Please wait a minute...
Acta Metall Sin  2026, Vol. 62 Issue (9): 1528-1540    DOI: 10.11900/0412.1961.2024.00441
Research paper Current Issue | Archive | Adv Search |
Effect of Transient Heat Treatment on the Interfacial Microstructure and Bonding Properties of Titanium/Steel Transit Joint
SU Yiyun1, HAO Xiaohu1,2, LI Shuhua2, CUI Zeqin1(), YAN Dejun3(), LI Weiguo1
1 College of Materials Science and Engineering, Taiyuan University of Technology, Taiyuan 030024, China
2 Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Advanced Welding Technology for Ships, CSSC Huangpu Wenchong Shipbuilding Co. Ltd., Guangzhou 510715, China
3 Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Advanced Welding Technology for Ships, Foshan University, Foshan 528051, China
Cite this article: 

SU Yiyun, HAO Xiaohu, LI Shuhua, CUI Zeqin, YAN Dejun, LI Weiguo. Effect of Transient Heat Treatment on the Interfacial Microstructure and Bonding Properties of Titanium/Steel Transit Joint. Acta Metall Sin, 2026, 62(9): 1528-1540.

Download:  HTML  PDF(4591KB) 
Export:  BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)      
Abstract  

During the secondary welding process of titanium-steel hybrid structures for ships, repeated thermal cycles inevitably change the interfacial microstructure and mechanical properties of explosive-welded transit joints. These changes directly affect the bonding strength of hybrid structures and navigational safety of ships. Herein, simulated transient heat treatment (STHT) was adopted to study the relationship among temperature, interfacial microstructure, and bonding properties of a titanium-steel hybrid structures during the secondary welding process. Results showed that when the STHT temperature was <600 oC, the interfacial microstructure remained stable. Meanwhile, at ≥ 700 oC, recrystallization occurred, causing grains near the interface to become coarse. Furthermore, the thickness of the intermetallic compound layer comprising FeTi and TiC increased rapidly. Unlike aluminum-steel hybrid structures, in which the interfacial bonding strength monotonically decreases with increasing temperature, the bonding and shear strengths of the titanium-steel hybrid structures initially increased and then decreased, with peaks appearing at 500 and 600 oC. The thermal effect at medium and low temperatures promoted atomic diffusion and stress release, thereby improving the interfacial bonding strength. At high temperatures, grain coarsening and intermetallic compound growth decreased the bonding strength of the transit joint. Overall, the critical threshold temperature at the interface of the titanium-steel hybrid structures is 600 oC.

Key words:  transient heat treatment      titanium/steel joint      recrystallization      interfacial microstructure      bonding property     
Received:  26 December 2024     
ZTFLH:  TG142.4  
Fund: National Natural Science Foundation of China(52105389);China Postdoctoral Science Foundation(2023M743270);Shanxi Province Patent Transformation Project(202402002);Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Advanced Welding Technology for Ships(2023B1212070026)

URL: 

https://www.ams.org.cn/EN/10.11900/0412.1961.2024.00441     OR     https://www.ams.org.cn/EN/Y2026/V62/I9/1528

Fig.1  Illustrations of the experiment process
(a) explosive welding (Vd—detonation velocity, Vc—impact velocity, Vp—plate collision velocity, β—impact angle)
(b) simulated transient heat treatment (STHT) experiment
(c1, c2) shear strength (c1) and bonding strength (c2) tests (F—applied force)
MaterialCCrFeMnSiTi
TA2< 0.01-< 0.01--Bal.
