Please wait a minute...
Acta Metall Sin  2017, Vol. 53 Issue (2): 153-162    DOI: 10.11900/0412.1961.2016.00143
Orginal Article Current Issue | Archive | Adv Search |
Study on Microbiologically Influenced Corrosion Behavior of Novel Cu-Bearing Pipeline Steels
Xianbo SHI1,2,Dake XU1,Maocheng YAN1,Wei YAN1,Yiyin SHAN1,Ke YANG1()
1 Institute of Metal Research, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shenyang 110016, China
2 University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China
Cite this article: 

Xianbo SHI,Dake XU,Maocheng YAN,Wei YAN,Yiyin SHAN,Ke YANG. Study on Microbiologically Influenced Corrosion Behavior of Novel Cu-Bearing Pipeline Steels. Acta Metall Sin, 2017, 53(2): 153-162.

Download:  HTML  PDF(7965KB) 
Export:  BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)      
Abstract  

Microbiologically influenced corrosion (MIC) is a major corrosion related problem for steel pipelines. The great loss caused by microbiologically influenced corrosion (MIC) on buried pipelines has been paid considerable attention domestically and internationally. Various physical, chemical or biological strategies have been used for MIC control, including biocides, coatings, cathodic protection and biocompetitive exclusion. These strategies have limitations of being expensive, subject to environmental restrictions, and sometimes inefficient. There is an urgent need for oil industry to develop environmentally friendly strategies for microbial corrosion control. Cu could play many benefical effects in steels, such as exerting a vigorous effect on hardenability, enhancing strength via precipitation strengthening, improving fatigue resistance, reducing susceptibility of hydrogen embrittlement, promoting formation protective layer etc.. Cu is well known for its inherent antimicrobial properties and is the focus of interest for potential application as a component in antibacterial materials. The Cu-bearing antibacterial stainless steel, characterized by continuous release of Cu ions with antibacterial function, provides analogy to develop a new type of MIC resistance pipeline steel. In this work, three different Cu contents (1.06Cu,1.46Cu,2.00Cu, mass fraction, %) pipeline steels, named 1.0Cu, 1.5Cu and 2.0Cu, were fabricated by making proper Cu alloying designs for X80 steel that currently used in oil/gas industry. Study on antibacterial performance and MIC behavior of novel Cu-bearing pipeline steels against Escherichiacoli (E.coli), Staphylococcusaureus (S.aureus) and Sulphate reducing bacteria (SRB) was carried out by antibacterial tests, electrochemistrical monitor, corrosion product analyses and confocal laser scanning microscope (CLSM). The results showed that Cu-bearing pipeline steels had strong antibacterial performance against E.coli and S.aureus compared with X80 steel. 1.0Cu steel with the microstructure of polygonal ferrite showed excellent resistance to SRB with remarkable strength enhancement by nano-scale Cu-rich precipitates and good impact toughness compared with X80 steel. Cu-rich precipitates in Cu-bearing pipeline steels were found to be responsible for the antibacterial capability. The linear polarization resistances (RLPR) of both X80 and 1.0Cu steels in the soil-extract solution with SRB were dramatically decreased after 2 d, leading to the corrosion current density (icorr) value of X80 steel was much higher than that of 1.0Cu steel. The corrosion product analysis results showed that much biofilm produced by SRB was the reason that many pits and larger pit depth on X80 steel than that of 1.0Cu steel.

Key words:  pipeline steel      Cu      microbiologically influenced corrosion      Cu-rich phase      antibacterial performance     
Received:  18 April 2016     
Fund: Supported by National Key Technology Support Program (No.2011BAE25B03) and National Natural Science Foundation of China (No.51271175)

URL: 

https://www.ams.org.cn/EN/10.11900/0412.1961.2016.00143     OR     https://www.ams.org.cn/EN/Y2017/V53/I2/153

Steel C Si Mn Mo Cu Ni Nb S P Cr V Fe
1.0Cu 0.031 0.14 1.09 0.31 1.06 0.32 0.05 0.0011 0.005 0.32 - Bal.
