Alloying is often used to improve resistance to hydrogen-induced pulverization and cracking of hydrogen storage materials such as titanium and zirconium. However, it often affects the hydrogen storage performance of the material itself. Ti-Y alloys exhibit good mechanical properties, and they can effectively suppress hydrogen embrittlement. The properties of hydrogen absorption and desorption were investigated experimentally and theoretically in the present work. Y was uniformly doped into Ti films as a substitution atom using direct current magnetron sputtering. In addition, a Ni film of about 5 nm was subsequently deposited onto all sample surfaces to reduce surface contamination. Deuterium gas (D2) was used for hydrogen absorption experiment. Hydrogen absorption results show that the deuterium concentration in Ti-Y films increases with the increase of Y concentration. Combined with the density functional theory (DFT) calculation, the effects of Y doping on the hydrogen absorption properties of Ti could be summarized as follows: (1) the binding energy of Y to H calculated by DFT is stronger than that of Ti, thereby increasing the concentration of D absorbed; (2) Y has a strong affinity for O to form Y2O3, which reduces O impurity concentration in Ti film and facilitates more D atoms to enter the Ti lattice to increase the amount of D absorption; (3) Y substitutes for the Ti atom to increase the binding energy of Ti—H adjacent to Y, making the D atom less likely to escape, and to reduce the diffusion barrier of D around Ti, which is distant from Y, making it easy for D to diffuse deeper into the sample. Therefore, the concentration of D absorbed in Ti samples increases with the increase of Y concentration. With regard to the properties of D desorbed in Ti-Y samples, the results show that the D desorption activation energy of the deuteride Ti-Y film could be increased by doping Y. The D desorption temperature is determined by the D thermal desorption kinetics of the Ni/Ti-Y film system, and Y doping may increase the apparent binding energy and diffusion activation energy for D of the overall Ti lattice. The surface potential barrier has an important effect on D desorbed from Ti. Furthermore, Y doping has a certain degree of influence on the hydrogen absorption and desorption performance of Ti thin films.
Fig.1 Schematic of magnetron sputtering composite target
Structure type
Space group
Space group No.
Cell parameter
a / nm
b / nm
c / nm
α / (°)
β / (°)
γ / (°)
α-Ti
P63/mmc
194
0.29487
0.29487
0.46146
90
90
120
TiH2
Fmm
225
0.44275
0.44275
0.44275
90
90
90
Table 1 Structural parameters of α-Ti and TiH2 unitcell
Fig.2 H diffusion paths in α-Ti (black arrows) (The blue (including the green), white, and purple balls represent Ti, H, and Y atoms, respectively; O1, O2, O3 represent octahedral interstitial sites (OIS) 1, 2, and 3, respectively; TIS—tetrahedron interstitial sites)
Fig.3 H diffusion paths in TiH2 (black arrows) (The blue, white, and purple balls represent Ti, H, and Y atoms, respectively; T1, T2 represent TIS 1 and 2, respectively)
Structure
Binding energy / eV
Diffusion activation energy / eV
Undoped Y
Doped Y
Undoped Y
Doped Y (near Y, far from Y)
α-Ti
-
-
Path 1: 0.733
