|
|
RESEARCH ON THE HYSTERESIS OF ATOM CLUSTER SIZE VARIATION IN Ga MELT FROM THE NUCLEATION UNDERCOOLING |
JIAN Zengyun; ZHOU Jing; CHANG Fang'e; JIE Wanqi |
1) School of Materials and Chemical Engineering; Xi'an Technological University; Xi'an 710032
2) State Key Lab of Solidification Processing; Northwestern Polytechnical University; Xi'an 710072 |
|
Cite this article:
JIAN Zengyun ZHOU Jing CHANG Fang'e JIE Wanqi. RESEARCH ON THE HYSTERESIS OF ATOM CLUSTER SIZE VARIATION IN Ga MELT FROM THE NUCLEATION UNDERCOOLING. Acta Metall Sin, 2009, 45(9): 1146-1152.
|
Abstract In order to achieve the relationship between the melt thermal history and the solidification structure so
as to explore new methods to effectively control the solidification process and the solidification structure of metal,
the effect of the melt thermal history of Ga on the nucleation undercooling has been studied by using DSC,
and some formulae among the atom cluster size in melt, the nucleation undercooling of melt, the melt temperature and
the concerned physical and chemical parameters of metal have been proposed. The experimental results
show that the nucleation undercooling increases with increasing the holding time at high temperature after a
heating process and decreases with increasing the holding time after cooling to low temperature, but the change
rates of the nucleation undercooling decrease with increasing the holding time. An equation between the atom
number in the largest cluster in the melt and the melt temperature has been obtained by studying the effect of the
liquid temperature on the cluster size thermodynamically and kinetically. Formulae between the homogenous
nucleation undercooling, the heterogeneous nucleation undercooling and the temperature of liquid metal have been
achieved. In terms of these formulae, the atom number in the largest cluster in the melt and the nucleation
undercooling of the melt can be predicted if the temperature at which liquid metal is heated and hold is known. A
method for predicting the hysteretic extent of nucleation temperature after changing the liquid temperature has
been developed. The predicted results of the hysteretic extent of the nucleation temperature are in agreement with
the experiential results. The predicted and experimental hysteretic extents of the nucleation temperature are -10.7
and -10.3 K for Ga heated from 303 K to 373 K, and 7.9 and 8.3 K for Ga cooled from 373 K to 313 K, respectively. The errors between the predicted hysteretic extent of the nucleation temperature and the experimental
result are only 3.9\% for Ga heated from 303 K to 373 K and 4.8\% for Ga cooled from 373 K to 313 K,
respectively.
|
Received: 09 February 2009
|
|
Fund: Supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China (Nos.50671075 and 50571076) and National Basic Research Program of China (No.2006CB605202) |
[1] Vasin M G, Lad’yanov V I. Phy Rev, 2003; 68E: 512021
[2] Hpolland–Morutz D, Schenk T, Simonet V, Bellissent R,Convert P, Hansen T, Herlach D M. Mater Sci Eng, 2004; A375–377: 98
[3] Chen H S, Zu F Q, Chen J, Li Z, Ding G H, Huang Z Y. Sci Chin, 2008; 51: 1402
[4] Yin F S, Sun X F, Guan H R, Hu Z Q. J Alloys Compd, 2004; 364: 225
[5] Wang W M, Bian X F. Jing Y Q, Syliusarenko S I. Metall Mater Trans, 2000; 31A: 2163
[6] Kaban I, Gruner S, Hoyer W, Il’inskii A, Shpak A. J Non– Cryst Solids, 2007; 353: 1979
[7] Kaban I, Hoyer W, Ilinskii A, Shpak A, Jovari P. J Non–Cryst Solids, 2007; 353: 1808
[8] Zhang L, Wu Y S, Bian X F, Li H, Wang W M, Wu S. J Non–Cryst Solids, 2000; 262: 169
[9] Lad’yanov V I, Bel’tyukov A L, Men’shikova S G, Maslov V V, Nosenko V K, Mashira V A. Phys Chem Liq, 2008; 46: 71
[10] Lad’yanov V I, Bel’tyukov A L, Maslov V V, Shishmarin A I, Vasin M G, Nosenko V K, Mashira V A. J Non–Cryst Solids, 2007; 353: 3264
[11] Lu Y P, Yang G C, Yang C L, Wang H P, Zhou Y H. Prog Nat Sci, 2006; 16: 287
[12] Geng X G, Chen G, Fu H Z. Acta Metall Sin, 2002; 38: 225
(狄兴国, 陈 光, 傅恒志. 金属学报, 2002; 38: 225)
[13] Cheng G, Yu J W, Xie F Q, Fu H Z. Acta Metall Sin, 2001; 37: 488
(陈光, 俞建威, 谢发勤, 傅恒志. 金属学报, 2001; 37: 488)
[14] Eskin D G, Savran V I, Katgerman L. Metall Mater Trans, 2005; 36A: 1965
[15] Chen Z W, Jie W Q, Zhang R J. Mater Lett, 2005; 59: 2183
[16] Nafisi S, Emadi D, Shehata M T, Shehata M T, Ghomashchi R. Mater Sci Eng, 2006; A432: 71
[17] Li P J, Nikitin V I, Kandalova E G, Nikitin K V. Mater Sci Eng, 2002; A332: 371
[18] Turnbull D. J Appl Phys, 1950; 21: 1022
[19] Turkdogan E T. Physical Chemistry of High Temperature Technology. New York: Academic Press, 1980: 88
[20] Spaepen F, Meyer R B. Scr Metall, 1976; 10: 37
[21] Jian Z Y, Kuribayashi K, Jie W Q, Chang F E. Acta Mater, 2006; 54: 3227
[22] Jian Z Y, Kuribayashi K, Jie W Q. Mater Trans, 2002; 43: 721
[23] Bernardin J D, Mudawar I, Walsh C B, Franses E I. In J Heat Mass Trans, 1997; 40: 1017
[24] Vadgama B, Harris D K. Exp Therm Fluid Sci, 2007; 31: 979 |
No Suggested Reading articles found! |
|
|
Viewed |
|
|
|
Full text
|
|
|
|
|
Abstract
|
|
|
|
|
Cited |
|
|
|
|
|
Shared |
|
|
|
|
|
Discussed |
|
|
|
|