9070.200.79Bal.0.930.50-
Table 1  Chemical compositions of TA2 pure titanium and 907 steel
Fig.2  SEM images showing the interfacial microstructures (a1-d1), enlarged images of the straight interface (a2-d2), and enlarged images of non-straight interface (a3-d3) in titanium/steel transit joint as-welded (a1-a3) and after STHT under 400 oC (b1-b3), 600 oC (c1-c3), and 700 oC (d1-d3)
Fig.3  EDS line scanning results of the non-straight interface in titanium/steel transit joint as-welded (a) and after STHT under 400 oC (b), 600 oC (c), and 700 oC (d)
PositionCTiFePossible phase
123.5457.6518.81TiC + FeTi
233.3643.8322.82TiC + FeTi
319.6437.9542.42TiC + Fe2Ti
426.0018.2255.78FeTi + α-Fe
525.984.0270.00α-Fe
628.3150.5621.13TiC + FeTi
79.5470.2720.19FeTi + α-Ti
810.4360.4225.15FeTi + α-Ti
929.3358.8611.81TiC + FeTi
1026.7225.3047.98TiC + α-Fe
1137.0546.4716.49TiC + FeTi
1228.6466.125.24TiC + α-Ti
1335.8228.1836.00TiC + α-Fe
1429.3120.4450.25FeTi + α-Fe
1535.7358.066.20TiC + α-Ti
1642.0839.8218.11TiC + α-Fe
1743.6824.0132.31TiC + α-Fe
189.9264.5225.56FeTi + α-Ti
1911.2861.5627.16FeTi + α-Ti
2013.8440.3045.86FeTi
Table 2  EDS spot scanning elemental analysis results of positions 1-20 in Fig.2
Fig.4  Inverse pole figures (IPFs) of the interface in titanium/steel transit joint as-welded (a) and after STHT under 600 oC (b) and 700 oC (c)
Fig.5  Pole figures (PFs) of titanium/steel transit joint for steel side (a1-c1) and Ti side (a2-c2) as-welded (a1, a2) and after STHT under 600 oC (b1, b2), and 700 oC (c1, c2) (TD—transverse direction, RD—rolling direction)
Fig.6  EBSD images (a, c, e) and grain boundary misorientation distributions (b, d, f) of the interface in titanium/steel transit joint as-welded (a, b) and after STHT under 600 oC (c, d) and 700 oC (e, f) (The black and red lines denote the high angle grain boundaries (HAGBs) with misorientation angle > 15° and low angle grain boundaries (LAGBs) with misorientation angle 2°-15°, respectively)
Fig.7  Kernel average misorientation (KAM) maps (a, c, e) and average misorientation distributions (b, d, f) of the interface in titanium/steel transit joint as-welded (a, b) and after STHT under 600 oC (c, d) and 700 oC (e, f)
Fig.8  Structural characteristics (a1-c1), statistical results of the corresponding recrystallizd, substructured, and deformed proportions of the steel side (a2-c2) and titanium side (a3-c3) of titanium/steel transit joint as-welded (a1-a3) and after STHT under 600 oC (b1-b3) and 700 oC (c1-c3)
Fig.9  Bonding strengths (a) and shear strengths (b) of the interface in titanium/steel transit joint as-welded and after STHT under different temperatures
Fig.10  SEM images showing the fracture morphologies (a-c) and fracture positions (d-f) of titanium/steel transit joint as-welded (a, d) and after STHT under 600 oC (b, e) and 700 oC (c, f) (Insets in Figs.10a1-a3 and Figs.10d-f show the locally enlarged images of square regions and EDS mappings, respectively)
PositionTiFePossible phase
159.8940.11FeTi
258.8641.14FeTi
358.9541.05FeTi
Table 3  EDS spot scanning elemental results of positions 1-3 in Fig.10
Fig.11  SEM images showing the nanoindentation test locations (a-c) and nano-hardness maps (d-f) of titanium/steel joint as-welded (a, d) and after STHT under 600 oC (b, e) and 700 oC (c, f)
Fig.12  Nanoindentation load-displacement curves (a) of FeTi, α-Ti, and α-Fe phases and the corresponding modulus of elasticity (b) of as-welded titanium/steel joint
[1] Yang M, Wang J X, Cao C, et al. A new strategy for preparing advanced aluminum/steel joint using low-temperature explosive welding technology [J]. Phys. Status Solidi-Rapid Res. Lett., 2023, 17: 2300179
doi: 10.1002/pssr.v17.10
[2] Tricarico L, Spina R, Sorgente D, et al. Effects of heat treatments on mechanical properties of Fe/Al explosion-welded structural transition joints [J]. Mater. Des., 2009, 30: 2693
doi: 10.1016/j.matdes.2008.10.010
