Please wait a minute...
Acta Metall Sin  2025, Vol. 61 Issue (2): 265-277    DOI: 10.11900/0412.1961.2023.00002
Research paper Current Issue | Archive | Adv Search |
Growth Behavior of Grain Boundary α Phase and Its Effect on the Microtexture During βα Phase Transformation in Ti6246 Titanium Alloys
QI Min1,2, WANG Qian2, MA Yingjie1,2(), CAO Hemeng1,2, HUANG Sensen2, LEI Jiafeng1,2, YANG Riu1,2
1 School of Materials Science and Engineering, University of Science and Technology of China, Shenyang 110016, China
2 Shichangxu Innovation Center for Advanced Materials, Institute of Metal Research, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shenyang 110016, China
Cite this article: 

QI Min, WANG Qian, MA Yingjie, CAO Hemeng, HUANG Sensen, LEI Jiafeng, YANG Riu. Growth Behavior of Grain Boundary α Phase and Its Effect on the Microtexture During βα Phase Transformation in Ti6246 Titanium Alloys. Acta Metall Sin, 2025, 61(2): 265-277.

Download:  HTML  PDF(3917KB) 
Export:  BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)      
Abstract  

The initial lamellar microstructure of titanium alloys significantly affects their microstructural evolution and mechanical property during thermo-mechanical treatments. Thus, the evolution of the initial lamellar microstructure must be explored to control the microstructure and enhance the mechanical property. The present work focuses on the evolution of the lamellar microstructure during βα phase transformation via interrupted furnace cooling experiments to analyze the growth behavior of the grain boundary α phase (αGB) and its effect on the subsequent growth of intragranular α lamellae and microtexture. Results show that when titanium alloy furnace cools from the β phase field to the α + β phase field, the αGB holding Burgers orientation relationship (BOR) with both sides of β grains (2-BOR αGB) has an advantage for early transformation at the β grain boundary. In particular, type II (49.5°/<110>) and type III (60°/<110>) β grain boundaries are preferential sites for the early nucleation of αGB particles. As the temperature decreases, α lamellae holding similar orientation to 2-BOR αGB grow to both sides of β grains. Thus, 2-BOR αGB and both sides of α lamellae form a strong microtexture at the grain boundary. At the early growth period of the α phase, the smaller the θ2-BOR (misorientation of the close-oriented αGB variant pair of parents β1 and β2) of 2-BOR αGB, the earlier the formation of a strong microtexture at the grain boundary. 2-BOR αGB preferentially precipitates, whereas the αGB holding BOR with only one side of the β grain (1-BOR αGB) nucleates. α lamellae holding a similar orientation to 1-BOR αGB grow to one side of the BOR-β grain (holding BOR with αGB), whereas α lamellae with a different orientation grow in the non-BOR-β grain. Thus, 1-BOR αGB and one side of α lamellae form a weak microtexture at the grain boundary.

Key words:  α + β titanium alloy      phase transformation      preferred growth      grain boundary α phase      microtexture     
Received:  03 January 2023     
ZTFLH:  TG146.2  
Fund: National Key Research and Development Program of China(2021YFC2801801);National Natural Science Foundation of China(51871225)
Corresponding Authors:  MA Yingjie, professor, Tel: 13840026329, E-mail: yjma@imr.ac.cn

URL: 

https://www.ams.org.cn/EN/10.11900/0412.1961.2023.00002     OR     https://www.ams.org.cn/EN/Y2025/V61/I2/265