1.5Cu 0.019 0.12 1.03 0.31 1.46 0.31 0.05 0.0011 0.005 0.31 - Bal.
2.0Cu 0.023 0.13 1.06 0.30 2.00 0.30 0.05 0.0010 0.005 0.30 - Bal.
X80 0.028 0.28 1.90 0.22 0.20 0.29 0.08 0.0020 0.012 - 0.03 Bal.
Table 1  Chemical compositions of the experimental steels (mass fraction / %)
Fig.1  OM images of as-rolled Cu-bearing pipeline steels and X80 steel (a, c, e, g), and corresponding TEM images aged at 500 ℃ for 1 h (b, d, f, h)s
(a, b) 1.0Cu steel (c, d) 1.5Cu steel (e, f) 2.0Cu steel (g, h) X80 steel
Steel As-rolled As-aged (500 ℃, 1 h)
σs / MPa σb / MPa δ / % AkV / J σs / MPa σb / MPa δ / % AkV / J
1.0Cu 443 651 30.0 141** 646 722 26.5 114**
1.5Cu 513 645 28.0 82** 728 794 24.0 60**
2.0Cu 608 759 25.0 66** 832 909 20.5 42**
X80 608 677 23.5 134** * * * *
Table 2  Mechanical properties of the experimental steels
Fig.2  Antibacterial rates against Escherichiacoli (E.coli) and Staphylococcusaureus (S.aureus) of Cu-bearing pipeline steels under aged and rolled conditions, respectively
Fig.3  Representative photos of antibacterial performance against E.coli on petridishes cultured with X80 steel and Cu-bearing pipeline steels
(a) X80 steel (b) 1.0Cu steel (c) 1.5Cu steel (d) 2.0Cu steel
Fig.4  Representative photos of antibacterial performance against S.aureus on petridishes cultured with X80 steel and Cu-bearing pipeline steels
(a) X80 steel (b) 1.0Cu steel, as-aged (c) 1.5Cu steel, as-aged (d) 2.0Cu steel, as-aged s
(e) 1.0Cu steel, as-rolled (f) 1.5Cu steel, as-rolled (g) 2.0Cu steel, as-rolled
Fig.5  Variations of linear polarization resistances (RLPR) (a) and corrosion current (icorr) (b) with exposure time for X80 and 1.0Cu steels in the soil-extract solution with sulphate reducing bacteria (SRB) at 30 ℃
Fig.6  Morphologies (a, b) and EDS analyses (c, d) of 1.0Cu (a, c) and X80 (b, d) steels exposed to soil-extract solution with SRB after 20 d immersion
Fig.7  Morphologies of 1.0Cu steel (a) and X80 steel (b) exposed to soil-extract solution with SRB after removing corrosion products
Fig.8  3D images of the largest pit morphology on 1.0Cu (a) and X80 (b) steels exposed to soil-extract solution with SRB after 20 d immersion
[1] Liu H W, Xu D K, Wu Y N, et al.Research progress in corrosion of steels induced by sulfate reducing bacteria[J]. Corros. Sci. Prot. Technol., 2015, 27: 409
[1] (刘宏伟, 徐大可, 吴亚楠等. 微生物生物膜下的钢铁材料腐蚀研究进展[J]. 腐蚀科学与防护技术, 2015, 27: 409)
[2] Videla H A.Manual of Biocorrosion[D][M]. Boca Raton: CRC-Press, 1996: 13
[3] Javaherdashti R.A review of some characteristics of MIC caused by sulfate-reducing bacteria: past, present and future[J]. Anti-Corros. Method. M., 1999, 46: 173
[4] Videla H A.Prevention and control of biocorrosion[J]. Int. Biodeter. Biodegr., 2002, 49: 259
[5] Li S Y, Kim Y G, Jeon K S, et al.Microbiologically influenced corrosion of underground pipelines under the disbonded coatings[J]. Met. Mater., 2000, 6: 281
