101̅2}形变孪晶机制*" /> 101̅2}形变孪晶机制*" /> 101̅2} DEFORMATION TWINNING IN MAGNESIUM" /> Mg的{<inline-formula><mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" id="Mml1-0412-1961-52-10-1267"><mml:mtable frame="none" columnlines="none" rowlines="none"><mml:mtr><mml:mtd><mml:maligngroup></mml:maligngroup><mml:mrow><mml:mn>10</mml:mn><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mn>1</mml:mn><mml:mtext fontstyle="italic">̅</mml:mtext></mml:mover><mml:mn>2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr></mml:mtable></mml:math></inline-formula>}形变孪晶机制<sup>*</sup>
Please wait a minute...
金属学报  2016, Vol. 52 Issue (10): 1267-1278    DOI: 10.11900/0412.1961.2016.00369
  本期目录 | 过刊浏览 |
Mg的{101̅2}形变孪晶机制*
单智伟(),刘博宇
西安交通大学材料科学与工程学院金属材料强度国家重点实验室微纳尺度材料行为研究中心, 西安 710049
THE MECHANISM OF {101̅2} DEFORMATION TWINNING IN MAGNESIUM
Zhiwei SHAN(),Boyu LIU
Center for Advancing Materials Performance from the Nanoscale, State Key Laboratory for Mechanical Behavior of Materials, School of Materials Science and Engineering, Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an 710049, China
全文: PDF(12044 KB)   HTML
  
摘要: 

Mg在室温下的强度和塑性较差, 其根源之一在于Mg的{101?2}形变孪晶在极低的应力下即可形核和扩展, 而且研究表明目前应用于镁合金的时效强化法通常无法显著抑制{101?2}形变孪晶. 尽管对Mg及其合金的力学性能至关重要, 迄今为止, 对{101?2}形变孪晶的形核和扩展的机制仍存在很大争议. 本文首先回顾了有关形变孪晶的定义以及{101?2}孪晶机制的研究历史, 然后着重介绍了最新的基于原位TEM的研究结果: 即Mg的{101?2}形变孪晶迥异于孪晶的经典定义, 它事实上是一种新的室温变形机制, 即塑性的产生可以通过局部的晶胞重构来完成, 而不需要孪晶位错的参与; 由晶胞重构机制所产生的界面为{0002}/{101?0}界面(BP界面), 而且该界面在三维空间呈现梯田状的不规则形貌. 晶胞重构机制迥异于基于位错的孪晶变形机制, 因此基于对该机制进行抑制的设计思路可能是开发未来高强韧镁合金的关键.

关键词 Mg形变孪晶基面-柱面界面强度合金设计    
Abstract

The {101?2} deformation twinning with extremely low activation stress is considered to be one of main reasons for the low strength of magnesium and its alloys at room temperature. In addition, it was found that those generally adopted age-strengthening methods are less effective for magnesium alloys in which postmortem investigation found that {101?2} deformation twinning is still profuse. The formation and propagation mechanism of {101?2} deformation twinning, which are of great importance for designing high strength magnesium alloy, remains elusive or under fervent debate. This paper reviewed the classical definition of deformation twinning, the existing twinning mechanisms, and the recent achievements through in-situ TEM studies on {101?2} deformation twinning. It was found that the {101?2} deformation twinning observed in magnesium are distinct from the classical definition on twinning. It is indeed a brand new room temperature deformation mechanism that can be carried out through unit-cell-reconstruction, without involving twinning dislocations. In addition, the boundaries generated through unit-cell-reconstruction are composed of {0002}/{101?0} interfaces (BP interfaces) and exhibit a terrace-like morphology in 3D space. The unit-cell-reconstruction is essentially different from the traditional dislocation-based twinning mechanism. As a consequence, to develop an effective strengthening strategy based on the nature of this new deformation mechanism would be the key for designing high strength magnesium alloy.

Key wordsMg    deformation twinning    basal/prismatic interface    strength    alloy design
收稿日期: 2016-08-16     
ZTFLH:     
基金资助:* 国家自然科学基金项目51231005和51321003资助
服务
把本文推荐给朋友 101̅2}形变孪晶机制*”的文章,特向您推荐。请打开下面的网址:https://www.ams.org.cn/CN/abstract/abstract24822.shtml" name="neirong"> 101̅2}形变孪晶机制*">
加入引用管理器
E-mail Alert
RSS
作者相关文章
单智伟
刘博宇

引用本文:

单智伟, 刘博宇. Mg的{101̅2}形变孪晶机制*[J]. 金属学报, 2016, 52(10): 1267-1278.
Zhiwei SHAN, Boyu LIU. THE MECHANISM OF {101̅2} DEFORMATION TWINNING IN MAGNESIUM. Acta Metall Sin, 2016, 52(10): 1267-1278.