[3] Xia Y Q, Dong H G, Zhang R Z, et al. Interfacial microstructure and shear strength of Ti6Al4V alloy/316L stainless steel joint brazed with Ti33.3Zr16.7Cu50 - x Ni x amorphous filler metals [J]. Mater. Des., 2020, 187: 108380
doi: 10.1016/j.matdes.2019.108380
[4] Kundu S, Roy D, Chatterjee S, et al. Influence of interface microstructure on the mechanical properties of titanium/17-4 PH stainless steel solid state diffusion bonded joints [J]. Mater. Des., 2012, 37: 560
doi: 10.1016/j.matdes.2011.10.041
[5] Norouzi E, Shamanian M, Atapour M, et al. Diffusion brazing of Ti-6Al-4V and AISI 304: An EBSD study and mechanical properties [J]. J. Mater. Sci., 2017, 52: 12467
doi: 10.1007/s10853-017-1376-z
[6] Dong H G, Li Y G, Li P, et al. Inhomogeneous microstructure and mechanical properties of rotary friction welded joints between 5052 aluminum alloy and 304 stainless steel [J]. J. Mater. Process. Technol., 2019, 272: 17
doi: 10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2019.04.039
[7] Li S H, Chen Y H, Zhou X W, et al. High-strength titanium alloy/steel butt joint produced via friction stir welding [J]. Mater. Lett., 2019, 234: 155
doi: 10.1016/j.matlet.2018.09.094
[8] Li Y L, Di H S, Chen L Q, et al. Microstructure and mechanical properties of TA2/304 weld seam with Cu transition layer under bias oscillation laser welding process [J]. J. Mater. Eng. Perform., 2024, 33: 4962
doi: 10.1007/s11665-023-08295-5
[9] Wang Y C, Li P, Zhao C H, et al. A novel high entropy composite interlayer for diffusion bonding of TC4 titanium alloy to 316L stainless steel [J]. Mater. Today Commun., 2024, 41: 110291
[10] Wang X M. Property and welding procedure of the steel-aluminum structural transition joint [J]. Ship Ocean Eng., 2008, 37(3): 20
王绪明. 钢-铝结构过渡接头的性能特点及焊接工艺 [J]. 船海工程, 2008, 37(3): 20
[11] Li B F, Li J Y. Application of aluminum-steel transition joint in real ship construction [J]. Dev. Appl. Mater., 1994, 9(6): 1
李标峰, 李敬勇. 铝-钢过渡接头在实船建造中的应用 [J]. 材料开发与应用, 1994, 9(6): 1
[12] Wang S H, Luo X B, Su H, et al. Effect of heat treatment temperature on interfacial microstructures and bonding properties of Al-steel clad plate [J]. J. Iron Steel Res., 2019, 31: 937
王世宏, 罗小兵, 苏 航 等. 热处理温度对铝钢复合板界面组织和性能的影响 [J]. 钢铁研究学报, 2019, 31: 937
doi: 10.13228/j.boyuan.issn1001-0963.20180027
[13] Phengsakul S, Rodchanarowan A. Effect of thermal treatment on intermetallic phases of Fe/Al structural transition joints [J]. Energy Procedia, 2013, 34: 782
doi: 10.1016/j.egypro.2013.06.814
[14] Zhao H, Wang Y Z, Bai Y F, et al. Investigation on heat treatment process optimization of 304L/Q235B stainless steel clad plates [J]. Hot Work. Technol., 2023, 52(16): 69
赵 惠, 王艺卓, 白一凡 等. 304L/Q235B不锈钢层状复合板热处理工艺优化研究 [J]. 热加工工艺, 2023, 52(16): 69
[15] Liu Z W, Guan S Z, Liu R S, et al. Relation of microstructure and mechanical property on aluminium/steel clad plate joining intererface under different heat treatment temperature [J]. Met. World, 2010, (1): 18
刘壮武, 关尚哲, 刘润生 等. 铝/钢复合板不同热处理温度结合界面显微结构与力学性能的关系 [J]. 金属世界, 2010, (1): 18
[16] Wang T, Wang H, Li N, et al. Microstructural and mechanical heterogeneity of electron beam welded thick pure titanium/Q235B steel bimetallic plate joint [J]. J. Mater. Eng. Perform., 2023, 32: 5273
doi: 10.1007/s11665-022-07489-7
[17] Ren G Z, Zhang Y, Zhou J P, et al. Titanium/steel composites were prepared by composite interlayer and two pass laser welding [J]. J. Mater. Res. Technol., 2023, 27: 6367
doi: 10.1016/j.jmrt.2023.11.118
[18] Gao Y D, Zhou J P, Zhang Y, et al. Two pass laser welding of TC4 titanium alloy and 304 stainless steel using TA2/Q235 composite interlayer [J]. Mater. Lett., 2019, 255: 126521
doi: 10.1016/j.matlet.2019.126521
[19] Bi Z Y, Yang J, Liu H Z, et al. Investigation on the welding process and microstructure and mechanical property of butt joints of TA1/X65 clad plates [J]. Acta Metall. Sin., 2016, 52: 1017
doi: 10.11900/0412.1961.2015.00615
