|
|
EFFECT OF RETAINED AUSTENITE ON DUCTILITY AND TOUGHNESS OF A LOW ALLOYED MULTI-PHASE STEEL |
Zhenjia XIE,Chengjia SHANG( ),Wenhao ZHOU,Binbin WU |
School of Materials Science and Engineering, University of Science and Technology Beijing, Beijing 100083, China |
|
Cite this article:
Zhenjia XIE,Chengjia SHANG,Wenhao ZHOU,Binbin WU. EFFECT OF RETAINED AUSTENITE ON DUCTILITY AND TOUGHNESS OF A LOW ALLOYED MULTI-PHASE STEEL. Acta Metall Sin, 2016, 52(2): 224-232.
|
Abstract High performance steels require not only high strength, but also the combination of high ductility, high toughness and good weldability. Retained austenite in multi-phase steels has been widely reported to be helpful for obtaining high strength, high ductility and high toughness. In this work, steel with multi-phase microstructure consisting of intercritical ferrite, tempered martensite/bainite and different volume fractions retained austenite was obtained by intercritical annealing and tempering at 600~680 ℃. The volume fractions of retained austenite were 2%, 5%, 10% for samples tempered at 600, 650 and 680 ℃, respectively. The effect of retained austenite on ductility and toughness was studied in detail. Results showed that there was no obvious change in strength by varying the volume fraction of retained austenite, yield strength of the steel was 540~590 MPa, tensile strength was 720~780 MPa. Retained austenite could largely improve both the ductility and toughness of the steel. With increasing the volume fraction of retained austenite from 2% to 10%, the uniform elongation and total elongation were enhanced from 10.3% and 23.8% to 20.4% and 33.8%, respectively. The underlying reason for the improvement of ductility was attributed to the transformation induced plasticity of retained austenite by providing sustainable high work hardening rate. The improvement of toughness by retained austenite became more obvious when testing temperature was lower. When impact test temperature was higher than -60 ℃, the Charpy impact energy of samples with 2%~10% retained austenite were larger than 120 J. When test temperature was -80 ℃, Charpy impact energy of sample with 2% retained austenite decreased to 14 J, while that of sample with 10% retained austenite remained as 60~80 J when test temperature was as low as -80 and -100 ℃. Results from instrument impact test indicated that retained austenite was helpful for enhancing plasticity before crack initiation at low temperature, leading to improvement of crack initiation energy, resulting in excellent low temperature toughness.
|
Received: 27 May 2015
|
Fund: Supported by National Basic Research Program of China (No.2010CB630801) |
