Effects of Overlapping Process on Grain Orientation and Microstructure of Nickel-Based Single-Crystal Superalloy DD491 Fabricated by Selective Laser Melting
ZHANG Zhenwu1, LI Jikang1(), XU Wenhe1, SHEN Muyu1, QI Leiyi1, ZHENG Keying1, LI Wei2, WEI Qingsong1()
1 State Key Laboratory of Material Processing and Die & Mould Technology, School of Material Science and Engineering, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430074, China 2 Key Laboratory of Metallurgical Equipment and Control Technology, Ministry of Education, School of Mechanical and Automation, Wuhan University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430081, China
Cite this article:
ZHANG Zhenwu, LI Jikang, XU Wenhe, SHEN Muyu, QI Leiyi, ZHENG Keying, LI Wei, WEI Qingsong. Effects of Overlapping Process on Grain Orientation and Microstructure of Nickel-Based Single-Crystal Superalloy DD491 Fabricated by Selective Laser Melting. Acta Metall Sin, 2024, 60(11): 1471-1486.
Aero-engine turbine blades are operated under harsh conditions such as high temperature, pressure, and load. Therefore, weak grain boundaries at high temperatures should be eliminated from the turbine blades, whereas convection channels inside the blades should be added to dissipate heat. Achieving integrated manufacturing of specialized microstructure in complex components has been a long-term research priority in turbine blade manufacturing. Nickel-based single-crystal superalloys are key materials for manufacturing single-crystal turbine blades for aero-engines, and selective laser melting (SLM) is feasible and technically advantageous for manufacturing complex components with single-crystal microstructures. Owing to the extremely high temperature gradient and scanning speed during SLM, the melt pool is unstable, thereby interrupting directional crystal growth. The metallurgical environment of SLM is further complicated by the large number of overlapping tracks and stacking layers. The quality of the overlaps is critical for the integrity of the single-crystal structure during SLM. Herein, the effects of scanning hatch (h = 0.06, 0.09, 0.12, and 0.15 mm) on the melt track morphology, metallurgical defects, crystal orientation, and microstructure of DD491 fourth-generation nickel-based single-crystal superalloy were investigated. Directionally solidified and solution-aged DD6 single-crystal superalloy rods were used as the substrate, and DD491 powder was coated to a thickness of 40 μm. Electron backscatter diffraction was used to characterize the crystal orientation of the samples. Results show that low power/low speed (S1) and high power/high speed (S4) combinations of laser power and scanning speed provide geometrically and metallurgically stable conditions for directional crystal growth, and the grains at the bottom of the melt track can orient the substrate to achieve [001] directional growth. Different types of crystal orientation defects were observed in different regions, including equiaxed stray grains in the top middle region, [010] and [100] columnar stray grains in the top side regions, and small orientation deviation in the internal region. The scanning hatch affected the crystal orientation in the overlapping regions mainly through the remelted proportion of the old melt pool and the substrate microstructure of the new melt pool during solidification. The higher overlapping ratio with a smaller scanning hatch was beneficial for reducing stray grain defects on both sides of the melt tracks. The role of residual heat on solidification conditions was related to the heat gradient vector of laser input, and multitrack overlapping samples under the S1 process accommodated higher residual heat without causing orientation deviation in the overlapping regions. The multitrack overlapping samples under S1, h = 0.06 and0.09 mm, had maximum pole densities along the y-z plane as high as 47.66 and 46.85, respectively, exhibiting a typical [001] single-crystal structure.
