Please wait a minute...
Acta Metall Sin  2014, Vol. 50 Issue (9): 1115-1122    DOI: 10.11900/0412.1961.2014.00079
Current Issue | Archive | Adv Search |
A PHYSICAL CONSTITUTIVE MODEL FOR Fe-22Mn-0.6C TWIP STEEL BASED ON DISLOCATION DENSITY
SUN Chaoyang(), HUANG Jie, GUO Ning, YANG Jing
School of Mechanical Engineering, University of Science and Technology Beijing, Beijing 100083
Cite this article: 

SUN Chaoyang, HUANG Jie, GUO Ning, YANG Jing. A PHYSICAL CONSTITUTIVE MODEL FOR Fe-22Mn-0.6C TWIP STEEL BASED ON DISLOCATION DENSITY. Acta Metall Sin, 2014, 50(9): 1115-1122.

Download:  HTML  PDF(1397KB) 
Export:  BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)      
Abstract  

Based on the evolution of dislocation density and volume fraction of twins, a physically based constitutive model of Fe-22Mn-0.6C twinning induced plasticity (TWIP) steel has been developed. By taking the influence of slip inside twins on the plastic deformation and the difference of the average Taylor factors between the twinned regions and matrix regions into account, the plastic strain at the representative element was presented as the weighted sum of matrix slip, twinning and slip in twinned regions in this model. A linear function between yield stress and strain rate with natural logarithm was established by considering the effect of strain rate on thermally activated stress. And then, The Euler method was adopted and the parameters of this model were obtained in order to describe as accurately as the experimental results. The results from the model are in good agreement with the experimental results and the average relative error is only 0.84%. Compared with the model free of slip and the model free of the difference of Taylor factor at twinned regions, the average relative error is reduced 1.1% and 2.9%, respectively. The interaction between two twins and the sliding mechanism and its impact on the macro-deformation were investigated. The results show that there is a negative correlation between gliding rate and twinning rate and slip rate decreases with the increase of twinning rate. When the twins become saturated, the twin rate decreases rapidly, being opposite to the slip rate. The yield stress increases and the rate of strain hardening remains approximately unchanged with the increase of strain rate.

Key words:  TWIP steel      dislocation density      twinning induced plasticity      constitutive model      strain rate     
ZTFLH:  TG142.1  
Fund: Supported by Joint Fund of National Natural Science Foundation of China and Chinese Academy of Engineering Physics (No.U1330121), National Natural Science Foundation of China (No.51105029) and Beijing Science Foundation of China (No.3112019)

URL: 

https://www.ams.org.cn/EN/10.11900/0412.1961.2014.00079     OR     https://www.ams.org.cn/EN/Y2014/V50/I9/1115

