Please wait a minute...
金属学报    DOI: 10.11900/0412.1961.2025.0224
  本期目录 | 过刊浏览 |
取向硅钢冷轧剪切带与基体晶粒间的取向关系:晶体塑性计算与实验

陈思昊  张 芳 沙玉辉  程思飞  左 良

东北大学 材料各向异性与织构教育部重点实验室  沈阳 110819
Orientation Relationship Between Cold-Rolling Shear Band and Matrix Grain in Grain-Oriented Silicon Steel: Crystal Plasticity Calculation and Experiment

CHEN Sihao, ZHANG Fang, SHA Yuhui, CHENG Sifei, ZUO Liang

Key Laboratory for Anisotropy and Texture of Materials, Ministry of Education, Northeastern University, Shenyang 110819, China

引用本文:

陈思昊, 沙玉辉, 张芳, 程思飞, 左良. 取向硅钢冷轧剪切带与基体晶粒间的取向关系:晶体塑性计算与实验[J]. 金属学报, DOI: 10.11900/0412.1961.2025.0224.

全文: PDF(2317 KB)  
摘要: 
为了阐明取向硅钢冷轧时偏转{111}<112>取向基体与剪切带间的取向偏差角关系,本工作引入二维(2D)剪切面(剪切带与轧制横轴平行)和三维(3D)剪切面(剪切带与滑移面平行),采用粘塑性自洽模型计算偏转{111}<112>取向基体中形成的剪切带晶体取向转动过程。结果表明,当偏转{111}<112>取向基体的Euler角φ1 < 90°且Euler角φ2 < 45°时,剪切带取向转动过程中取向偏差角|Δφ1ʹ|减小、取向偏差角|Δφ2ʹ|先减小后增加或单调增加,相对于理想Goss取向,剪切带最终取向的|Δφ1ʹ|小于|Δφ2ʹ|。当偏转{111}<112>取向基体中φ1 < 90°且φ2 > 45°时,剪切带取向转动过程中|Δφ1ʹ|和|Δφ2ʹ|均减小,相对于理想Goss取向,剪切带最终取向的|Δφ1ʹ|大于|Δφ2ʹ|。在φ2 < 45°的偏转{111}<112>取向基体中,剪切带所在滑移面偏离最大剪切应力平面的角度大,剪切面更趋近于2D剪切面;在φ2 > 45°的偏转{111}<112>取向基体中,剪切带所在滑移面偏离最大剪切应力平面的角度小,剪切面更趋近于3D剪切面。
关键词 剪切带高斯取向取向转动晶体塑性取向硅钢    
Abstract

Superior magnetic properties of grain-oriented silicon steel arise from sharp Goss texture after secondary recrystallization. Shear band which is formed during cold rolling acts as preferential nucleation sites for recrystallization, and is a critical factor influencing accuracy of recrystallized Goss texture. The deviation angle of shear band φ1ʹ and Δφ2ʹ) from ideal Goss orientation ({110}<001>) is closely related to that of deformed matrix φ1 and Δφ2) from ideal {111}<112> orientation. Accordingly, it is essential to elucidate the relationship of orientation deviation between deviated {111}<112> orientation matrix and Goss shear band for precise orientation control of grain-oriented silicon steel. This study incorporates two-dimensional (2D) shear band plane (shear band parallel to transverse direction) and three-dimensional (3D) shear band plane (shear band parallel to slip plane) into a visco-plastic self-consistent (VPSC) model to calculate the crystal orientation rotation of shear bands within deviated {111}<112> orientation matrix, and simulated results are compared with experimental data. The findings indicate that both magnitude and mode of matrix orientation deviation significantly affect the corresponding shear band orientation deviation. When Euler angle φ1 of deviated {111}<112> orientation matrix is less than 90° and Euler angle φ2 is less than 45°, φ1ʹ| decreases while |Δφ2ʹ| either initially decreases and then increases or monotonically increases during shear band orientation rotation, and final shear band orientation exhibits a smaller |Δφ1ʹ| than |Δφ2ʹ| relative to ideal Goss. When φ1 of deviated {111}<112> orientation matrix is less than 90° and φ2 exceeds 45°, both |Δφ1ʹ| and |Δφ2ʹ| decrease during shear band orientation rotation, and final shear band orientation exhibits a greater |Δφ1ʹ| than |Δφ2ʹ| compared to ideal Goss. Shear band plane is also found to depend on direction of matrix deviation. For φ2 < 45°, the slip plane where shear band locates deviates significantly from the maximum shear stress plane, and shear band plane is more accurately represented by 2D shear band plane. For φ2 > 45°, the slip plane where shear band forms exhibits a smaller deviation from the maximum shear stress plane, and shear band plane is more accurately represented by 3D shear band plane. Identification of shear plane in deviated {111}<112> orientation matrix is thus fundamental to clarify the mechanism of shear band formation and to enable reliable crystal plasticity simulations of shear band orientation.


