Please wait a minute...
Acta Metall Sin  2016, Vol. 52 Issue (2): 241-248    DOI: 10.11900/0412.1961.2015.00283
Orginal Article Current Issue | Archive | Adv Search |
EVALUATION OF INFLUENCE OF PRESET CRACK BURIAL DEPTH ON STRESS OF LASER CLADDING COATING WITH METAL MAGNETIC MEMORY
Bin LIU1,Kai GONG1,Yanxin QIAO1(),Shiyun DONG2
1 Key Laboratory of Advanced Welding Technology of Jiangsu Province, Jiangsu University of Science and Technology, Zhenjiang 212003, China
2 National Key Laboratory for Remanufacturing, Academy of Armored Forces Engineering, Beijing 100072, China
Cite this article: 

Bin LIU,Kai GONG,Yanxin QIAO,Shiyun DONG. EVALUATION OF INFLUENCE OF PRESET CRACK BURIAL DEPTH ON STRESS OF LASER CLADDING COATING WITH METAL MAGNETIC MEMORY. Acta Metall Sin, 2016, 52(2): 241-248.

Download:  HTML  PDF(2597KB) 
Export:  BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)      
Abstract  

The stress state is important for properties and service life of mechanical parts, so finding an optimal method for evaluation of stress state is urgently needed to be solved. Because of convenience and fast detection speed, metal magnetic memory method has attracted attention of scholars, and some research findings also have been obtained. While current research mainly focuses on evaluation of stress state of single ferromagnetic material, the research on ferromagnetic composite material or ferromagnetic coating material is rare. Because of high energy density, laser cladding technology has been used widely in field of surface engineering. For this reason, the stress state of ferromagnetic laser cladding Fe314 alloy coating is evaluated with metal magnetic memory method. Distribution of stress state is usually affected by flaw including crack and gas hole in laser cladding Fe314 alloy coating, so the interaction influence of crack and load on evaluation of stress state of laser cladding Fe314 alloy coating is discussed in this work. Combing with equivalent method, different cracks, which were substituted with regular rectangular grooves, were machined in laser cladding Fe314 alloy coating. In order to obtain the relationship between burial depth and magnetic field intensity normal component Hp(y), the regular rectangular grooves that had the same width and different buried depths were machined. The microstructure of laser cladding coating was observed by SEM, and the influence of microstructure on magnetic field intensity normal component Hp(y) was also discussed. Based on magnetic-mechanical theory, interaction influence mechanism of crack and load on evaluation stress state of laser cladding coating with metal magnetic memory method was clarified, the relationship between burial depth of crack, load and gradient value K of magnetic field intensity normal component Hp(y) was also obtained. The results show that when zero crossing is seen as center, the magnetic field intensity normal component Hp(y) rotates clockwise as stress increases gradually, the slope and amplitude of Hp(y) curve increases, gradient value K of magnetic field intensity normal component Hp(y) corresponding to crack also increases as stress increases. Stress concentration in different zones is caused by anisotropic microstructure and layer interface of laser cladding Fe314 alloy coating, so the Hp(y) fluctuats obviously. When load is the same, gradient value K of magnetic field intensity normal component Hp(y) corresponding to crack decreases in the regular pattern of quadratic polynomial as burial depth increases. When burial depth is the same, gradient value K of magnetic field intensity normal component Hp(y) corresponding to crack increases as load increases. When burial depth is less, the influence of load on gradient value K is more obvious. When burial depth is bigger than 3.0 mm, advance the speed of gradient value K is relatively slow as load increases, and the difference in deformation capacity between laser cladding Fe314 alloy coating and 45 steel is seen as the main reason for above result.

Key words:  laser cladding Fe314 alloy coating      metal magnetic memory      interaction effect      stress evaluation      crack burial depth     
Received:  27 May 2015     
Fund: Supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China (Nos.51305172 and 51401092)

URL: 

https://www.ams.org.cn/EN/10.11900/0412.1961.2015.00283     OR     https://www.ams.org.cn/EN/Y2016/V52/I2/241