Fig.1  Schematic morphology of twins in the representative element
Fig.2  True stress-true strain curves of Fe-22Mn-0.6C steel tested at room temperature with strain rates of 0.01 and 0.1 s-1
Fig.3  Variation of strain hardening rate of Fe-22Mn-0.6C steel as a function of strain
Fig.4  Schematic representation of physical constitutive model (t1—step time, einit—critical strain when twinning begins)
Fig.5  Yield stress sy of Fe-22Mn-0.6C steel at room temperature as a function of lnε? ( ε? —strain rate)
Parameter Physical meaning Value
μ Shear modulus / GPa 69
E Young′s modulus / GPa 200
b Magnitude of Burgers vector / m 2.5×10-10
M Taylor factor 3.06
α Mean dislocation strength 0.0895
d Grain size / μm 50
k Forest hardening 0.032
f Dynamic recovery 0.002
ρ0 Initial dislocation density / m2 10-10
F0 Maximum volume fraction of twins 0.2
e Twin mean thickness / nm 100
εinit Critical strain at which twinning begins 0.05
β Material constant 10
m Material constant 11
Table 1  Values of physical constant parameters of Fe-22Mn-0.6C steel at room temperature
Fig.6  Comparison of simulated and experimental true stress-true strain curves for Fe-22Mn-0.6C steel with strain rates of 0.1 and 0.01 s-1
Fig.7  Comparison of simulated and experimental strain hardening rates for Fe-22Mn-0.6C steel with strain rates of 0.01 s-1 (a) and 0.1 s-1 (b)
Fig.8  True stress-true strain curves of Fe-22Mn-0.6C steel subjected to three decompositions with strain rate of 0.1 s-1
Fig.9  Evolution of plastic strain rate, slip rate and twinning rate for Fe-22Mn-0.6C steel with strain rate of 0.1 s-1
Decomposition Average relative error
0< e ≤0.2 0.2< e ≤0.4 e >0.4 Total
Excluding slip inside twinning 1.85% 1.18% 2.07% 1.91%
Including slip inside twinning 1.84% 2.34% 4.48% 3.72%
This work 1.88% 0.74% 0.60% 0.84%
Table 2  Average relative errors of simulated and experimental stresses for Fe-22Mn-0.6C steel subjected to three decompositions with strain rate 0.1 s-1
Fig.10  Evolution of dislocation density and volume fraction of twins for Fe-22Mn-0.6C steel subjected to three decompositions with strain rate of 0.1 s-1
[1] Mi Z L, Tang D, Yan L, Guo J. J Mater Sci Technol, 2005; 21: 451
[2] Grassel O, Kruger L, Frommeyer G, Meyer L W. Int J Plast, 2000; 16: 1391
[3] Vercammen S, Blanpain B, De Cooman B C, Wollants P. Acta Mater, 2004; 52: 2005
[4] Frommeyer G, Brux U, Neumann P. ISIJ Int, 2003; 43: 438
[5] Bouaziz O. Scr Mater, 2012; 66: 982
[6] Wang S H, Liu Z Y, Zhang W N, Wang G D. Acta Metall Sin, 2009; 45: 573
(王书晗, 刘振宇, 张维娜, 王国栋. 金属学报, 2009; 45: 573)
[7] Renard K, Jacques P J. Mater Sci Eng, 2012; A542: 8
[8] Bouaziz O, Allain S, Scott C P, Cugy P, Barbier D. Curr Opin Solid State Mater Sci, 2011; 15: 141
[9] Gutierrez-Urrutia I, Raabe D. Acta Mater, 2011; 59: 6449
[10] Yang P, Lu F Y, Meng L, Cui F E. Acta Metall Sin, 2010; 46: 657
(杨 平, 鲁法云, 孟 利, 崔凤娥. 金属学报, 2010; 46: 657)
[11] Bouaziz O, Guelton N. Mater Sci Eng, 2001; A319: 246
[12] Allain S, Chateau J P, Bouaziz O. Mater Sci Eng, 2004; A387: 143
[13] Kim J, Estrin Y, Beladi H, Timokhina I, Chin K, Kim S, De Cooman B C. Metall Mater Trans, 2012; 43A: 479
[14] Johnson G R, Cook W H. Eng Fract Mech, 1985; 21: 31
[15] Zerilli F J, Armstrong R W. J Appl Phys, 1987; 61: 1816
[16] Salem A A, Kalidindi S R, Doherty R D, Semiatin S L. Metall Mater Trans, 2006; 37A: 259
[17] Salem A A, Kalidindi S R, Doherty R D. Acta Mater, 2003; 51: 4225
[18] Yu Y, Pan X X, Xie R Z, Zhang F J, Hu W J. Chin J Theory Appl Mech, 2012; 44: 334
(余 勇, 潘晓霞, 谢若泽, 张方举, 胡文军. 力学学报, 2012; 44: 334)
[19] Wu Z Q, Tang Z Y, Li H Y, Zhang H D. Acta Metall Sin, 2012; 48: 593
