Please wait a minute...
金属学报  2017, Vol. 53 Issue (7): 888-896    DOI: 10.11900/0412.1961.2017.00034
  本期目录 | 过刊浏览 |
马氏体相变对9%Cr热强钢管道多道焊接头残余应力演化的影响
王学1,2(),胡磊1,陈东旭3,孙松涛3,李立全3
1 武汉大学动力与机械学院 武汉 430072
2 哈尔滨工业大学先进焊接与连接国家重点实验室 哈尔滨 150001
3 河南第一火电建设公司 郑州 467001
Effect of Martensitic Transformation on Stress Evolution in Multi-Pass Butt-Welded 9%Cr Heat-Resistant Steel Pipes
Xue WANG1,2(),Lei HU1,Dongxu CHEN3,Songtao SUN3,Liquan LI3
1 School of Power and Mechanics, Wuhan University, Wuhan 430072, China
2 State Key Laboratory of Advanced Welding and Joining, Harbin Institute of Technology, Harbin 150001, China
3 Henan No.1 Thermal Power Construction Company, Zhengzhou 467001, China
全文: PDF(1451 KB)   HTML
  
摘要: 

使用有限元软件Abaqus计算了考虑马氏体相变影响时9%Cr钢管道多道接头中的应力演化过程,并分析了马氏体相变在应力演化中的作用。结果表明,在管道纵截面上,环向和轴向残余应力的分布相似,但环向残余应力较大。环向和轴向残余压应力的最大值均出现在末道焊缝及热影响区,残余拉应力的最大值则出现在管道中部的焊缝及热影响区,而管道内壁附近的残余应力较低。在末道焊缝附近,发生在较低温度下的马氏体相变不仅抵消了焊缝和热影响区热收缩所形成的拉应力,并且形成了显著的压应力,但马氏体相变并没有消除次表层焊缝显著的残余拉应力。末道焊道对多道焊接头残余应力的影响最大,其原因是马氏体相变虽然在先焊焊缝中形成了很高的压应力,但后续焊道的焊接热循环会显著降低该压应力,使最终结果表现为马氏体相变只显著地降低了末道焊缝及其热影响区内的拉应力,并形成了显著的压应力。马氏体相变对管道外壁附近残余应力的影响较大,而对管道内壁附近残余应力的影响较小。

关键词 9%Cr热强钢多道焊数值模拟马氏体相变残余应力    
Abstract

It has been recognized that low temperature martensitic transformation can reduce harmful tensile stress and generate beneficial compressive stress in weld zone of single pass welded joints. The influence of martensitic transformation is even greater in 9%Cr steel because of its high hardenability and low transformation temperature (about 100~400 ℃). However, compressive stress was confined in certain parts of weld zone in multi-pass butt-welded 9%Cr steel pipes. In this work, stress evolution in a multi-pass butt-welded 9%Cr steel pipe was predicted using Abaqus software, and the effect of martensitic transformation was further investigated. The simulated results show that the overall pattern for the axial and hoop stresses appears to be similar, despite the lower magnitudes for axial stress. The maximum compressive stress was found in the final weld pass, and the maximum tensile stress was formed in the weld pass adjacent to the final weld pass. Stress in weld passes adjacent to weld root is relatively low. Tensile stress due to thermal contraction in the final weld pass was relieved by martensitic transformation and clear compressive stress was formed. However, little effect of martensitic transformation was found on the significant tensile residual stress in weld passes adjacent to the final weld pass. The final weld pass has the primary effect on the formation of residual stress. Compressive stress was indeed generated by martensitic transformation in former weld pass, however it was relieved by weld thermal cycle of latter weld pass. As a result, the effect of martensitic transformation appears to be confined to the final weld pass. The influence of martensitic transformation is greater around outer surface than that around inner surface.

Key words9%Cr heat-resistant steel    multi-pass welding    numerical analysis    martensitic transformation    residual stress
收稿日期: 2017-02-13      出版日期: 2017-04-19
基金资助:国家自然科学基金项目Nos.51374153和51574181及先进焊接与连接国家重点实验室开放课题项目No.AWJ-Z15-02

引用本文:

王学,胡磊,陈东旭,孙松涛,李立全. 马氏体相变对9%Cr热强钢管道多道焊接头残余应力演化的影响[J]. 金属学报, 2017, 53(7): 888-896.
Xue WANG,Lei HU,Dongxu CHEN,Songtao SUN,Liquan LI. Effect of Martensitic Transformation on Stress Evolution in Multi-Pass Butt-Welded 9%Cr Heat-Resistant Steel Pipes. Acta Metall Sin, 2017, 53(7): 888-896.