Fund: National Natural Science Foundation of China(52275333);Stabilization Support Project of AVIC Manufacturing Technology Institute(KZ571801);Knowledge Innovation Special Project of Wuhan(2022010801010302)
Corresponding Authors:
WEI Qingsong, professor, Tel: (027)87558155, E-mail: wqs_xn@hust.edu.cn; LI Jikang, Tel: (027)87558155, E-mail: lijikang@hust.edu.cn
Table 1 Nominal chemical compositions of the DD491 and DD6 Ni-based single-crystal superalloys
Fig.1 SEM image (a) and particle size distribution (b) of the DD491 Ni-based single-crystal superalloy powder (Inset in Fig.1a shows the high magnified image. D10, D50, and D90—sizes below which 10%, 50%, and 90% of the particles are con-tained, respectively)
Processes
P / W
v / (mm·s-1)
h / mm
S1: low power, low speed
260
500
0.06, 0.09, 0.12, 0.15
S2: low power, medium speed
260
600
0.06, 0.09, 0.12, 0.15
S3: high power, medium speed
310
600
0.06, 0.09, 0.12, 0.15
S4: high power, high speed
310
700
0.06, 0.09, 0.12, 0.15
Table 2 Processes for selective laser melting (SLM)-fabricated single-track and multi-track overlapping samples
Fig.2 Samples (a) and schematic (b) of SLM-fabricated single-track and multi-track overlapping samples under different processes
Fig.3 SEM images of single-track samples in the x-y (a-d) and y-z (e-h) planes under S1 (a, e), S2 (b, f), S3 (c, g), and S4 (d, h) processes (White dotted line in Fig.4e indicates boundary of grains in two different orientations, red arrows indicates growth directions)
Fig.4 SEM images of S1 (a1-a4), S2 (b1-b4), S3 (c1-c4), and S4 (d1-d4) multi-track overlapping samples in the x-y plane under 0.06 mm (a1-d1), 0.09 mm (a2-d2), 0.12 mm (a3-d3), and 0.15 mm (a4-d4) scanning hatches (Arrows show cracks)
Fig.5 SEM images of solidification hot cracks (a, b), solid cracks (c, d), and EDS elemental distribution maps of rectangle area in Fig.5d (e) in the multi-track overlapping samples (a) S1, h = 0.09 mm (b) S3, h = 0.12 mm (c) S1, h = 0.15 mm (d) S1, h = 0.06 mm
Fig.6 SEM images of S1 (a1-a4), S2 (b1-b4), S3 (c1-c4), and S4 (d1-d4) multi-track overlapping samples in the y-z plane under 0.06 mm (a1-d1), 0.09 mm (a2-d2), 0.12 mm (a3-d3), and 0.15 mm (a4-d4) scanning hatches (Dotted lines indicate melt pool boundaries)
Fig.7 Schematic of multi-track overlapping melt pool (a); relationships between process parameters and standard deviation (SD) (b), average melt pool depth () (c), average overlapping region depth () (d), and radio of (e) (Di —depth of melt pool i, dj —depth of overlapping region j, lk —height from the highest point of melt pool/overlapping region k to substrate plane)
Fig.8 Crystal orientation maps of S1 multi-track overlapping samples in the y-z plane under scanning hatches of 0.06 mm (a), 0.09 mm (b), and 0.12 mm (c) (Dotted lines in Fig.8c indicate melt pool boundaries)
Fig.9 Crystal orientation maps of S4 multi-track overlapping samples in the y-z plane under scanning hatches of 0.06 mm (a), 0.09 mm (b), and 0.12 mm (c); distribution of grain misorientation angle from point A to B in Fig.9a (d)
Fig.10 Inverse pole figures (IPFs) of S1 (a-c) and S4 (d-f) multi-track overlapping samples in the y-z plane under scanning hatches of 0.06 mm (a, d), 0.09 mm (b, e), and 0.12 mm (c, f) (a—the lattice parameter along the x1-axis, b—the lattice parameter along the y1-axis, c—the lattice parameter along the z1-axis, δ—the angle difference with respect to the preferred orientation)
Fig.11 SEM images of S1 multi-track overlapping samples under scanning hatches of 0.06 mm (a), 0.09 mm (b), 0.12 mm (c), and 0.15 mm (d) (Insets show the high magnified images)
