Please wait a minute...
Acta Metall Sin  2016, Vol. 52 Issue (6): 707-716    DOI: 10.11900/0412.1961.2015.00551
Orginal Article Current Issue | Archive | Adv Search |
MECHANISMS OF NON-UNIFORM MICROSTRUC-TURE EVOLUTION IN GH4169 ALLOYDURING HEATING PROCESS
Jianguo WANG(),Dong LIU,Yanhui YANG
State Key Laboratory of Solidification Processing, Northwestern Polytechnical University, Xi'an 710072, China
Cite this article: 

Jianguo WANG,Dong LIU,Yanhui YANG. MECHANISMS OF NON-UNIFORM MICROSTRUC-TURE EVOLUTION IN GH4169 ALLOYDURING HEATING PROCESS. Acta Metall Sin, 2016, 52(6): 707-716.

Download:  HTML  PDF(1783KB) 
Export:  BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)      
Abstract  

The Ni-Fe-based superalloy GH4169 (Inconel718) is widely used for several critical gas-turbine components which are hot forged. Its microstructure and property are sensitive to the parameter adjustment during hot working process. To obtain required low-cycle fatigue and fracture properties, it is essential that the microstructure is controlled during preheating and heat treatment. The evolution of non-uniform microstructure during hot working is more complicated than that of uniform microstructure. On the other hand, various secondary phases can be observed in GH4169 alloy, thus it is important to investigate the effect of secondary phases on the microstructure evolution during forging process. In this work, the mechanisms of non-uniform microstructure evolution in GH4169 alloy were studied by analyzing the evolution of secondary phases, grain boundary misorientation, grain size and interactions of dislocation. It is found that the volume fraction of δ phase increases with the increasing of temperature and heating time at the lower temperature. While at the higher temperature, it decreases monotonously with the temperature increasing, but increases first and then decreases to stable value with time increasing. The pinning effect of secondary phases in GH4169 alloy can be concluded that the γ" phase and δ phase precipitated within the grains retain movement of dislocation, the δ phase precipitated at the grain boundary hinders the nucleation and growth of recrystallized grains, and the carbides limits the grain growth. The frequency of low angle grain boundary decreases with temperature and time increasing, and the mobility of low angle grain boundary increases with temperature increasing. The uniformity of microstructure and the size of equaxied subgrain increases with heating temperature and time increasing. Continuous recrystallization of elongated grain occurs at specific conditions. The mechanisms of non-uniform microstructure evolution during heating process can be concluded as subgrain growth, recrystallized grain growth, and anneal twinning nucleation and growth. The recrystallized grains are formed by the growth of subgrains conducted by the rotation of low angle grain boundary and the movement of dislocation. When the grain growth is pinned, the mechanisms for the energy dissipation is the nucleation and growth of anneal twinning. And the growth of anneal twinning promotes the generation of low angle grain boundaries at the tip of partial anneal twinning.

Key words:  GH4169 alloy      secondary phase      grain boundary misorientation      subgrain growth     
Received:  30 October 2015     
Fund: Supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China (No.51504195)

URL: 

https://www.ams.org.cn/EN/10.11900/0412.1961.2015.00551     OR     https://www.ams.org.cn/EN/Y2016/V52/I6/707

Grain boundary θ Initial state 1163 K,
30 min
1233 K,
60 min
1263 K,
60 min
1283 K,
60 min
1313 K,
60 min
Low angle 0°~10° 65.3 62.3 47.5 13.9 1.5 2.8
10°~15° 2.0 0.9 0.9 0.8 2.5 3.0
High angle 15°~25° 4.0 3.1 3.2 3.2 3.5 5.0
25°~35° 4.9 4.9 6.1 8.2 8.5 7.8
35°~45° 7.1 7.6 10.8 17.6 13.1 12.3
45°~55° 8.7 7.6 11.2 13.9 15.1 11.6
55°~65° 8.0 13.4 20.6 42.3 55.7 57.4
Table 1  Misorientation angle (θ) fraction of GH4169 alloy after heat treatment at different temperatures and times
Fig.1  OM image of initial microstructure (a), SEM image of δ phase (b), EBSD image of grain boundary (c) and misorientation angel distribution (d) in GH4169 alloy (The red line in Fig.1c represents low angle boundary at θ<15°, and the black line represents high angle boundary at θ>15°)
Fig.2  SEM images of secondary phases in GH4169 alloy after heated at 1163 K (a), 1233 K (b), 1263 K (c) and 1283 K (d) for 60 min
Fig.3  Highly-magnified SEM image of secondary phases in GH4169 alloy after heated at 1163 K for 60 min
Fig.4  Effect of heating time on volume fraction of δ phase in GH4169 alloy
Fig.5  SEM images of the uncoated tool and coated tools with different Al contents after TC4 turned at 65 m/min