(吴志强, 唐正友, 李华英, 张海东. 金属学报, 2012; 48: 593)
[20] Koyama M, Sawaguchi T, Lee T, Lee C S, Tsuzaki K. Mater Sci Eng, 2011; A528: 7310
[21] Remy L. Acta Metall, 1978; 26: 443
[22] Voyiadjis G Z, Abed F H. Mech Mater, 2005; 37: 355
[23] Estrin Y, Mecking H. Acta Metall, 1984; 32: 57
[24] Mecking H, Kocks U F. Acta Metall, 1981; 29: 1865
[25] Ismael A M, Ahmed H, Johannes R. Mater Sci Eng, 2009; A504: 40
[26] Allain S, Chateau J P, Bouaziz O, Migot S, Guelton N. Mater Sci Eng, 2004; A387-389: 246
[27] Wang W H. Master Thesis, University of Science and Technology Beijing, 2012
(王伟华. 北京科技大学硕士学位论文, 2012)
[1] SI Yongli, XUE Jintao, WANG Xingfu, LIANG Juhua, SHI Zimu, HAN Fusheng. Effect of Cr Addition on the Corrosion Behavior of Twinning-Induced Plasticity Steel[J]. 金属学报, 2023, 59(7): 905-914.
[2] WANG Kai, JIN Xi, JIAO Zhiming, QIAO Junwei. Mechanical Behaviors and Deformation Constitutive Equations of CrFeNi Medium-Entropy Alloys Under Tensile Conditions from 77 K to 1073 K[J]. 金属学报, 2023, 59(2): 277-288.
[3] CHANG Litao. Corrosion and Stress Corrosion Crack Initiation in the Machined Surfaces of Austenitic Stainless Steels in Pressurized Water Reactor Primary Water: Research Progress and Perspective[J]. 金属学报, 2023, 59(2): 191-204.
[4] WANG Nan, CHEN Yongnan, ZHAO Qinyang, WU Gang, ZHANG Zhen, LUO Jinheng. Effect of Strain Rate on the Strain Partitioning Behavior of Ferrite/Bainite in X80 Pipeline Steel[J]. 金属学报, 2023, 59(10): 1299-1310.
[5] CHEN Yang, MAO Pingli, LIU Zheng, WANG Zhi, CAO Gengsheng. Detwinning Behaviors and Dynamic Mechanical Properties of Precompressed AZ31 Magnesium Alloy Subjected to High Strain Rates Impact[J]. 金属学报, 2022, 58(5): 660-672.
[6] PENG Jun, JIN Xinyan, ZHONG Yong, WANG Li. Influence of Substrate Surface Structure on the Galvanizability of Fe-16Mn-0.7C-1.5Al TWIP Steel Sheet[J]. 金属学报, 2022, 58(12): 1600-1610.
[7] HU Chen, PAN Shuai, HUANG Mingxin. Strong and Tough Heterogeneous TWIP Steel Fabricated by Warm Rolling[J]. 金属学报, 2022, 58(11): 1519-1526.
[8] SHI Zengmin, LIANG Jingyu, LI Jian, WANG Maoqiu, FANG Zifan. In Situ Analysis of Plastic Deformation of Lath Martensite During Tensile Process[J]. 金属学报, 2021, 57(5): 595-604.
[9] LI Gen, LAN Peng, ZHANG Jiaquan. Solidification Structure Refinement in TWIP Steel by Ce Inoculation[J]. 金属学报, 2020, 56(5): 704-714.
[10] ZHANG Zhefeng,SHAO Chenwei,WANG Bin,YANG Haokun,DONG Fuyuan,LIU Rui,ZHANG Zhenjun,ZHANG Peng. Tensile and Fatigue Properties and Deformation Mechanisms of Twinning-Induced Plasticity Steels[J]. 金属学报, 2020, 56(4): 476-486.
[11] LI Jinxu,WANG Wei,ZHOU Yao,LIU Shenguang,FU Hao,WANG Zheng,KAN Bo. A Review of Research Status of Hydrogen Embrittlement for Automotive Advanced High-Strength Steels[J]. 金属学报, 2020, 56(4): 444-458.
[12] LI Yizhuang,HUANG Mingxin. A Method to Calculate the Dislocation Density of a TWIP Steel Based on Neutron Diffraction and Synchrotron X-Ray Diffraction[J]. 金属学报, 2020, 56(4): 487-493.
[13] Futao DONG,Fei XUE,Yaqiang TIAN,Liansheng CHEN,Linxiu DU,Xianghua LIU. Effect of Annealing Temperature on Microstructure, Properties and Hydrogen Embrittlement of TWIP Steel[J]. 金属学报, 2019, 55(6): 792-800.
[14] Qingdong XU, Kejian LI, Zhipeng CAI, Yao WU. Effect of Pulsed Magnetic Field on the Microstructure of TC4 Titanium Alloy and Its Mechanism[J]. 金属学报, 2019, 55(4): 489-495.
[15] Yubi GAO, Yutian DING, Jianjun CHEN, Jiayu XU, Yuanjun MA, Dong ZHANG. Evolution of Microstructure and Texture During Cold Deformation of Hot-Extruded GH3625 Alloy[J]. 金属学报, 2019, 55(4): 547-554.
No Suggested Reading articles found!