Optimization of Stainless Steel Composition for Fuel Cell Bipolar Plates
HUANG Yichuan1, WANG Qing1, ZHANG Shuang2, DONG Chuang1,2(), WU Aimin1, LIN Guoqiang1
1.Key Laboratory of Materials Modification by Laser, Ion and Electron Beams, Ministry of Education, Dalian University of Technology, Dalian 116024, China 2.School of Materials Science and Engineering, Dalian Jiaotong University, Dalian 116028, China
Cite this article:
HUANG Yichuan, WANG Qing, ZHANG Shuang, DONG Chuang, WU Aimin, LIN Guoqiang. Optimization of Stainless Steel Composition for Fuel Cell Bipolar Plates. Acta Metall Sin, 2021, 57(5): 651-664.
316 stainless steel is the first choice for bipolar plate material in fuel cells; however, it suffers from passivation-induced corrosion and conductivity deficiencies. In this work, Fe-Cr-Ni alloy was refined using the cluster-plus-glue-atom model to obtain stainless steels with balanced corrosion and electrical performances. For austenite 316L stainless steel, the unit is described as a 16-atom cluster formula [Ni-Fe11Ni1]Cr3. By fixing the three atoms of a glue, Cr3 is required to achieve sufficient corrosion resistance, and new compositions with varying Ni contents are designed following [Ni-Fe13-xNix-1]Cr3 = Fe13-xNixCr3 (x = 1-5). The designed alloys were arc melted at least five times, copper-mold suction casted into 10-mm cylindrical rods under an argon atmosphere, homogenized at 1150oC for 2 h, and water quenched. Under the simulated bipolar plate service environment (0.5 mol/L H2SO4 + 2 × 10-6 HF aqueous solution), as the Ni content increases, the self-corrosion current density decreases to 1.10 and 0.29 μA/cm2 after acid passivation and electrochemical nitridation, respectively. These values are well below compared to the commercial 316L stainless steel (7.51 and 0.47 μA/cm2) and close to the current industry target (0.5 μA/cm2) for bipolar plates. At the same time, the contact electrical resistance (under 0.064 MPa pressure) decreases to 0.98 and 1.03 Ω·cm2 after acid passivation and electrochemical nitridation, respectively, which is superior to the 316L stainless steel (1.1 Ω·cm2). Thus, optimal alloy composition [Ni-Fe10Ni2]Cr3 can be used as the right substrate material of the bipolar plate instead of the 316L stainless steel. The electrochemical nitridation method is the proper surface treatment method for stainless steel bipolar plates, and this method improves the alloy's corrosion resistance while maintaining the same level of contact resistance.
Table 1 Fe-Cr-Ni alloys designed using the cluster [Ni-Fe13-xNix-1]Cr3, together with the composition and cluster formula of the reference 316L alloy
Fig.2 Designed alloys and 316L in Schaeffler diagram (A—austenite, F—ferrite, M—martensite; (M)—mass fraction of element M)
Fig.3 XRD spectra of the designed alloys after solution (1150oC, 2 h) and water-quenching treatment
Fig.4 OM images of the designed alloys after solution and water-quenching treatment
Fig.5 Hardness of the the designed alloy and reference alloy (316L stainless steel) vs their Ni equivalents
Fig.6 Open circuit potential (Eocp)-time (t) curves of the designed and reference alloys before and after passivation treatment
Fig.7 Dynamic potential polarization curves of the designed and reference alloys before (a) and after (b) acid passivation treatment in 0.5 mol/L H2SO4 + 2 × 10-6 HF aqueous solution (i—corrosion current density, E—potential)
Cluster
Before passivation
After passivation
Ecorr / mV
icorr / (μA·cm-2)
Ecorr / mV
icorr / (μA·cm-2)
[Ni-Fe12]Cr3
-456.64
138.15
-287.18
14.39
[Ni-Fe11.5Ni0.5]Cr3
-392.75
166.39
-251.04
10.59
[Ni-Fe11Ni]Cr3
-303.94
129.03
-228.72
7.16
[Ni-Fe10.5Ni1.5]Cr3
-270.71
109.26
-227.14
4.09
[Ni-Fe10Ni2]Cr3
-265.21
130.25
-224.98
1.68
[Ni-Fe9Ni3]Cr3
-262.08
111.49
-227.63
2.22
[Ni-Fe8Ni4]Cr3
-230.26
75.60
-219.29
1.10
[Ni-Fe11Ni1] Mo0.2Cr2.9(316L)
-291.07
78.28
-264.47
7.51
Table 2 Self-corrosion potential (Ecorr) and self-corrosion current density (icorr) of the designed and reference alloys before and after the acid passivation
