Cross-Section Effect of Ni-Cr-Mo-B Ultra-Heavy Steel Plate for Offshore Platform
ZHANG Shouqing1,2, HU Xiaofeng1, DU Yubin1,2, JIANG Haichang1, PANG Huiyong3, RONG Lijian1()
1 CAS Key Laboratory of Nuclear Materials and Safety Assessment, Institute of Metal Research, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shenyang 110016, China 2 School of Materials Science and Engineering, University of Science and Technology of China, Shenyang 110016, China 3 Wuyang Iron and Steel Co. Ltd. , Pingdingshan 462500, China
Cite this article:
ZHANG Shouqing, HU Xiaofeng, DU Yubin, JIANG Haichang, PANG Huiyong, RONG Lijian. Cross-Section Effect of Ni-Cr-Mo-B Ultra-Heavy Steel Plate for Offshore Platform. Acta Metall Sin, 2020, 56(9): 1227-1238.
With the increasing demand and exploitation depth for offshore oil and gas, offshore platforms are becoming larger and the performance requirements and size for offshore platform of ultra-heavy plates are also increasing. Due to the large plate thickness and the limitation of manufacturing techniques, inhomogeneous microstructures and mechanical properties along thickness direction are great challenges for offshore platform of ultra-heavy plates. In this work, variation of microstructure and its effect on mechanical properties for the 117 mm-thick Ni-Cr-Mo-B industrial ultra-heavy plate were investigated by means of OM, SEM, TEM and EBSD observation, in combination with the tensile and impact toughness test. The results show that yield strength reduces gradually from the surface (798 MPa) to the center (718 MPa) and elongation almost keeps constant around 20.0%~22.0% for the 117 mm-thick plate. It is noted that impact energy at -60 ℃ increases first from 35 J at the surface and reaches its peak 160 J at the depth of 1/8T (T—thickness of plate), and then drops to the minimum about 20 J at the center, which suggests that impact energy curve along the whole section varies sharply and exhibits like letter 'M'. Lath width, boundary carbide size and intragranular carbide size are all gradually increasing from the surface to the center, i.e., from 198.7 nm to 500.6 nm, 130.6 nm to 226.6 nm, 45.8 nm to 106.2 nm, respectively, and there are also some blocky areas at the center, all those indicate that refinement strengthening and precipitation strengthening would decrease, as well as the gradual decrease of yield strength. Also, from the surface to the center, effective grain size (EGS) decreases first and then increases. The surface and the center have larger EGS (2.2 μm and 2.7 μm, respectively), which indicates that they have weaker resistance to cleavage crack and exhibit lower impact energy. However, the 1/8T position has smaller EGS (1.7 μm) while obtains higher impact energy.
Fund: National Key Research and Development Program of China(2016YFB0300601);Liaoning Revitalization Talents Program(XLYC1907143);Major Science and Technology Projects of Construction Corps(2017AA004-2)
Fig.1 Schematics of samples for mechanical property tests and microstructure observations (a), and impact fracture cross-section (b) for the Ni-Cr-Mo-B ultra-heavy plate (RD—rolling direction, TD—transverse direction, ND—normal direction, T—thickness of Ni-Cr-Mo-B ultra-heavy plate)
Position
C
Ni
Mn
Mo
Cr
B
Si
Nb
V
Ti
Cu
Al
S
P
Fe
Surface
0.15
1.35
0.95
0.44
1.03
0.0007
0.17
0.025
0.045
0.02
0.023
0.035
0.003
0.015
Bal.
Center
0.13
1.26
0.95
0.41
1.02
0.0011
0.17
0.022
0.041
0.02
0.022
0.031
0.003
0.014
Bal.
Table 1 Chemical compositions of the Ni-Cr-Mo-B ultra-heavy plate at the surface and the center
Position
Type A
Type B
Type C
Type D
Type DS
Coarse
Fine
Coarse
Fine
Coarse
Fine
Coarse
Fine
0T
0
0
0
0
0
0
0.5
1.0
0
1/4T
0
0
0
0
0
0
1.0
1.0
0
1/2T
0
0
0
0
0
0
0.5
1.0
0.5
3/4T
0
0
0
0
0
0
0.5
1.0
0
1T
0
0
0
0
0
0
1.0
1.0
0
Table 2 Inclusion grade of the Ni-Cr-Mo-B ultra-heavy plate at different positions
Fig.2 Yield strength and elongation at room temperature (a), and impact energy at -60 ℃ (b) of the Ni-Cr-Mo-B ultra-heavy steel plate at different positions
Fig.3 Prior austenite grain images of the Ni-Cr-Mo-B ultra-heavy plate at 6 mm (a), 19 mm (b) and 58 mm (c)
Fig.4 OM images of the Ni-Cr-Mo-B ultra-heavy plate at different positions (LMT—tempered lath martensite, LBT—tempered lath bainite, GBT—tempered granular bainite)
Fig.5 SEM images of the Ni-Cr-Mo-B ultra-heavy plate at 6 mm (a, d), 19 mm (b, e) and 58 mm (c, f, g) (Figs.5d, e and f are magnified images of the zones marked by solid lines in Figs.5a, b and c, respectively. Fig.5g is magnified image of the zone marked by dotted lines in Fig.5c)