Path 2: 1.987
Path 3: 0.563
Path 1: 1.605, 0.721
Path 2: 4.369, 1.906
Path 3: 1.215, 0.616
TiH2
Site 1: 1.136
Site 1: 1.167
Path 1: 1.101
Path 1: 1.885, 1.070
Site 2: 1.136
Site 2: 1.102
Path 2: 0.965
Path 2: 0.993, 0.961
Site 3: 1.348
Site 3: 1.197
Table 2 Calculation results of hydrogen binding energy and diffusion activation energy in α-Ti and TiH2
Fig.4 Energy barriers for a H atom to need to be overcome in passing through different diffusion paths in α-Ti (Ti32) (a) and TiH2 (Ti32H64) (b) before and after Y doping
Fig.5 Schematic of H at different positions in calculating the binding energy of H in Y-doped TiH2 (The gray, orange, green, and pink balls all represent the H atoms of the TiH2 matrix; the blue and purple balls represent the Ti and Y atoms, respectively; the white ball represents the H atom located in OIS near the Y atom)
Structure type
Bond
Population
Length / nm
Ti32 + (OIS)H
H 1—Ti 24
0.11
0.207939
H 1—Ti 25
0.11
0.207980
H 1—Ti 31
0.11
0.210424
H 1—Ti 27
0.11
0.210441
H 1—Ti 22
0.11
0.210450
H 1—Ti 18
0.11
0.210462
Ti31Y + (OIS)H
H 1—Ti 16
0.25
0.196828
H 1—Ti 22
-0.04
0.215428
H 1—Ti 30
-0.04
0.215478
H 1—Ti 6
-0.09
0.216495
H 1—Ti 14
-0.09
0.216544
H 1—Y 1
0.75
0.231456
Ti32H64
H 57—Ti 29
0.17
0.191691
H 57—Ti 32
0.17
0.191692
H 57—Ti 31
0.17
0.191692
H 57—Ti 30
0.17
0.191690
Ti31YH64
H 57—Y 1
0.78
0.216871
H 57—Ti 29
-0.02
0.191911
H 57—Ti 30
-0.03
0.191911
H 57—Ti 31
-0.02
0.191912
H 61—Ti 13
0.17
0.192944
H 61—Ti 16
0.18
0.192419
H 61—Ti 29
0.17
0.194045
H 61—Ti 30
0.17
0.194046
H 53—Ti 9
0.17
0.192053
H 53—Ti 12
0.16
0.191819
H 53—Ti 26
0.16
0.191820
H 53—Ti 27
0.16
0.190320
Table 3 Bonding order and length of interatomic bonds in α-Ti (Ti32) and TiH2 (Ti32H64) before and after Y doping
Fig.6 RBS experimental and simulated spectra of TiY0.13 before (a) and after (b) absorbing deuterium (RBS—Rutherford backscattering spectrometry; insets are the corresponding local enlargements of spectra)
Fig.7 ERDA experimental and simulated spectra of TiY0.13D0.78 sample after absorbing deuterium (ERDA—elastic recoil detection analysis)
Fig.8 Depth profiles of D concentration in Ti films with Y concentration after absorbing deuterium (Dashed lines indicate estimated values)
Sample
Before/after hydrogenation
Thickness / (1015 atoms·cm-2)
Atomic fraction of Ti / %
Atomic fraction of Y / %
Atomic fraction of D / %
Ni
Ti
Ti
(TiD0.63)
Before
57
7060
100
0
0
After
50
11300
61.50
0
38.50
TiY0.08
(TiY0.08D0.73)
Before
48
7200
92.50
7.50
0
After
45
12200
55.11
4.59
40.30
TiY0.13
(TiY0.13D0.78)
Before
50
6370
88.80
11.20
0
After
45
10800
52.44
6.56
41.00
Table 4 Element concentration and film thickness before and after deuterium absorption measured by ion beam analysis
Fig.9 GIXRD spectra of Ti and TiY0.08 films before (a) and after (b) absorbing deuterium
Fig.10 XPS full scan spectra of TiD0.63 and TiY0.13D0.78 after absorbing deuterium (a), and XPS narrow scan spectra of Y3d in TiY0.13D0.78 (b) and Ti2p in TiD0.63 and TiY0.13D0.78 (c)
