Please wait a minute...
Acta Metall Sin  2014, Vol. 50 Issue (11): 1311-1318    DOI: 10.11900/0412.1961.2014.00102
Current Issue | Archive | Adv Search |
CHARACTERIZATION OF ALTERNATING CURRENT FIELD ENHANCED PACK BORIDING FOR 45 CARBON STEEL AT LOW AND MEDIUM TEMPERATURES
CHENG Jian1, XIE Fei1,2(), SUN Li1, ZHU Liman1, PAN Jianwei3
1 School of Materials Science and Engineering, Changzhou University, Changzhou 213164
2 Key Laboratory of Materials Surface Engineering of Jiangsu Province, Changzhou University, Changzhou 213164
3 Huaide College, Changzhou University, Changzhou 213016
Cite this article: 

CHENG Jian, XIE Fei, SUN Li, ZHU Liman, PAN Jianwei. CHARACTERIZATION OF ALTERNATING CURRENT FIELD ENHANCED PACK BORIDING FOR 45 CARBON STEEL AT LOW AND MEDIUM TEMPERATURES. Acta Metall Sin, 2014, 50(11): 1311-1318.

Download:  HTML  PDF(4023KB) 
Export:  BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)      
Abstract  

Conventional pack boriding (CPB) has shortcomings of high processing temperature and long process duration for producing boride coating with an effective thickness. Alternating current field enhanced pack boriding (ACFEPB) is a new approach for overcoming those shortcomings in CPB. In the present work, ACFEPB was carried out on a 45 medium carbon steel at low and medium temperatures (450~800 ℃) by applying a 50 Hz alternating current field (ACF) during the pack boriding for revealing effects of ACF on the treatment. Understanding characterization of the ACFEPB better will lay a good foundation for investigating the mechanism of the ACF on the boriding and optimizing the new process. Experimental results showed that nearly same thick boride coatings were obtained in target surface of samples located in different positions right between the parallel ACF electrodes, while less thick boride coatings were found in samples not within the region. All ACFEPB samples' boride coatings were thicker than that of corresponding CPB, which demonstrated that applying an appropriate ACF could notably enhance the boriding. A linear relation was shown in the profile of ACFEPB coating thickness vs the boriding temperature. The coating thickness of the ACFEPB at 800 ℃ increased with the increase of the ACF current. And the coating thickness vs the boriding time exhibited a parabolic character. Morphology similar to the CPB coating was presented in the ACFEPB coating. The saw-tooth shaped boride penetrated perpendicularly to the substrate. However, fewer or no FeB phase was found in ACFEPB coating when comparing with CPB coating treated at same temperature with same duration. More micro-porosities were found in the near surface zone of single Fe2B phase coating by ACFEPB, which was an indication that more vacancies moved from the substrate to the near surface region. Although a temperature rise caused by the ACF was detected in the sample during the boriding, the heating effect of the ACF to the sample and the boriding media was not the main reason for ACF's enhancing effect to boriding. The ACF’s electro-magnetic effect should be the main factor for the enhancement. The ACF induced current would lead more vacancies in the treated sample, which promoted the diffusion in the substrate. The ACF should also intensify chemical reactions and diffusions in the boriding media with the energy from the ACF and the ACF's electro-magnetic stirring effect. More active boron-containing species formed and moved to the sample's surface to accelerate the formation of borides.

Key words:  pack boriding      alternating current field      low and medium temperature      diffusion     
Received:  25 June 2014     
ZTFLH:  TG156.87  
Fund: Supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China (No.51171032)

URL: 

https://www.ams.org.cn/EN/10.11900/0412.1961.2014.00102     OR     https://www.ams.org.cn/EN/Y2014/V50/I11/1311

Process Mass fraction of media Soaking time / h Temperature / ℃ Current / A
formulation
ACFEPB1 10%Fe-B+5%KBF4+ 4 800 4
CPB1 1%charcoal+84%SiC 0
ACFEPB21~ACFEPB26 5%Fe-B+5%KBF4+ 4 800 1~6
1%charcoal+89%SiC
ACFEPB31~ACFEPB39 10%Fe-B+5%KBF4+ 4 400~800 4
CPB31~CPB39 1%charcoal+84%SiC 0
ACFEPB40~ACFEPB44 0~6 800 4
CPB40~ CPB44 0~6 800 0
ACFEPB50~ ACFEPB54 0~6 600 4
Table 1  Parameters of alternating current field enhanced pack boriding (ACFEPB) and conventional pack boriding (CPB) processes
Fig.1  Schematic of experimental apparatus for pack boriding (1~5: sample positions; 6: voltage-controllable alternating current supplier; 7: conducting line; 8: container; 9: powder boriding agent; 10: electrode: 11: clay sealing; 12: lid)

