Please wait a minute...
Acta Metall Sin  2015, Vol. 51 Issue (8): 913-919    DOI: 10.11900/0412.1961.2014.00709
Current Issue | Archive | Adv Search |
THE COMBINED EFFECT OF HOT DEFORMATION PLUS QUENCHING AND PARTITIONING TREATMENT ON MARTENSITE TRANSFORMATION OF LOW CARBON ALLOYED STEEL
Cunyu WANG1,Ying CHANG2(),Jie YANG3,Kunmin ZHAO2,Han DONG1
1 East China Branch of Central Iron & Steel Research Institute, Beijing 100081
2 State Key Laboratory of Industrial Equipment Structural Analysis, School of Automotive Engineering, Dalian University of Technology, Dalian 116024
3 Technology Center, Great Wall Motor Company Limited, Baoding 071000
Cite this article: 

Cunyu WANG,Ying CHANG,Jie YANG,Kunmin ZHAO,Han DONG. THE COMBINED EFFECT OF HOT DEFORMATION PLUS QUENCHING AND PARTITIONING TREATMENT ON MARTENSITE TRANSFORMATION OF LOW CARBON ALLOYED STEEL. Acta Metall Sin, 2015, 51(8): 913-919.

Download:  HTML  PDF(6986KB) 
Export:  BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)      
Abstract  

A combined process of hot deformation with different deformation temperatures plus two step quenching and partitioning (Q&P) treatment was applied to low carbon alloyed steel. The effect of stress (30% plastic deformation) on the start temperature of martensite transformation (Ms), volume fraction of retained austenite and mechanical properties was analyzed. It found that comparing with specimen treated by conventional two-step Q&P process, the microstructure of steel treated by combined process was finer and finer with the decreasing hot deformation temperature, and the typical curved micromorphology of martensite exists. Moreover, the Ms of specimen treated by combined process is increased with the increasing of deformation temperature. The effect of stress on the Ms can be attributed to the effect of stress on the grain boundaries of austenitic parent phase, where a large amount of dislocation induced by the stress is prior to occur so as to promote formation of martensite. However, the stability of untransformed austenite was improved by the plastic deformation when matensite transformed so as to get the more retained austenite (the highest volume fraction of retained austenite obtained by combined process of hot deformation at 750 ℃ is 17.2%). Moreover, the mechanical properties were improved by the combined process, namely, the highest hardness of specimen were obtained when hot deformation at 650 ℃ and the highest plasticity were obtained when hot deformed at 750 ℃.

Key words:  hot deformation      quenching and partitioning      martensite transformation      stress     
Fund: Supported by National Basic Research Program of China (No.2010CB630803), National Natural Science Foundation of China (Nos.51101036, 51201093 and 11472072), Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (No.DUT15QY09) and Natural Science Foundation of Liaoning Province (No.2014028001)

URL: 

https://www.ams.org.cn/EN/10.11900/0412.1961.2014.00709     OR     https://www.ams.org.cn/EN/Y2015/V51/I8/913

Fig.1  Schematic of hot deformation and Q&P treatment process (Q&P—quenching and partitioning)