[1] | Weng Y Q, Yang C F, Shang C J.Iron Steel, 2011; (9): 1 | [1] | (翁宇庆, 杨才福, 尚成嘉. 钢铁, 2011; (9): 1) | [2] | Wang X M, Shang C J, Yang S W.Acta Metall Sin, 2005; 41: 1256 | [2] | (王学敏, 尚成嘉, 杨善武. 金属学报, 2005; 41: 1256) | [3] | Wang X M, Shang C J, Yang S W, He X L, Liu X Y. Mater Sci Eng, 2006; A438-440: 162 | [4] | Shu W, Wang X M, Li S R, He X L.Acta Metal Sin, 2011; 47: 435 | [4] | (舒玮, 王学敏, 李书瑞, 贺信莱. 金属学报, 2011; 47: 435) | [5] | Sakuma Y, Matsumura O, Takechi H.Metall Mater Trans, 1991; 22A: 489 | [6] | Herrera C, Ponge D, Raabe D.Acta Mater, 2011; 59: 4653 | [7] | Zhou W H, Guo H, Xie Z J, Wang X M, Shang C J.Mater Sci Eng, 2013; A587: 365 | [8] | Zackay V F, Parker E R, Fahr D, Busch R.ASM Trans Quart, 1967; 60: 252 | [9] | Allaina S, Chateau J P, Bouaziz O. Mater Sci Eng, 2004; A387-389: 143 | [10] | Bouaziza O, Allain S, Scott C P, Cugy P, Barbier D.Curr Opin Solid State Mater Sci, 2011; 15(4): 141 | [11] | Lei M, Guo Y Y.Acta Metall Sin (Engl Lett), 1989; 2: 244 | [12] | Fultz B, Kim J I, Kim Y H, Kim H J, Fior G O, Morris J W Jr.Metall Trans, 1985; 16A: 2237 | [13] | Xu L S, Yu W, Zhang Y M, Lu X J.J Univ Sci Technol Beijing, 2012; 34: 125 | [13] | (徐立善, 余伟, 张烨铭, 卢小节. 北京科技大学学报, 2012; 34: 125) | [14] | Xie Z J, Yuan S F, Zhou W H, Yang J R, Guo H, Shang C J.Mater Des, 2014; 59: 193 | [15] | You Y, Shang C J, Chen L, Subramanian S.Mater Sci Eng, 2012; A546: 111 | [16] | Santofimia M J, Nguyen-Minh T, Zhao L, Petrovb R, Sabirovd I, Sietsmab J.Mater Sci Eng, 2010; A527: 6429 | [17] | Jacques P, Delannay F, Cornet X, Harlet P, Ladriere J.Metall Mater Trans, 1998; 29A: 2383 | [18] | Colla V, DeSanctis M, Dimatteo A, Lovicu G, Solina A, Valentini R.Metall Mater Trans, 2009; 40A: 2557 | [19] | Shi J, Sun X J, Wang M Q, Hui W J, Dong H, Cao W Q.Scr Mater, 2010; 63: 815 | [20] | Ren Y Q, Xie Z J, Zhang H W, Yuan S F, Song T T, Shang C J.Acta Metall Sin, 2013; 49: 1558 | [20] | (任勇强, 谢振家, 张宏伟, 袁胜福, 宋婷婷, 尚成嘉. 金属学报, 2013; 49: 1558) | [21] | Wang Y, Zhang K, Guo Z H, Chen N L, Rong Y H.Acta Metall Sin, 2012; 48: 641 | [21] | (王颖, 张柯, 郭正洪, 陈乃录, 戎咏华. 金属学报, 2012; 48: 641) | [22] | Xie Z J, Ren Y Q, Zhou W H, Yang J R, Shang C J, Misra R D K.Mater Sci Eng, 2014; A603: 69 | [23] | Brophy G R, Miller A J.Trans ASM, 1949; 41: 1185 | [24] | Tamate O.Int J Fract Mech, 1968; 4: 257 | [25] | Rack H J, Kalish D.Metall Trans, 1971; 2: 3011 | [26] | Ahlquist C N.Acta Metall, 1975; 23: 239 | [27] | Syn C K, Fultz B, Morris J W Jr.Metall Trans, 1978; 9A: 1735 | [28] | Fultz B, Morris J W Jr.Metall Trans, 1985; 16A: 173 | [29] | Antolovich S D, Singh B.Metall Trans, 1971; 2: 2135 | [30] | Lai G Y, Wood W E, Clark R A, Zackay V F, Parker E R.Metall Trans, 1974; 5: 1663 | [31] | Kim K J, Schwartz L H.Mater Sci Eng, 1978; 33: 5 | [32] | Kang J, Wang C, Wang G D.Mater Sci Eng, 2012; A553: 96 | [33] | Santofimia M J, Zhao L, Sietsmab J.Metall Mater Trans, 2009; 40A: 46 | [34] | Cullity B D.Elements of X-ray Diffraction. Massachusetts: Addison-Wesley, 1978: 359 |
|
No Suggested Reading articles found! |
|
|
Viewed |
|
|
|
Full text
|
|
|
|
|
Abstract
|
|
|
|
|
Cited |
|
|
|
|
|
Shared |
|
|
|
|
|
Discussed |
|
|
|
|