(a) vertical view (b) principal view

Fig.2  Coating thickness of samples borided at 800 ℃ for 4 h versus sample positions in the boriding container
Fig.3  Alternating field current versus coating thickness and temperature rise caused by alternating current field after borided at 800 ℃ for 4 h
Fig.4  Coating thickness of samples borided for 4 h at temperatures from 400 to 800 ℃
Fig.5  Effects of temperature rise caused by alternating current field on coating thickness of samples at position 4 after borided for 4 h
Fig.6  Coating thickness versus boriding soaking time
Fig.7  Square of coating thickness versus boriding soaking time
Fig.8  Microstructures of borided layer by processes of ACFEPB31 (a), ACFEPB32 (b), ACFEPB35 (c), ACFEPB36 (d), ACFEPB39 (e), CPB35 (f), CPB38 (g) and CPB39 (h)
Fig.9  Diffusion zone morphologies of borided samples by processes of ACFEPB53 (a) and CPB43 (b)
Fig.10  XRD spectra of borided samples with processes of ACFEPB31 (a), ACFEPB32 (b), ACFEPB39 (c) and CPB39 (d)
Fig.11  Microhardness distributions of different borided samples
[1] Usta M, Ozbek I, Bindal C, Ucisik A H, Ingole S, Liang H. Vacuum, 2006; 80: 1321
[2] Oliveira C K N, Casteletti L C, Lombardi Neto A, Totten G E, Hech S C. Vacuum, 2010; 84: 792
[3] Sinha A K. Boriding (Boronizing) of Steels. Materials Park: ASM International, 1991: 437
[4] Yu L G, Chen X J, Khor K A, Sundararajan G. Acta Mater, 2005; 53: 2361
[5] Ipek M, Celebi Efe G, Ozbek I, Zeythin S, Bindal C. J Mater Eng Perform, 2012; 21: 733
[6] Miyashita F, Yokota K. Surf Coat Technol, 1996; 84: 334
[7] Huang Z R, Li P N, Xie F, Pan J W. Rare Earth, 2000; 18: 205
[8] Lu X X, Liang C, Gao X X, An J, Yang X H. ISIJ Int, 2011; 51: 799
[9] Anthymidis K G, Stergiousdis E, Tsipas D N. Mater Res Bull, 2001; 51: 156
[10] Anthymidis K G, Stergiousdis G, Tsipas D N. Sci Technol Adv Mater, 2002; 3:303
[11] Bartsch K, Leonhardt A. Surf Coat Technol, 1999; 116-119: 386
[12] Gunes I, Ulker S, Taktak S. Mater Des, 2011; 32: 2380
[13] Xie F, Sun L, Pan J W. Surf Coat Technol, 2012; 206: 2839
[14] Angkurarach L, Juijerm P. Arch Metall Mater, 2012; 57: 799
[15] Xie F, Zhu Q H, Lu J J. Solid State Phenom, 2006; 118: 167
[16] Xie F, Zhou Z H, Wang D L. Acta Metall Sin, 2008; 44: 810
(谢 飞, 周正华, 王大亮. 金属学报, 2008; 44: 810)
[17] Xie F, Hu J, Zhou Z H, Hu H B, Li H J, Pan J W. Surf Eng, 2011; 27: 134
[18] Xie F, Pan J W. IHTSE, 2012; 6(2): 80
[19] Xie F, Sun L, Cheng J. Surf Eng, 2013; 29: 240
[20] Chen F S, Wang K L. Surf Coat Technol, 1999; 115: 239
[21] Wu B S, Xie Z J, He L. Trans Mater Heat Treat, 1985; 6(2): 20
(吴宝善, 谢泽嘉, 何 力. 金属热处理学报, 1985; 6(2): 20)
[22] Wang G Z,Wang W Z. Thermo-Chemical Treatment for Steels. Beijing: China Railway Press, 1980: 293
(王国佐,王万智. 钢的化学热处理. 北京: 中国铁道出版社, 1980: 293)
[23] Wuhan Research Institute of Materials Protection,Shanghai Research Institute of Materials. Metallographic Maps of Thermo-Chemically Treated Irons and Steels. Beijing: Mechanical Industry Press, 1980: 52
(武汉材料保护研究所,上海材料研究所. 钢铁化学热处理金相图谱. 北京: 机械工业出版社, 1980: 52)
[24] КИЛИК И Н,translated by Li W Q. Characteristics of Steels' Induction Heat Treatment. Beijing: Industry Press of China, 1962: 3
(КИЛИК И Н 著,李文卿译. 感应加热热处理工艺特点. 北京: 中国工业出版社, 1962: 3)
[25] Asoka-Kumar P, O'Brien K, Lynn K G, Simpson P J, Rodbell K P. Appl Phys Lett, 1996; 68: 406