Fig.12 SEM and corrsponding high magnified images of S4 multi-track overlapping samples under scanning hatches of 0.06 mm (a), 0.09 mm (b), and 0.12 mm (c)
Fig.13 Schematics of the relations between grain evolution (a) and subcooling of the solid-liquid solidification stray interface (b), dendrite interface (c), and parabolic interface (d) front (G—temperature gradient at the solid-liquid solidification interface, TL—temperature of liquid phase)
Fig.14 Schematics of the relations between the laser scanning direction (), the solidification interface front direction () (a), and the grain preferred growth direction () (b) (θ—the angle between and , ψ—the angle between and )
Fig.15 Schematic of the [001], [010], and [100] grain growth directions in the melt pool (θ—the angle between and X-axis, ξ—the angle between the projection of on the Y-Z plane and Y-axis)
Fig.16 Schematics of smaller scanning hatch (a), larger scanning hatch (b), and heat gradient (c) affecting the grain growth in the overlapping region (G0—residual heat gradient in old melt pool; —heat gradient of laser input; —heat gradient of crystal solidification; α—the angle between and [001]-axis; , , and — component on [100], [010], and [001] direction, respectively; G∥ and G⊥—the magnitude of component parallel and perpendicular to [001]-axis)
1
Zhang J, Wang L, Wang D, et al. Recent progress in research and development of nickel-based single crystal superalloys [J]. Acta Metall. Sin., 2019, 55: 1077
Xia W S, Zhao X B, Yue L, et al. A review of composition evolution in Ni-based single crystal superalloys [J]. J. Mater. Sci. Technol., 2020, 44: 76
doi: 10.1016/j.jmst.2020.01.026
3
Zhao X B, Gao S F, Yang C B, et al. Influence of crystal orientation on microstructure and mechanical properties and its control for nickel-base single crystal superalloys [J]. Mater. China, 2013, 32: 24
Liu L, Sun D J, Huang T W, et al. Directional solidification under high thermal gradient and its application in superalloys processing [J]. Acta Metall. Sin., 2018, 54: 615
doi: 10.11900/0412.1961.2018.00075
Li J G, Meng X B, Liu J D, et al. Common solidification defects and inhibition methods in single crystal superalloy turbine blades [J]. Spec. Cast. Nonferrous Alloys, 2021, 41: 1321
Bondarenko Y A, Kablov E N. Directional crystallization of high-temperature alloys with elevated temperature gradient [J]. Met. Sci. Heat Treat., 2002, 44: 288
7
Kong X C, Zhang Z Q, Zhu J Q, et al. Research progress on cooling structure of aeroengine air-cooled turbine blade [J]. J. Prop. Technol., 2022, 43(5): 1
Song B, Zhang J L, Zhang Y J, et al. Research progress of materials design for metal laser additive manufacturing [J]. Acta Metall. Sin., 2023, 59: 1
doi: 10.11900/0412.1961.2022.00026
DeBroy T, Mukherjee T, Wei H L, et al. Metallurgy, mechanistic models and machine learning in metal printing [J]. Nat. Rev. Mater., 2021, 6: 48
10
Liu J, To A C. Quantitative texture prediction of epitaxial columnar grains in additive manufacturing using selective laser melting [J]. Addit. Manuf., 2017, 16: 58
11
Kalidindi S R, Bronkhorst C A, Anand L. Crystallographic texture evolution in bulk deformation processing of FCC metals [J]. J. Mech. Phys. Solids, 1992, 40: 537
12
Liu L T, Chen C Y, Li X, et al. Research progress in laser additive manufacturing technology of single crystal superalloy [J]. J. Netshape Forming Eng., 2019, 11(4): 73
Ci S W. Study on microstructure and mechanical properties of nickel-based single crystal supertalloy by laser additive manufacturing [D]. Hefei: University of Science and Technology of China, 2021