链接本文:

https://www.ams.org.cn/CN/10.11900/0412.1961.2016.00369      或      https://www.ams.org.cn/CN/Y2016/V52/I10/1267

图1  fcc晶体中的111孪晶的孪生要素[38]
图 2  微纳尺度纯镁力学测试样品的SEM像[69]
图3  101?2孪晶界与加载方向的夹角[69]
图4  {101?2}孪晶界与加载方向近似平行或垂直[68,69]
图5  具有一定“宽度”的{101?2}孪晶界投影[69]及成因示意图
图6  沿[0001]方向观察到的{101?2} 孪晶界迁移过程的原位录像截图[69]
图7  {101?2}孪晶界的高分辨像[70]
图 8  BP界面的原子尺度成像及界面示意图[39]
图 9  一种可能的晶胞重构路径[68,70]
[1] Yu Q, Zhang J X, Jiang Y Y.Philos Mag Lett, 2011; 91: 757
[2] Barnett M R.Mater Sci Eng, 2007; A464: 1
[3] Wonsiewicz B C, Backofen W A.Trans Metall Soc AIME, 1967; 239: 9
[4] Kelley E W, Hosford W F.Trans Metall Soc AIME, 1968; 242: 5
[5] Yin D L, Wang J T, Liu J Q, Zhao X.J Alloys Compd, 2009; 478: 789
[6] Barnett M R, Davies C H J, Ma X.Scr Mater, 2005; 52: 627
[7] Ball E A, Prangnell P B.Scr Metall, 1994; 31: 111
[8] Yu Q, Wang J, Jiang Y Y, McCabe R J, Li N, Tome C N.Acta Mater, 2014; 77: 28
[9] Price P B.Proc R Soc Lon, 1961; 260A: 251
[10] Li B, Ma Q, McClelland Z, Horstemeyer S J, Whittington W R, Brauer S, Allison P G.Scr Mater, 2013; 69: 493
[11] Yu Q, Jiang Y, Wang J.Scr Mater, 2015; 96: 41
[12] Nie J F, Zhu Y M, Liu J Z, Fang X Y.Science, 2013; 340: 957
[13] Mahajan S, Chin G Y.Acta Metall, 1973; 21: 1353
[14] Christian J W, Mahajan S.Prog Mater Sci, 1995; 39: 1
[15] Raeisinia B, Agnew S R, Akhtar A.Metall Mater Trans, 2011; 42A: 1418
[16] Akhtar A, Teghtsoonian E.Acta Metall, 1969; 17: 1339
[17] Akhtar A, Teghtsoonian E.Acta Metall, 1969; 17: 1351
[18] Nie J F.Scr Mater, 2003; 48: 1009
[19] Liao M, Li B, Horstemeyer M F.Comput Mater Sci, 2013; 79: 534
[20] Nie J F.Metall Mater Trans, 2012; 43A: 3891
[21] Hong S G, Park S H, Lee C S.J Mater Res, 2010; 25: 784
[22] Lou X Y, Li M, Boger R K, Agnew S R, Wagoner R H.Int J Plast, 2007; 23: 44
[23] Xiong Y, Yu Q, Jiang Y.Mater Sci Eng, 2012; A546: 119
[24] Wan G, Wu B L, Zhang Y D, Sha G Y, Esling C.Mater Sci Eng, 2010; A527: 2915
[25] Proust G, Tome C N, Jain A, Agnew S R.Int J Plast, 2009; 25: 861
[26] Chino Y, Kimura K, Mabuchi M.Mater Sci Eng, 2008; A486: 481
[27] Wang Y N, Huang J C.Acta Mater, 2007; 55: 897
[28] Knezevic M, Levinson A, Harris R, Mishra R K, Doherty R D, Kalidindi S R.Acta Mater, 2010; 58: 6230
[29] Kleiner S, Uggowitzer P J.Mater Sci Eng, 2004; A379: 258
[30] Robson J D, Stanford N, Barnett M R.Acta Mater, 2011; 59: 1945
[31] Stanford N, Barnett M R.Mater Sci Eng, 2009; A516: 226