[6] Jacobson G A.Corrosion at prudhoe bay—A lesson on the line[J]. Mater. Perform., 2007, 46: 26
[7] Bhat S, Kumar B, Prasad S R, et al.Failure of a new 8-in pipeline from group gathering station to central tank farm[J]. Mater. Perform., 2011, 50: 50
[8] Niu T, Yang J W, Wang L, et al.Pitting mechanism of X60 pipeline steel under the action of SRB[J]. Corros. Prot., 2014, 35: 1060
[8] (牛涛, 杨建炜, 王林等. 硫酸盐还原菌作用下X60管线钢的腐蚀穿孔机制[J]. 腐蚀与防护, 2014, 35: 1060)
[9] Yin Y S, Dong L H, Liu T, et al.Microbiologically Influenced Corrosion of Materials Used in Ocean [M]. Beijing: Chemical Science Press, 2012: 1
[9] (尹衍升, 董丽华, 刘涛等. 海洋材料的微生物附着腐蚀 [M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 2012: 1)
[10] Hall-Stoodley L, Costerton J W, Stoodley P.Bacterial biofilms: from the natural environment to infectious diseases[J]. Nat. Rev. Microbiol., 2004, 2: 95
[11] Wang M F, Liu H F, Xu L M.Applied research on the competitive growth of bacteria in biological control of MIC[J]. J. Chin. Soc. Corros. Prot., 2004, 24: 159
[11] (汪梅芳, 刘宏芳, 许立铭. 细菌竞争生长在微生物腐蚀防治中的应用研究[J]. 中国腐蚀与防护学报, 2004, 24: 159)
[12] Dong Z H, Guo X P, Liu H F.Study on electrochemistry characteristics in MIC by wire beam electrodes[J]. J. Chin. Soc. Corros. Prot., 2002, 22: 48
[12] (董泽华, 郭兴蓬, 刘宏芳. 用丝束电极研究SRB微生物诱导腐蚀的电化学特征[J]. 中国腐蚀与防护学报, 2002, 22: 48)
[13] Venzlaff H, Enning D, Srinivasan J, et al.Accelerated cathodic reaction in microbial corrosion of iron due to direct electron uptake by sulfate-reducing bacteria[J]. Corros. Sci., 2013, 66: 88
[14] Xu D K, Li Y C, Song F M, et al.Laboratory investigation of microbiologically influenced corrosion of C1018 carbon steel by nitrate reducing bacterium Bacillus licheniformis[J]. Corros. Sci., 2013, 77: 385
[15] Xu D K, Li Y C, Gu T Y.Mechanistic modeling of biocorrosion caused by biofilms of sulfate reducing bacteria and acid producing bacteria[J]. Bioelectrochemistry, 2016, 110: 52
[16] Li H B, Zhou E Z, Zhang D W, et al.Microbiologically influenced corrosion of 2707 hyper-duplex stainless steel by marine Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilm[J]. Sci. Rep., 2016, 6: 20190
[17] Xu D K, Gu T Y.Carbon source starvation triggered more aggressive corrosion against carbon steel by the Desulfovibrio vulgaris biofilm[J]. Int. Biodeter. Biodegr., 2014, 91: 74
[18] Xia J, Xu D K, Nan L, et al.Study on mechanisms of microbiologically influenced corrision of metal from the perspective of bio-electrochemistry and bio-energetics[J]. Chin. J. Mater. Res., 2016, 30: 161
[18] (夏进, 徐大可, 南黎等. 从生物能量学和生物电化学角度研究金属微生物腐蚀的机理[J]. 材料研究学报, 2016, 30: 161)
[19] Yan M C, Wang J Q, Han E-H, et al.Characteristics and evolution of thin layer electrolyte on pipeline steel under cathodic protection shielding disbonded coating[J]. Acta Metall. Sin., 2014, 50: 1137
[19] (闫茂成, 王俭秋, 韩恩厚等. 埋地管线阴极保护屏蔽剥离涂层下薄液腐蚀环境特征及演化[J]. 金属学报, 2014, 50: 1137)
[20] Chen S H, Lv M Q, Zhang J D, et al.Microstructure and antibacterial properties of Cu-contained antibacterial stainless steel[J]. Acta Metall. Sin.,2004, 40: 314
