Please wait a minute...
Acta Metall Sin  2016, Vol. 52 Issue (7): 804-810    DOI: 10.11900/0412.1961.2015.00518
Orginal Article Current Issue | Archive | Adv Search |
NUMERICAL SIMULATION OF DYNAMIC BEHAVIOR OF KEYHOLE AND MOLTEN POOL AT K-PAW QUASI STEADY PROCESS
Bin XU1(),Qingxian HU2,Shujun CHEN1,Fan JIANG1,Xiaoli WANG2
1 Engineering Research Center of Advanced Manufacturing Technology for Automotive Components, Ministry of Education, College of Mechanical Engineering and Applied Electronics Technology, Beijing University of Technology, Beijing 100124, China
2 Key Laboratory of Advanced Welding Technology of Jiangsu Province, Jiangsu University of Science and Technology, Zhenjiang 212003, China
Cite this article: 

Bin XU,Qingxian HU,Shujun CHEN,Fan JIANG,Xiaoli WANG. NUMERICAL SIMULATION OF DYNAMIC BEHAVIOR OF KEYHOLE AND MOLTEN POOL AT K-PAW QUASI STEADY PROCESS. Acta Metall Sin, 2016, 52(7): 804-810.

Download:  HTML  PDF(950KB) 
Export:  BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)      
Abstract  

The keyhole plasma arc welding (K-PAW) is widely applied in engineering project now as a high energy beam welding with its advantages of low-cost and easy operation. However, the arc instability may arise and welding defects will be produced in K-PAW due to the high current and strong plasma penetrating force when medium thickness plates are welded, finally weakening the efficiency of K-PAW. Furthermore, it is found that the flow field of liquid metal in the molten pool and the stability of keyhole have a critical influence on welding quality. Therefore, modeling and simulating molten pool, keyhole and flow field in the K-PAW quasi steady process except for arc starting and ending phases are helpful to understand the welding process theory completely and promote its application further. But to date, there is little study on the coupled analysis of molten pool and keyhole in the quasi steady welding process due to the difficulty to make keyhole stable. In this work, based on the principles of fluid dynamics with considering arc pressure, surface tension, electromagnetic force, buoyancy and gravity, a three dimensional transient model is established to reveal the secondary changing of heat and force effect regularly as the keyhole depth increases. To describe the welding heat process, a combined type volumetric heat source model of 'double ellipsoid+conical body' is employed. A keyhole inside solid agitated (KISA) calculated method is proposed to maintain the keyhole stability in the quasi steady welding process. To improve the computational efficiency, the calculated region is limited within the action region of a cone-symmetrical weld heat source. With volume of fluid (VOF) method to track the keyhole boundary, the dynamic behavior process of molten pool, keyhole and flow field are calculated using FLUENT software. The stability of K-PAW is analyzed and the factors affecting keyhole production are discussed. The calculated results show that under the welding current 140 A and plasma gas flow 3.5 L/min, it needs 3.0 s to reach the quasi-steady state in which the average thickness of molten pool in keyhole front wall is 0.6 mm. The offset range of the keyhole center between top side and bottom side is 0.46~0.97 mm. There is the anticlockwise heat vortex appearing in molten pool of back side. The calculated width of keyholes on the bottom side is in good agreement with experimental results.

Key words:  K-PAW quasi steady process      keyhole      molten pool      flow field      numerical simulation     
Received:  07 October 2015     
Fund: Supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China (No.51205176)

URL: 

https://www.ams.org.cn/EN/10.11900/0412.1961.2015.00518     OR     https://www.ams.org.cn/EN/Y2016/V52/I7/804