Fig.8 Ecorr and icorr of the designed and reference alloys after passivation vs their Ni equivalents
Fig.9 Mott-Schottky curves of the designed and reference alloys after acid passivation (Csc—space-charge capacitance)
Fig.10 Carrier concentrations of the designed and reference alloys after acid passivation vs their Ni equivalents (Nd—donor density, Na—acceptor density)
Cluster
②: Nd
1023 cm-3
③: Na
1023 cm-3
[Ni-Fe12]Cr3
0.91
0.90
[Ni-Fe11.5Ni0.5]Cr3
2.38
1.86
[Ni-Fe11Ni]Cr3
2.47
1.96
[Ni-Fe10.5Ni1.5]Cr3
2.50
2.07
[Ni-Fe10Ni2]Cr3
2.54
2.15
[Ni-Fe9Ni3]Cr3
2.59
2.21
[Ni-Fe8Ni4]Cr3
2.69
2.23
[Ni-Fe11Ni1] Mo0.2Cr2.9 (316L)
0.78
0.85
Table 3 Carrier concentrations of the designed alloys after acid passivation, with Nd and Na fitted from zones ② and ③ in Fig.9, respectively
Cluster
δsc / 10-6 cm
[Ni-Fe12]Cr3
2.86
[Ni-Fe11.5Ni0.5]Cr3
1.95
[Ni-Fe11Ni]Cr3
1.83
[Ni-Fe10.5Ni1.5]Cr3
1.79
[Ni-Fe10Ni2]Cr3
1.77
[Ni-Fe9Ni3]Cr3
1.75
[Ni-Fe8Ni4]Cr3
1.75
[Ni-Fe11Ni1] Mo0.2Cr2.9(316L)
2.89
Table 4 Space charge layer thickness (δsc) of the designed and reference alloys after acid passivation
Fig.11 Open circuit potential-time curves of the designed and reference alloys before and after electrochemical nitridation
Fig.12 Dynamic potential polarization curves of the designed and reference alloys before (a) and after (b) electrochemical nitridation in 0.5 mol/L H2SO4 + 2 × 10-6 HF aqueous solution
Cluster
Before passivation
After passivation
Ecorr / mV
icorr / (μA·cm-2)
Ecorr / mV
icorr / (μA·cm-2)
[Ni-Fe12]Cr3
-456.64
138.15
-273.80
1.03
[Ni-Fe11.5Ni0.5]Cr3
-392.75
166.39
1.59
0.48
[Ni-Fe11Ni]Cr3
-303.94
129.03
30.77
0.48
[Ni-Fe10.5Ni1.5]Cr3
-270.71
109.26
42.17
0.45
[Ni-Fe10Ni2]Cr3
-265.21
130.25
92.22
0.43
[Ni-Fe9Ni3]Cr3
-262.08
111.49
78.41
0.28
[Ni-Fe8Ni4]Cr3
-230.26
75.60
134.23
0.29
[Ni-Fe11Ni1] Mo0.2Cr2.9 (316L)
-291.07
78.28
19.00
0.47
Table 5 Ecorr and icorr of the designed and reference alloys before and after electrochemical nitridation
Fig.13 Ecorr and icorr of alloys after electrochemical nitridation vs their Ni equivalents
Fig.14 Mott-Schottky curves of alloys after electrochemical nitridation
Cluster
②: Nd
1021 cm-3
③: Na
1021 cm-3
[Ni-Fe12]Cr3
0.94
1.02
[Ni-Fe11.5Ni0.5]Cr3
1.00
1.08
[Ni-Fe11Ni]Cr3
1.01
1.08
[Ni-Fe10.5Ni1.5]Cr3
1.05
1.05
[Ni-Fe10Ni2]Cr3
1.03
1.18
[Ni-Fe9Ni3]Cr3
1.05
1.13
[Ni-Fe8Ni4]Cr3
1.25
1.37
[Ni-Fe11Ni1] Mo0.2Cr2.9 (316L)
1.03
1.16
Table 6 Carrier concentrations of the designed alloys after electrochemical nitridation
Cluster
δsc / 10-6 cm
[Ni-Fe12]Cr3
9.26
[Ni-Fe11.5Ni0.5]Cr3
9.13
[Ni-Fe11Ni]Cr3
9.06
[Ni-Fe10.5Ni1.5]Cr3
9.03
[Ni-Fe10Ni2]Cr3
8.96
[Ni-Fe9Ni3]Cr3
8.77
[Ni-Fe8Ni4]Cr3
8.05
[Ni-Fe11Ni1] Mo0.2Cr2.9(316L)
8.91
Table 7 δsc of the designed and reference alloys after electrochemical nitridation
Cluster
Passivation method
ICR / (Ω·cm2) (0.064 MPa)
Before
After
[Ni-Fe12]Cr3
Acid passivation
0.26
1.16
[Ni-Fe11.5Ni0.5]Cr3
Acid passivation
0.27
1.12
[Ni-Fe11Ni]Cr3
Acid passivation
0.41
1.10
[Ni-Fe10.5Ni1.5]Cr3
Acid passivation
0.46
1.04
Electrochemical nitriding
0.46
1.07
[Ni-Fe10Ni2]Cr3
Acid passivation
0.51
0.99
Electrochemical nitriding
0.51
1.03
[Ni-Fe9Ni3]Cr3
Acid passivation
0.49
0.98
[Ni-Fe8Ni4]Cr3
Acid passivation
0.50
0.98
Table 8 Interfacial contact resistance (ICR) of the designed and reference alloys after acid passivation and electrochemical nitridation
Fig.15 ICR of alloys after acid passivation vs their Ni equivalents
1
Huang N B, Yi B L, Hou M, et al. Review on thin metal bipolar plates for PEMFC [J]. Prog. Chem., 2005, 17: 963
Wang H, Turner J A. Reviewing metallic PEMFC bipolar plates [J]. Fuel Cells, 2010, 10: 510
4
Yang L J, Wei H J, Zhu L, et al. Present research state and prospects for bipolar plates of proton exchange membrane fuel cells [J]. Met. Funct. Mater., 2009, 16(5): 50
Matsuura T, Kato M, Hori M. Study on metallic bipolar plate for proton exchange membrane fuel cell [J]. J. Power Sources, 2006, 161: 74
6
