Effect of Fe Content on the Microstructure, Electrical Resistivity, and Nanoindentation Behavior of Zr60Cu40-xFex Phase-Separated Metallic Glasses
SUN Xiaojun1,2, HE Jie1,2(), CHEN Bin1,2, ZHAO Jiuzhou1,2, JIANG Hongxiang1, ZHANG Lili1, HAO Hongri1
1.Shi -Changxu Innovation Center for Advanced Materials, Institute of Metal Research, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shenyang 110016, China 2.School of Materials Science and Engineering, University of Science and Technology of China, Shenyang 110016, China
Cite this article:
SUN Xiaojun, HE Jie, CHEN Bin, ZHAO Jiuzhou, JIANG Hongxiang, ZHANG Lili, HAO Hongri. Effect of Fe Content on the Microstructure, Electrical Resistivity, and Nanoindentation Behavior of Zr60Cu40-xFex Phase-Separated Metallic Glasses. Acta Metall Sin, 2021, 57(5): 675-683.
Liquid-liquid phase separation was used to design phase-separated metallic glasses with special properties. In this work, Zr60Cu40-xFex phase-separated metallic glasses were designed by partial substitution of Cu by Fe in Zr60Cu40 metallic glass. The liquid-liquid phase separation behavior of Zr60Cu40-xFex alloy was investigated. The results show that the miscibility gap of the binary Cu-Fe system can be extended into the Zr60Cu40-xFex system and that liquid-liquid phase separation into Cu-rich and Fe-rich liquids occurred during rapid cooling. On the basis of the behavior of liquid-liquid phase separation of the Zr60Cu40-xFex system, the effect of partial substitution of Cu by Fe on the microstructure and phase formation of the Zr60Cu40-xFex alloys was investigated. The microstructure evolution and the competitive mechanism of phase formation in the as-quenched Zr60Cu40-xFex alloy were discussed. For the Zr60Cu20Fe20 alloy, liquid-liquid phase separation into Cu-rich and Fe-rich liquids and then liquid-glass transition occurred during rapid cooling and resulted in a heterogeneous structure with glassy Fe-rich matrix embedded with glassy Cu-rich nanoparticles. Considering this structure, the electrical properties and nanoindentation behavior of the as-quenched Zr60Cu20Fe20 alloy were examined. The abnormal change in electrical resistivity during crystallization and the effect of nanoscale phase separation on the shear transformation zone of the Zr60Cu20Fe20 alloy were analyzed.
Fig.1 XRD spectra (a) and DTA heating curves (b) of as-quenched Zr60Cu40-xFex alloys (Tg—glass transition temperature; Tx1, Tx2—first and second crystallization temperatures, respectively)
Sample
Tg / K
Tx1 / K
Tx2 / K
Zr60Cu40
650
712
723
Zr60Cu38Fe2
658
705
718
Zr60Cu28Fe12
653
723
766
Zr60Cu20Fe20
-
706
782
Zr60Cu16Fe24
-
718
755
Table 1 Thermal parameters of the Zr60Cu40-xFex alloy
Fig.2 TEM images and corresponding SAED patterns (insets) of the as-quenched Zr60Cu40-xFex alloys with x = 12 (a) and x = 20 (b)
Fig.3 Calculated miscibility gap of the Zr60Cu40-xFex alloy (Tc—critical temperature of liquid-liquid phase separation)
Fig.4 Variation of normalized resistivity (ρ/ρ373 K, ρ and ρ373 K represent the resistivity of alloy at a temperature T and 373 K, respectively) with temperature of Zr60Cu20Fe20, Zr60Cu40 and Zr75Fe25 alloys (a), and DSC heating curve of Zr60Cu20Fe20 alloy (b)
Fig.5 XRD spectra of as-quenched Zr60Cu20Fe20 alloys befor and after annealed at 673 K, 713 K, and 813 K for 0.5 h, respectively