Fig.11 Energy states of atomic and molecular hydrogen on the surface and in the bulk of metal ( is the heat of solution for molecules; is the energy barrier for conversion of molecules to chemisorbed state H; is the energy barrier for conversion of adsorbed H to molecular hydrogen; is the energy barrier for transformation of adsorbed H into dissolved H; is the energy barrier for transformation of dissolved H into adsorbed H; is the diffusion activation energy; is the binding energy between H and host atom; is the de-trapping activation energy; is the saddle point energy)
Fig.12 Thermal desorption spectra of TiD0.63 (a) and TiY0.13D0.78 (b) samples after absorbing deuter-ium (only the D2 signal is shown)
Fig.13 Relationships between heating rate (v) and thermal desorption peak temperature (TP) of TiD0.63 and TiY0.13D0.78 (R2—goodness of fit)
1
Schlapbach L, Züttel A. Hydrogen-storage materials for mobile applications [J]. Nature, 2001, 414: 353
2
Beavis L C, Miglionico C J. Structural behavior of metal tritide films [J]. J. Less Common Met., 1972, 27: 201
3
Duan Y M, Wang W D, Ding W, et al. IBA investigation on the effect of Ti-Mo interdiffusion on the D concentration in TiD x /Mo films [J]. Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res., 2020, 470B: 61
4
Hirooka Y, Miyake M, Sano T. A study of hydrogen absorption and desorption by titanium [J]. J. Nucl. Mater., 1981, 96: 227
5
Tal-Gutelmacher E, Eliezer D. Hydrogen cracking in titanium-based alloys [J]. J. Alloys Compd., 2005, 404-406: 621
6
Zhao Y, Zheng H, Liu S, et al. Investigation of the structure and the property of hydrogen storage Ti-Mo alloys [J]. Acta Metall. Sin., 2003, 39: 89
Shi L Q, Zhou Z Y, Zhao G Q, et al. Hydrogenation characteristics and observation of disintegration conditions of Ti-Mo and Ni-coated Ti-Mo thin films [J]. J. Vac. Sci. Technol., 2001, 19A: 240
8
Shi L Q, Zhou Z Y, Zhao G Q. Hydrogen storage and hydrogen embrittlement of Ti-Mo alloy films [J]. Acta Metall. Sin., 2000, 36: 530
Liu B L, Liu S, Wang L B. Investigation on helium bubbles shape in Ti and Ti alloy by transmission electron microscopy [J]. At. Energy Sci. Technol., 2008, 42: 799
Zhao E T, Chen Y Y, Kong F T, et al. Effect of yttrium on microstructure and mold filling capacity of a near-α high temperature titanium alloy [J]. China Foundry, 2012, 9: 344
12
Heo K H, Munirathnam N R, Lim J W, et al. Effect of oxygen and yttrium doping on the electrical resistivity and hardness of titanium metal obtained by electron beam melting [J]. Mater. Chem. Phys., 2008, 112: 923
13
Zhang J C, Wu E D, Liu S. Effects of Y on helium behavior in Ti-Y alloy films [J]. J. Nucl. Mater., 2014, 454: 119
14
Li C J, Xiong L Y, Wu E D, et al. Effect of yttrium on nucleation and growth of zirconium hydrides [J]. J. Nucl. Mater., 2015, 457: 142
15
Yun S, Oyama S T. Correlations in palladium membranes for hydrogen separation: A review [J]. J. Membrane Sci., 2011, 375: 28
16
Verma N, Krishnamurthy G, Tichelaar F D, et al. Controlling morphology and texture of sputter-deposited Pd films by tuning the surface topography of the (Ti) adhesive layer [J]. Surf. Coat. Technol., 2019, 359: 24
17
Lim H R, Eom N S A, Cho J H, et al. Hydrogen gettering of titanium-palladium/palladium nanocomposite films synthesized by cosputtering and vacuum-annealing [J]. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy, 2018, 43: 19990
18
Zhang Q J, Qi Q H, Cao Z, et al. Effect of C contamination on H2 uptake of Ti film [J]. Vac. Sci. Technol., 1997, 17: 45
