Microstructure and Mechanical Properties of a Cold Rolled Gradient Medium-Carbon Martensitic Steel
WANG Zhoutou1,2, YUAN Qing1,2, ZHANG Qingxiao1,2, LIU Sheng1,2, XU Guang1,2()
1State Key Laboratory of Refractories and Metallurgy, Wuhan University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430081, China 2Key Laboratory for Ferrous Metallurgy and Resources Utilization of Ministry of Education, Wuhan University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430081, China
Cite this article:
WANG Zhoutou, YUAN Qing, ZHANG Qingxiao, LIU Sheng, XU Guang. Microstructure and Mechanical Properties of a Cold Rolled Gradient Medium-Carbon Martensitic Steel. Acta Metall Sin, 2023, 59(6): 821-828.
Martensite is an attractive crystalline structure to fabricate ultrafine grain steels by cold rolling and annealing because of its low equivalent strain. However, the deformation resistance of martensite increases inevitably with the increase in the carbon content of the steel. Accordingly, cracks are easily initiated in martensite before it reaches the desired strain, restricting the application of cold rolling and annealing to ultra-low and low-carbon steels. Thus, to extend the application of these methods from low to medium-carbon steel, compositional gradient steel was prepared by decarburizing medium-carbon steel. The carbon content increased from the surface layer to core layer in the gradient steel. The decarburized medium-carbon martensite was successfully cold rolled under large deformation with an equivalent strain of 1.5 with no microcracks on the sample surface. The microstructure and mechanical properties of the quenched and cold rolled gradient component steel were characterized and studied via OM, SEM, and tensile test. The experimental results revealed the gradient size of martensite along with the gradient carbon content in the microstructure. Further, different diffusion rates of carbon atoms during decarburization and austenitization resulted in the gradient austenite grain, which restrained the size of martensite. Compared with homogenous martensite of the experimental medium-carbon steel, the steel with gradient distribution of carbon exhibited low tensile strength, which decreased from 1700 MPa to 1525 MPa, but high tensile uniform elongation, which is increased by 40%; moreover, the gradient steel showed higher product of strength and elongation than homogeneous martensite steel with similar average carbon content without decarburization. The good combination of strength and plasticity in the compositionally gradient steel was attributed to the high strength and good plasticity provided by the core layer and decarburized layer, respectively. Additionally, the heterogeneity in the strain distribution led to an extra strain-hardening; thus, the surface layer restrains further propagation of micro-shear bands from the core layer.
Fund: National Natural Science Foundation of China(51874216);National Natural Science Foundation of China(52004193);Hebei Iron and Steel Group Key Research and Development Project(HG2019313);China Postdoctoral Science Fo-undation Project(2020M682496)
Corresponding Authors:
XU Guang, professor, Tel:15697180996, E-mail: xuguang@wust.edu.cn
Fig.1 Rout 1 for decarburization procedures (a) and rout 2 for obtaining homogeneous martensite (b) (V—volume of CO or CO2)
Fig.2 Microstructure of the homogenous martensite
Fig.3 SEM images of the decarburized martensite in the surface layer (a) and core layer (b) (Insets show the enlarged microstructure)
Fig.4 Microstructure of the decarburized steel from surface layer to core layer
Fig.5 Hardness profile of decarburized martensite and homogeneous martensite
Fig.6 Morphologies of the cold rolled specimens of homogeneous martensite (sample 1) and compositionally gradient martensite (sample 2) (a) and enlarged view of homogeneous martensite in sample 1 (b)
Fig.7 SEM images of the cold rolled decarburized martensite in surface layer (a) and core layer (b) (ND—normal direction, RD—rolling direction, LDC—lamellar dislocation cell, IBL—irregularly bent lamella, KL—kinked lath)
Fig.8 Hardness and carbon content distributions along sample thickness
Fig.9 Engineering stress-strain curves of samples
Fig.10 Equivalent strains as a function of tensile strength of cold rolled martensite in different researches
Fig.11 Tensile fracture morphologies of the surface layer (a), the area from surface to core layer (b), and the transition area (c) of homogeneous martensite
Fig.12 Tensile fracture morphologies of the surface layer (a), the area from surface to core layer (b), and the transition area (c) of decarburized martensite
Fig.13 Tensile fracture morphologies of the surface layer (a), the whole area (b), and the transition area (c) of cold rolled decarburized martensite
1
Nuckowski P M, Snopiński P, Wróbel T. Influence of plastic strain accumulation in continuous ingots during ECAP on structure and recrystallization temperature of AlCu4MgSi alloy [J]. Materials, 2020, 13: 576