Material C Si Mn P Cr Ni B Fe
Laser cladding Fe314 alloy coating 0.10~0.15 1.00 - - 15.00 10.00 1.00 Bal.
45 steel 0.40~0.50 0.17~0.37 0.50~0.80 0.04 0.15 0.25 - Bal.
Table 1  Chemical compositions of experimental specimens (mass fraction / %)
Material Elastic limit
σe / MPa
Yield strength
σs / MPa
Ultimate tensile strength
σb / MPa
Elongation after fracture
δ / %
Laser cladding Fe314 alloy coating 580 610 875 15
45 steel 380 400 670 18
Table 2  Tensile properties of experimental specimens at room temperature
Fig.1  Sketch map of laser cladding path
Fig.2  Sketch map of detection path of magnetic field intensity normal component Hp(y) of laser cladding Fe314 alloy coating
Fig.3  Curves of Hp(y) of laser cladding Fe314 alloy coating at different lift-off values
Fig.4  Surface distribution of Hp(y) of laser cladding Fe314 alloy coating at tensile loads of 0 kN (a), 2 kN (b), 6 kN (c), 12 kN (d), 18 kN (e) and 22 kN (f)
Fig.5  Curves of Hp(y) of laser cladding Fe314 alloy coating at different tensile loads along a1 detection path
Fig.6  Microstructure of laser cladding Fe314 alloy coating
Fig.7  Variation of gradient value of Hp(y) (K) with crack burial depths
Fig.8  Change processes of magnetic domain at different states (σ—stress, arrows indicate the directions of magnetic domains)
[1] Xu F.PhD Dissertation, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, 2013
[1] (徐帆. 浙江大学博士学位论文, 杭州, 2013)
[2] Tomohiro Y, Shinji Y, Masahiko H.NDT&E Int, 1996; 29: 263
[3] Dovbov A A.Therm Eng, 2001; 48: 289
[4] Zhang W M, Dong S P, Zhang Z J.Chin Mech Eng, 2003; 14: 892
[4] (张卫民, 董韶平, 张之敬. 中国机械工程, 2003; 14: 892)
[5] Liu D X. Master Thesis, Yanshan University, Qinhuangdao, 2010
[5] (刘东旭. 燕山大学硕士学位论文, 秦皇岛, 2010)
[6] Wang Z D, Yao K, Deng B, Ding K Q.NDT&E Int, 2010; 43: 513
[7] Iordache V E, Hug E, Buiron N.Mater Sci Eng, 2003; A359: 62
[8] Doubov A A.NDT&E Int, 2000; 33: 351
[9] Pearson J, Squire P T, Maylin M G, Gore J G.IEEE Trans Magn, 2000; 36: 3251
[10] Huang S L, Li L M, Shi K R, Wang X F.J Centr South Univ Technol, 2004; 11: 23
[11] Dai G, Wang W J, Li W.Nondestruct Test, 2002; 24: 262
[11] (戴光, 王文江, 李伟. 无损检测, 2002; 24: 262)
[12] Shi C L. PhD Dissertation, Harbin Institute of Technology, 2011
[12] (石常亮. 哈尔滨工业大学博士学位论文, 2011)
[13] Xu B S, Dong L H, Dong S Y, Xue N.Acta Metall Sin, 2011; 47: 257
[13] (徐滨士, 董丽虹, 董世运, 薛楠. 金属学报, 2011; 47: 257)
[14] Leng J C, Liu Y, Zhou G Q, Gao Y T.NDT&E Int, 2013; 55: 42
[15] Dong L H, Xu B S, Dong S Y, Li S, Chen Q Z, Wang D.NDT&E Int, 2009; 42: 323
[16] Shi C L, Dong S Y, Xu B S, He P.J Magn Magn Mater, 2010; 322: 413
[17] Qin Y J, Wu Y P, Zhang J F, Guo W M, Hong S, Chen L Y.Trans Nonferrous Met Soc China, 2015; 25: 1144
[18] Shan L, Wang X Y, Li J L, Li H, Lu X, Chen J M.Trans Nonferrous Met Soc China, 2015; 25: 1135
[19] Lu Z, Kim M S, Myoung S W, Lee J H, Jung Y G, Kin I S, Jo C Y.Trans Nonferrous Met Soc China, 2014; 24(S1): 29
[20] Wang Q Y, Bai S L, Liu Z D.Trans Nonferrous Met Soc China, 2014; 24: 1610
[21] He X L, Wei Y H, Hou L F, Yan Z F, Guo C L, Han P J.Trans Nonferrous Met Soc China, 2014; 24: 3429
[22] Ariely S.Surf Coat Technol, 1991; 45: 403
[23] Lin Y H, Lei Y P, Fu H G, Lin J.Acta Metall Sin, 2014; 50: 1513
[23] (林英华, 雷永平, 符寒光, 林健. 金属学报, 2014; 50: 1513)
[24] Feng S R, Tang H B, Zhang S Q, Wang H M.Trans Nonferrous Met Soc China, 2012; 22: 1667
[25] Liu B, Chen S J, Dong S Y, Fang C F, Hu Q X, Guo Y.Trans China Weld Inst, 2015; 36(8): 23
[25] (刘彬, 陈书锦, 董世运, 方臣富, 胡庆贤, 郭宇. 焊接学报, 2015; 36(8): 23)
[26] American Society for Nondestructive Testing, translated by Society for Nondestructive Testing. Nondestructive Testing Handbook-Electromagnetic Roll. Beijing: World Book Publising, 1994: 166
[26] (美国无损检测学会编, 无损检测学会译. 无损检测手册-电磁卷. 北京: 世界图书出版社, 1994: 166)
[27] Wang H P, Dong S Y, Dong L H, Xu B S.Mater Eng, 2010; (12): 35
[27] (王慧鹏, 董世运, 董丽虹, 徐滨士. 材料工程, 2010; (12): 35)
[28] Zhang W M, Liu H G, Yuan J J, Sun H T.Trans Beijing Inst Technol, 2005; 25: 1003
[28] (张卫民, 刘红光, 袁俊杰, 孙海涛. 北京理工大学学报, 2005; 25: 1003
No related articles found!
No Suggested Reading articles found!