(a) uncoated tool (b) Ti0.50Al0.50N (c) Ti0.42Al0.58N (d) Ti0.37Al0.63N

Fig.6  SEM images of the uncoated tool and coated tools with different Al contents after TC4 turned at 100 m/min

(a) uncoated tool (b) Ti0.50Al0.50N (c) Ti0.42Al0.58N (d) Ti0.37Al0.63N

Fig.7  Misorientation angle distribution of GH4169 alloy after different treatments

(a) 1263 K, 60 min (b) 1263 K, 240 min (c)1283 K, 10 min (d) 1283 K, 60 min

Fig.8  Misorientation angle distributions of GH4169 alloy after heated at 1313 K for 60 min (a) and 240 min (b)
Fig.9  Schematic of subgrain evolution in GH4169 alloy (a) initial state (b) precipitation and growth of secondary phases

(c) dissolution of γ" phase and subgrain growth (d) dissolution of δ phase and grain growth (e) grain growth and twinning

Fig.10  Schematic of elongated grain evolution in GH4169 alloy

(a) initial state (b) precipitation and growth of secondary phases (c) dissolution of γ" phase (d) dissolution of δ phase and grain refining (e) grain growth and twinning

Fig.11  Bright field TEM images of GH4169 alloy after heated at 1163 K for 60 min (a) subgrain boundary(b) δ phase and dislocation(c) grain boundary and δ phase
[1] Thomas A, El-Wahabi M, Cabrera J M, Prado J M.J Mater Process Tech, 2006; 177: 469
[2] Li R B, Yao M, Liu W C, He X C.Scr Mater, 2002; 46: 635
[3] Tian S G, Wang X, Xie J, Liu C, Guo Z G, Liu J, Sun W R.Acta Metall Sin, 2013; 49: 845
[3] (田素贵, 王欣, 谢君, 刘臣, 郭忠革, 刘姣, 孙文儒. 金属学报, 2013; 49: 845)
[4] Luo Z J, Liu D.J Mater Process Tech, 1996; 59: 381
[5] Guest R P, Tin S.In: Loria E A ed., Superalloys 718, 625, 706 and Derivatives 2005, Warrendale, PA: TMS, 2005: 625
[6] Wen D, Lin Y C, Li H, Chen X, Deng J, Li L.Mater Sci Eng, 2014; A591: 183
[7] Liu H, Zhang L, He X, Qu X, Zhang G, Liu H, Zhang L, Zhang G.High Temp Mater, 2014; 33: 485
[8] Azadian S, Wei L Y, Warren R.Mater Charact, 2004; 53(1): 7
[9] Hosseinifar M, Asgari S.Mater Sci Eng, 2010; A527: 7313
[10] Lee H, Hou W.Mater Trans, 2012; 53: 1334
[11] Wang Y, Lin L, Shao W Z, Zhen L, Zhang X M.Trans Mater Heat Treat, 2007; 28: 176
[11] (王岩, 林琳, 邵文柱, 甄良, 张新梅. 材料热处理学报, 2007; 28: 176)
[12] Weaver D S, Semiatin S L.Scr Mater, 2007; 57: 1044
[13] Fullman R L.J Appl Phys, 1951; 22: 1350
[14] Sleeswyk A W.Acta Metall, 1964; 12: 669
[15] Devaux A, Eacute L N, Molins R, Pineau A, Organista A, Guédou J Y, Uginet J F, Héritier P.Mater Sci Eng, 2008; A486: 117
[16] Sundararaman M, Mukhopadhyay P, Banerjee S.Metall Trans, 1992; 23A: 2015
[17] Wei X P, Zheng W, Song Z, Lei T, Yong Q, Xie Q.J Wuhan Univ Technol: Mater Sci Ed, 2014; 29: 379
[18] Muralidharan G, Thompson R G.Scr Mater, 1997; 36: 755
[19] Wang L M, Chen C C.Mater Lett, 2012; 67: 158
