20] Asgari S, Sharghi-Moshtaghin R, SadeghAhmadi M, et al. On phase transformations in a Ni-based superalloy [J]. Philos. Mag., 2013, 93: 1351
[21] Yang Y H, Yu J J, Sun X F, et al. Investigation of impact toughness of a Ni-based superalloy at elevated temperature [J]. Mater. Des., 2012, 36: 699
[22] Schilke P W, Pepe J J, Schwant R C. Alloy 706 metallurgy and turbine wheel application [A]. Superalloys 718, 625, 706 and Various Derivatives [C]. Warrendale: TMS, 1994: 1
[23] Zhao J C, Ravikumar V, Beltran A M. Phase precipitation and phase stability in nimonic 263 [J]. Metall. Mater. Trans., 2001, 32A: 1271
[24] Hou K L, Ou M Q, Wang M, et al. Precipitation of η phase and its effects on stress rupture properties of K4750 alloy [J]. Mater. Sci. Eng., 2019, A763: 138137
[25] Theska F, Stanojevic A, Oberwinkler B, et al. Microstructure-property relationships in directly aged Alloy 718 turbine disks [J]. Mater. Sci. Eng., 2020, A776: 138967
[26] Devaux A, Nazé L, Molins R, et al. Gamma double prime precipitation kinetic in Alloy 718 [J]. Mater. Sci. Eng., 2008, A486: 117
[27] Zhao Y A, Guan K, Yang Z W, et al. The effect of subsequent heat treatment on the evolution behavior of second phase particles and mechanical properties of the Inconel 718 superalloy manufactured by selective laser melting [J]. Mater. Sci. Eng., 2020, A794: 139931
[28] Liu F, Sun W R, Yang S L, et al. Effects of Al content on microstructure and stability of GH4169 nickel base alloy [J]. Acta Metall. Sin., 2008, 44: 791
[28] 刘 芳, 孙文儒, 杨树林 等. Al含量对GH4169镍基合金组织及其稳定性的影响 [J]. 金属学报, 2008, 44: 791
[29] Özgün Ö, Yılmaz R, Gülsoy H Ö, et al. The effect of aging treatment on the fracture toughness and impact strength of injection molded Ni-625 superalloy parts [J]. Mater. Charact., 2015, 108: 8
[30] Taheri M, Jam J E, Beni M H, et al. The effect of service temperature on the impact strength and fracture toughness of GTD-111 superalloy [J]. Eng. Fail. Anal., 2021, 127: 105507
[31] Wang L. Mechanical Properties of Materials [M]. 4th Ed., Beijing: Chemical Industry Press, 2022: 4
[31] (王 磊, 材料的力学性能 [M]. 第4版. 北京: 化学工业出版社, 2022: 4)
[32] Tanguy B, Besson J, Piques R, et al. Ductile to brittle transition of an A508 steel characterized by Charpy impact test: Part II: Modeling of the Charpy transition curve [J]. Eng. Fract. Mech., 2005, 72: 413
[33] Härkegård G, Balbach W, Stärk K, et al. The influence of heat treatment on the mechanical behavior of IN706 [A]. Superalloys 718, 625, 706 and Various Derivatives [C]. Warrendale: TMS, 1997: 425
[34] Gao M, Dwyer D J, Wei R P. Chemical and microstructural aspects of creep crack growth in Inconel 718 alloy [A]. Superalloys 718, 625, 706 and Various Derivatives [C]. Warrendale: TMS, 1994: 581
[35] Peng B, Wang H, Zhou M, et al. Ultrastrong metallic materials via minimal lattice misfit and strong ordering effect [J]. Sci. China Mater., 2023, 66: 4182
[1] 郑德宇, 夏玉峰, 曾扬, 周杰. 水平集法模拟GH4706合金动态再结晶过程[J]. 金属学报, 2025, 61(9): 1425-1437.
[2] 宋逸思, 廖瑜, 李传维, 陈益华, 顾剑锋. 逆转变奥氏体对0Cr16Ni5Mo1超级马氏体不锈钢低温冲击韧性的影响[J]. 金属学报, 2025, 61(5): 687-698.
[3] 刘金来, 孙晶霞, 孟杰, 李金国. 一种第三代单晶高温合金的组织稳定性与持久性能[J]. 金属学报, 2024, 60(6): 770-776.
[4] 介子奇, 刘鼎元, $\boxed{\hbox{张军}}$. BZr复合添加对IN718高温合金流动性的影响[J]. 金属学报, 2024, 60(12): 1615-1621.
[5] 张子轩, 于金江, 刘金来. 镍基单晶高温合金DD432的持久性能各向异性[J]. 金属学报, 2023, 59(12): 1559-1567.
[6] 朱东明, 何江里, 史根豪, 王青峰. 热输入对Q500qE钢模拟CGHAZ微观组织和冲击韧性的影响[J]. 金属学报, 2022, 58(12): 1581-1588.
[7] 蒋中华, 杜军毅, 王培, 郑建能, 李殿中, 李依依. M-A岛高温回火转变产物对核电SA508-3钢冲击韧性影响机制[J]. 金属学报, 2021, 57(7): 891-902.
[8] 郭小童, 郑为为, 李龙飞, 冯强. 冷却速率导致的薄壁效应对K465合金显微组织和持久性能的影响[J]. 金属学报, 2020, 56(12): 1654-1666.
[9] 万响亮, 胡锋, 成林, 黄刚, 张国宏, 吴开明. 两步贝氏体转变对中碳微纳结构钢韧性的影响[J]. 金属学报, 2019, 55(12): 1503-1511.
[10] 邵毅, 李彦默, 刘晨曦, 严泽生, 刘永长. 低碳铁素体不锈钢高频直缝电阻焊管退火工艺优化[J]. 金属学报, 2019, 55(11): 1367-1378.
[11] 文明月, 董文超, 庞辉勇, 陆善平. 一种Fe-Cr-Ni-Mo高强钢焊接热影响区的显微组织与冲击韧性研究[J]. 金属学报, 2018, 54(4): 501-511.
[12] 杜瑜宾, 胡小锋, 姜海昌, 闫德胜, 戎利建. 回火时间对Fe-Cr-Ni-Mo高强钢碳化物演变及力学性能的影响[J]. 金属学报, 2018, 54(1): 11-20.
[13] 舒志强,袁鹏斌,欧阳志英,龚丹梅,白雪明. 回火温度对26CrMo钻杆钢显微组织和力学性能的影响[J]. 金属学报, 2017, 53(6): 669-676.
[14] 李学达,尚成嘉,韩昌柴,范玉然,孙建波. X100管线钢焊接热影响区中链状M-A组元对冲击韧性和断裂机制的影响*[J]. 金属学报, 2016, 52(9): 1025-1035.
[15] 王学林,董利明,杨玮玮,张宇,王学敏,尚成嘉. Mn/Ni/Mo配比对K65管线钢焊缝金属组织与力学性能的影响*[J]. 金属学报, 2016, 52(6): 649-660.