Influence of Size Factor on Calculation Accuracy of Welding Residual Stress of Stainless Steel Pipe by 2D Axisymmetric Model
Peiyuan DAI,Xing HU,Shijie LU,Yifeng WANG(),Dean DENG
College of Materials Science and Engineering, Chongqing University, Chongqing 400045, China
Cite this article:
Peiyuan DAI,Xing HU,Shijie LU,Yifeng WANG,Dean DENG. Influence of Size Factor on Calculation Accuracy of Welding Residual Stress of Stainless Steel Pipe by 2D Axisymmetric Model. Acta Metall Sin, 2019, 55(8): 1058-1066.
Austenitic stainless steel, owing to its good mechanical properties and excellent corrosion resistance, is widely used in petroleum, chemical, nuclear power and other fields. Welding is an extremely important manufacturing method in industrial production. When the thermal elastic-plastic finite element method (TEP-FEM) is used to simulate welding residual stress, especially in thick welded joints, a long calculation time is generally needed. Therefore, it has become an urgent problem to develop an efficient and high-precision computational approach to simulate welding residual stress. In this work, numerical simulation and experimental methods were combined to explore the effect of size on the calculation precision of welding residual stress of SUS316 stainless steel by the 2D axisymmetric model, in order to clarify the applicability of 2D axisymmetric model in the prediction of welding residual stress in pipe butt joints. This research can provide theoretical support for the development of computational methods suitable for engineering applications. Based on the finite element software MSC. Marc, the temperature field and welding residual stress distribution of three different sizes of pipes were calculated by 2D axisymmetric model and 3D model. The calculated residual stress distributions in the thin pipe model are compared with the experimental measurements. The results show that calculated residual stress by the 2D axisymmetric model agrees well with the 3D model. However, in the weld seam near the inner surface and the areas near the weld seam, a deviation on the residual stress distribution between in the 2D axisymmetric model and in the 3D model was observed, which is significant as the pipe size increases. For practical engineering applications, with the regardless of the stress problems at the beginning and end positions, the 2D axisymmetric model can be used instead of the 3D model to calculate the residual stress of the girth weld, which is very beneficial to calculation time saving.
Fund: National Natural Science Foundation of China((No.51875063));Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities((No.2018CDXYCL0018));Graduate Research and Innovation Foundation of Chongqing, China((No.CYB18003))
Fig.1 Schematic of weld groove dimension and welding sequence (unit: mm)
Fig.2 Schematics of residual stress measurement location (a) and welding direction (b) (unit: mm)
Fig.3 2D and 3D finite element (FE) models of thin pipe (a), middle pipe (b) and thick pipe (c)Color online
Case
Model
d / mm
t / mm
d/t
M
A
3D
114.3
8.6
13.3
42200
B
2D
422
C
3D
348.5
26.2
13.3
139200
D
2D
870
E
3D
665.0
50.0
13.3
226240
F
2D
808
Table 1 2D and 3D FE simulation cases of three different sizes of pipes
Fig.4 Thermal physical properties (a) and mechanical properties (b) of material
Fig.5 Thermal cycles during the last welding of thin pipe (a), middle pipe (b) and thick pipe (c)Color online
Fig.6 Comparisons of axial residual stress simulation results and measurements[19] of inside (a) and outside (b) surfaces
Fig.7 Comparisons of hoop residual stress simulation results and measurements[19] of inside (a) and outside (b) surfaces
Fig.8 Comparison of hoop residual stress distribution in 3D model 180° section and 2D axisymmetric modelColor online
Fig.9 Comparison of axial residual stress distribution in 3D model 180° section and 2D axisymmetric modelColor online
Fig.10 Hoop (a) and axial (b) residual stress distributions along the weld centerline (x—distance from inside surface)Color online
[1]
Deng P, Peng Q J, Han E H, et al. Effect of irradiation on corrosion of 304 nuclear grade stainless steel in simulated PWR primary water [J]. Corros. Sci., 2017, 127: 91
[2]
Soria S R, Tolley A, Yawny A. A study of debris and wear damage resulting from fretting of Incoloy 800 steam generator tubes against AISI type 304 stainless steel [J]. Wear, 2016, 368-369: 219
[3]
