1 CAS Key Laboratory of Nuclear Materials and Safety Assessment, Institute of Metal Research, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shenyang 110016, China 2 School of Materials Science and Engineering, University of Science and Technology of China, Shenyang 110016, China
Cite this article:
Xiaofeng HU,Yubin DU,Desheng YAN,Lijian RONG. Cu Precipitation and Its Effect on Damping Capacity and Mechanical Properties of FeCrMoCu Alloy. Acta Metall Sin, 2017, 53(5): 601-608.
Fe-Cr based damping alloys have high mechanical properties and good corrosion resistance, which have been applied to reduce vibration and noise. Their high damping behavior is primarily attributed to the stress-induced irreversible movement of 90° magnetic domain walls. Most researches mainly focused on the damping behavior of these alloys. However, little attention has been paid to the mechanical properties, which are the important consideration for engineering applications. Recently, a FeCrMo damping alloy with Cu addition was found to possess higher damping capacity and higher mechanical properties. In this work, scanning transmission electron microscopy (STEM) and dynamic mechanical analyzer (DMA) were used to investigate the Cu precipitation and its influences on damping capacity and mechanical properties of FeCrMoCu alloy (1.0% and 2.0% Cu addition, mass fraction) with dif ferent cooling rates. The results show that the Cu element in 1.0Cu alloy is fully dissolved in the matrix. When the cooling rate is slow (furnace cooling), there will precipitate a small amount of second phases, which are small in size (<5 nm) and contain relatively few Cu atoms (3.7%). As for 2.0Cu alloy, with decreasing cooling rate (from water cooling to air cooling, and to furnace cooling) there will firstly precipitate a small amount of second phase with small size (<5 nm); subsequently, the particles grow into a spherical shape (10~15 nm) and their number increases; at last, the particles transform into round bar with coarse size of 100~400 nm and the precipitate number decreases obviously. The Cu content of the latter two precipitates increased obviously (about 30%~40%). These precipitates will significantly increase the average internal stress of the experimental FeCrMoCu alloy, which will obviously decrease the damping capacity. Therefore, the damping capacity of 2.0Cu alloy is much lower than that of 1.0Cu alloy. Meanwhile, the precipitate will obviously improve the strength. Compared with coarsen Cu-riched phase, the finer second phase has better hardening effect and its influence on ductility and toughness is relatively small. The FeCrMoCu alloy with addition of 1.0% Cu can obtain better damping capacity and mechanical properties at the same time.
Fig.1 Microstructures of 1.0Cu alloy (a~c) and 2.0Cu alloy (d~f) under WC (a, d), AC (b, e) and FC (c, f) (WC—water cooling, AC—air cooling, FC—furnace cooling)
Fig.2 Grain sizes of two FeCrMoCu alloys under different cooling rates
Fig.3 TEM images of 1.0Cu alloy (a~c) and 2.0Cu alloy (d~f) annealed under WC (a, d), AC (b, e) and FC (c, f)
Alloy
Cooling
Precipitate
Mass fraction / %
method
size / nm
Cu
Cr
Mo
Fe
1.0Cu
FC
<5
3.7
18.6
2.6
Bal.
2.0Cu
WC
<5
4.5
18.3
2.5
Bal.
AC
10~15
31.4
14.1
1.7
Bal.
FC
10~15
32.9
12.6
1.8
Bal.
100~400
39.3
11.7
1.6
Bal.
Table 1 Precipitate sizes and compositions by EDS analysis for FeCrMoCu damping alloys
Fig.4 Variation of damping capacity (Q-1) with strain amplitude (ε) for 1.0Cu alloy (a) and 2.0Cu alloy (b) with different cooling rates
Fig.5 Variation of strength with different cooling rates for 1.0Cu alloy (a) and 2.0Cu alloy (b)
Fig.6 Variation of elongation (a) and impact energy (b) with different cooling rates for two FeCrMoCu damping alloys
[1]
Hu X F, Li X Y, Zhang B, et al.Magnetic domain structure and damping capacity of Fe-13Cr-2.5Mo alloy[J]. Mater. Sci. Eng., 2010, B171: 40
[2]
Pulino-Sagradi D, Sagradi M, Karimi A, et al.Damping capacity of Fe-Cr-X high-damping alloys and its dependence on magnetic domain structure[J]. Scr. Mater., 1998, 39: 131
[3]
