Peritectic Solidification Characteristics and Mechanism of 15CrMoG Steel
LI Yaqiang1, LIU Jianhua1(), DENG Zhenqiang1, QIU Shengtao2, ZHANG Pei3, ZHENG Guiyun3
1 Institute of Engineering Technology, University of Science and Technology Beijing, Beijing 100083, China 2 National Engineering Research Center of Continuous Casting Technology, Central Iron and Steel Research Institute, Beijing 100081, China 3 Laiwu Branch of Shandong Iron and Steel Ltd. , Jinan 271104, China
Cite this article:
LI Yaqiang, LIU Jianhua, DENG Zhenqiang, QIU Shengtao, ZHANG Pei, ZHENG Guiyun. Peritectic Solidification Characteristics and Mechanism of 15CrMoG Steel. Acta Metall Sin, 2020, 56(10): 1335-1342.
Cast defects of hypo-peritectic steel such as uneven growth of strand shell, crack formation and oscillation marks formation were found to occur frequently during continuous casting of steels. In industry, measures such as high-basicity casting powder, hot-top mold and reduction of mold cooling strength were usually used in the investigations, but a reasonable explanation for these measures has been lacking. In this work, solidification of 15CrMoG steel at different cooling rates were observed with an ultra high temperature confocal scanning laser microscope. The precipitation of the δ-phase was in a cellular manner when the cooling rates were 5 and 15 ℃/min, whereas it was in a dendrite manner when the cooling rate was increased to 100 ℃/min. Thermodynamic analysis of the peritectic phase nucleation showed that a concentration gradient existed at the L/δ interface during the solidication of initial δ phase which led to an increase in the Gibbs free energy barrier for the nucleation of the peritectic γ phase. As the cooling rate increased, the concentration gradient across the L/δ interface became steeper, resulting in an increase in the nucleation undercooling of the peritectic γ phase. This, in turn, decreased the temperature and increased the peritectic reaction rate. In addition, an increase in the cooling rate led to a change in the mode of peritectic transformation (δ→γ). A diffusion-controlled δ→γ transformation occurred due to the progression of planar and cellular interfaces at cooling rates of 5 and 15 ℃/min, respectively. However, a large δ→γ transformation, which was controlled by the interface process, occurred when the cooling rate was increased to 100 ℃/min. The difference in volume shrinkage of the different modes of peritectic transformation (δ→γ) led to a discussion of the control mechanism of continuous casting of hypo-peritectic steel.
Fig.1 Schematic of temperature control of experiments
Fig.2 In situ observations of δ precipitation and peritectic phase transformation at a cooling rate of 5 ℃/min (L—liquid phase) (a, b) precipitation and growth of δ-ferrite (c, d) peritectic reaction (e, f) peritectic transformation
Fig.3 In situ observations of δ precipitation and peritectic phase transformation at the cooling rate of 15 ℃/min (a, b) precipitation and growth of δ-ferrite (c, d) peritectic reaction (e, f) peritectic transformation
Fig.4 In situ observations of δ precipitation and peritectic phase transformation at the cooling rate of 100 ℃/min (a, b) precipitation and growth of δ-ferrite (c, d) peritectic reaction (e, f) peritectic transformation
Fig.5 Peritectic reactions at cooling rates of 5 ℃/min (a), 15 ℃/min (b) and 100 ℃/min (c)
Fig.6 Peritectic transformations at cooling rates of 5 ℃/min (a), 15 ℃/min (b) and 100 ℃/min (c)
Fig.7 Schematic of the concentration distribution at theL/δ interface
Fig.8 Carbon concentration distribution (a) and Gibbs free energies at cooling rates of 5 ℃/min (b), 15 ℃/min (c) and 100 ℃/min (d), respectively (T1, T2 and T3 are peritectic phase transformation temperatures at cooling rates of 5, 15 and 100 ℃/min, respectively. T0-line is the thermodynamic equivalence of δ and γ. G, Gand G are Gibbs free energies of δ, γ and liquid, respectively. ΔGm is the thermodynamic driving force for the transformation of δ to γ. C is interfacial composition of δ. C, C, Cand C are the average compositions of δ,γ/δ interface, γ/L interface and liquid, respectively) Color online
Fig.9 Migration distances of the L/δ and δ/γ interfaces as a function of the square root of time at the cooling rate of 5 ℃/min (t—time)
[1]
Suzuki M, Yu C H, Sato H, et al. Origin of heat transfer anomaly and solidifying shell deformation of peritectic steels in continuous casting [J]. ISIJ Int., 1996, 36(suppl.): S171
