|
|
PHASE-FIELD MODELLING OF THE MARTENSITIC TRANSFORMATION IN SHAPE MEMORYALLOY Au30Cu25Zn45 |
Pengcheng SONG1,Wenbo LIU2,Lei CHEN3,Chi ZHANG1,Zhigang YANG1( ) |
1 Key Laboratory of Advanced Materials of Ministry of Education, School of Materials Science and Engineering, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China. 2 School of Nuclear Science and Technology, Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an 710049, China. 3 Department of Mechanical Engineering, Mississippi State University, MS 39762, USA |
|
Cite this article:
Pengcheng SONG,Wenbo LIU,Lei CHEN,Chi ZHANG,Zhigang YANG. PHASE-FIELD MODELLING OF THE MARTENSITIC TRANSFORMATION IN SHAPE MEMORYALLOY Au30Cu25Zn45. Acta Metall Sin, 2016, 52(8): 1000-1008.
|
|
Abstract Applications of shape memory alloys require them have the ability to undergo back and forth through the solid-to-solid martensitic phase transformations for many times without degradation of properties (termed “reversibility”). Low hysteresis and small migration of transformation temperature under cycling are the macroscopic manifestation of high reversibility. By the crystallographic theory of martensite, materials with certain crystalline symmetry and geometric compatibility tend to form no-stressed transformation interface and have exce-llent functional stability. In the theory, several conditions that corresponding to extremely low hysteresis are specified. Stronger compatibility conditions which lead to even better reversibility have been theoretically proposed, those conditions are called “cofactor conditions”. Recently, for the first time, experimental results find out the shape memory alloy Au30Cu25Zn45 that closely satisfy the cofactor conditions. Enhanced reversibility with thermal hysteresis of 2.045 ℃, and the unusual riverine microstructure are found in Au30Cu25Zn45. However, their studies are limited to crystallographic analysis, and haven't provided enough details of microstructural evolution in martensitic transformation. Furthermore, it is the evolution of microstructures that leads to an extremely low thermal hysteresis in this alloy. Thus, making clear of evolution of microstructures in martensitic transformation in this alloy is of great importance. So, in the present work, the phase field method was applied, in which the microstructure is described by Landau theory of martensitic transformation, Khachaturyan-Shatalov's phase field microelasticity theory, and thermodynamics gradient to study the microstructural evolution of martensitic transformation in Au30Cu25Zn45, trying to figure out pathway of formation of the unusual microstructure with satisfying cofactor conditions. The simulation results show that during the martensitic transformation, quad-junctions composed of four different variants are formed. These junctions grow layer by layer, and the previously formed layer has larger size, thus leading to the formation of the experimentally reported “riverine” microstructure of martensite in Au30Cu25Zn45. Further analysis based on the crystallographic theory of martensitic transformation shows that in Au30Cu25Zn45 6 groups of variants can form such kind of quad-junction, and each group of variants can form 4 kinds of type 1/type 2 twin pairs and two kinds of compound twin pairs. All of the quad-junctions in this transformation are composed of four of those 6 twin pairs in each variant group, and the twin walls of these four twin pairs are perpendicular to each other.