[20] (陈四红, 吕曼祺, 张敬党等. 含Cu抗菌不锈钢的微观组织及其抗菌性能[D] [J]. 金属学报, 2004, 40: 314)
[21] Nan L, Liu Y Q, Yang W C, et al.Study on antibacterial properties of copper-containing antibacterial stainless steels[J]. Acta Metall. Sin., 2007, 43: 1065
[21] (南黎, 刘永前, 杨伟超等. 含铜抗菌不锈钢的抗菌特性研究[J]. 金属学报, 2007, 43: 1065)
[22] Wang S, Yang C G, Xu D K, et al.Effect of heat treatment on antibacterial performance of 3Cr13MoCu martensitic stainless steel[J]. Acta Metall. Sin., 2014, 50: 1453
[22] (王帅, 杨春光, 徐大可等. 热处理对3Cr13MoCu马氏体不锈钢抗菌性能的影响[J]. 金属学报, 2014, 50: 1453)
[23] Wu T Q, Ding W C, Zeng D C, et al.Microbiologically induced corrosion of X80 pipeline steel in an acid soil solution: (I) electrochemical analysis[J]. J. Chin. Soc. Corros. Prot., 2014, 34: 346
[23] (吴堂清, 丁万成, 曾德春等. 酸性土壤浸出液中X80钢微生物腐蚀研究: (I) 电化学分析[J]. 中国腐蚀与防护学报, 2014, 34: 346)
[24] Zhao M C, Xiao F R, Shan Y Y, et al.Microstructural characteristic and toughening of an ultralow carbon acicular ferrite pipeline steel[J]. Acta Metall. Sin., 2002, 38: 283
[24] (赵明纯, 肖福仁, 单以银等. 超低碳针状铁素体管线钢的显微特征及强韧性行为[J]. 金属学报, 2002, 38: 283)
[25] Nan L, Cheng J L, Yang K.Antibacterial behavior of a Cu-bearing type 200 stainless steel[J]. J. Mater. Sci. Technol., 2012, 28: 1067
[26] Ren L, Yang K.Bio-functional design for metal implants, a new concept for development of metallic biomaterials[J]. J. Mater. Sci. Technol., 2013, 29: 1005
[27] Zou Y, Wang J, Zheng Y Y.Electrochemical techniques for determining corrosion rate of rusted steel in seawater[J]. Corros. Sci., 2011, 53: 208
[28] Wu T Q, Xu J, Yan M C, et al.Synergistic effect of sulfate-reducing bacteria and elastic stress on corrosion of X80 steel in soil solution[J]. Corros. Sci., 2014, 83: 38
[29] Alabbas F M, Williamson C, Bhola S M, et al.Influence of sulfate reducing bacterial biofilm on corrosion behavior of low-alloy, high-strength steel (API-5L X80)[J]. Int. Biodeter. Biodegr., 2013, 78: 34
[30] Castaneda H, Benetton X D.SRB-biofilm influence in active corrosion sites formed at the steel-electrolyte interface when exposed to artificial seawater conditions[J]. Corros. Sci., 2008, 50: 1169
[31] O'Gorman J, Humphreys H. Application of copper to prevent and control infection. Where are we now?[J]. J. Hosp. Infect., 2012, 81: 217
[32] Shi X B, Yan W, Wang W, et al.Novel Cu-bearing high-strength pipeline steels with excellent resistance to hydrogen-induced cracking[J]. Mater. Des., 2016, 92: 300
[1] CHANG Songtao, ZHANG Fang, SHA Yuhui, ZUO Liang. Recrystallization Texture Competition Mediated by Segregation Element in Body-Centered Cubic Metals[J]. 金属学报, 2023, 59(8): 1065-1074.
[2] MU Yahang, ZHANG Xue, CHEN Ziming, SUN Xiaofeng, LIANG Jingjing, LI Jinguo, ZHOU Yizhou. Modeling of Crack Susceptibility of Ni-Based Superalloy for Additive Manufacturing via Thermodynamic Calculation and Machine Learning[J]. 金属学报, 2023, 59(8): 1075-1086.
