|
|
|
| SEGREGATION OF ATOMS ON THE INTERFACES IN THE RPV MODEL STEEL STUDIED BY APT |
| XU Gang, CAI Linling, FENG Liu, ZHOU Bangxin, LIU Wenqing, WANG Junan |
1) Institute of Materials, Shanghai University, Shanghai 200072
2) Laboratory for Microstructures, Shanghai University, Shanghai 200444 |
|
Cite this article:
XU Gang CAI Linling FENG Liu ZHOU Bangxin LIU Wenqing WANG Junan. SEGREGATION OF ATOMS ON THE INTERFACES IN THE RPV MODEL STEEL STUDIED BY APT. Acta Metall Sin, 2012, 48(7): 789-796.
|
|
|
Abstract The segregation of impurity or solute atoms to grain boundaries as well as phase interfaces can either improve or degrade the chemical, physical and mechanical properties of alloys. This phenomenon has been studied widely for iron based alloys, and the analysis method by an atom probe tomography (APT) is a powerful tool for better understanding this problem. The resulting composition changes of grain boundaries and phase interfaces, as well as the precipitation of Cu-rich nanophases, are frequently associated with the phenomenon of embrittlement in ferritic reactor pressure vessel (RPV) steels. The present work was carried out to study the segregation of impurity or solute atoms to grain boundaries as well as phase interfaces in a RPV model steel with higher content of Cu (0.53%, atomic fraction) than commercially available one. The RPV model steel was prepared by vacuum induction melting. The specimens were further heat treated by water quenching at 880 ℃ for 30 min and tempering at 660 ℃ for 10 h, and finally aged at 370 ℃ for 3000 h. The results show that the segregation amount of Ni, Mn, Si, C, P and Mo atoms on grain boundaries are varied. The sequence of segregation tendency for different atoms from strong to weak is C, P, Mo, Si, Mn and Ni, whilst Cu atoms were clearly depleted at the grain boundaries. Si atoms also segregate to the grain boundaries, but it depends on the characteristic of the grain boundaries. The C segregation range at grain boundaries is the widest. According to the width of the composition profiles at the half intensity for different atoms at the grain boundaries, the segregation range of C atoms is 1.5 times wider than that of Mn, Ni and Mo atoms. Furthermore, Ni and Mn atoms evidently segregate to the interfaces between the Cu-rich phase and the α-Fe matrix, while C, P, Mo, Si atoms prefer to segregate towards the α-Fe matrix near the interfaces, but their segregation amount at the interfaces of Cu-rich phase and the α-Fe matrix is less than that at the grain boundaries.
|
|
Received: 17 November 2011
|
|
|
| Fund: ;National Natural Science Foundation of China |
| [1] Takaki S, Fujioka M, Aihara S, Nagataki Y, Yamashita T, Sano N, Adachi Y, Nomura M, Yaguchi H. Mater Trans, 2004; 45: 2239[2] Garc´?a–Mazar´?o M, Lancha A M, Hern´andez–Mayoral M. J Nucl Mater, 2007; 360: 293[3] Laha K, Kyono J, Kishimoto S, Shinya N. Scr Mater, 2005; 52: 675[4] Bowen P, Hippsley C A, Knott J F. Acta Metall, 1984; 32: 637[5] Bulloch J H. Int J Pres Ves Pip, 1988; 33: 197[6] Wang K, Xu T D, Shao C, Yang C. J Iron Steel Res Int, 2011; 18: 61[7] Wei W, Grabke H J. Corros Sci, 1986; 26: 223[8] Atrens A, Wang J Q, Stiller K, Andren H O. Corros Sci, 2006; 48: 79[9] Heo N H, Jung Y C, Lee J K, Kim K T. Scr Mater, 2008; 59: 1200[10] Lemarchand D, Cadel E, Chambreland S, Blavette D. Philos Mag, 2002; 82A: 1651[11] Kolli R P, Seidman D N. Acta Mater, 2008; 56: 2073[12] Wu J, Song S H, Weng L Q, Xi T H, Yuan Z X. Mater Charact, 2008; 59: 261[13] Khalid F A. Scr Mater, 2001; 44: 797[14] Hudson D, Smith G D W. Scr Mater, 2009; 61: 411[15] Sha G, Yao L, Liao X Z, Ringer S P, Duan Z C, Langdon T G. Ultramicroscopy, 2011; 111: 500[16] Isheim D, Kolli R P, Fine M E, Seidman D N. Scr Mater, 2006; 55: 35[17] Etienne A, Radiguet B, Cunningham N J, Odette G R, Valiev R, Pareige P. Ultramicroscopy, 2011; 111: 659[18] Li H, Xia S, Zhou B X, Liu W Q. Mater Charact, 2012; 66: 68[19] Toyama T, Nagai Y, Tang Z, Hasegawa M, Almazouzi A, van Walle E, Gerard R. Acta Mater, 2007; 55: 6852[20] Bischler P J E, Wild R K. In: Gelles D S, Nanstad R K, Kumar A S, Little E A eds., Effects of Radiation on Materials: 17th International Symposium, ASTM STP 1270, West Conshohocken, PA: American Society for Testing and Materials, 1996: 260[21] Miller M K. Atom Probe Tomography: Analysis at the Atomic Level. New York: Kliwer Academic/Plenum Publishers, 2000: 25[22] Yong Q L. Secondary Phase in Steel. Beijing: Metallurgical Industry Press, 2006: 127(雍其龙. 钢铁材料中的第二相. 北京: 冶金工业出版社, 2006: 127)[23] Hornbogen E, Glenn R C. Trans Metall Soc AIME, 1960; 218: 1064[24] Xu G, Chu D F, Cai L L, Zhou B X, Wang W, Peng J C. Acta Metall Sin, 2011; 7: 905(徐刚, 楚大锋, 蔡琳玲, 周邦新, 王伟, 彭剑超. 金属学报, 2011; 47: 905)[25] Vurpillot F, Cerezo A, Blavette D, Larson D J. Microsc Microanal, 2004; 10: 384[26] Blavette D, Duval P, Letellier L, Guttmann M. Acta Mater, 1996; 44: 4995[27] Faulkner R G, Jones R B, Zheng L, Flewett P E J. Philos Mag, 2005; 85: 2065[28] Suzuki S, Obata M, Abiko K, Kimura H. Scr Metall, 1983; 17: 1325[29] Cerezo A, Clifton P H, Lozano–Perez S, Panayi P, Sha G, Smith G D W. Microsc Microanal, 2007; 13: 408[30] Jiao Z, Was G S. Acta Mater, 2011; 59: 4467[31] Chu D F, Xu G, Wang W, Peng J C, Wang J A, Zhou B X. Acta Metall Sin, 2011; 47: 269(楚大锋, 徐刚, 王伟, 彭剑超, 王均安, 周邦新. 金属学报, 2011; 47: 269) |
| No Suggested Reading articles found! |
|
|
Viewed |
|
|
|
Full text
|
|
|
|
|
Abstract
|
|
|
|
|
Cited |
|
|
|
|
| |
Shared |
|
|
|
|
| |
Discussed |
|
|
|
|