Liu X X, Cheng X, Wang H M, et al. Influence of processing conditions on formation of stray grains in DD5 single-crystal superalloys by laser melting multi-traced deposition [J]. Chin. J. Lasers, 2017, 44: 0602009
Fernandez-Zelaia P, Kirka M M, Rossy A M, et al. Nickel-based superalloy single crystals fabricated via electron beam melting [J]. Acta Mater., 2021, 216: 117133
18
Körner C, Ramsperger M, Meid C, et al. Microstructure and mechanical properties of CMSX-4 single crystals prepared by additive manufacturing [J]. Metall. Mater. Trans., 2018, 49A: 3781
19
Li Y, Yu Y F, Wang Z B, et al. Additive manufacturing of nickel-based superalloy single crystals with IN-738 alloy [J]. Acta Metall. Sin. (Engl. Lett.), 2022, 35: 369
20
Matuszewski K, Rettig R, Matysiak H, et al. Effect of ruthenium on the precipitation of topologically close packed phases in Ni-based superalloys of 3rd and 4th generation [J]. Acta Mater., 2015, 95: 274
21
Li J K, Zhang Z W, Yang Y Q, et al. Single-track morphology, crystal orientation and microstructure of DD91 nickel-based single crystal superalloy fabricated by selective laser melting [J]. Chin. J. Lasers, 2022, 49: 1402103
Guo C, Li G, Li S, et al. Additive manufacturing of Ni-based superalloys: Residual stress, mechanisms of crack formation and strategies for crack inhibition [J]. Nano Mater. Sci., 2023, 5: 53
23
Li Y, Xu H J, Li K, et al. Effect of volumetric energy density on microstructure and properties of Hastelloy X alloy manufactured by selective laser melting [J]. Mater. Mech. Eng., 2020, 44(5): 38
Wei Q S, Xie Y, Teng Q, et al. Crack types, mechanisms, and suppression methods during high-energy beam additive manufacturing of nickel-based superalloys: A review [J]. Chin. J. Mech. Eng.: Addit. Manuf. Front., 2022, 1: 100055
25
Jin T, Sun X F, Zhao N R, et al. Laser glazing rapidly solidified microstructure of DD8 single crystal Ni-based superalloy [J]. Acta Metall. Sin., 2009, 45: 711
Liang J J, Yang Y H, Zhou Y Z, et al. Microstructures of nickel-base single-crystal superalloy prepared by laser solid forming [J]. Rare Met. Mater. Eng., 2017, 46: 3753
Anderson T D, Dupont J N, Debroy T. Origin of stray grain formation in single-crystal superalloy weld pools from heat transfer and fluid flow modeling [J]. Acta Mater., 2010, 58: 1441
28
Rappaz M, David S A, Vitek J M, et al. Development of microstructures in Fe-15Ni-15Cr single crystal electron beam welds [J]. Metall. Trans., 1989, 20A: 1125
29
Yang J J, Li F Z, Pan A Q, et al. Microstructure and grain growth direction of SRR99 single-crystal superalloy by selective laser melting [J]. J. Alloys Compd., 2019, 808: 151740
30
Zhang P Y, Zhou X, Zhang W Q, et al. Effects of melt-pool geometry on the oriented to misoriented transition in directed energy deposition of a single-crystal superalloy [J]. Addit. Manuf., 2022, 60: 103253
31
Shi R P, Khairallah S A, Roehling T T, et al. Microstructural control in metal laser powder bed fusion additive manufacturing using laser beam shaping strategy [J]. Acta Mater., 2020, 184: 284
32
Wang G W, Liang J J, Zhou Y Z, et al. Variation of crystal orientation during epitaxial growth of dendrites by laser deposition [J]. J. Mater. Sci. Technol., 2018, 34: 732
doi: 10.1016/j.jmst.2017.05.002
33
Tönhardt R, Amberg G. Phase-field simulation of dendritic growth in a shear flow [J]. J. Cryst. Growth, 1998, 194: 406
34
Zhou Z P, Lei Q, Yan Z, et al. Effects of process parameters on microstructure and cracking susceptibility of a single crystal superalloy fabricated by directed energy deposition [J]. Mater. Des., 2021, 198: 109296