|
|
ω LATTICE MECHANISM OF {112}<111> TWINNING NUCLEATION AND GROWTH AND TERMINATION |
Songquan WU1,2,Yi YANG3,Geping LI1(),Dehai PING4,Qingmiao HU1,Rui YANG1 |
1) Institute of Metal Research, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shenyang 110016, China 2) Key Laboratory of Optoelectronic Materials Chemical and Physics, Fujian Institute of Research on The Structure of Matter, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Fuzhou 350002, China 3) Research Institute (R&D center), Baosteel Group Corporation, Shanghai 201900, China 4) Department of Materials Science and Engineering, China University of Petroleum, Beijing 102249, China; |
|
Cite this article:
Songquan WU,Yi YANG,Geping LI,Dehai PING,Qingmiao HU,Rui YANG. ω LATTICE MECHANISM OF {112}<111> TWINNING NUCLEATION AND GROWTH AND TERMINATION. Acta Metall Sin, 2016, 52(2): 249-256.
|
|
Abstract {112}<111>-type twin is a common twinning structure in quenched carbon steel. As carbon content increases, the density of the twin becomes high in the quenched state. Researchers have suggested that understanding such twinning mechanism may help us to understand the martensitic transformation in steel. {112}<111>-type twin is also commonly observed in other body centered cubic (bcc) metals and alloys, especially deformed under the conditions of low temperatures and/or high strain rates. Yet, due to the intrinsic non-close-packed structure and the rapid speed of twinning process, the mechanisms of twinning nucleation, growth and termination have not been clearly understood although phenomenological mechanisms such as the classical shearing mechanism, dislocation mechanism, or shuffling mechanism, etc., were proposed. Recently, after reviewing numerous investigations on {112}<111>-type twinning process both experimentally and theoretically in bcc metals and alloys, it was found that the twinning boundaries are always embedded with ω phase, i.e., the displacement of the first layer of the twin is 1/12 <111> for ω instead of 1/6 <111> for twin, thus, an ω phase-related {112}<111>-type twinning mechanism (so-called ω lattice mechanism) in our previous study is proposed. In order to better understand the ω lattice mechanism, in this work, a detailed description of the whole process of nucleation, growth and termination of the {112}<111>-type twinning was offered by using the atomic lattice model. The model shows that the twin could nucleate during ω→bcc transition process, and then grow up by extending or merging of twin embryos, and finally terminate during encountering the different ω variants. Such two-dimensional atomic model can be extended to three-dimensional one, which can finally explain the formation mechanism of an internal twin in one bcc crystal. Moreover, the model suggests that the diffuse ω lattice (ωdiff) between the ideal ω lattice and bcc lattice (in the twin boundary) plays an important role in promoting the transition of ω↔bcc during twinning nucleation and growth processes. The results suggest that the {112}<111>-type twins are phase transition twin or phase transformation product.
|
Received: 15 June 2015
|
Fund: Supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China (No.51271200) |
[1] | Christian J W, Mahajan S.Prog Mater Sci, 1995; 39: 1 | [2] | Zhu Y T, Liao X Z, Wu X L.Prog Mater Sci, 2012; 57: 1 | [3] | Clark R, Craig G B.Prog Met Phys, 1952; 3: 117 | [4] | Buerger M J.Am Mineral, 1945; 30: 469 | [5] | Kelly A.Proc Phys Soc, 1953; 66A: 403 | [6] | Cottrell A H, Bilby B A.Philos Mag, 1951; 42: 573 | [7] | Frank F C, Read Jr W T.Phys Rev, 1950; 79: 722 | [8] | Hirth J P, Lothe J.Theory of Dislocations. New York: Wiley, 1968: 728 | [9] | Lagerlöf K P D.Acta Metall, 1993; 41: 2143 | [10] | Yang Y, Li G P, Wang H, Wu S Q, Zhang L C, Li Y L, Yang K.Scr Mater, 2012; 66: 211 | [11] | Ogata S, Li J, Yip S.Phys Rev, 2005; 71B: 224102 | [12] | Ping D H, Cui C Y, Yin F X, Yamabe-Mitarai Y.Scr Mater, 2006; 54: 1305 | [13] | Sukedai E, Shimoda M, Nishizawa H, Nako Y. Mater Trans, 2011; 52: 324 | [14] | Hatt B A, Roberts J A.Acta Metall, 1960; 8: 575 | [15] | Hatt B A, Roberts J A, Williams G I.Nature, 1957; 180: 1406 | [16] | Jackson W A, Perkins A J, Hehemann R F.Metall Trans, 1970; 1B: 2014 | [17] | Hsiung L M, Lassila D H.Acta Mater, 2000; 48: 4851 | [18] | Shao G, Tsakiropoulos P.Acta Mater, 2000; 48: 3671 | [19] | Cheng G M, Yuan H, Jian W W, Xu W Z, Millett P C, Zhu Y T.Scr Mater, 2012; 68: 130 | [20] | Ayer R, Bendel L P, Zackay V F.Metall Trans, 1992; 23A: 2447 | [21] | Ping D H, Geng W T.Mater Chem Phys, 2013; 139: 830 | [22] | Ping D H, Yin J, Liu W Q, Su Y J, Rong L J, Zhao X Q.Acta Metall Sin, 2013; 49: 769 | [22] | (平德海, 殷匠, 刘文庆, 宿彦京, 戎利建, 赵新青. 金属学报, 2013; 49: 769) | [23] | Vítek V.Scr Metall, 1970; 4: 725 | [24] | Bristowe P D, Crocker A G.Philos Mag, 1975; 31: 503 | [25] | Wu S Q, Ping D H, Yamabe-Mitarai Y, Xiao W L, Yang Y, Hu Q M, Li G P, Yang R.Acta Mater, 2014; 62: 122 | [26] | Jamieson J C.Science, 1963; 140: 72 | [27] | Williams J C, De Fontaine D D, Paton N E.Metall Trans, 1973; 4: 2701 | [28] | Brotzen F R, Harmon E L, Troiano A R.J Met, 1955; 7: 413 | [29] | Nelson R S, Hudson J A, Mazey D J.J Nucl Mater, 1972; 44: 318 | [30] | Sikka S K, Vohra Y K, Chidambaram R.Prog Mater Sci, 1982; 27: 245 | [31] | Fontaine D D, Paton N E, Williams J C.Acta Metall, 1971; 19: 1153 | [32] | Wasilewski R J.Metall Trans, 1970; 1B: 2641 | [33] | Hall E O.Twinning and Diffusionless Transformations in Crystals. London: Butterworths Scientific Publications, 1954: 1 | [34] | Klassen-Nekhlyudova M V, translated by Bradley J E S. Mechanical Twinning of Crystals. New York: Consultants Bureau, 1964: 106 | [35] | Ping D H.Acta Metall Sin (Engl Lett), 2014; 27: 1 | [36] | Ping D H.Acta Metall Sin (Engl Lett), 2015; 28: 663 |
|
No Suggested Reading articles found! |
|
|
Viewed |
|
|
|
Full text
|
|
|
|
|
Abstract
|
|
|
|
|
Cited |
|
|
|
|
|
Shared |
|
|
|
|
|
Discussed |
|
|
|
|