|
Received: 15 December 2015
|
Fund: Supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China (No.51471094) and National Basic Research Program of China (Nos.2015GB118000 and 2015CB654802) |
[1] | Yintao S, Xian C, Vivekanand D, Thomas W S, James R D.Nature, 2013; 502: 85 | [2] | Walia H, Brantley W A, Gerstein H.J Endod, 1988; 14: 950 | [3] | Liu J, Gottschall T, Skokov K P, Moore J D, Gutfleisch M O.Nature Mater, 2012; 11: 620 | [4] | Moya X, Stern-Taulats E, Crossley S, González-Alonso D, Kar-Narayan S, Planes A, Ma?osa L D, Mathur N.Adv Mater, 2013; 25: 1360 | [5] | Srivastava V, Song Y, Bhatti K, James R D.Adv Energy Mater, 2011; 1: 97 | [6] | Kato H, Ozu T, Hashimoto S, Miura S.Mater Sci Eng, 1999; A264: 245 | [7] | Cui J, Chu Y S, Famodu O O, Furuya Y, Hattrick-Simpers J, James R D, Ludwig A, Thienhaus S, Wuttig M, Zhang Z Y, Takeuchi I.Nature Mater, 2006; 5: 286 | [8] | Zarnetta R, Takahashi R, Young M L, Savan A, Furuya Y, Thienhaus S, Maa? B, Rahim M, Frenzel J, Brunken H, Chu Y S, Srivastava V, James R D, Takeuchi I, Eggeler G, Ludwig A.Adv Funct Mater, 2010; 20: 1917 | [9] | Bechtold C, Chluba C, de Miranda R L, Quandt EAppl Phys Lett, 2012; 101: 091903 | [10] | Zhang Z, James R D, Muller S.Acta Mater, 2009; 57: 4332 | [11] | Delville R, Kasinathan S, Zhang Z Y, Humbeeck J V, James R D, Schryvers D.Phil Mag, 2010; 90: 177 | [12] | Srivastava V, Chen X, James R D.Appl Phys Lett, 2010; 97: 014101 | [13] | Ball J M, James R D.Arch Ration Mech Anal, 1987; 100: 13 | [14] | Chen X, Srivastava V, Dabade V, James R D.J Mech Phys Solids, 2013; 61: 2566 | [15] | Chluba C, Ge W W, Miranda R L, Strobel J, Kienle L, Quandt E, Wuttig M.Science, 2015; 348: 1004 | [16] | Militzer M.Current Opin Solid State Mater Sci, 2011; 15: 106 | [17] | Artemev A, Yi W, Khatchaturyan A G.Acta Mater, 2000; 48: 2503 | [18] | Artemev A, Jin Y, Khatchaturyan A G.Acta Mater, 2001; 49: 1165 | [19] | Artemev A, Jin Y, Khatchaturyan A G.Phil Mag, 2002; 82A: 1249 | [20] | Gao Y, Zhou N, Wang D, Wang Y.Acta Mater, 2014; 68: 93 | [21] | Tadaki T, Okazaki H, Yoshiyuki N, Shimizu K.Mater Trans JIM, 1990; 31: 935 | [22] | Tadaki T, Okazaki H, Yoshiyuki N, Shimizu K.Mater Trans JIM, 1990; 31: 941 | [23] | Salje E.Ferroelectrics, 1990; 104: 111 | [24] | Khachaturyan A G.Theory of Structural Transformations in Solids. New York: Wiley-Interscience, 1983: 157 | [25] | Cahn J W, Hilliard J E.J Chem Phys, 1958; 28: 258 | [26] | Hillert M.Acta Metall, 1961; 9: 525 | [27] | Bhattacharya K.Microstructure of Martensite. Cambridge: Oxford University Press, 2003: 66 | [28] | Lieberman D S, Wechsler M S, Read T A.J Appl Phys, 1955; 26: 473 | [29] | Bowles J S, Mackenzie J K.Acta Metall, 1954; 2: 129 | [30] | Bowles J S, Mackenzie J K.Acta Metall, 1954; 2: 138 | [31] | Chen L Q.Annu Rev Mater Res, 2002; 32: 113 | [32] | Ji Y Z, Issa A, Heo T W, Saal J E, Wolverton C, Chen L Q.Acta Mater, 2014; 76: 259 | [33] | Wang Y, Khachaturyan A G.Acta Mater, 1997; 45: 759 | [34] | Wang Y Z, Khachaturyan A G.Mater Sci Eng, 2006; A438: 55 | [35] | Olson G B.Mater Sci Eng, 1999; A273:11 | [36] | Chu Y A, Moran B, Reid A C E.Metall Mater Trans, 2000; 31A: 1321 |
|
No Suggested Reading articles found! |
|
|
Viewed |
|
|
|
Full text
|
|
|
|
|
Abstract
|
|
|
|
|
Cited |
|
|
|
|
|
Shared |
|
|
|
|
|
Discussed |
|
|
|
|