Wang H L, Sweikart M A, Turner J A. Stainless steel as bipolar plate material for polymer electrolyte membrane fuel cells [J]. J. Power Sources, 2003, 115: 243
7
Jannat S, Rashtchi H, Atapour M, et al. Preparation and performance of nanometric Ti/TiN multi-layer physical vapor deposited coating on 316L stainless steel as bipolar plate for proton exchange membrane fuel cells [J]. J. Power Sources, 2019, 435: 226818
8
Hentall P L, Lakeman J B, Mepsted G O, et al. New materials for polymer electrolyte membrane fuel cell current collectors [J]. J. Power Sources, 1999, 80: 235
9
Wang S L, Hou M, Zhao Q, et al. Ti/(Ti, Cr)N/CrN multilayer coated 316L stainless steel by arc ion plating as bipolar plates for proton exchange membrane fuel cells [J]. J. Energy Chem., 2017, 26: 168
10
Wu A M, Hao K G, Wang M C, et al. Fuel cell metal bipolar plate surface modification material technology: From basic material research to application technology development [A]. Abstracts of TFC' National Symposium on Thin Film Technology [C]. Hefei, China Academic Journal Electronic Pubishing House, 2017: 68
Song Y, Zhang C, Ling C, et al. Review on current research of materials, fabrication and application for bipolar plate in proton exchange membrane fuel cell [J]. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy, 2020, 45: 29832
12
André J, Antoni L, Petit J P, et al. Electrical contact resistance between stainless steel bipolar plate and carbon felt in PEFC: A comprehensive study [J]. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy, 2009, 34: 3125
13
Hermann A, Chaudhuri T, Spagnol P. Bipolar plates for PEM fuel cells: A review [J]. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy, 2005, 30: 1297
14
Davies D P, Adcock P L, Turpin M, et al. Bipolar plate materials for solid polymer fuel cells [J]. J. Appl. Electrochem., 2000, 30: 101
15
Dong C, Dong D D, Wang Q. Chemical units in solid solutions and alloy composition design [J]. Acta Metall. Sin., 2018, 54: 293
Jiang B B, Wang Q, Dong C. A cluster-formula composition design approach based on the local short-range order in solid solution structure [J]. Acta Phys. Sin., 2017, 66: 026102
Dong C, Wang Q, Qiang J B, et al. From clusters to phase diagrams: Composition rules of quasicrystals and bulk metallic glasses [J]. J. Phys., 2007, 40D: R273
18
Li Z, Zhang R Q, Zha Q F, et al. Composition design of superhigh strength maraging stainless steels using a cluster model [J]. Prog. Nat. Sci.: Mater. Int., 2014, 24: 35
19
Schaeffler A L. Constitution diagram for stainless steel weld metal [J]. Met. Prog., 1949, 56: 680
20
Wang Q, Zha Q F, Liu E X, et al. Composition design of high-strength martensitic precipitation hardening stainless steels based on a cluster model [J]. Acta Metall. Sin., 2012, 48: 1201
Lee S, Lee C Y, Lee Y K. Schaeffler diagram for high Mn steels [J]. J. Alloys Compd., 2015, 628: 46
22
Wang H L, Sweikart M A, Turner J A. Stainless steel as bipolar plate material for polymer electrolyte membrane fuel cells [J]. J. Power Sources, 2003, 115: 243
23
Lizlovs E A, Bond A P. Anodic polarization of some ferritic stainless steels in chloride media [J]. J. Electrochem. Soc., 1969, 116: 574
24
Alves V A, Brett C M A. Characterisation of passive films formed on mild steels in bicarbonate solution by EIS [J]. Electrochim. Acta, 2002, 47: 2081
25
Chen H Y. Electrochemical nitridation of 316L stainless steel for PEMFC bipolar plates [D]. Tainan: National Cheng Kung University, 2013
Dong Z H, Zhou T, Liu J, et al. Performance of surface chromizing layer on 316L stainless steel for proton exchange membrane fuel cell bipolar plates [J]. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy, 2019, 44: 22110
27
Zhang M, Wu B, Lin G Q, et al. Arc ion plated Cr/CrN/Cr multilayers on 316L stainless steel as bipolar plates for polymer electrolyte membrane fuel cells [J]. J. Power Sources, 2011, 196: 3249
28
Tian R J. Chromium nitride/Cr coated 316L stainless steel as bipolar plate for proton exchange membrane fuel cell [J]. J. Power Sources, 2011, 196: 1258