[32] Partridge P G, Roberts E.Acta Metall, 1964; 12: 1205
[33] Clark J B.Acta Metall, 1965; 13: 1281
[34] Clark J B.Acta Metall, 1968; 16: 141
[35] Gharghouri M A, Weatherly G C, Embury J D.Philos Mag, 1998; 78A: 1137
[36] Bilby B A, Crocker A G.Proc R Soc Lon, 1965; 288A: 240
[37] Cahn R W.Adv Phys, 1954; 3: 363
[38] Yu Y N.The Principle of Physical Metallurgy. 2nd Ed., Beijing: Metallurgica Industry Press, 2013: 763
[38] (余永宁. 金属学原理. 第2版, 北京: 冶金工业出版社, 2013: 763)
[39] Liu B Y.PhD Dissertation, Xi'an Jiaotong University, 2015
[39] (刘博宇, 西安交通大学博士学位论文, 2015)
[40] Li B, Zhang X Y.Scr Mater, 2016; 125: 73
[41] Thompson N, Millard D J.Philos Mag, 1952; 43: 422
[42] Capolungo L, Beyerlein I J.Phys Rev, 2008; 78B: 2
[43] Serra A, Bacon D J, Pond R C.Acta Mater, 1999; 47: 1425
[44] Pond R C, Serra A, Bacon D J.Acta Mater, 1999; 47: 1441
[45] Serra A, Bacon D J.Philos Mag, 1996; 73A: 333
[46] Pond R C, Bacon D J, Serra A, Sutton A P.Metall Trans, 1991; 22A: 1185
[47] Serra A, Bacon D J, Pond R C.Acta Metall, 1988; 36: 3183
[48] Serra A, Bacon D J.Philos Mag, 1986; 54A: 793
[49] Braisaz T, Ruterana P, Nouet G, Pond R C.Philos Mag, 1997; 75A: 1075
[50] Wang J, Hoagland R G, Hirth J P, Capolungo L, Beyerlein I J, Tome C N.Scr Mater, 2009; 61: 903
[51] Wang J, Hirth J P, Tome C N.Acta Mater, 2009; 57: 5521
[52] Li B, Ma E.Phys Rev Lett, 2009; 103: 035503
[53] Serra A, Bacon D J, Pond R C.Phys Rev Lett, 2010; 104: 029603
[54] Li B, Ma E.Phys Rev Lett, 2010; 104: 029604
[55] Pond R C, Hirth J P, Serra A, Bacon D J.Mater Res Lett, 2016; 4: 185
[56] Hirth J P, Wang J, Tomé C N.Prog Mater Sci, 2016; 83: 417
[57] Ishii A, Li J, Ogata S.Int J Plast, 2016; 82: 32
[58] Zong H, Ding X, Lookman T, Li J, Sun J.Acta Mater, 2015; 82: 295
[59] Yuasa M, Hayashi M, Mabuchi M, Chino Y.J Phys: Condens Matter, 2014; 26: 015003
[60] Li B, Zhang X Y.Scr Mater, 2014; 71: 45
[61] Li B, McClelland Z, Horstemeyer S J, Aslam I, Wang P T, Horstemeyer M F.Mater Des, 2014; 66(Part B): 575
[62] Barrett C D, El Kadiri H.Acta Mater, 2014; 63: 1
[63] Xu B, Capolungo L, Rodney D.Scr Mater, 2013; 68: 901
[64] Wang J, Yadav S K, Hirth J P, Tomé C N, Beyerlein I J.Mater Res Lett, 2013; 1: 126
[65] Wang J, Liu L, Tomé C N, Mao S X, Gong S K.Mater Res Lett, 2013; 1: 81
[66] Shan Z W.JOM, 2012; 64: 1229
[67] Liu B Y, Li B, Shan Z W.In: Hort N, Mathaudhu S N, Neelameggham N R, Alderman M eds., Magnesium Technology 2013, San Diego: John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 2013: 107