链接本文:

http://www.ams.org.cn/CN/10.11900/0412.1961.2017.00034      或      http://www.ams.org.cn/CN/Y2017/V53/I7/888

图1  计算使用的管道和坡口尺寸示意图
Pass number Welding method I / A U / V v / (cmmin-1) Tp (or Ti) / ℃
1 GTAW 120 11 5.2 300
2 GTAW 170 11 6.5 200~250
3~11 GMAW 250 30 25~40 200~250
表1  管道焊接采用的焊接参数[15]
图2  焊缝及附近有限元网格划分以及焊道的布置
图3  焊接完成后的马氏体分布
图4  图3中点A在第1道焊缝焊接热循环过程中的温度以及组织随时间的变化曲线
图5  残余应力计算结果
图6  P91接头沿长度方向的管道内、外壁残余应力分布
图7  环向残余应力在焊接中的演化
图8  轴向残余应力在焊接中的演化
图9  图8c中点B在第3道焊缝中的应力演化
[1] Bugge J, Kj?r S, Blum R.High-efficiency coal-fired power plants development and perspectives[J]. Energy, 2006, 31: 1437
[2] Liu Z D, Cheng S C, Wang Q J, et al.Development of Boiler Steel Used for 600 ℃ Power Plants in China [M]. Beijing: Metallurgical Industry Press, 2011: 345
[2] (刘正东, 程世长, 王起江等. 中国600 ℃火电机组锅炉钢进展 [M]. 北京: 冶金工业出版社, 2011: 345)
[3] Liang W, Murakawa H, Deng D A.Investigation of welding residual stress distribution in a thick-plate joint with an emphasis on the features near weld end-start[J]. Mater. Des., 2015, 67: 303
[4] Wang X, Pan Q G, Tao Y S, et al.Type IV creep rupture characteristics of P92 steel weldment[J]. Acta Metall. Sin., 2012, 48: 427
[4] (王学, 潘乾刚, 陶永顺等. P92钢焊接接头IV型蠕变断裂特性[J]. 金属学报, 2012, 48: 427)
[5] Zhang G D, Zhou C Y, Xue J L.Finite element analysis of high temperature piping creep under inner pressure and welding residual stress[J]. Acta Metall. Sin., 2008, 44: 1271
[5] (张国栋, 周昌玉, 薛吉林. 内压与焊接残余应力共同作用下高温管道蠕变有限元分析[J]. 金属学报, 2008, 44: 1271)
[6] Zhang G D, Zhou C Y.Finite element simulations of welding residual stress and creep damage for welded joint[J]. Acta Metall. Sin., 2008, 44: 848
[6] (张国栋, 周昌玉. 焊接接头残余应力及蠕变损伤的有限元模拟[J]. 金属学报, 2008, 44: 848)
[7] Moat R J, Stone H J, Shirzadi A A, et al.Design of weld fillers for mitigation of residual stresses in ferritic and austenitic steel welds[J]. Sci. Technol. Weld. Join., 2011, 16: 279
[8] Ramjaun T, Stone H J, Karlsson L, et al.Effect of interpass temperature on residual stresses in multi-pass welds produced using low transformation temperature filler alloy[J]. Sci. Technol. Weld. Join., 2014, 19: 44
[9] Ooi S W, Garnham J E, Ramjaun T I.Review: Low transformation temperature weld filler for tensile residual stress reduction[J]. Mater. Des., 2014, 56: 773
[10] Mochizuki M, Toyoda M.Strategy of considering microstructure effect on weld residual stress analysis[J]. J. Pressure Vessel Technol., 2006, 129: 619
[11] Francis J A, Bhadeshia H K D H, Withers P J. Welding residual stresses in ferritic power plant steels[J]. Mater. Sci. Technol., 2007, 23: 1009
[12] Lee C H, Chang K H.Prediction of residual stresses in high strength carbon steel pipe weld considering solid-state phase transformation effects[J]. Comput. Struct., 2011, 89: 256
[13] Deng D A, Zhang Y B, Li S, et al.Influence of solid-state phase transformation on residual stress in P92 steel welded joint[J]. Acta Metall. Sin., 2016, 52: 394
[13] (邓德安, 张彦斌, 李索等. 固态相变对P92钢焊接接头残余应力的影响[J]. 金属学报, 2016, 52: 394)
[14] Yaghi A H, Hyde T H, Becker A A, et al.A comparison between measured and modeled residual stresses in a circumferentially butt-welded P91 steel pipe[J]. J. Pressure Vessel Technol., 2010, 132: 011206
[15] Deng D A, Murakawa H.Prediction of welding residual stress in multi-pass butt-welded modified 9Cr-1Mo steel pipe considering phase transformation effects[J]. Comp. Mater. Sci., 2006, 37: 209