[2]
Jiang Z K, Su Z J, Xu C Q, et al. Abnormal mold level fluctuation during slab casting of peritectic steels [J]. J. Iron Steel Res. Int., 2020, 27: 160
doi: 10.1007/s42243-019-00299-7
[3]
Saraswat R, Maijer D M, Lee P D, et al. The effect of mould flux properties on thermo-mechanical behaviour during billet continuous casting [J]. ISIJ Int., 2007, 47: 95
doi: 10.2355/isijinternational.47.95
[4]
Xia G, Bernhard C, Ilie S, et al. A study about the influence of carbon content in the steel on the casting behavior [J]. Steel Res. Int., 2011, 82: 230
doi: 10.1002/srin.201000196
[5]
Boettinger W J, Coriell S R, Greer A L, et al. Solidification microstructures: Recent developments, future directions [J]. Acta Mater., 2000, 48: 43
doi: 10.1016/S1359-6454(99)00287-6
[6]
Shibata H, Arai Y, Suzuki M, et al. Kinetics of peritectic reaction and transformation in Fe-C alloys [J]. Metall. Mater. Trans., 2000, 31B: 981
[7]
Griesser S, Bernhard C, Dippenaar R. Mechanism of the peritectic phase transition in Fe-C and Fe-Ni alloys under conditions close to chemical and thermal equilibrium [J]. ISIJ Int., 2014, 54: 466
doi: 10.2355/isijinternational.54.466
[8]
Chuang Y K, Reinisch D, Schwerdtfeger K. Kinetics of the diffusion controlled peritectic reaction during solidification of iron-carbon-alloys [J]. Metall. Mater. Trans., 1975, 6A: 235
[9]
Fredriksson H, Stjerndahl J. Solidification of iron-base alloys [J]. Met. Sci., 1982, 16: 575
[10]
Gao Z, Zhang X Z, Yao S F. Mechanism of crack formation during continuous casting of peritectic steel slabs [J]. J. Iron Steel Res., 2009, 21(10): 8
de Andrés C G, Caballero F G, Capdevila C, et al. Application of dilatometric analysis to the study of solid-solid phase transformations in steels [J]. Mater. Charact., 2002, 48: 101
doi: 10.1016/S1044-5803(02)00259-0
[12]
Guo J L, Wen G H, Pu D Z, et al. A novel approach for evaluating the contraction of hypo-peritectic steels during initial solidification by surface roughness [J]. Materials, 2018, 11: 571
doi: 10.3390/ma11040571
[13]
Guo L J, Wen G H, Fu J J, et al. Influence of cooling rate on the contraction of peritectic transformation during solidification of peritectic steels [J]. Acta Metall. Sin., 2019, 55: 1311
doi: 10.11900/0412.1961.2018.00553
Pu D Z, Wen G H, Fu D C, et al. Study of the effect of carbon on the contraction of hypo-peritectic steels during initial solidification by surface roughness [J]. Metals, 2018, 8: 982
doi: 10.3390/met8120982
[15]
Saleem S, Vynnycky M, Fredriksson H. The influence of peritectic reaction/transformation on crack susceptibility in the continuous casting of steels [J]. Metall. Mater. Trans., 2017, 48B: 1625
[16]
Phelan D, Reid M, Dippenaar R. Kinetics of the peritectic phase transformation: In-situ measurements and phase field modeling [J]. Metall. Mater. Trans., 2006, 37A: 985
[17]
Matsuura K, Itoh Y, Narita T. A solid-liquid diffusion couple study of a peritectic reaction in iron-carbon system [J]. ISIJ Int., 1993, 33: 583
doi: 10.2355/isijinternational.33.583
[18]
Griesser S, Reid M, Bernhard C, et al. Diffusional constrained crystal nucleation during peritectic phase transitions [J]. Acta Mater., 2014, 67: 335
doi: 10.1016/j.actamat.2013.12.018
[19]
Griesser S, Bernhard C, Dippenaar R. Effect of nucleation undercooling on the kinetics and mechanism of the peritectic phase transition in steel [J]. Acta Mater., 2014, 81: 111
doi: 10.1016/j.actamat.2014.08.020
[20]
Demirel Y. Nonequilibrium Thermodynamics: Transport and Rate Processes in Physical, Chemical and Biological Systems [M]. 2nd Ed., Amsterdam: Elsevier, 2007: 97
[21]
Müller I. A History of Thermodynamics: The Doctrine of Energy and Entropy [M]. Berlin: Springer, 2007: 330
[22]
Ueshima Y, Mizoguchi S, Matsumiya T, et al. Analysis of solute distribution in dendrites of carbon steel with δ/γ transformation during solidification [J]. Metall. Trans., 1986, 17B: 845
[23]
Mittemeijer E J. Fundamentals of Materials Science: The Microstructure-Property Relationship Using Metals as Model Systems [M]. Berlin Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag, 2011: 139
[24]
Jacot A, Sumida M, Kurz W. Solute trapping-free massive transformation at absolute stability [J]. Acta Mater., 2011, 59: 1716
doi: 10.1016/j.actamat.2010.11.038
[25]
Liu Z C, Ren H P, Song Y Q, et al. Tutorial of Solid Metal Phase Transition [M]. Beijing: Metallurgical Industry Press, 2003: 181