Griessen R, Huiberts J N, Kremers M, et al. Yttrium and lanthanum hydride films with switchable optical properties [J]. J. Alloys Compd., 1997, 253-254: 44
20
Shi L Q, Zhou Z Y, Zhao G Q. Hydrogenation and thermal release of hydrogen in titanium thin films [J]. At. Energy Sci. Technol., 2000, 34: 328
Zhang W Z, Tang X H, Li J Q, et al. Deuterium retention in carbon-tungsten co-deposition layers prepared by RF magnetron sputtering [J]. Acta Phys. Sin., 2013, 62: 195202
Zhao G Q, Ren C G. Nuclear Analysis Technique [M]. Beijing: Atomic Energy Press, 1989: 1
赵国庆, 任炽刚. 核分析技术 [M]. 北京: 原子能出版社, 1989: 1
23
L′ Ecuyer J, Brassard C, Cardinal C, et al. An accurate and sensitive method for the determination of the depth distribution of light elements in heavy materials [J]. J. Appl. Phys., 1976, 47: 381
24
Mayer M. Improved physics in SIMNRA 7 [J]. Nucl. Instrum. Meth., 2014, 332B: 176
25
Li M Q, Yao X Y. First-principles study of α-titanium and β-titanium crystal structure with hydrogen [J]. Rare Met. Mater. Eng., 2013, 42: 530
Liu X K, Zhang Y, Zheng Z, et al. Structural and thermodynamic properties of TiH2 from first-principles calculations [J]. Sci. Sin. Phys. Mech. Astron., 2011, 41: 207
Huang X T, Qing P L, Qin C S, et al. Influences of transition elements (V, Ti, Y) on hydrogen storage property of Mg-Al alloy [J]. Chin. J. Nonferrous Met., 2020, 30: 333
Zhu Y, Wang F H. First principles study on the dehydrogenation from MgH2 (001) surface by metal (Li, A1, Ti) doping [J]. Dev. Energy Sci., 2015, 3(1): 20
Germán E, Luna C, Marchetti J, et al. A DFT study of dopant (Zr, Nb) and vacancies on the dehydrogenation on MgH2 (001) surface [J]. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy, 2014, 39: 1732
31
Li Y X. First-principles study on properties and hydrogen atoms diffusion of zirconium-hydrogen system [D]. Taiyuan: North University of China, 2021
李越鑫. 锆氢体系性质和氢原子扩散的第一性原理研究 [D]. 太原: 中北大学, 2021
32
Kohn W, Sham L J. Self-consistent equations including exchange and correlation effects [J]. Phys. Rev., 1965, 140: A1133
33
Segall M D, Lindan P J D, Probert M J, et al. First-principles simulation: Ideas, illustrations and the CASTEP code [J]. J. Phys. Condens. Matter, 2002, 14: 2717
Han X L, Wang Q, Sun D L, et al. First-principles study of hydrogen diffusion in alpha Ti [J]. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy, 2009, 34: 3983
36
San-Martin A, Manchester F D. The H-Ti (Hydrogen-Titanium) system [J]. Bull. Alloy Phase Diagrams, 1987, 8: 30
37
Yakel H L. Thermocrystallography of higher hydrides of titanium and zirconium [J]. Acta Crystallogr., 1958, 11: 46
38
Uwamino Y, Ishizuka T, Yamatera H. X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy of rare-earth compounds [J]. J. Electron Spectrosc. Relat. Phenom., 1984, 34: 67
39
Paulin I, Mandrino D, Donik Č, et al. AES and XPS characterization of titanium hydride powder [J]. Mater. Technol., 2010, 44: 73
40
Ebihara K I, Kaburaki H. Numerical modeling of thermal desorption spectra of hydrogen: A review of thermal desorption models [J]. ISIJ Int., 2012, 52: 181
41
Zhang B, Zheng H, Liu S, et al. Hydrogen absorption and desorption of titanium [J]. At. Energy Sci. Technol., 2005, 39: 522