|
|
MICROSTRUCTURES AND PROPERTIES OF AZ91D MAGNESIUM ALLOY PRODUCED BY FORCED CONVECTION MIXING RHEO-DIECASTING PROCESS |
Mingfan QI,Yonglin KANG( ),Bing ZHOU,Guoming ZHU,Huanhuan ZHANG |
School of Materials Science and Engineering, University of Science and Technology Beijing, Beijing 100083 |
|
Cite this article:
Mingfan QI, Yonglin KANG, Bing ZHOU, Guoming ZHU, Huanhuan ZHANG. MICROSTRUCTURES AND PROPERTIES OF AZ91D MAGNESIUM ALLOY PRODUCED BY FORCED CONVECTION MIXING RHEO-DIECASTING PROCESS. Acta Metall Sin, 2015, 51(6): 668-676.
|
Abstract Based on the forced convection mixing (FCM) principle, a self-developed FCM semisolid slurry preparation device was successfully developed. Taking AZ91D magnesium alloy tensile parts for example, the rheo-diecasting process that consists of slurry preparation, transportation and forming was achieved by combining with a diecasting machine. Microstructural characteristics of FCM rheo-diecasting parts in different processing parameters were investigated. Mechanical properties of AZ91D alloy parts in different processes were compared. Besides, the formation mechanism and solidification behavior of semisolid slurry were analyzed in FCM rheo-diecasting process. The results show that processing parameters have a great effect on the microstructures of parts, increasing rotation speed or decreasing barrel temperature appropriately is beneficial to optimizing the microstructure. The process not only can produce parts with fine, spherical and uniformly distributed primary a-Mg particles, but also is able to improve mechanical performance of parts significantly. Compared with traditional diecasting, the yield strength remains unchanged, but the ultimate strength and elongation are increased by 12.5% and 80.0%, respectively. Furthermore, compared with parts subjected to T4 and T6 heat treatment, the ultimate strength of the as-cast is the lowest, and the yield strength and elongation are between T4 and T6.
|
|
[1] | Jiang J F, Wang Y, Li Y F, Shan W W. Luo S J. Mater Des, 2012; 37: 202 | [2] | Mustafa K K. Int J Adv Manuf Technol, 2008; 39: 851 | [3] | Mordike B L, Ebert T. Mater Sci Eng, 2001; A302: 37 | [4] | Tzamtzis S, Zhang H, Xia M, Hari Babu N, Fan Z. Mater Sci Eng, 2011; A528: 2664 | [5] | Le Q C, Ou P, Wu Y D, Lu G M, Cui J Z, Qiu Z X. Acta Metall Sin, 2002; 38: 219 (乐启炽, 欧 鹏, 吴跃东, 路贵民, 崔建忠, 邱竹贤. 金属学报, 2002; 38: 219) | [6] | Zhao Z D, Chen Q, Chao H Y, Huang S H. Mater Des, 2010; 31: 1906 | [7] | Jiang J F, Wang Y, Chen G, Liu J, Li Y F, Luo S J. Mater Des, 2012; 40: 541 | [8] | Polmear L J. Mater Trans, 1996; 37: 12 | [9] | Chul K J, Chung G K. Hydrogen Energy, 2012; 37: 1661 | [10] | Lai H Q, Xu X, Fan H X. Met Form Technol, 2004; 22(2): 12 (赖华清, 徐 翔, 范宏训. 金属成形工艺, 2004; 22(2): 12) | [11] | Yang L Q, Kang Y L, Zhang F, Ding R H, Li J. Trans Nonferrous Met Soc China, 2010; 20: 966 | [12] | Fan Z, Fang X, Ji S. Mater Sci Eng, 2005; A412: 298 | [13] | Zhou B, Kang Y L, Zhang J, Gao J Z, Zhang F. Solid State Phenomena, 2013; 192-193: 422 | [14] | Tzamtzis S, Zhang H, Hari Babu N, Fan Z. Mater Sci Eng, 2010; A527: 2929 | [15] | Guo D Y, Yang Y S, Dong W H, Hua F A, Cheng G F, Hu Z Q. Acta Metall Sin, 2003; 39: 914 (郭大勇, 杨院生, 童文辉, 花福安, 程根发, 胡壮麒. 金属学报, 2003; 39: 914) | [16] | Flemings M C. Metall Trans, 1991; 22A: 957 | [17] | Ohno A. Solidification-the Separation Theory and Its Practical Applications. Berlin: Springer-Verlag Press, 1987: 36 | [18] | Trivedi R. J Cryst Growth, 1980; 48: 93 | [19] | Zhang X L, Li T J, Xie S S. Chin J Nonferrous Met, 2011; 21: 1881 (张小立, 李廷举, 谢水生. 中国有色金属学报, 2011; 21: 1881) | [20] | Minkoff I. Solidification and Cast Structure. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons Ltd, 1986: 79 | [21] | Molenaar J M M, Katgerman L, Kool W H. J Mater Sci, 1986; 21: 389 | [22] | Guo H M, Yang X J, Luo X Q. J Alloys Compd, 2009; 482: 412 | [23] | Doherty R D, Lee H I, Feest E A. Mater Sci Eng, 1984; A65: 181 |
|
No Suggested Reading articles found! |
|
|
Viewed |
|
|
|
Full text
|
|
|
|
|
Abstract
|
|
|
|
|
Cited |
|
|
|
|
|
Shared |
|
|
|
|
|
Discussed |
|
|
|
|