[68] Liu B Y, Wang J, Li B, Lu L, Zhang X Y, Shan Z W, Li J, Jia C L, Sun J, Ma E.Nat Commun, 2014; 5: 3297
[69] Liu B Y, Wan L, Wang J, Ma E, Shan Z W.Scr Mater, 2015; 100:86
[70] Liu B Y, Shan Z-W, Ma E.In: Singh A, Solanki K, Manuel M V, Neelameggham N R eds., Magnesium Technology 2016, Nashville: John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 2016: 199
[71] Zhang X Y, Li B, Wu X L, Zhu Y T, Ma Q, Liu Q, Wang P T, Horstemeyer M F.Scr Mater, 2012; 67: 862
[72] Tu J, Zhang X Y, Wang J, Sun Q, Liu Q, Tomé C N.Appl Phys Lett, 2013; 103: 051903
[73] Sun Q, Zhang X Y, Ren Y, Tu J, Liu Q. Scr Mater, 2014; 90-91: 41
[74] Uchic M D, Dimiduk D M, Florando J N, Nix W D.Science, 2004; 305: 986
[75] Yu Q, Shan Z-W, Li J, Huang X, Xiao L, Sun J, Ma E.Nature, 2010; 463: 335
[76] Jian W W, Cheng G M, Xu W Z, Yuan H, Tsai M H, Wang Q D, Koch C C, Zhu Y T, Mathaudhu S N.Mater Res Lett, 2013; 1: 61
[77] Li B, Yan P F, Sui M L, Ma E.Acta Mater, 2010; 58: 173
[78] Bere A, Chen J, Hairie A, Nouet G, Paumier E.Phys Status Solidi, 2004; 241B: 2482
[1] 耿遥祥, 樊世敏, 简江林, 徐澍, 张志杰, 鞠洪博, 喻利花, 许俊华. 选区激光熔化专用AlSiMg合金成分设计及力学性能[J]. 金属学报, 2020, 56(6): 821-830.
[2] 刘震鹏, 闫志巧, 陈峰, 王顺成, 龙莹, 吴益雄. 金刚石工具用Cu-10Sn-xNi合金的制备和性能表征[J]. 金属学报, 2020, 56(5): 760-768.
[3] 余晨帆, 赵聪聪, 张哲峰, 刘伟. 选区激光熔化316L不锈钢的拉伸性能[J]. 金属学报, 2020, 56(5): 683-692.
[4] 王存宇,常颖,周峰峦,曹文全,董瀚,翁宇庆. 高强度高塑性第三代汽车钢的M3组织调控理论与技术[J]. 金属学报, 2020, 56(4): 400-410.
[5] 张哲峰,邵琛玮,王斌,杨浩坤,董福元,刘睿,张振军,张鹏. 孪生诱发塑性钢拉伸与疲劳性能及变形机制[J]. 金属学报, 2020, 56(4): 476-486.
[6] 刘振宝,梁剑雄,苏杰,王晓辉,孙永庆,王长军,杨志勇. 高强度不锈钢的研究及发展现状[J]. 金属学报, 2020, 56(4): 549-557.
[7] 蒋一,程满浪,姜海洪,周庆龙,姜美雪,江来珠,蒋益明. 高强度含NNi奥氏体不锈钢08Cr19Mn6Ni3Cu2N (QN1803)的显微组织及性能[J]. 金属学报, 2020, 56(4): 642-652.
[8] 孙衡,林小娉,周兵,赵圣诗,唐琴,董允. 定向凝固Mg-xGd-0.5Y合金的微观组织及拉伸变形行为[J]. 金属学报, 2020, 56(3): 340-350.
[9] 于雷,罗海文. 部分再结晶退火对无取向硅钢的磁性能与力学性能的影响[J]. 金属学报, 2020, 56(3): 291-300.
[10] 肖宏,许朋朋,祁梓宸,吴宗河,赵云鹏. 感应加热异温轧制制备钢/铝复合板[J]. 金属学报, 2020, 56(2): 231-239.
[11] 张健,王莉,王栋,谢光,卢玉章,申健,楼琅洪. 镍基单晶高温合金的研发进展[J]. 金属学报, 2019, 55(9): 1077-1094.
[12] 张正延,柴锋,罗小兵,陈刚,杨才福,苏航. 调质态含Cu高强钢的强化机理及钢中Cu的析出行为[J]. 金属学报, 2019, 55(6): 783-791.
[13] 董福涛,薛飞,田亚强,陈连生,杜林秀,刘相华. 退火温度对TWIP钢组织性能和氢致脆性的影响[J]. 金属学报, 2019, 55(6): 792-800.
[14] 冯汉臣,闵学刚,魏大圣,周立初,崔世云,方峰. 低温回火对超大形变冷拔珠光体钢丝显微组织和力学性能的影响[J]. 金属学报, 2019, 55(5): 585-592.
[15] 高钰璧, 丁雨田, 陈建军, 许佳玉, 马元俊, 张东. 挤压态GH3625合金冷变形过程中的组织和织构演变[J]. 金属学报, 2019, 55(4): 547-554.