Terachi T, Yamada T, Miyamoto T, et al. SCC growth behaviors of austenitic stainless steels in simulated PWR primary water [J]. J. Nucl. Mater., 2012, 426: 59
[4]
Nakagawa K, Nono M, Kimura A. Effect of dissolved hydrogen on the SCC susceptibility of SUS316L stainless steel [J]. Mater. Sci. Forum, 2010, 654-656: 2887
[5]
Ma C, Peng Q J, Mei J N, et al. Microstructure and corrosion behavior of the heat affected zone of a stainless steel 308L-316L weld joint [J]. J. Mater. Sci. Technol., 2018, 34: 1823
[6]
Hoffmeister H, Klein O. Modeling of SCC initiation and propagation mechanisms in BWR environments [J]. Nucl. Eng. Des., 2011, 241: 4893
[7]
Singh J, Shahi A S. Weld joint design and thermal aging influence on the metallurgical, sensitization and pitting corrosion behavior of AISI 304L stainless steel welds [J]. J. Manuf. Processes, 2018, 33: 126
[8]
Li G F, Congleton J. Stress corrosion cracking of a low alloy steel to stainless steel transition weld in PWR primary waters at 292 ℃ [J]. Corros. Sci., 2000, 42: 1005
[9]
Deng D A, Murakawa H, Liang W. Numerical and experimental investigations on welding residual stress in multi-pass butt-welded austenitic stainless steel pipe [J]. Comput. Mater. Sci., 2008, 42: 234
[10]
Ueda Y, Murakawa H, Ma N. Welding Deformation and Residual Stress Prevention [M]. Waltham: Elsevier, 2012: 1
[11]
Murakawa H. Computational welding mechanics and its interface with industrial application [J]. Trans. JWRI, 2013, 25: 191
[12]
Deng D A, Kiyoshima S. Influence of annealing temperature on calculation accuracy of welding residual stress in a sus304 stainless steel joint [J]. Acta Metall. Sin., 2014, 50: 626
[12]
(邓德安, Kiyoshima S. 退火温度对SUS304不锈钢焊接残余应力计算精度的影响 [J]. 金属学报, 2014, 50: 626)
[13]
Zhang J X, Liu C, Zhang J L. Efficient calculation technologies for welding stress and deformarion with nonlinear and gradient character [J]. Trans. China Weld. Inst., 2009, 30(6): 107
Ueda Y, Yuan M G. A predicting method of welding residual stress using source of residual stress (Report II): Determination of standard inherent strain (mechanics, strength & structural design) [J]. Trans. JWRI, 1989, 18: 143
[15]
Hong J K, Tsai C L, Dong P L. Assessment of numerical procedures for residual stress analysis of multipass welds [J]. Weld. J., 1998, 77: 372
[16]
Jiang W, Yahiaoui K, Hall R, et al. Finite element simulation of multipass welding: Full three-dimensional versus generalized plane strain or axisymmetric models [J]. J. Strain Anal. Eng. Des., 2005, 40: 587
[17]
Deng D A, Murakawa H. Numerical simulation of temperature field and residual stress in multi-pass welds in stainless steel pipe and comparison with experimental measurements [J]. Comput. Mater. Sci., 2006, 37: 269
[18]
Totten G E, Howes M, Inoue T. Handbook of Residual Stress and Deformation of Steel [M]. Ohio: ASM International, 2002: 1
[19]
Katsuyama J, Nakamura M, Tobita T, et al. Effects of shape of weld and welding conditions on residual stress at welded joints of stainless steel piping [A]. Preprints of the National Meeting of JWS [C]. Tokyo: Japan Welding Society, 2009: 37
[20]
Sun J M, Liu X Z, Tong Y G, et al. A comparative study on welding temperature fields, residual stress distributions and deformations induced by laser beam welding and CO2 gas arc welding [J]. Mater. Des., 2014, 63: 519
[21]
Deng D A, Ren S D, Li S, et al. Influence of multi-thermal cycle and constraint condition on residual stress in P92 steel weldment [J]. Acta Metall. Sin., 2017, 53: 1532
Goldak J, Chakravarti A, Bibby M. A new finite element model for welding heat sources [J]. Metall. Trans., 1984, 15B: 299
[23]
Deng D A, Zhang C H, Pu X W, et al. Influence of material model on prediction accuracy of welding residual stress in an austenitic stainless steel multi-pass butt-welded joint [J]. J. Mater. Eng. Perform., 2017, 26: 1494
[24]
Deng D A, Kiyoshima S. FEM analysis of residual stress distribution near weld start/end location in thick plates [J]. Comput. Mater. Sci., 2011, 50: 2459
[25]
Deng D A, Kiyoshima S, Ogawa K, et al. Predicting welding residual stresses in a dissimilar metal girth welded pipe using 3D finite element model with a simplified heat source [J]. Nucl. Eng. Des., 2011, 241: 46
[26]
Li S, Ren S D, Zhang Y B, et al. Numerical investigation of formation mechanism of welding residual stress in P92 steel multi-pass joints [J]. J. Mater. Process. Technol., 2017, 244: 240
[27]
Dong P. On the mechanics of residual stresses in girth welds [J]. J. Pressure Vessel Technol., 2007, 129: 345