Fig.1  Schematics of the heat treatment processes (T—temperature, t—time, F.C.—furnace cooling, W.Q.—water quenching, Tββ-transus temperature)
(a) β annealing treatment (b) interrupted furnace cooling treatment
Fig.2  Low (a) and high (b) magnified SEM images of the as-received Ti6246 alloy (αp—primary α, αs—secondary α)
Fig.3  OM image of the lamellae microstructure of Ti6246 alloy after β annealing treatment
Fig.4  EBSD analyses of Ti6246 alloy after β annealing treatment, showing typical Widmanstätten microstructures
(a, b) band contrast map (a) and the corresponding α orientation map (b) (αGB—grain boundary α phase) (c, d) SEM image (c) and the corresponding α orientation map (d)
Fig.5  OM images of α phase in the Ti6246 alloy after furnace cooling from β phase field to 920 oC (a), 880 oC (b), 840 oC (c), and 810 oC (d)
Fig.6  SEM images of α phase in the Ti6246 alloy after furnace cooling from β phase field to 920 oC (a), 880 oC (b), 840 oC (c), and 810 oC (d)
Fig.7  Volume fractions of the αGB and α colony as a function of temperature below Tβ in Ti6246 alloy
Fig.8  EBSD analyses of the α phase in the Ti6246 alloy after furnace cooling from β phase field to 920 oC (a), 880 oC (b), and 840 oC (c) (The area enclosed by dashed line in Fig.8c indicates that the β phase has not yet transformed to α phase)
Temperature / oCHAGBLAGB (< 10o)
9203.320.016.711.748.30
8805.013.301.708.371.70
8403.308.301.708.376.71.7
Table 1  Fractions of the β phase grain boundary transformed to αGB in Ti6246 alloy after furnace cooling from β phase field to different temperatures
Fig.9  EBSD analyses of the α phase grain at multiple positions (a-d) of Ti6246 alloy after furnace cooling from β phase field to 880 oC, pole overlaps as shown in black boxes
Fig.10  EBSD analyses of αGB in the Ti6246 alloy after furnace cooling from β phase field to 880 oC
(a) SEM image (b, d) orientation map (b) and pole figure (d) of α phase corresponding to the square area in Fig.10a (c, e) orientation map (c) and pole figure (e) of β phase corresponding to the square area in Fig.10a
Fig.11  EBSD analyses of 2-BOR αGB in the Ti6246 alloy after furnace cooling from β phase field to 880 oC, pole overlaps as shown in black boxes
(a, c) orientation map (a) and corresponding pole figure (c) of α phase (b, d) orientation map (b) and corresponding pole figure (d) of β phase
Fig.12  Probabilities of two colonies emitted by αGB grains as a function of θ2-BOR in Ti6246 alloy after furnace cooling from β phase field to 880 oC (Numbers of observed boundaries are indicated in the figure)
Fig.13  Schematics of the transformation of the microtexture when the Ti alloy was cooled from a β phase field
(a) 2-BOR αGB and both sides of α lamellae forming strong microtexture
(b) 1-BOR αGB and one side of α lamellae forming weak microtexture
1 Kang L M, Yang C. A Review on high‐strength titanium alloys: Microstructure, strengthening, and properties [J]. Adv. Eng. Mater., 2019, 21: 1801359
2 Li S J, Hou W T, Hao Y L, et al. Research progress on the mechanical properties of the biomedical titanium alloy porous structures fabricated by 3D printing technique [J]. Acta Metall. Sin., 2023, 59: 478
doi: 10.11900/0412.1961.2022.00566
李述军, 侯文韬, 郝玉琳 等. 3D打印医用钛合金多孔材料力学性能研究进展 [J]. 金属学报, 2023, 59: 478
doi: 10.11900/0412.1961.2022.00566
3 Fan J K, Lai M J, Tang B, et al. Research progress of dynamic phase transformation behavior of titanium alloy under thermo-mechanical coupling process [J]. J. Aeronaut. Mater., 2020, 40: 25
樊江昆, 赖敏杰, 唐 斌 等. 热力耦合作用下钛合金动态相变行为研究进展 [J]. 航空材料学报, 2020, 40: 25
doi: 10.11868/j.issn.1005-5053.2020.000065
4 Germain L, Gey N, Humbert M, et al. Texture heterogeneities induced by subtransus processing of near α titanium alloys [J]. Acta Mater., 2008, 56: 4298
5 Li C, Zhang X Y, Li Z Y, et al. Hot deformation of Ti-5Al-5Mo-5V-1Cr-1Fe near β titanium alloys containing thin and thick lamellar α phase [J]. Mater. Sci. Eng., 2013, A573: 75
6 Wang L, Fan X G, Zhan M, et al. The heterogeneous globularization related to crystal and geometrical orientation of two-phase titanium alloys with a colony microstructure [J]. Mater. Des., 2020, 186: 108338
7 Zhang Y, Xin R L, Guo B Q, et al. Influence of alternate grain boundary α on the development of Widmanstätten microstructure in TC21 Ti alloy [J]. Mater. Charact., 2021, 177: 111162