Fig.6 HRTEM images of as-quenched Zr60Cu20Fe20 alloys annealed at 673 K for 0.5 h
Fig.7 Nanoindentation force-displacement (P-h) curves of Zr60Cu20Fe20, Zr60Cu40, and Zr75Fe25 alloys
Sample
Hardness / GPa
Modulus / GPa
m
Ω / nm3
Zr60Cu20Fe20
6.626
91.717
0.00963
7.02
Zr60Cu40
6.501
76.530
0.01477
9.28
Zr75Fe25
8.046
100.466
0.02572
4.17
Table 2 Hardness, elastic modulus, strain rate sensitivity (m), and shear transformation zone volume (Ω) of melt-spun ribbons from nanoindentation tests
Fig.8 Typical creep curves (a), variations of (b) and H′ (c) as a function of t during creep, and relationship of lnH′ vs ln (d) (t, , and H′ represent hold time, strain rate, and nanoindentation hardness, respectively)
He J, Kaban I, Mattern N, et al. Local microstructure evolution at shear bands in metallic glasses with nanoscale phase separation [J]. Sci. Rep., 2016, 6: 25832
3
Sun Q, Jiang H X, Zhao J Z, et al. Microstructure evolution during the liquid-liquid phase transformation of Al-Bi alloys under the effect of TiC particles [J]. Acta Mater., 2017, 129: 321
4
Chen S Q, Hui K Z, Dong L Z, et al. Excellent long-term reactivity of inhomogeneous nanoscale Fe-based metallic glass in wastewater purification [J]. Sci. China Mater., 2020, 63: 453
5
Wang C P, Liu X J, Ohnuma I, et al. Formation of immiscible alloy powders with egg-type microstructure [J]. Science, 2002, 297: 990
6
Xian A P, Zhu Y X. The development of manufacture processing for Cu-Cr contact alloy [J]. Acta Metall. Sin., 2003, 39: 225
He J, Jiang H X, Chen S, et al. Liquid phase separation in immiscible Ag-Ni-Nb alloy and formation of crystalline/amorphous composite [J]. J. Non-Cryst. Solids, 2011, 357: 3561
8
Xi Y Y, He J, Sun X J, et al. Ni-based metallic glass composites containing Cu-rich crystalline nanospheres [J]. Acta Metall. Sin. (Engl. Lett.), 2018, 31: 1130
9
He J, Mattern N, Kaban I, et al. Enhancement of glass-forming ability and mechanical behavior of zirconium-lanthanide two-phase bulk metallic glasses [J]. J. Alloys Compd., 2015, 618: 795
10
Wang Z Y, He J, Yang B J, et al. Liquid-liquid phase separation and formation of two glassy phases in Zr-Ce-Co-Cu immiscible alloys [J]. Acta Metall. Sin., 2016, 52: 1379
Kündig A A, Ohnuma M, Ping D H, et al. In situ formed two-phase metallic glass with surface fractal microstructure [J]. Acta Mater., 2004, 52: 2441
12
Park B J, Chang H J, Kim D H, et al. In situ formation of two amorphous phases by liquid phase separation in Y-Ti-Al-Co alloy [J]. Appl. Phys. Lett., 2004, 85: 6353
13
Chang H J, Yook W, Park E S, et al. Synthesis of metallic glass composites using phase separation phenomena [J]. Acta Mater., 2010, 58: 2483
14
Mattern N, Kühn U, Gebert A, et al. Microstructure and thermal behavior of two-phase amorphous Ni-Nb-Y alloy [J]. Scr. Mater., 2005, 53: 271
15
Han X L, Qin Y S, Qin K, et al. Glass-forming ability and early crystallization kinetics of novel Cu-Zr-Al-Co bulk metallic glasses [J]. Metals, 2016, 6: 225
16
Sun X J, He J, Chen B, et al. Microstructure formation and electrical resistivity behavior of rapidly solidified Cu-Fe-Zr immiscible alloys [J]. J. Mater. Sci. Technol., 2020, 44: 201
17
Sun X J, He J, Wang Z Y, et al. Liquid-liquid phase separation and two-phase bulk metallic glasses of Ce-Zr based alloys [J]. Sci. Sin. Technol., 2018, 48: 1413