Zhou Z C, Wei J N, Han F S.Influences of heat treatment and grain size on the damping capacity of an Fe-Cr-Al alloy[J]. Phys. Status Solidi, 2002, 191A: 89
[4]
Wang H, Wang F, Xiao J, et al.Effect of cooling rate on damping capacity of Fe-Cr based ferromagnetic metal alloy[J]. Mater. Sci. Eng., 2016, A650: 382
[5]
Hu X F, Li X Y, Zhang B, et al.Influences of additions of Nb, Ti and Cu on damping capacity and corrosion resistance of Fe-13Cr-2.5Mo alloy[J]. Acta Metall. Sin., 2009, 45: 717
Wang H, Wang F, Liu H T, et al.Influence of alloy elements (Mo, Nb, Ti) on the strength and damping capacity of Fe-Cr based alloy[J]. Mater. Sci. Eng., 2016, A667: 326
[7]
Hu X F, Liu S W, Li X Y, et al.Influence of static stress on damping behavior in Fe-15Cr and Fe-8Al ferromagnetic alloys[J]. Mater. Sci. Eng., 2011, A528: 5491
[8]
Karimi A, Giauque P H, Martin J L.Magnetomechanical damping in plasma sprayed iron-chromium based coatings[J]. J. Appl. Phys., 1996, 79: 1670
[9]
Azco?tia C, Karimi A.Magnetomechanical damping in Fe-Cr alloys and effect of Al and Mo addition[J]. J. Alloys Compd., 2000, 310: 160
[10]
Karimi A, Azcoitia C, Degauque J.Relationships between magnetomechanical damping and magnetic properties of Fe-Cr(Al, Mo)
[10]
alloys [J]. J. Magn. Magn. Mater., 2000, 215-216: 601
[11]
Karimi A, Giauque P H, Martin J L. Magneto-mechanical damping in plasma sprayed Fe-Cr-X alloys [J]. Mater. Sci. Forum, 1995, 179-181: 679
[12]
Xu Y G, Chen X G.On relationship between annealing treatment and magnetostriction behavior of Fe-16Cr-2.5Mo damping alloy[J]. J. Alloys Compd., 2014, 582: 364
[13]
Lin R R, Liu F, Cao M Z, et al.Influence of annealing and substitution elements on damping capacity and strength of Fe-Cr-Al based alloys[J]. Acta Metall. Sin., 2005, 41: 958
Lin R R, Cao M Z, Yang R. Damping capacity of the Fe-Cr-Al based alloys [J]. Mater. Sci. Forum, 2005, 475-479: 261
[15]
Hu X F, Du Y B, Yan D S, et al.Effect of Cu content on microstructure and properties of Fe-16Cr-2.5Mo damping alloy[J]. J. Mater. Sci. Technol., in press
[16]
Nakashima K, Futamura Y, Tsuchiyama T, et al.Interaction between dislocation and copper particles in Fe-Cu alloys[J]. ISIJ Int., 2002, 42: 1541
[17]
Kimura Y, Takaki S.Phase transformation mechanism of Fe-Cu alloys[J]. ISIJ Int., 1997, 37: 290
[18]
Zhang Z W.Research development of high strength low alloy (HSLA) steels[J]. Mater. China, 2016, 35: 141
Xu Z, Zhao L C.Principle of Solid Phase Transformation of Metals [M]. Beijing: Science Press, 2004: 150
[19]
(徐洲, 赵连城. 金属固态相变原理 [M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 2004: 150)
[20]
Deschamps A, Militzer M, Poole W J.Precipitation kinetics and strengthening of a Fe-0.8wt%Cu alloy[J]. ISIJ Int., 2001, 41: 196
[21]
Takaki S, Fujioka M, Aihara S, et al.Effect of copper on tensile properties and grain-refinement of steel and its relation to precipitation behavior[J]. Mater. Trans., 2004, 45: 2239
[22]
Xiao J M.Alloy Phase and Phase Transformation [M]. 2nd Ed., Beijing: Metallurgical Industry Press, 2004: 307
[22]
(肖纪美. 合金相与相变 [M]. 第2版, 北京: 冶金工业出版社, 2004: 307)
[23]
Wang W G, Zhou B X.The correlation of damping capacity with grain-boundary precipitates in Fe-Cr-based damping alloys annealed at high temperature[J]. Mater. Sci. Eng., 2004, A366: 45
[24]
Smith G W, Birchak J R.Internal stress distribution theory of magnetomechanical hysteresis-an extension to include effects of magnetic field and applied stress[J]. J. Appl. Phys., 1969, 40: 5174
[25]
Smith G W, Birchak J R.Effect of internal stress distribution on magnetomechanical damping[J]. J. Appl. Phys., 1968, 39: 2311
[26]
Goodman S R, Brenner S S, Low J R.An FIM-atom probe study of the precipitation of copper from lron-1.4 at. pct copper. Part II: Atom probe analyses[J]. Metall. Trans., 1973, 4: 2371
[27]
Goodman S R, Brenner S S, Low J R.An FIM-atom probe study of the precipitation of copper from lron-1.4 at. pct copper. Part I: Field-ion microscopy[J]. Metall. Trans., 1973, 4: 2363
[28]
Li Z, He Z Q, Jin J J, et al.Development of Aeronautical Ultra Strength Steels [M]. Beijing: National Defense Industry Press, 2012: 45