[20] Lin Y C, Wu X, Chen X, Chen J, Wen D, Zhang J, Li L.J Alloys Compd, 2015; 640: 101
[21] Araujo L S, Dos Santos D S, Godet S, Dille J, Pinto A L, de Almeida L H.J Mater Eng Perform, 2014; 23: 4130
[22] Lin Y C, Wu X, Chen X, Chen J, Wen D, Zhang J, Li L.J Alloys Compd, 2015; 640: 101
[23] Tian G, Jia C, Liu J, Hu B.Mater Des, 2009; 30: 433
[24] Song K, Aindow M.Mater Sci Eng, 2008; A479: 365
[25] Ferry M, Humphreys F J.Acta Mater, 1996; 44: 1293
[26] Li J C M.J Appl Phys, 1962; 33: 2958
[27] Gleiter H.Acta Metall, 1969; 17: 1421
[1] DU Jinhui, BI Zhongnan, QU Jinglong. Recent Development of Triple Melt GH4169 Alloy[J]. 金属学报, 2023, 59(9): 1159-1172.
[2] ZHANG Weidong, CUI Yu, LIU Li, WANG Wenquan, LIU Rui, LI Rui, WANG Fuhui. Corrosion Behavior of GH4169 Alloy in NaCl Solution Spray Environment at 600oC[J]. 金属学报, 2023, 59(11): 1475-1486.
[3] LI Yanmo, GUO Xiaohui, CHEN Bin, LI Peiyue, GUO Qianying, DING Ran, YU Liming, SU Yu, LI Wenya. Microstructure and Mechanical Properties of Linear Friction Welding Joint of GH4169 Alloy/S31042 Steel[J]. 金属学报, 2021, 57(3): 363-374.
[4] WANG Lei, AN Jinlan, LIU Yang, SONG Xiu. Deformation Behavior and Strengthening-Toughening Mechanism of GH4169 Alloy with Multi-Field Coupling[J]. 金属学报, 2019, 55(9): 1185-1194.
[5] Jing GUO,Hanjie GUO,Keming FANG,Shengchao DUAN,Xiao SHI,Wensheng YANG. Morphology Prediction Theory and Experimental Measurement for the Secondary Phase Particle in Steel[J]. 金属学报, 2017, 53(7): 789-796.
[6] Mingzhe XI,Wei ZHOU,Junying SHANG,Chao LV,Zhenhao WU,Shiyou GAO. Effect of Heat Treatment on Microstructure and Mechanical Properties of Consecutive Point-Mode Forging and Laser Rapid Forming GH4169 Alloy[J]. 金属学报, 2017, 53(2): 239-247.
[7] Lei WANG,Jinlan AN,Yang LIU,Xiu SONG,Guohua XU,Guangpu ZHAO. INFLUENCE OF ELECTRIC FIELD TREATMENT ON PRECIPITATION BEHAVIOR OF d PHASE IN GH4169 SUPERALLOY[J]. 金属学报, 2015, 51(10): 1235-1241.
[8] ZHANG Haiyan,ZHANG Shihong, CHENG Ming. EFFECT OF δ PHASE ON THE TENSILE DEFORMATION BEHAVIOR OF GH4169 ALLOY AT HIGH TEMPERATURE[J]. 金属学报, 2013, 29(4): 483-488.
[9] ZHANG Maicang, CAO Guoxin, DONG Jianxin, ZHENG Lei, YAO Zhihao. INVESTIGATIONS ON DISSOLUTION MECHANISM OF LAVES PHASE IN GH4169 ALLOY INGOT BASED ON CLASSICAL DYNAMICAL MODEL[J]. 金属学报, 2013, 49(3): 372-378.
[10] LIU Yang WANG Lei HE Sisi FENG Fei LV Xudong ZHANG Beijiang. EFFECT OF LONG-TERM AGING ON DYNAMIC TENSILE DEFORMATION BEHAVIOR OF GH4169 ALLOY[J]. 金属学报, 2012, 48(1): 49-55.
[11] FANG Xiaoying WANG Weiguo Rohrer G S ZHOU Bangxin. GRAIN BOUNDARY PLANE DISTRIBUTIONS IN THE COLD–ROLLED AND ANNEALED FERRITIC STAINLESS STEEL[J]. 金属学报, 2010, 46(4): 404-410.
No Suggested Reading articles found!