(a) combined process

(b) conventional two-step Q&P process

Fig.2  Dimension of the specimen in uniaxial tension test (unit: mm)
Fig.3  HTLCM images show the formation and growth of martensite during the quenching treatment at 362.9 ℃ (a), 358.5 ℃ (b), 356.6 ℃ (c) and 350.7 ℃ (d) (Arrow 1 indicates martensite nucleates in the grain boundary, arrow 2 indicates martensite transformation promoted in the adjacent grain, arrow 3 indicates new formed martensite, arrow 4 indicates martensite nucleates in the corner of austenite grain, arrow 5 indicates adjacent and parallel martensite, arrow 6 indicates non-adjacent but parallel martensite and arrow 7 indicate approximately parallel martensite)
Fig.4  SEM images of samples treated by Q&P process after hot deformation at 650 ℃ (a), 750 ℃ (b) and conventional Q&P process (c) (M1—initial martensite, M2—fresh martensite)
Fig.5  Bright field (a~c, e) and dark field (d, f) TEM images of samples treated by Q&P process after hot deformation at 650 ℃ (a), 750 ℃ (b), 850 ℃ (c, d) and conventional Q&P (e, f)
Fig.6  Effect of deformation temperature on start temperature of martensite transformation Ms
Fig.7  Uniaxial tensile curves of specimens obtained by different processes
[1] Briant C L, Banerji S K. Metall Trans, 1979; 10A: 1729
[2] Lee W S, Su T T. J Mater Process Technol, 1999; 87: 198
[3] Salemi A, Abdollah-Zadeh A. Mater Charact, 2008; 59: 484
[4] Matlock D K, BrautigamV E, Speer J G. Mater Sci Forum, 2003; 426-432: 1089
[5] Speer J, Matlock D K, De Cooman B C, Schroth J G. Acta Mater, 2003; 51: 2611
[6] Santofimia M J, Speer J G, Clarke A J, Zhao L, Sietsma J. Acta Mater, 2009; 57: 4548
[7] Wang C Y, Shi J, Cao W Q, Hui W J, Wang M Q, Dong H. Acta Metall Sin, 2011; 47: 720 (王存宇, 时 捷, 曹文全, 惠卫军, 王毛球, 董 瀚, 金属学报, 2011; 47: 720)
[8] Clarke A J, Speer J G, Matlock D K, Rizzo F C, Edmonds D V, Santofimia M J. Scr Mater, 2009; 61: 149
[9] Rizzo F, Martins A R, Speer J G. Mater Sci Forum, 2007; 539-543: 4476
[10] Wang C Y, Shi J, Cao W Q, Dong H. Mater Sci Eng, 2011; A527: 3442
[11] Cheng L, Wu K M, Wan X L, Wei R. Mater Charact, 2014; 87: 86
[12] Marder A R, Krauss G. Trans ASM, 1969; 69: 957
[13] Hao Q G, Wang Y, Jia X S, Zuo X W, Chen N L, Rong Y H. Acta Metall Sin (Engl Lett), 2014; 27: 444
[14] Hsu T Y, Jin X J, Rong Y H. J Alloys Compd, 2013; 577: S568
[15] Xiong X C, Chen B, Huang M X, Wang J F, Wang L. Scr Mater, 2013; 68: 321
[16] Speer J G, Matlock D K. World Iron Steel, 2009; 1: 31
[17] Chandra T, Ionescu M, Mantovani D. Mater Sci Forum, 2012; 706-709: 2824
[18] Zhou S, Zhang K, Chen N L, Gu J F, Rong Y H. ISIJ Int, 2011; 51: 1688
[19] Thomas G A, Speer J G, Matlock D K. Metall Mater Trans, 2011; 42A: 3652
[20] Koistinen D P, Marburger R E. Acta Metall, 1959; 7: 59
[21] Guimaraes J R C, Shyne J C. Metall Trans, 1973; 2: 2063
[22] Wang C Y. PhD Dissertation, Central Iron & Steel Research Institute, Beijing, 2010 (王存宇. 钢铁研究总院博士学位论文, 北京, 2010)
[23] Olson G B, Cohen M. J Less-Common Met, 1972; 28: 107
[24] Hsu T Y. Martensitic Transformation and Martensite. 2nd Ed., Beijing: Science Press, 1999: 690 (徐祖耀. 马氏体相变与马氏体. 第二版, 北京: 科学出版社, 1999: 690)
[25] Liu C C, Yao K F, Gao G F, Liu Z. Acta Metall Sin, 1999; 35: 1125 (刘春成, 姚可夫, 高国峰, 刘 庄. 金属学报, 1999; 35: 1125)
