|
|
HOT DEFORMATION BEHAVIOR OF 2205 DUPLEX STAINLESS STEEL |
CHEN Lei; WANG Longmei; DU Xiaojian; LIU Xiao |
Department of Metallurgical Technology; Central Iron and Steel Research Institute; Beijing 100081 |
|
Cite this article:
CHEN Lei WANG Longmei DU Xiaojian LIU Xiao. HOT DEFORMATION BEHAVIOR OF 2205 DUPLEX STAINLESS STEEL. Acta Metall Sin, 2010, 46(1): 52-56.
|
Abstract During hot deformation of the duplex stainless steels consisting of $\delta$--ferrite and $\gamma$--austenite, their microstructure evolution and mechanical response are more complicated as compared with those of single--phase ferritic or austenitic stainless steels, especially for study of the mechanical behavior. In the present research, the hot deformation behavior of a 2205 duplex stainless steel has been investigated through uniaxial compression test using Gleeble--3800 thermal--mechanical simulator within the temperature range of 1223---1523 K and the strain rate range of 0.01---10 s$^{-1}$, the corresponding flow curves and their characters and microstructures have been determined and analyzed. Elongated austenite distributes in ferrite matrix, and the volume fraction of ferrite increases with rising temperature. Dynamic recrystallization of austenite is enhanced by increasing temperature and decreasing strain rate. Based on the constitutive equation for hot deformation, the apparent activation energy (Q) and the apparent stress exponent (n) of the steel are obtained to be about 451 kJ/mol and 4.026, respectively. There is a particular shape of flow curves, i.e. a yield point elongation-like effect, which is characterized by a non-strengthening plateau during the initial stages of plastic deformation. This yield point elongation-like effect increases with decreasing Zener-Hollomon parameter, Z. When used a simplified stress function, a deviation of linear relationship between ln Z and peak stress (σp) occurred at the critical value (ln Zc=38.18). Relationships between peak stress and temperature and strain rate can be more simply described as σp=20.6ln ε+1118002/T-266.8(ln Z>38.18), and σp=9.1ln ε+493874/T-701.9(ln Z≦38.18).
|
Received: 14 May 2009
|
|
[1] Nilsson J O. Mater Sci Technol, 1992; 8: 685
[2] Chen T H, Weng K L, Yang J R. Mater Sci Eng, 2002; A338: 259
[3] Tseng C M, Liou H Y, Tsai W T. Mater Sci Eng, 2003; A344: 190
[4] Yu Z C, Cheng S M, Ding D H. Spec Steel Technol, 2005; (4): 42
(余志川, 程士明, 丁大虎. 特钢技术, 2005; (4): 42)
[5] Shu X J, Zhang S Q, Song Z G. Steel Pipe, 2004; 33(6): 15
(舒先进, 张淑琴, 宋志刚. 钢管, 2004; 33(6): 15)
[6] Iza–Mendia A, Pi˜nol–Juez A, Urcola J J, Guti´errez I. Metall Mater Trans, 1998; 29A: 2975
[7] Pi˜nol–Juez A, Iza–Mendia A, Guti´errez I. Metall Mater Trans, 2000; 31A: 1671
[8] Balacin O, HoffmannWA, Jonas J J. Metall Mater Trans, 2000; 31A: 1353
[9] Evangelista E, McQueen H J, Niewczas M, Cabibbo M. Can Metall Q, 2004; 43: 339
[10] Cabrera J M, Mateo A, Llanes L, Prado J M, Anglada M. J Mater Process Technol, 2003; 143–144: 321
[11] Reis G S, Jorge A M, Balancin O. Mater Res, 2000; 3: 31
[12] Cizek P, Wynne B P. Mater Sci Eng, 1997; A230: 88
[13] Dehghan–Manshadi A, Barnett M R, Hodgson P D. Mater Sci Technol, 2007; 23: 1478
[14] Dehghan–Manshadi A, Hodgson P D. J Mater Sci, 2008; 43: 6272
[15] Duprez L, de Cooman B C, Akdut N. Metall Mater Trans, 2002; 33A: 1931
[16] Jinmenze J A, Carreno F, Ruano O A. Mater Sci Technol, 1999; 15: 127
[17] Hernandez L E, Beynon J H, Christophe P, Sybrand Z. Steel Res Int, 2005; 76: 137
[18] Imbert C, Ryan N D, McQueen H J. Metall Mater Trans, 1984; 15A: 1855
[19] Milovic C, Manojlovic D. Andjelic M, Drobnjak D. Steel Res, 1992; 63: 78
[20] Wang B Z, Fu W T, Lv Z Q, Jiang P, Zhang W H, Tian Y J. Mater Sci Eng, 2008; A487: 108 |
No Suggested Reading articles found! |
|
|
Viewed |
|
|
|
Full text
|
|
|
|
|
Abstract
|
|
|
|
|
Cited |
|
|
|
|
|
Shared |
|
|
|
|
|
Discussed |
|
|
|
|