[3] LI Xiaohan, CAO Gongwang, GUO Mingxiao, PENG Yunchao, MA Kaijun, WANG Zhenyao. Initial Corrosion Behavior of Carbon Steel Q235, Pipeline Steel L415, and Pressure Vessel Steel 16MnNi Under High Humidity and High Irradiation Coastal-Industrial Atmosphere in Zhanjiang[J]. 金属学报, 2023, 59(7): 884-892.
[4] WANG Zongpu, WANG Weiguo, Rohrer Gregory S, CHEN Song, HONG Lihua, LIN Yan, FENG Xiaozheng, REN Shuai, ZHOU Bangxin. {111}/{111} Near Singular Boundaries in an Al-Zn-Mg-Cu Alloy Recrystallized After Rolling at Different Temperatures[J]. 金属学报, 2023, 59(7): 947-960.
[5] WU Dongjiang, LIU Dehua, ZHANG Ziao, ZHANG Yilun, NIU Fangyong, MA Guangyi. Microstructure and Mechanical Properties of 2024 Aluminum Alloy Prepared by Wire Arc Additive Manufacturing[J]. 金属学报, 2023, 59(6): 767-776.
[6] WANG Hanyu, LI Cai, ZHAO Can, ZENG Tao, WANG Zumin, HUANG Yuan. Direct Alloying of Immiscible Tungsten and Copper Based on Nano Active Structure and Its Thermodynamic Mechanism[J]. 金属学报, 2023, 59(5): 679-692.
[7] LIU Manping, XUE Zhoulei, PENG Zhen, CHEN Yulin, DING Lipeng, JIA Zhihong. Effect of Post-Aging on Microstructure and Mechanical Properties of an Ultrafine-Grained 6061 Aluminum Alloy[J]. 金属学报, 2023, 59(5): 657-667.
[8] XU Linjie, LIU Hui, REN Ling, YANG Ke. Effect of Cu on In-Stent Restenosis and Corrosion Resistance of Ni-Ti Alloy[J]. 金属学报, 2023, 59(4): 577-584.
[9] ZHANG Zhefeng, LI Keqiang, CAI Tuo, LI Peng, ZHANG Zhenjun, LIU Rui, YANG Jinbo, ZHANG Peng. Effects of Stacking Fault Energy on the Deformation Mechanisms and Mechanical Properties of Face-Centered Cubic Metals[J]. 金属学报, 2023, 59(4): 467-477.
[10] WAN Tao, CHENG Zhao, LU Lei. Effect of Component Proportion on Mechanical Behaviors of Laminated Nanotwinned Cu[J]. 金属学报, 2023, 59(4): 567-576.
[11] HAN Weizhong, LU Yan, ZHANG Yuheng. Mechanism of Ductile-to-Brittle Transition in Body-Centered-Cubic Metals:A Brief Review[J]. 金属学报, 2023, 59(3): 335-348.
[12] ZHANG Yuexin, WANG Jujin, YANG Wen, ZHANG Lifeng. Effect of Cooling Rate on the Evolution of Nonmetallic Inclusions in a Pipeline Steel[J]. 金属学报, 2023, 59(12): 1603-1612.
[13] GONG Xiangpeng, WU Cuilan, LUO Shifang, SHEN Ruohan, YAN Jun. Effect of Natural Aging on Artificial Aging of an Al-2.95Cu-1.55Li-0.57Mg-0.18Zr Alloy at 160oC[J]. 金属学报, 2023, 59(11): 1428-1438.
[14] HOU Xuru, ZHAO Lin, REN Shubin, PENG Yun, MA Chengyong, TIAN Zhiling. Effect of Heat Input on Microstructure and Mechanical Properties of Marine High Strength Steel Fabricated by Wire Arc Additive Manufacturing[J]. 金属学报, 2023, 59(10): 1311-1323.
[15] HAN Dong, ZHANG Yanjie, LI Xiaowu. Effect of Short-Range Ordering on the Tension-Tension Fatigue Deformation Behavior and Damage Mechanisms of Cu-Mn Alloys with High Stacking Fault Energies[J]. 金属学报, 2022, 58(9): 1208-1220.
No Suggested Reading articles found!