Fig.1  Schematic of quasi steady welding process of keyhole plasma arc welding (K-PAW)
Fig.2  Computational domains and boundary condition (unit: mm)
Fig.3  Temperature (T) and flow field distributions at longitudinal section of K-PAW pool at welding times of 3.0 s (a), 4.0 s (b), 5.0 s (c) and 6.0 s (d)
Fig.4  Flow trace variations in molten pool at welding times of 3.0 s (a), 4.0 s (b), 5.0 s (c) and 6.0 s (d)
Fig.5  Three dimensional morphologies of keyhole at welding times of 3.0 s (a), 4.0 s (b), 5.0 s (c) and 6.0 s (d)
Fig.6  The keyhole at longitudinal section (a) and partial enlarged view (b)
Fig.7  Keyhole offset at different welding times (Welding current I=140 A, welding speed u0=12 cm/min)
Fig.8  Measured (a1~a5) and simulated (b1~b5) keyhole images at different welding times (ST—standard time)
Fig.9  Schematic boundary of measured keyhole
Fig.10  Comparison between measured and simulated keyhole widths
[1] Jenney C L, O'Brien A. Welding Handbook. 2nd Ed., Miami: American Welding Society, 2001: 303
[2] Wu C S.Thermal Process and Weld Pool Behavior. Beijing: China Machine Press, 2007: 8
[2] (武传松. 焊接热过程与熔池形态. 北京: 机械工业出版社, 2007: 8)
[3] Wu C S, Gao J Q, Liu X F, Zhao Y H.Proc Inst Mech Eng, 2003; 217: 879
[4] Liu Z M.PhD Dissertation, Shandong University, Jinan, 2013
[4] (刘祖名. 山东大学博士学位论文, 济南, 2013)
[5] Liu Z M, Wu C S, Gao J Q.Int J Therm Sci, 2013; 63: 38
[6] Wu C S, Liu Z M, Chen J.J Mech Eng, 2011; 47(6): 45
[6] (武传松, 刘祖名, 陈姬. 机械工程学报, 2011; 47(6): 45)
[7] Hu Q X, Wu C S, Zhang Y M.China Weld, 2007; 16(1): 6
[8] Pei L C. Master Thesis, Harbin Institute of Technology, 2006
[8] (裴利程. 哈尔滨工业大学硕士学位论文, 2006)
[9] Dong H G, Gao H M, Wu L.Trans China Weld Inst, 2002; 23(4): 24
[9] (董红刚, 高洪明, 吴林. 焊接学报, 2002; 23(4): 24)
[10] Hsu Y F, Rubinsky B.Int J Heat Mass Transfer, 1988; 31: 1409
[11] Hu Q X.PhD Dissertation, Shandong University, Jinan, 2007
[11] (胡庆贤. 山东大学博士学位论文, 济南, 2007)
[12] Wang H G, Wu C S, Zhang M X.Trans China Weld Inst, 2005; 26(7): 49
[12] (王怀刚, 武传松, 张明贤. 焊接学报, 2005; 26(7): 49)
[13] Wu C S, Wang H G, Zhang M X.Acta Metall Sin, 2006; 42: 311
[13] (武传松, 王怀刚, 张明贤. 金属学报, 2006; 42: 311)
[14] Wu C S, Hu Q X, Gao J Q.Comput Mater Sci, 2009; 46: 167
[15] Hu Q X, Wu C S, Zhang Y M.China Weld, 2007; 16(2): 55
[16] Huo Y S, Wu C S, Chen M A.Acta Metall Sin, 2011; 47: 706
[16] (霍玉双, 武传松, 陈茂爱. 金属学报, 2011; 47: 706)
[17] Huo Y S, Wu C S.China Weld, 2009; 18(2): 17
[18] Wu C S, Huo Y S.J Manuf Process, 2013; 15: 593
[19] Fan H G, Kovacevic R.J Phys, 1999; 32D: 2902
[20] Li T Q, Wu C S, Feng Y H, Zheng L C.Int J Heat Fluid Flow, 2012; 34: 117
[21] Wang X J, Wu C S, Chen M A.Acta Metall Sin, 2010; 46: 984
[21] (王小杰, 武传松, 陈茂爱. 金属学报, 2010; 46: 984)
[22] Wu C S, Zhang T, Feng Y H.Int J Heat Fluid Flow, 2013; 40: 186
[23] Zhang T, Wu C S, Chen M A.Acta Metall Sin, 2012; 48: 1025
[23] (张涛, 武传松, 陈茂爱. 金属学报, 2012; 48: 1025)
[24] Zhang T, Wu C S.Trans China Weld Inst, 2011; 32(7): 87
[24] (张涛, 武传松. 焊接学报, 2011; 32(7): 87)
[25] Li Y, Feng Y H, Zhang X X, Wu C S.Acta Metall Sin, 2013; 49: 804
[25] (李岩, 冯妍卉, 张欣欣, 武传松. 金属学报, 2013; 49: 804)
[26] Li T Q.PhD Dissertation, Shandong University, Jinan, 2014
[26] (李天庆. 山东大学博士学位论文, 济南, 2014)