[26] Kondo T, Yasuhara M, Kuramoto T, Kodera Y, Ohyanagi M, Munir Z A. J Mater Sci, 2008; 43: 6400
[27] Zhou Y, Wang Q, Sun D L, Han X L. J Alloys Compd, 2011; 509: 1201
[28] Xie F, Cheng J. In: Chinese Heat Treatment Society ed., Proc 20th IFHTSE, Beijing: Chinese Heat Treatment Society, 2012: 293
[29] Cheng J, Xie F, Sun L, Pan J W. Sci Sin Technol, 2014; 44: 315
[1] GONG Shengkai, LIU Yuan, GENG Lilun, RU Yi, ZHAO Wenyue, PEI Yanling, LI Shusuo. Advances in the Regulation and Interfacial Behavior of Coatings/Superalloys[J]. 金属学报, 2023, 59(9): 1097-1108.
[2] XU Wenguo, HAO Wenjiang, LI Yingju, ZHAO Qingbin, LU Bingyu, GUO Heyi, LIU Tianyu, FENG Xiaohui, YANG Yuansheng. Effects of Trace Aluminum and Titanium on High Temper-ature Oxidation Behavior of Inconel 690 Alloy[J]. 金属学报, 2023, 59(12): 1547-1558.
[3] LIU Lujun, LIU Zheng, LIU Renhui, LIU Yong. Grain Boundary Structure and Coercivity Enhancement of Nd90Al10 Alloy Modified NdFeB Permanent Magnets by GBD Process[J]. 金属学报, 2023, 59(11): 1457-1465.
[4] LI Sai, YANG Zenan, ZHANG Chi, YANG Zhigang. Phase Field Study of the Diffusional Paths in Pearlite-Austenite Transformation[J]. 金属学报, 2023, 59(10): 1376-1388.
[5] SHEN Yingying, ZHANG Guoxing, JIA Qing, WANG Yumin, CUI Yuyou, YANG Rui. Interfacial Reaction and Thermal Stability of the SiCf/TiAl Composites[J]. 金属学报, 2022, 58(9): 1150-1158.
[6] LI Xifeng, LI Tianle, AN Dayong, WU Huiping, CHEN Jieshi, CHEN Jun. Research Progress of Titanium Alloys and Their Diffusion Bonding Fatigue Characteristics[J]. 金属学报, 2022, 58(4): 473-485.
[7] HUA Yu, CHEN Jianguo, YU Liming, SI Yonghong, LIU Chenxi, LI Huijun, LIU Yongchang. Microstructure Evolution and Mechanical Properties of Dissimilar Material Diffusion-Bonded Joint for High Cr Ferrite Heat-Resistant Steel and Austenitic Heat-Resistant Steel[J]. 金属学报, 2022, 58(2): 141-154.
[8] LIU Zhongwu, HE Jiayi. Several Issues on the Development of Grain Boundary Diffusion Process for Nd-Fe-B Permanent Magnets[J]. 金属学报, 2021, 57(9): 1155-1170.
[9] CHEN Shenghu, RONG Lijian. Oxide Scale Formation on Ultrafine-Grained Ferritic-Martensitic Steel During Pre-Oxidation and Its Effect on the Corrosion Performance in Stagnant Liquid Pb-Bi Eutectic[J]. 金属学报, 2021, 57(8): 989-999.
[10] LI Juan, ZHAO Honglong, ZHOU Nian, ZHANG Yingzhe, QIN Qingdong, SU Xiangdong. Diffusion Bonding of CoCrFeNiCu High-Entropy Alloy to 304 Stainless Steel[J]. 金属学报, 2021, 57(12): 1567-1578.
[11] LIU Chenxi, MAO Chunliang, CUI Lei, ZHOU Xiaosheng, YU Liming, LIU Yongchang. Recent Progress in Microstructural Control and Solid-State Welding of Reduced Activation Ferritic/Martensitic Steels[J]. 金属学报, 2021, 57(11): 1521-1538.
[12] SUN Zhengyang, YANG Chao, LIU Wenbo. Phase Field Simulations of the Sintering Process of UO2[J]. 金属学报, 2020, 56(9): 1295-1303.
[13] WANG Chao, ZHANG Xu, WANG Yumin, YANG Qing, YANG Lina, ZHANG Guoxing, WU Ying, KONG Xu, YANG Rui. Mechanisms of Interfacial Reaction and Matrix Phase Transition in SiCf /Ti65 Composites[J]. 金属学报, 2020, 56(9): 1275-1285.
[14] DING Wen, WANG Xiaojing, LIU Ning, QIN Liang. Diffusion Bonding of Copper and 304 Stainless Steel with an Interlayer of CoCrFeMnNi High-Entropy Alloy[J]. 金属学报, 2020, 56(8): 1084-1090.
[15] SUN Zhengyang, WANG Yutian, LIU Wenbo. Phase-Field Simulation of the Interaction Between Pore and Grain Boundary[J]. 金属学报, 2020, 56(12): 1643-1653.
No Suggested Reading articles found!