毕宗岳, 杨 军, 刘海璋 等. TA1/X65复合板焊接工艺及焊缝组织和性能研究 [J]. 金属学报, 2016, 52: 1017
doi: 10.11900/0412.1961.2015.00615
[20] Wang T, Zhang F, Li X P, et al. Interfacial evolution of explosively welded titanium/steel joint under subsequent EBW process [J]. J. Mater. Process. Technol., 2018, 261: 24
doi: 10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2018.05.031
[21] Kundu S, Sam S, Chatterjee S. Interface microstructure and strength properties of Ti-6Al-4V and microduplex stainless steel diffusion bonded joints [J]. Mater. Des., 2011, 32: 2997
doi: 10.1016/j.matdes.2010.12.052
[22] Zhao D S, Yan J C, Liu Y J. Effect of intermetallic compounds on heat resistance of hot roll bonded titanium alloy-stainless steel transition joint [J]. Trans. Nonferrous Met. Soc. China, 2013, 23: 1966
doi: 10.1016/S1003-6326(13)62684-9
[23] Wu T, Yang C L. Interfacial evolution of titanium/steel clad plates during pulsed tungsten inert gas welding [J]. Mater. Sci. Technol., 2023, 39: 834
doi: 10.1080/02670836.2022.2143622
[24] Wu T, Yang C L. Influence of pulse TIG welding thermal cycling on the microstructure and mechanical properties of explosively weld titanium/steel joint [J]. Vacuum, 2022, 197: 110817
doi: 10.1016/j.vacuum.2021.110817
[25] Akbari Mousavi S A A, Sartangi P F. Effect of post-weld heat treatment on the interface microstructure of explosively welded titanium-stainless steel composite [J]. Mater. Sci. Eng., 2008, A494: 329
[26] Zhang B Y, Ma H H, Xu J F, et al. Investigations on the microstructure evolution and mechanical properties of explosive welded ODS-Cu/316L stainless steel composite [J]. Fusion Eng. Des., 2022, 179: 113142
doi: 10.1016/j.fusengdes.2022.113142
[27] Yang X Y, Guo K, Gao Y Z, et al. Effect of carbon content on interfacial microstructure and mechanical properties of a vacuum hot-compressed bonding titanium-steel composite [J]. Mater. Sci. Eng., 2021, A824: 141802
[28] Chai X Y, Chen G, Chai F, et al. Hot roll bonding between commercially pure titanium and high-strength low-alloy steel using Fe interlayer [J]. J. Iron Steel Res. Int., 2019, 26: 1126
doi: 10.1007/s42243-019-00322-x
[29] Yu C, Xiao H, Yu H, et al. Mechanical properties and interfacial structure of hot-roll bonding TA2/Q235B plate using DT4 interlayer [J]. Mater. Sci. Eng., 2017, A695: 120
[30] Momono T, Enjo T, Ikeuchi K. Effects of carbon content on the diffusion bonding of iron and steel to titanium [J]. ISIJ Int., 1990, 30: 978
doi: 10.2355/isijinternational.30.978
[31] Zhang H, Jiao K X, Zhang J L, et al. Microstructure and mechanical properties investigations of copper-steel composite fabricated by explosive welding [J]. Mater. Sci. Eng., 2018, A731: 278
[32] Yang M, Cao C, Wang J X. Fabrication of high-quality platinum coating using explosive welding technology and its microstructure evolution mechanisms [J]. Mater. Des., 2023, 235: 112372
doi: 10.1016/j.matdes.2023.112372
[33] Tan J C, Tan M J. Dynamic continuous recrystallization characteristics in two stage deformation of Mg-3Al-1Zn alloy sheet [J]. Mater. Sci. Eng., 2003, A339: 124
[34] Omiya M, Sakakibara Y. Strain evaluation method around triple junctions using electron backscatter diffraction [J]. Mater. Trans., 2024, 65: 754
doi: 10.2320/matertrans.MT-Z2023013
[35] Prasanthi T N, Sudha R C, Saroja S. Explosive cladding and post-weld heat treatment of mild steel and titanium [J]. Mater. Des., 2016, 93: 180
doi: 10.1016/j.matdes.2015.12.120
[1] QIN Zhiwei, WANG Bin, ZHAO Qiang, LI Jiachen, SUN Yutao, HONG Xiaolong, LI Peng, DONG Honggang. Effect of Heat Treatment on Interfacial Microstructure of Inertial Friction Welded Joints for GH4065A/IN718 Dissimilar Superalloys[J]. 金属学报, 2026, 62(6): 1032-1042.
[2] SUN Yuchong, LIU Zhimin, XU Zhen, TIAN Shuangyong, TIAN Shuang. Effect of Zr Content on Recrystallization Behavior and Mechanical Properties of Al-Mg-Si Cast-Rolled Sheet[J]. 金属学报, 2026, 62(3): 421-430.