[26] Zhang Y J, Wang C Y, Liu W Z, Cao W Q. Trans Met Heat Treat, 2013; 34(5): 97 (张玉杰, 王存宇, 刘文忠, 曹文全. 材料热处理学报, 2013; 34(5): 97)
[1] DU Jinhui, BI Zhongnan, QU Jinglong. Recent Development of Triple Melt GH4169 Alloy[J]. 金属学报, 2023, 59(9): 1159-1172.
[2] BI Zhongnan, QIN Hailong, LIU Pei, SHI Songyi, XIE Jinli, ZHANG Ji. Research Progress Regarding Quantitative Characterization and Control Technology of Residual Stress in Superalloy Forgings[J]. 金属学报, 2023, 59(9): 1144-1158.
[3] LI Shilei, LI Yang, WANG Youkang, WANG Shengjie, HE Lunhua, SUN Guang'ai, XIAO Tiqiao, WANG Yandong. Multiscale Residual Stress Evaluation of Engineering Materials/Components Based on Neutron and Synchrotron Radiation Technology[J]. 金属学报, 2023, 59(8): 1001-1014.
[4] LI Fulin, FU Rui, BAI Yunrui, MENG Lingchao, TAN Haibing, ZHONG Yan, TIAN Wei, DU Jinhui, TIAN Zhiling. Effects of Initial Grain Size and Strengthening Phase on Thermal Deformation and Recrystallization Behavior of GH4096 Superalloy[J]. 金属学报, 2023, 59(7): 855-870.
[5] LIANG Kai, YAO Zhihao, XIE Xishan, YAO Kaijun, DONG Jianxin. Correlation Between Microstructure and Properties of New Heat-Resistant Alloy SP2215[J]. 金属学报, 2023, 59(6): 797-811.
[6] LI Qian, LIU Kai, ZHAO Tianliang. Rust Formation Behavior and Mechanism of Q235 Carbon Steel in 5%NaCl Salt Spray Under Elastic Tensile Stress[J]. 金属学报, 2023, 59(6): 829-840.
[7] HAN En-Hou, WANG Jianqiu. Effect of Surface State on Corrosion and Stress Corrosion for Nuclear Materials[J]. 金属学报, 2023, 59(4): 513-522.
[8] CHENG Yuanyao, ZHAO Gang, XU Deming, MAO Xinping, LI Guangqiang. Effect of Austenitizing Temperature on Microstructures and Mechanical Properties of Si-Mn Hot-Rolled Plate After Quenching and Partitioning Treatment[J]. 金属学报, 2023, 59(3): 413-423.
[9] CHANG Litao. Corrosion and Stress Corrosion Crack Initiation in the Machined Surfaces of Austenitic Stainless Steels in Pressurized Water Reactor Primary Water: Research Progress and Perspective[J]. 金属学报, 2023, 59(2): 191-204.
[10] ZHANG Kaiyuan, DONG Wenchao, ZHAO Dong, LI Shijian, LU Shanping. Effect of Solid-State Phase Transformation on Stress and Distortion for Fe-Co-Ni Ultra-High Strength Steel Components During Welding and Vacuum Gas Quenching Processes[J]. 金属学报, 2023, 59(12): 1633-1643.
[11] ZHANG Zixuan, YU Jinjiang, LIU Jinlai. Anisotropy of Stress Rupture Property of Ni Base Single Crystal Superalloy DD432[J]. 金属学报, 2023, 59(12): 1559-1567.
[12] WANG Chongyang, HAN Shiwei, XIE Feng, HU Long, DENG Dean. Influence of Solid-State Phase Transformation and Softening Effect on Welding Residual Stress of Ultra-High Strength Steel[J]. 金属学报, 2023, 59(12): 1613-1623.
[13] JIANG Jiang, HAO Shijie, JIANG Daqiang, GUO Fangmin, REN Yang, CUI Lishan. Quasi-Linear Superelasticity Deformation in an In Situ NiTi-Nb Composite[J]. 金属学报, 2023, 59(11): 1419-1427.
[14] QI Zhao, WANG Bin, ZHANG Peng, LIU Rui, ZHANG Zhenjun, ZHANG Zhefeng. Effects of Stress Ratio on the Fatigue Crack Growth Rate Under Steady State of Selective Laser Melted TC4 Alloy with Defects[J]. 金属学报, 2023, 59(10): 1411-1418.
[15] LU Haifei, LV Jiming, LUO Kaiyu, LU Jinzhong. Microstructure and Mechanical Properties of Ti6Al4V Alloy by Laser Integrated Additive Manufacturing with Alternately Thermal/Mechanical Effects[J]. 金属学报, 2023, 59(1): 125-135.
No Suggested Reading articles found!