Key wordsshear band    Goss orientation    orientation rotation    crystal plasticity    grain-oriented silicon steel
收稿日期: 2025-08-08     
基金资助:立方金属板带晶界梯度区形变结构关联统计研究(52371022)
[1] 尚宏春, 田中旺, 牛兰杰, 范晨阳, 张哲伟, 娄燕山. 5182-O铝合金屈服演化行为表征及晶体塑性模拟[J]. 金属学报, 2025, 61(8): 1276-1292.
[2] 范荣磊, 陈明和, 吴迪鹏, 武永. 基于晶体塑性模型预测TA32钛合金损伤及高温成形极限[J]. 金属学报, 2025, 61(8): 1293-1304.
[3] 贾春妮, 刘腾远, 郑成武, 王培, 李殿中. 中锰钢奥氏体中化学界面变形行为的晶体塑性研究[J]. 金属学报, 2025, 61(2): 349-360.
[4] 郑潇禹, 陈辛, 何美玲, 黄奇, 李亚, 孔毅, 杜勇. 基于晶体塑性的6XXX铝合金力学性能多尺度计算[J]. 金属学报, 2025, 61(11): 1758-1768.
[5] 杨伟阳, 黎先浩, 赵鹏飞, 于海彬, 赵松山, 罗海文. 取向硅钢不同常化工艺下组织及抑制剂的变化[J]. 金属学报, 2024, 60(5): 605-615.
[6] 徐永生, 张卫刚, 徐凌超, 但文蛟. 铁素体晶间变形协调与硬化行为模拟研究[J]. 金属学报, 2023, 59(8): 1042-1050.
[7] 郭祥如, 申俊杰. 孪生诱发软化与强化效应的Cu晶体塑性行为模拟[J]. 金属学报, 2022, 58(3): 375-384.
[8] 郭昊函, 杨杰, 刘芳, 卢荣生. GH4169合金拘束相关的疲劳裂纹萌生寿命[J]. 金属学报, 2022, 58(12): 1633-1644.
[9] 陈伟, 章环, 牟娟, 朱正旺, 张海峰, 王沿东. 显微组织和应变速率对TC4合金动态力学性能和绝热剪切带的影响[J]. 金属学报, 2022, 58(10): 1271-1280.
[10] 蒋敏强, 高洋. 金属玻璃的结构年轻化及其对力学行为的影响[J]. 金属学报, 2021, 57(4): 425-438.
[11] 屈瑞涛, 王晓地, 吴少杰, 张哲峰. 金属玻璃的剪切带变形与断裂机制研究进展[J]. 金属学报, 2021, 57(4): 453-472.
[12] 许占一, 沙玉辉, 张芳, 章华兵, 李国保, 储双杰, 左良. 取向硅钢二次再结晶过程中的取向选择行为[J]. 金属学报, 2020, 56(8): 1067-1074.
[13] 于雷,罗海文. 部分再结晶退火对无取向硅钢的磁性能与力学性能的影响[J]. 金属学报, 2020, 56(3): 291-300.
[14] 祝佳林,刘施峰,曹宇,柳亚辉,邓超,刘庆. 交叉轧制周期对高纯Ta板变形及再结晶梯度的影响[J]. 金属学报, 2019, 55(8): 1019-1033.
[15] 李学雄,徐东生,杨锐. 双相钛合金高温变形协调性的CPFEM研究[J]. 金属学报, 2019, 55(7): 928-938.