Qiao J C, Wang Q, Pelletier J M, et al. Structural heterogeneities and mechanical behavior of amorphous alloys [J]. Prog. Mater. Sci., 2019, 104: 250
19
Pan J, Liu L, Chan K C. Enhanced plasticity by phase separation in CuZrAl bulk metallic glass with micro-addition of Fe [J]. Scr. Mater., 2009, 60: 822
20
He J, Zhao J Z, Ratke L. Solidification microstructure and dynamics of metastable phase transformation in undercooled liquid Cu-Fe alloys [J]. Acta Mater., 2006, 54: 1749
21
Chen B, He J, Xi Y Y, et al. Liquid-liquid hierarchical separation and metal recycling of waste printed circuit boards [J]. J. Hazard. Mater., 2019, 364: 388
22
Chen Q, Jin Z P. The Fe-Cu system: A thermodynamic evaluation [J]. Metall. Mater. Trans., 1995, 26A: 417
23
Dreval L A, Agraval P G, Turchanin M A. Enthalpy of mixing of liquid Cu-Fe-Zr alloys at 1873 K (1600oC) [J]. Metall. Mater. Trans., 2015, 46B: 2234
24
Guo C P, Du Z M, Li C R, et al. Thermodynamic description of the Al-Fe-Zr system [J]. Calphad, 2008, 32: 637
25
Hsiao H M, Liang S M, Schmid-Fetzer R, et al. Thermodynamic assessment of the Ag-Zr and Cu-Zr binary systems [J]. Calphad, 2016, 55: 77
26
Bakke E, Busch R, Johnson W L. The viscosity of the Zr46.75Ti8.25Cu7.5Ni10Be27.5 bulk metallic glass forming alloy in the supercooled liquid [J]. Appl. Phys. Lett., 1995, 67: 3260
27
Deng C K, Jiang H X, Zhao J Z, et al. Study on the solidification of Ag-Ni monotectic alloy [J]. Acta Metall. Sin., 2020, 56: 212
Chung S J, Hong K T, Ok M R, et al. Analysis of the crystallization of Zr41Ti14Cu12.5Ni10Be22.5 bulk metallic glass using electrical resistivity measurement [J]. Scr. Mater., 2005, 53: 223
29
Haruyama O, Miyazawa T, Saida J, et al. Change in electrical resistivity due to icosahedral phase precipitation in Zr70Pd20Ni10 and Zr65Al7.5Cu7.5Ni10Ag10 glasses [J]. Appl. Phys. Lett., 2001, 79: 758
30
Li M X, Zhao S F, Zhen L, et al. High-temperature bulk metallic glasses developed by combinatorial methods [J]. Nature, 2019, 569: 99
31
Ichitsubo T, Matsubara E, Yamamoto T, et al. Microstructure of fragile metallic glasses inferred from ultrasound-accelerated crystallization in Pd-based metallic glasses [J]. Phys. Rev. Lett., 2005, 95: 245501
32
Cohen M H, Turnbull D. Molecular transport in liquids and glasses [J]. J. Chem. Phys., 1959, 31: 1164
33
Argon A S, Kuo H Y. Plastic flow in a disordered bubble raft (an analog of a metallic glass) [J]. Mater. Sci. Eng., 1979, 39: 101
34
Wang Z, Wang W H. Flow units as dynamic defects in metallic glassy materials [J]. Natl. Sci. Rev., 2019, 6: 304
35
Johnson W L, Samwer K. A universal criterion for plastic yielding of metallic glasses with a (T / Tg)2/3 temperature dependence [J]. Phys. Rev. Lett., 2005, 95: 195501
36
Pan D, Inoue A, Sakurai T, et al. Experimental characterization of shear transformation zones for plastic flow of bulk metallic glasses [J]. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 2008, 105: 14769
37
Nandam S H, Ivanisenko Y, Schwaiger R, et al. Cu-Zr nanoglasses: Atomic structure, thermal stability and indentation properties [J]. Acta Mater., 2017, 136: 181
38
Şopu D, Ritter Y, Gleiter H, et al. Deformation behavior of bulk and nanostructured metallic glasses studied via molecular dynamics simulations [J]. Phys. Rev., 2011, 83B: 100202