[27] Jian X X, Wu C S.Int J Heat Mass Transfer, 2015; 84: 839
[28] Wang H X, Wei Y H, Yang C L.Comput Mater Sci, 2007; 38: 571
[29] Wang H X, Wei Y H, Yang C L.Comput Mater Sci, 2007; 40: 213
[1] BI Zhongnan, QIN Hailong, LIU Pei, SHI Songyi, XIE Jinli, ZHANG Ji. Research Progress Regarding Quantitative Characterization and Control Technology of Residual Stress in Superalloy Forgings[J]. 金属学报, 2023, 59(9): 1144-1158.
[2] WANG Chongyang, HAN Shiwei, XIE Feng, HU Long, DENG Dean. Influence of Solid-State Phase Transformation and Softening Effect on Welding Residual Stress of Ultra-High Strength Steel[J]. 金属学报, 2023, 59(12): 1613-1623.
[3] ZHANG Kaiyuan, DONG Wenchao, ZHAO Dong, LI Shijian, LU Shanping. Effect of Solid-State Phase Transformation on Stress and Distortion for Fe-Co-Ni Ultra-High Strength Steel Components During Welding and Vacuum Gas Quenching Processes[J]. 金属学报, 2023, 59(12): 1633-1643.
[4] XIA Dahai, DENG Chengman, CHEN Ziguang, LI Tianshu, HU Wenbin. Modeling Localized Corrosion Propagation of Metallic Materials by Peridynamics: Progresses and Challenges[J]. 金属学报, 2022, 58(9): 1093-1107.
[5] HU Long, WANG Yifeng, LI Suo, ZHANG Chaohua, DENG Dean. Study on Computational Prediction About Microstructure and Hardness of Q345 Steel Welded Joint Based on SH-CCT Diagram[J]. 金属学报, 2021, 57(8): 1073-1086.
[6] LI Zihan, XIN Jianwen, XIAO Xiao, WANG Huan, HUA Xueming, WU Dongsheng. The Arc Physical Characteristics and Molten Pool Dynamic Behaviors in Conduction Plasma Arc Welding[J]. 金属学报, 2021, 57(5): 693-702.
[7] WANG Fuqiang, LIU Wei, WANG Zhaowen. Effect of Local Cathode Current Increasing on Bath-Metal Two-Phase Flow Field in Aluminum Reduction Cells[J]. 金属学报, 2020, 56(7): 1047-1056.
[8] LIU Jizhao, HUANG Hefei, ZHU Zhenbo, LIU Awen, LI Yan. Numerical Simulation of Nanohardness in Hastelloy N Alloy After Xenon Ion Irradiation[J]. 金属学报, 2020, 56(5): 753-759.
[9] WANG Bo,SHEN Shiyi,RUAN Yanwei,CHENG Shuyong,PENG Wangjun,ZHANG Jieyu. Simulation of Gas-Liquid Two-Phase Flow in Metallurgical Process[J]. 金属学报, 2020, 56(4): 619-632.
[10] TANG Haiyan, LI Xiaosong, ZHANG Shuo, ZHANG Jiaquan. Fluid Flow and Heat Transfer in a Tundish with Channel Induction Heating for Sequence Casting with a Constant Superheat Control[J]. 金属学报, 2020, 56(12): 1629-1642.
[11] XU Qingyan,YANG Cong,YAN Xuewei,LIU Baicheng. Development of Numerical Simulation in Nickel-Based Superalloy Turbine Blade Directional Solidification[J]. 金属学报, 2019, 55(9): 1175-1184.
[12] Peiyuan DAI,Xing HU,Shijie LU,Yifeng WANG,Dean DENG. Influence of Size Factor on Calculation Accuracy of Welding Residual Stress of Stainless Steel Pipe by 2D Axisymmetric Model[J]. 金属学报, 2019, 55(8): 1058-1066.
[13] ZHANG Qingdong, LIN Xiao, LIU Jiyang, HU Shushan. Modelling of Q&P Steel Heat Treatment Process Based on Finite Element Method[J]. 金属学报, 2019, 55(12): 1569-1580.
[14] LU Shijie, WANG Hu, DAI Peiyuan, DENG Dean. Effect of Creep on Prediction Accuracy and Calculating Efficiency of Residual Stress in Post Weld Heat Treatment[J]. 金属学报, 2019, 55(12): 1581-1592.
[15] Jun LI, Mingxu XIA, Qiaodan HU, Jianguo LI. Solutions in Improving Homogeneities of Heavy Ingots[J]. 金属学报, 2018, 54(5): 773-788.
No Suggested Reading articles found!