|
|
INFLUENCE OF ANNEALING TEMPERATURE ON CALCULATION ACCURACY OF WELDING RESIDUAL STRESS IN A SUS304 STAINLESS STEEL JOINT |
DENG Dean1,2( ), KIYOSHIMA Shoichi3 |
1 College of Materials Science and Engineering, Chongqing University, Chongqing 400045 2 State Key Laboratory of Advanced Welding and Joining, Harbin Institute of Technology, Harbin 150001 3 Computational Mechanics Research Center Inc., Tokyo, 142-0041, Japan |
|
Cite this article:
DENG Dean, KIYOSHIMA Shoichi. INFLUENCE OF ANNEALING TEMPERATURE ON CALCULATION ACCURACY OF WELDING RESIDUAL STRESS IN A SUS304 STAINLESS STEEL JOINT. Acta Metall Sin, 2014, 50(5): 626-632.
|
Abstract Austenite stainless steels such as SUS304, owing to their good combination of mechanical properties, corrosion resistance and weldability, are widely used in a variety of industries. In the simulation of welding residual stress of an austenite stainless steel joint, because of the high strain hardening rate and the heating-cooling thermal cycles, both the work hardening phenomenon and the annealing effect have to be taken into account in the material constitutive relations. Though a number of numerical models have included the work hardening by using isotropic rule, kinematic rule or mixed rule, limited models have dealt with the annealing effect. For the steels or alloys with high strain hardening coefficient, neglecting the annealing effect will overestimate the welding residual stresses to a large extent. In this study, the thermal elastic plastic finite element method (T-E-P FEM) was used to simulate welding temperature and residual stresses in a SUS304 steel bead-on joint. In the computational approach based on the T-E-P FEM, a moving heat source with uniform density distribution was used to model the heat input, and a simple model was proposed to consider the annealing effect. Using the developed computational approach, the influences of work hardening and annealing effect on the welding residual stress were clarified. In addition, the effect of annealing temperature on the distribution and magnitude of welding residual stress in the weld zone and its vicinity was examined. The simulated results show that annealing effect has a significant influence on the longitudinal residual stress, and the peak value of longitudinal tensile stress increases with annealing temperature. The longitudinal tensile stresses in the fusion zone and its vicinity also increase with annealing temperature. It seems that the annealing temperature has insignificant influence on the transverse residual stresses. Comparing the simulated results and the measured data, it was found that when the annealing temperature was assumed to be 1000 ℃ for SUS304 steel, the longitudinal residual stresses predicted by the T-E-P FEM generally match the measurements. The present work is helpful for developing more advanced materials model to calculate welding residual stress with high accuracy.
|
Received: 09 September 2013
|
|
Fund: Supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China (No.51275544) and Open-Fund Research of State Key Laboratory of Advanced Welding and Joining, Harbin Institute of Technology |
[1] |
Ueda Y, Murakawa H, Ma N. Welding Deformation and Residual Stress Prevention. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 2012: 1
|
[2] |
Lindgren L E. Computational Welding Mechanics. London: Woodhead Publishing, 2007: 1
|
[3] |
Deng D, Murakawa H. Comp Mater Sci, 2013; 78: 55
|
[4] |
Deng D, Tong Y, Ma N, Murakawa H. Acta Metall Sin (Engl Lett), 2013; 26: 333
|
[5] |
Deng D, Murakawa H. Comp Mater Sci, 2008; 43: 681
|
[6] |
Deng D, Murakawa H. Comp Mater Sci, 2006; 37: 209
|
[7] |
Keavey M,Mark A,Dai H,Withers P J. Proc ASME 2010 Pressure Vessels & Piping Division/K-PVP Conference, Washington, USA: ASME, 2010 (CD-ROM)
|
[8] |
Qiao D, Zhang W, Pan T Y, Crooker P, David S, Feng Z. Sci Technol Weld Joining, 2013; 18: 624
|
[9] |
Francis J A, Bhadeshia H K D H, Withers P J. Mater Sci Technol, 2007; 23: 1009
|
[10] |
Dong P. Sci Technol Weld Joining, 2005; 10: 389
|
[11] |
Totten G, Howes M, Inoue T. Handbook of Residual Stress and Deformation of Steel. Materials Park, Ohio: ASM International, 2002: 1
|
[12] |
Ma N, Ueda Y. Trans JWRI, 1994; 23: 239
|
[13] |
Ueda Y, Murakawa H, Ma N. Trans AMSE, 1996; 118: 576
|
[14] |
Deng D, Kiyoshima S. Comp Mater Sci, 2010; 50: 612
|
[15] |
Deng D, Kiyoshima S. Acta Metall Sin, 2010; 46: 195
|
|
(邓德安, 青岛祥一. 金属学报, 2010; 46: 195)
|
[16] |
Deng D. Mater Des, 2013; 49: 1022
|
[17] |
Deng D, Kiyoshima S. Comp Mater Sci, 2012; 62: 23
|
[18] |
Okagaito T, Ohji T, Miyasaka F. Q J Jpn Weld Soc, 2004; 22: 21
|
[19] |
Okagaito T, Ohji T, Miyasaka F. Q J Jpn Weld Soc, 2005; 23: 536
|
[20] |
Dupont J N, Marder A R. Weld J, 1995; 74: 406s
|
[21] |
Chaboche J L. Int J Plasticity, 2008; 24: 1642
|
[22] |
Deng D, Kiyoshima S. Nucl Eng Des, 2010; 240: 688
|
[23] |
Leggatt H. Int J Pres Ves Pip, 2008; 85: 144
|
No Suggested Reading articles found! |
|
|
Viewed |
|
|
|
Full text
|
|
|
|
|
Abstract
|
|
|
|
|
Cited |
|
|
|
|
|
Shared |
|
|
|
|
|
Discussed |
|
|
|
|