8 Wu C, Zhao Y Q, Huang S X, et al. Effect of cooling rate on α variant selection and microstructure evolution in a near β Ti-5Al-3Mo-3V-2Cr-2Zr-1Nb-1Fe alloy [J]. J. Alloys Compd., 2020, 841: 155728
9 Vanderesse N, Maire E, Darrieulat M, et al. Three-dimensional microtomographic study of Widmanstätten microstructures in an alpha/beta titanium alloy [J]. Scr. Mater., 2008, 58: 512
10 Zhao Z B, Wang Q J, Wang H, et al. Determining the orientation of parent β grain from one α variant in titanium alloys [J]. J. Appl. Crystallogr., 2018, 51: 1125
11 Zhao Z B, Wang Q J, Liu J R, et al. Effect of heat treatment on the crystallographic orientation evolution in a near-α titanium alloy Ti60 [J]. Acta Mater., 2017, 131: 305
12 Zhao Z B, Wang Q J, Hu Q M, et al. Effect of β (110) texture intensity on α-variant selection and microstructure morphology during βα phase transformation in near α titanium alloy [J]. Acta Mater., 2017, 126: 372
13 Shi R, Dixit V, Fraser H L, et al. Variant selection of grain boundary α by special prior β grain boundaries in titanium alloys [J]. Acta Mater., 2014, 75: 156
14 Bhattacharyya D, Viswanathan G B, Denkenberger R, et al. The role of crystallographic and geometrical relationships between α and β phases in an α/β titanium alloy [J]. Acta Mater., 2003, 51: 4679
15 Sun Z C, Guo S S, Yang H. Nucleation and growth mechanism of α-lamellae of Ti alloy TA15 cooling from an α + β phase field [J]. Acta Mater., 2013, 61: 2057
16 Gao X, Zhang S F, Wang L, et al. Evolution of grain boundary α phase during cooling from β phase field in a α + β titanium alloy [J]. Mater. Lett., 2021, 301: 130318
17 Bhattacharyya D, Viswanathan G B, Fraser H L. Crystallographic and morphological relationships between β phase and the Widmanstätten and allotriomorphic α phase at special β grain boundaries in an α/β titanium alloy [J]. Acta Mater., 2007, 55: 6765
18 Qiu J K, Ma Y J, Lei J F, et al. A comparative study on dwell fatigue of Ti-6Al-2Sn-4Zr-xMo (x = 2 to 6) alloys on a microstructure-normalized basis [J]. Metall. Mater. Trans., 2014, 45A: 6075
19 Pilchak A L. A simple model to account for the role of microtexture on fatigue and dwell fatigue lifetimes of titanium alloys [J]. Scr. Mater., 2014, 74: 68
20 Sinha V, Spowart J E, Mills M J, et al. Observations on the faceted initiation site in the dwell-fatigue tested Ti-6242 alloy: Crystallographic orientation and size effects [J]. Metall. Mater. Trans., 2006, 37A: 1507
21 Sun Z C, Li X S, Wu H L, et al. A unified growth model of the secondary grain boundary α phase in TA15 Ti-alloy [J]. J. Alloys Compd., 2016, 689: 693
22 Zheng H J, Fan X G, Zeng X, et al. Crystal orientation and morphology of α lamellae in wrought titanium alloys: On the role of microstructure evolution in β processing [J]. Chin. J. Aeronaut., 2019, 32: 1305
23 Liu T, Germain L, Teixeira J, et al. Hierarchical criteria to promote fast and selective αGB precipitation at β grain boundaries in β- metastable Ti-alloys [J]. Acta Mater., 2017, 141: 97
24 Salib M, Teixeira J, Germain L, et al. Influence of transformation temperature on microtexture formation associated with α precipitation at β grain boundaries in a β metastable titanium alloy [J]. Acta Mater., 2013, 61: 3758
25 Appolaire B, Héricher L, Aeby-Gautier E. Modelling of phase transformation kinetics in Ti alloys—Isothermal treatments [J]. Acta Mater., 2005, 53: 3001
26 Li T, Ahmed M, Sha G, et al. The influence of partitioning on the growth of intragranular α in near-β Ti alloys [J]. J. Alloys Compd., 2015, 643: 212
27 Spanos G, Masumura R A, Vandermeer R A, et al. The evolution and growth kinetics of precipitate plates growing by the ledge mechanism [J]. Acta Metall. Mater., 1994, 42: 4165
28 Shi R, Wang Y. Variant selection during α precipitation in Ti-6Al-4V under the influence of local stress—A simulation study [J]. Acta Mater., 2013, 61: 6006
29 Sharma H, van Bohemen S M C, Petrov R H, et al. Three-dimensional analysis of microstructures in titanium [J]. Acta Mater., 2010, 58: 2399
30 Pang G D, Lin Y C, Jiang Y Q, et al. Precipitation behaviors and orientation evolution mechanisms of α phases in Ti-55511 titanium alloy during heat treatment and subsequent hot deformation [J]. Mater. Charact., 2020, 167: 110471