[16] Yaghi A H, Hyde T H, Becke A A, et al.Finite element simulation of welding and residual stresses in a P91 steel pipe incorporating solid-state phase transformation and post-weld heat treatment[J]. J. Strain Anal. Eng. Des., 2008, 43: 275
[17] Ning B Q, Liu Y C, Qiao Z X, et al.Determination of critical cooling rates in undercooled austenite transformation process of T91 ferritic heat-resistant steel[J]. J. Mater. Eng., 2007, (9): 9
[17] (宁保群, 刘永长, 乔志霞等. T91铁素体耐热钢过冷奥氏体转变过程中临界冷却速度的研究[J]. 材料工程, 2007, (9): 9)
[18] Koistinen D P, Marburger R E.A general equation prescribing the extent of the austenite-martensite transformation in pure iron-carbon alloys and plain carbon steels[J]. Acta Metall., 1959, 7: 59
[19] Karlsson R I, Josefson B L.Three-dimensional finite element analysis of temperatures and stresses in a single-pass butt-welded pipe[J]. J. Pressure Vessel Technol., 1990, 112: 76
[20] Paddea S, Francis J A, Paradowska A M, et al.Residual stress distributions in a P91 steel-pipe girth weld before and after post weld heat treatment[J]. Mater. Sci. Eng., 2012, A534: 663
[21] Zhang Y H, Li H Q, Xu Y.Reasons for metallography defect form and the formation of P91 steel main steam pipe welding seam[J]. Northeast Electr. Power Technol., 2009, (7): 1
[21] (张艳红, 李宏强, 徐昀. P91钢主蒸汽管道焊缝金相缺陷形态及其形成原因探讨[J]. 东北电力技术, 2009, (7): 1)
[22] Wang Z Y, Li S J, Hao X J, et al.Ultrasonic testing of interlayer cracks in P91 butt weld[J]. Nondestr. Test., 2011, 33(5): 54
[22] (王志永, 李树军, 郝晓军等. P91钢管对接焊缝层间裂纹的超声波检测[J]. 无损检测, 2011, 33(5): 54)
[23] Wang X, Hu L, Xu Q, et al.Influence of martensitic transformation on welding residual stress in plates and pipes[J]. Sci. Technol. Weld. Join., 2016, doi: 10.1080/13621718.2016.1263711
[24] Brickstad B, Josefson B L.A parametric study of residual stresses in multi-pass butt-welded stainless steel pipes[J]. Int. J. Pressure Vessels Piping, 1998, 75: 11
[25] Radaj D.Heat Effects of Welding: Temperature Field, Residual Stress, Distortion[M]. Berlin Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag, 1992: 204
[1] 戴培元,胡兴,逯世杰,王义峰,邓德安. 尺寸因素对2D轴对称模型计算不锈钢管焊接残余应力精度的影响[J]. 金属学报, 2019, 55(8): 1058-1066.
[2] 秦海龙,张瑞尧,毕中南,杜洪标,张金辉. GH4169合金圆盘时效过程残余应力的演化规律研究[J]. 金属学报, 2019, 55(8): 997-1007.
[3] 张体明, 赵卫民, 蒋伟, 王永霖, 杨敏. X80钢焊接残余应力耦合接头组织不均匀下氢扩散的数值模拟[J]. 金属学报, 2019, 55(2): 258-266.
[4] 崔立山, 姜大强. 基于应变匹配的高性能金属纳米复合材料研究进展[J]. 金属学报, 2019, 55(1): 45-58.
[5] 魏铖, 柯常波, 马海涛, 张新平. 基于序参量梯度的改进相场模型及对大尺度体系马氏体相变的模拟研究[J]. 金属学报, 2018, 54(8): 1204-1214.
[6] 李军, 夏明许, 胡侨丹, 李建国. 大型铸锭均质化问题及其新解[J]. 金属学报, 2018, 54(5): 773-788.
[7] 刘新华, 付华栋, 何兴群, 付新彤, 江燕青, 谢建新. Cu-Al复合材料连铸直接成形数值模拟研究[J]. 金属学报, 2018, 54(3): 470-484.
[8] 刘政, 陈志平, 陈涛. 坩埚尺寸和电磁频率对半固态A356铝合金浆料流动的影响[J]. 金属学报, 2018, 54(3): 435-442.
[9] 文舒, 董安平, 陆燕玲, 祝国梁, 疏达, 孙宝德. GH536高温合金选区激光熔化温度场和残余应力的有限元模拟[J]. 金属学报, 2018, 54(3): 393-403.
[10] 种晓宇, 汪广驰, 杜军, 蒋业华, 冯晶. ZTAp/HCCI复合材料凝固过程中的温度场和热应力的数值模拟[J]. 金属学报, 2018, 54(2): 314-324.
[11] 高英俊, 卢昱江, 孔令一, 邓芊芊, 黄礼琳, 罗志荣. 晶体相场模型及其在材料微结构演化中的应用[J]. 金属学报, 2018, 54(2): 278-292.
[12] 武传松, 宿浩, 石磊. 搅拌摩擦焊接产热传热过程与材料流动的数值模拟[J]. 金属学报, 2018, 54(2): 265-277.
[13] 吴士平, 王汝佳, 陈伟, 戴贵鑫. 振动过程的数值模拟在金属凝固中应用的研究进展[J]. 金属学报, 2018, 54(2): 247-264.
[14] 王强, 何明, 朱晓伟, 李显亮, 吴春雷, 董书琳, 刘铁. 电磁场技术在冶金领域应用的数值模拟研究进展[J]. 金属学报, 2018, 54(2): 228-246.
[15] 王锦程, 郭灿, 张琪, 唐赛, 李俊杰, 王志军. 原子尺度下凝固形核计算模拟研究的进展[J]. 金属学报, 2018, 54(2): 204-216.