doi: 10.3390/ma13030576
2
Pei Y B, Gui Y W, Huang T, et al. Microstructure and corrosion behaviors of AZ63 magnesium alloy fabricated by accumulative roll bonding process [J]. Mater. Res. Express, 2020, 7: 066525
3
Krywopusk N M, Williams C L, Kecskes L J, et al. Characterization of spalled AZ31B processed by ECAE [J]. Mater. Sci. Eng., 2019, A767: 138298
4
Zhang L Y, Yang G, Huang C X, et al. High strength and high toughness heat-resistant martensitic steel produced by ECAP [J]. Acta Metall. Sin., 2008, 44: 409
Mroz S, Wierzba A, Stefanik A, et al. Effect of asymmetric accumulative roll-bonding process on the microstructure and strength evolution of the AA1050/AZ31/AA1050 multilayered composite materials [J]. Materials, 2020, 13: 5401
doi: 10.3390/ma13235401
6
Al-Fadhalah K J, Alyazidi M K, Rafiq M. Effect of microstructure refinement on hardness homogeneity of aluminum alloy 1100 processed by accumulative roll bonding [J]. J. Mater. Eng. Perform., 2019, 28: 4693
doi: 10.1007/s11665-019-04228-3
7
Loucif A, Figueiredo R B, Baudin T, et al. Ultrafine grains and the Hall-Petch relationship in an Al-Mg-Si alloy processed by high-pressure torsion [J]. Mater. Sci. Eng., 2012, A532: 139
8
Fujita I, Edalati K, Sauvage X, et al. Grain growth in nanograined aluminum oxide by high-pressure torsion: Phase transformation and plastic strain effects [J]. Scr. Mater., 2018, 152: 11
doi: 10.1016/j.scriptamat.2018.04.003
9
Roy A, Tiwari M, Sahu S, et al. Microstructure, texture and mechanical properties of Al-Mg-Si Alloy processed by multiaxial compression [J]. J. Mater. Eng. Perform., 2020, 29: 3876
doi: 10.1007/s11665-020-04917-4
10
Ramesh S, Anne G, Nayaka H S, et al. Effects of combined multiaxial forging and rolling process on microstructure, mechanical properties and corrosion behavior of a Cu-Ti alloys [J]. Mater. Res. Express, 2019, 6: 056559
11
Feng G, Shi L J, Lv J, et al. Investigation of surface nanocrystallization of a low carbon steel induced by ultrasonic shot peening [J]. Acta Metall. Sin., 2000, 36: 300
Mansoor P, Dasharath S M. Microstructural and mechanical properties of magnesium alloy processed by severe plastic deformation (SPD)—A review [J]. Mater. Today Proc., 2020, 20: 145
13
Huang J Y, Zhu Y T, Jiang H, et al. Microstructures and dislocation configurations in nanostructured Cu processed by repetitive corrugation and straightening [J]. Acta Mater., 2001, 49: 1497
doi: 10.1016/S1359-6454(01)00069-6
14
Song R, Ponge D, Raabe D. Mechanical properties of an ultrafine grained C-Mn steel processed by warm deformation and annealing [J]. Acta Mater., 2005, 53: 4881
doi: 10.1016/j.actamat.2005.07.009
15
Lin P C, Pang Y H, Sun Q, et al. 3D-SPD rolling method of 45 steel ultrafine grained bar with bulk size [J]. Acta Metall. Sin., 2021, 57: 605
doi: 10.11900/0412.1961.2020.00247
Ueji R, Tsuji N, Minamino Y, et al. Ultragrain refinement of plain low carbon steel by cold-rolling and annealing of martensite [J]. Acta Mater., 2002, 50: 4177
doi: 10.1016/S1359-6454(02)00260-4
17
Lan H F, Liu W J, Liu X H. Ultrafine ferrite grains produced by tempering cold-rolled martensite in low carbon and microalloyed steels [J]. ISIJ Int., 2007, 47: 1652
doi: 10.2355/isijinternational.47.1652
18
Yuan Q, Xu G, Liu S, et al. Effect of rolling reduction on microstructure and property of ultrafine grained low-carbon steel processed by cryorolling martensite [J]. Metals, 2018, 8: 518
doi: 10.3390/met8070518
19
Ashrafi H, Najafizadeh A. Fabrication of the ultrafine grained low carbon steel by cold compression and annealing of martensite [J]. Trans. Indian Inst. Met., 2016, 69: 1467
doi: 10.1007/s12666-015-0714-6
20
Huang X, Morito S, Hansen N, et al. Ultrafine structure and high strength in cold-rolled martensite [J]. Metall. Mater. Trans., 2012, 43A: 3517
21
Morito S, Ohba T, Maki T. Comparison of deformation structure of lath martensite in low carbon and ultra-low carbon steels [J]. Mater. Sci. Forum., 2007, 558-559: 933
doi: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/MSF.558-559
22
Krauss G. Martensite in steel: Strength and structure [J]. Mater. Sci. Eng., 1999, A273-275: 40
23
Lee J C, Kang U G, Oh C S, et al. Effects of deformation strains and annealing temperatures on mechanical properties of martensitic steels [J]. Mater. Sci. Forum., 2010, 654-656: 218
doi: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/MSF.654-656
24
Wu X L, Jiang P, Chen L, et al. Synergetic strengthening by gradient structure [J]. Mater. Res. Lett., 2014, 2: 185
doi: 10.1080/21663831.2014.935821
25
Ueji R, Tsuji N, Minamino Y, et al. Effect of rolling reduction on ultrafine grained structure and mechanical properties of low-carbon steel thermomechanically processed from martensite starting structure [J]. Sci. Technol. Adv. Mater., 2004, 5: 153
doi: 10.1016/j.stam.2003.10.017
26
Zhao X, Jing T F, Gao Y W, et al. Annealing behavior of nano-layered steel produced by heavy cold-rolling of lath martensite [J]. Mater. Sci. Eng., 2005, A397: 117