|
|
SIZE EFFECT OF MECHANICAL BEHAVIOR OF MINIATURE SOLDER JOINT INTERCONNECTIONS IN ELECTRONIC PACKAGING |
YIN Limeng; YANG Yan; LIU Liangqi; ZHANG Xinping |
School of Materials Science and Engineering; South China University of Technology; Guangzhou 510640 |
|
Cite this article:
YIN Limeng YANG Yan LIU Liangqi ZHANG Xinping. SIZE EFFECT OF MECHANICAL BEHAVIOR OF MINIATURE SOLDER JOINT INTERCONNECTIONS IN ELECTRONIC PACKAGING. Acta Metall Sin, 2009, 45(4): 422-427.
|
Abstract Mechanical behaviors of miniature solder joint interconnections with different scale matches, diameter (d) in the range of 200—575 μm and length (l) of 75—525 μm, were investigated by using quasi–static micro–tensile testing. The results show that the joint geometry scaling factor (d/l) plays an important role in influencing the mechanical constraint level and tensile strength of the solder joints. However, with increasing d/l, the tensile strength of the joints does not always increase and not always exhibit a similar trend to that predicted by Orowan approximation equation, but there is an inverse size effect on the solder joint strength. For both lead–free and lead–containing solders, the correlation between the tensile strength and volume of the solder joints largely follows inverse proportion function equation, i.e., σF−Joint = 1/(Ad2l) + B, where tensile strength of the solder joints increases obviously with the decrease of the solder joint volume and there is a so–called "solder joint volume effect", that is, the smaller the solder joint volume, the higher the solder joit strenth.
|
Received: 28 April 2008
|
|
Fund: Supported by New Century Excellent Talents in University (NCET–04–0824) |
[1] Zhang X P, Yin L M, Yu C B. Chin J Mater Res, 2008; 22: 1
(张新平, 尹立孟, 于传宝. 材料研究学报, 2008; 22: 1)
[2] Yin L M, Zhang X P. Acta Electron Sin, 2008; 36: 1610
(尹立孟, 张新平. 电子学报, 2008; 36: 1610)
[3] Huang Z H, Conway P P, Jung E, Thomson R C, Liu C Q, Loeher T, Minkus M. J Electron Mater, 2006; 36: 1761
[4] Arzt E. Acta Mater, 1998; 46: 5611
[5] Zimprich P, Betzwar–Kotas A, Khatibi G, Weiss B, Ipser H. J Mate Sci: Mater Electron, 2008; 19: 383
[6] Wang F J, Qian Y Y, Ma X. Acta Metall Sin, 2005; 41: 775
(王凤江, 钱乙余, 马 鑫. 金属学报, 2005; 41: 775)
[7] Islam M N, Sharif A, Chan Y C. J Electron Mater, 2005; 34: 143
[8] Chen H T, Wang C Q, Yan C, Huang Y, Tian Y H. J Electron Mater, 2007; 36: 33
[9] Sharif A, Chan Y C, Islam R A. Mater Sci Eng, 2004; B106: 120
[10] Wong C K, Pang J H L, Tew J W, Lok B K, Lu H J, Ng F L, Sun Y F. Microelectron Relia, 2008; 48: 611
[11] Ho C E, Lin Y W, Yang S C, Kao C R, Jiang D S. J Electron Mater, 2006; 35: 1017
[12] Wiese S, Roellig M, Mueller M, Bennemann S, Petzold M, Wolter K J. Proc 57th Electronic Components and Technology Conf, May 29—June 1, 2007, Reno, Nevada, USA, 2007: 548
[13] Ren F, Nah J W, Suh J O, Tu K N, Xiong B S, Xu L H, Pang J H L. Inter Symp Adv Pack Mater: Process, Properties and Interfaces, 2005; 16–18: 66
[14] Ren F, Nah J W, Tu K N, Xiong B S, Xu L H, Pang J H L. Appl Phys Lett, 2006; 89: 1
[15] Plumbridge W J. J Mater Sci, 1996; 31: 2501
[16] Kim K S, Huh S H, Suganuma K. Microelectron Relia, 2003; 43: 259
[17] Saxton H J, West A J, Barrett C R. Metall Trans, 1971; 2: 999
[18] West A J, Saxton H J, Tetelman A S, Barrett C R. Metall Trans, 1971; 2: 1009
[19] Courtney T H. Mechanical Behavior of Materials, New York: McGraw Hill, 1990: 201
[20] Bridgman P W. Studies in Large Plastic Flow and Fracture. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1964: 9 |
No Suggested Reading articles found! |
|
|
Viewed |
|
|
|
Full text
|
|
|
|
|
Abstract
|
|
|
|
|
Cited |
|
|
|
|
|
Shared |
|
|
|
|
|
Discussed |
|
|
|
|