[3] ZHAO Xia, WANG Min, HAO Xianchao, ZHANG Long, GAO Ming, MA Yingche, LIU Kui. Effect of Grain Boundary Carbide and Dynamic Recrystalli-zation on the High-Temperature Plasticity of Columnar-Grain Solidified Microstructure in 690 Alloy[J]. 金属学报, 2026, 62(2): 339-350.
[4] ZHENG Deyu, XIA Yufeng, ZENG Yang, ZHOU Jie. Dynamic Recrystallization Process Simulation of GH4706 Alloy by Level-Set Method[J]. 金属学报, 2025, 61(9): 1425-1437.
[5] ZHANG Mingchuan, XU Qinsi, LIU Yi, CAI Yusheng, MU Yiqiang, REN Dechun, JI Haibin, LEI Jiafeng. Effect of Hot-Pressing Temperature on the Microstructure and Properties of the Diffusion-Bonded Region of TC4 Alloy[J]. 金属学报, 2025, 61(8): 1183-1192.
[6] GE Penghua, ZHANG Yong, LI Zhiming. Soft-Magnetic and Mechanical Behaviors of Heterostructured FeCoNi Medium-Entropy Alloys[J]. 金属学报, 2025, 61(7): 1119-1128.
[7] BAO Chengli, LI Hao, HU Li, ZHOU Tao, TANG Ming, HE Qubo, LIU Xiangguo. Construction of Hot Processing Map of Solutionized Mg-10Gd-6Y-1.5Zn-0.5Zr Alloy and Microstructure Evolution[J]. 金属学报, 2025, 61(4): 632-642.
[8] PENG Zichao, LUO Junpeng, ZHAO Yu, ZHOU Lei, WANG Xuqing, ZOU Jinwen. Evolution of Microstrucutre During Static Recrystallization in FGH96 Superalloy[J]. 金属学报, 2025, 61(2): 235-242.
[9] LIU Guanghui, WANG Weiguo, Rohrer Gregory S, CHEN Song, LIN Yan, TONG Fang, FENG Xiaozheng, ZHOU Bangxin. {111}/{111} Near Singular Boundaries in a Dynamically Recrystallized Al-Zn-Mg-Cu Alloy Compressed at Elevated Temperature[J]. 金属学报, 2024, 60(9): 1165-1178.
[10] YANG Ruize, ZHAI Ruzong, REN Shaofei, SUN Mingyue, XU Bin, QIAO Yanxin, YANG Lanlan. Evolution and Healing Mechanism of 1Cr22Mn16N High Nitrogen Austenitic Stainless Steel Interface Microstructure During Plastic Deformation Bonding[J]. 金属学报, 2024, 60(7): 915-925.
[11] JIANG Haowen, PENG Wei, FAN Zengwei, WANG Yangxin, LIU Tengshi, DONG Han. Effect of Ag on Microstructure and Mechanical Properties of Austenitic Stainless Steel[J]. 金属学报, 2024, 60(4): 434-442.
[12] TIAN Teng, ZHA Min, YIN Haoliang, HUA Zhenming, JIA Hailong, WANG Huiyuan. Enhanced Mechanical Properties and Thermal Stability Mechanism of a High Solid Solution Al-Mg Alloy Processed by Cryogenic High-Reduction Hard-Plate Rolling[J]. 金属学报, 2024, 60(4): 473-484.
[13] CHEN Shenghu, WANG Qiyu, JIANG Haichang, RONG Lijian. Effect of δ-Ferrite on Hot Deformation and Recrystallization of 316KD Austenitic Stainless Steel for Sodium-Cooled Fast Reactor Application[J]. 金属学报, 2024, 60(3): 367-376.
[14] HU Baojia, ZHENG Qinyuan, LU Yi, JIA Chunni, LIANG Tian, ZHENG Chengwu, LI Dianzhong. Recrystallization Controlling in a Cold-Rolled Medium Mn Steel and Its Effect on Mechanical Properties[J]. 金属学报, 2024, 60(2): 189-200.
[15] ZHAI Xinya, HE Zhenghua, SHA Yuhui, ZHU Xiaofei, LI Feng, CHEN Lijia, ZUO Liang. Inhibitor and Secondary Recrystallization Behavior of Giant Magnetostriction of Fe-Ga Thin Sheet[J]. 金属学报, 2024, 60(11): 1559-1570.
No Suggested Reading articles found!