31 Huang S S, Zhang J H, Ma Y J, et al. Influence of thermal treatment on element partitioning in α + β titanium alloy [J]. J. Alloys Compd., 2019, 791: 575
32 Qi M, Ma Y J, Yang J, et al. Microtexture evolution effected by Mo content in α + β titanium alloys [J]. Mater. Charact., 2022, 188: 111884
33 Joseph S, Bantounas I, Lindley T C, et al. Slip transfer and deformation structures resulting from the low cycle fatigue of near-alpha titanium alloy Ti-6242Si [J]. Int. J. Plast., 2018, 100: 90
34 Wang T, Guo H Z, Tan L J, et al. Beta grain growth behaviour of TG6 and Ti17 titanium alloys [J]. Mater. Sci. Eng., 2011, A528: 6375
35 Obasi G C, Moat R J, Leo Prakash D G, et al. In situ neutron diffraction study of texture evolution and variant selection during the αβα phase transformation in Ti-6Al-4V [J]. Acta Mater., 2012, 60: 7169
36 Gil F X, Rodríguez D, Planell J A. Grain growth kinetics of pure titanium [J]. Scr. Metall. Mater., 1995, 33: 1361
[1] YU Dong, MA Weilong, WANG Yali, WANG Jincheng. Phase Field Modeling of Microstructure Evolution During Solidification and Subsequent Solid-State Phase Transformation of Au-Pt Alloys[J]. 金属学报, 2025, 61(1): 109-116.
[2] TANG Jingtao, YAO Yingjie, ZHANG Youyou, WU Wenhua, LI Yubo, CHEN Hao, YANG Zhigang. Research Progress on the Influence of Metastable Austenite on the Fracture Toughness of High-Strength Steels[J]. 金属学报, 2025, 61(1): 77-87.
[3] WANG Yanxu, GONG Wu, SU Yuhua, LI Bing. Application of Neutron Characterization Techniques to Metallic Structural Materials[J]. 金属学报, 2024, 60(8): 1001-1016.
[4] SHEN Yang, GU Zhengman, WANG Cong. Phase Transformation Behaviors in the Heat-Affected Zones of Ferritic Heat-Resistant Steels Enabled by In Situ CSLM Observation[J]. 金属学报, 2024, 60(6): 802-816.
[5] YANG Weiyang, LI Xianhao, ZHAO Pengfei, YU Haibin, ZHAO Songshan, LUO Haiwen. Changes in the Microstructures and Inhibitors of Grain-Oriented Silicon Steel Under Different Normalizing Processes[J]. 金属学报, 2024, 60(5): 605-615.
[6] YANG Ping, MA Dandan, GU Chen, GU Xinfu. Influence of Initial Microstructure and Cold Rolling Reduction on Transformation Texture and Magnetic Properties of Industrial Low-Grade Electrical Steel[J]. 金属学报, 2024, 60(3): 377-387.
[7] ZHANG Shuqian, MA Yingjie, WANG Qian, QI Min, HUANG Sensen, LEI Jiafeng, YANG Rui. Mechanical Properties and Electrical Conductivity of α + β Titanium Alloy Sheet Regulated by Heat Treatment[J]. 金属学报, 2024, 60(12): 1622-1636.
[8] LI Zhishang, ZHAO Long, ZONG Hongxiang, DING Xiangdong. Machine-Learning Force Fields for Metallic Materials: Phase Transformations and Deformations[J]. 金属学报, 2024, 60(10): 1388-1404.
[9] BAI Jiaming, LIU Jiantao, JIA Jian, ZHANG Yiwen. Creep Properties and Solute Atomic Segregation of High-W and High-Ta Type Powder Metallurgy Superalloy[J]. 金属学报, 2023, 59(9): 1230-1242.
[10] FENG Aihan, CHEN Qiang, WANG Jian, WANG Hao, QU Shoujiang, CHEN Daolun. Thermal Stability of Microstructures in Low-Density Ti2AlNb-Based Alloy Hot Rolled Plate[J]. 金属学报, 2023, 59(6): 777-786.
[11] WANG Chongyang, HAN Shiwei, XIE Feng, HU Long, DENG Dean. Influence of Solid-State Phase Transformation and Softening Effect on Welding Residual Stress of Ultra-High Strength Steel[J]. 金属学报, 2023, 59(12): 1613-1623.
[12] ZHANG Kaiyuan, DONG Wenchao, ZHAO Dong, LI Shijian, LU Shanping. Effect of Solid-State Phase Transformation on Stress and Distortion for Fe-Co-Ni Ultra-High Strength Steel Components During Welding and Vacuum Gas Quenching Processes[J]. 金属学报, 2023, 59(12): 1633-1643.
[13] LI Sai, YANG Zenan, ZHANG Chi, YANG Zhigang. Phase Field Study of the Diffusional Paths in Pearlite-Austenite Transformation[J]. 金属学报, 2023, 59(10): 1376-1388.
[14] LI Xiaobing, QIAN Kun, SHU Lei, ZHANG Mengshu, ZHANG Jinhu, CHEN Bo, LIU Kui. Effect of W Content on the Phase Transformation Behavior in Ti-42Al-5Mn- xW Alloy[J]. 金属学报, 2023, 59(10): 1401-1410.
[15] LI Xueda, LI Chunyu, CAO Ning, LIN Xueqiang, SUN Jianbo. Crystallography of Reverted Austenite in the Intercritically Reheated Coarse-Grained Heat-Affected Zone of High Strength Pipeline Steel[J]. 金属学报, 2021, 57(8): 967-976.
No Suggested Reading articles found!