Fig.6 Microstructure percentage on the section of the Ni-Cr-Mo-B ultra-heavy steel plate
Fig.7 Grain boundary distribution maps for the Ni-Cr-Mo-B ultra-heavy plate at different positions (The black and red lines indicate the boundaries with misorientations of higher than 15° and 2°~15°, respectively)
Fig.8 Effective grain sizes of the Ni-Cr-Mo-B ultra-heavy steel plate at different positions
Fig.9 TEM images of the Ni-Cr-Mo-B ultra-heavy plate at 6 mm (a, e), 19 mm (b, f) and 58 mm (c, d, g) (Insets in Figs.3e~g show corresponding SAED patterns)
Fig.10 Grain boundary distribution map of impact fracture cross-section of the Ni-Cr-Mo-B ultra-heavy plate at 1/8T (The black and red lines indicate the boundaries with misorientations of higher than 15° and 2°~15°, respectively)
Fig.11 SEM images of impact specimens of the Ni-Cr-Mo-B ultra-heavy plate at 0T (a, d), 1/8T (b, e) and 1/2T (c, f) (The zones marked by dotted lines are cleavage areas. Figs.11d~f are magnified images of the zones marked by solid lines in Figs.11a~c, respectively)
Fig.12 SEM images of impact fracture cross-section of the Ni-Cr-Mo-B ultra-heavy plate at 0T (a), 1/8T (b) and 1/2T (c) (UPCL—unit primary crack length)
Fig.13 Relationships among effective grain size (EGS), unit primary crack length and impact energy at -60 ℃ (AKV) of the Ni-Cr-Mo-B ultra-heavy plate at different positions
[1]
Yang C F, Su H. Research and development of high performance shipbuilding and marine engineering steel [J]. Iron Steel, 2012, 47(12): 1
Tsuyama S. Thick plate technology for the last 100 years: A world leader in thermo mechanical control process [J]. ISIJ Int., 2015, 55: 67
doi: 10.2355/isijinternational.55.67
[3]
Zhang J J. Medium and Heavy Plate Production [M]. Beijing: Metallurgical Industry Press, 2005: 1
(张景进. 中厚板生产 [M]. 北京: 冶金工业出版社, 2005: 1)
[4]
Wu T, Wu D Z, Ye J J, et al. Development of 177.8 mm thickness steel plate for gear rack of jack-up offshore platform [J]. Wide Heavy Plate, 2015, 21(3): 1
Gao Z Y. Study of hot deformtation behavior and microstructure evolution of HSLA ultra-heavy plate steel [D]. Beijing: University of Science and Technology Beijing, 2016
Liu H B, Zhang H Q, Li J F. Thickness dependence of toughness in ultra-heavy low-alloyed steel plate after quenching and tempering [J]. Metals, 2018, 8: 628
doi: 10.3390/met8080628
[7]
Wang X Y, Pan T, Wang H, et al. Investigation of the toughness of low carbon tempered martensite in the surface of Ni-Cr-Mo-B ultra-heavy plate steel [J]. Acta Metall. Sin., 2012, 48: 401
doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1037.2011.00698
Liu D S, Cheng B G, Chen Y Y. Fine microstructure and toughness of low carbon copper containing ultra high strength NV-F690 heavy steel plate [J]. Acta Metall. Sin., 2012, 48: 334
Liu D S, Cheng B G, Chen Y Y. Strengthening and toughening of a heavy plate steel for shipbuilding with yield strength of approximately 690 MPa [J]. Metall. Mater. Trans., 2013, 44A: 440
[10]
Hwang B, Lee C G, Kim S J. Low-temperature toughening mechanism in thermomechanically processed high-strength low-alloy steels [J]. Metall. Mater. Trans., 2010, 42A: 717
[11]
Kim S, Lee S, Lee B S. Effects of grain size on fracture toughness in transition temperature region of Mn-Mo-Ni low-alloy steels [J]. Mater. Sci. Eng., 2003, A359: 198
[12]
Wang J. Study on structural heredity of 30Cr2Ni4MoV steel for steam turbine lp rotor of heavy forgings [D]. Qingdao: Shandong University of Science and Technology, 2011
Zhou T, Yu H, Wang S Y. Effect of microstructural types on toughness and microstructural optimization of ultra-heavy steel plate: EBSD analysis and microscopic fracture mechanism [J]. Mater. Sci. Eng., 2016, A658: 150
[14]
Furuhara T, Kawata H, Morito S, et al. Crystallography of upper bainite in Fe-Ni-C alloys [J]. Mater. Sci. Eng., 2006, A431: 228
[15]
Morsdorf L, Tasan C C, Ponge D, et al. 3D structural and atomic-scale analysis of lath martensite: Effect of the transformation sequence [J]. Acta Mater., 2015, 95: 366
[16]
Jiang Z H, Wang P, Li D Z, et al. The evolutions of microstructure and mechanical properties of 2.25Cr-1Mo-0.25V steel with different initial microstructures during tempering [J]. Mater. Sci. Eng., 2017, A699: 165
[17]
Takayama N, Miyamoto G, Furuhara T. Effects of transformation temperature on variant pairing of bainitic ferrite in low carbon steel [J]. Acta Mater., 2012, 60: 2387
doi: 10.1016/j.actamat.2011.12.018
[18]
Chen J, Tang S, Liu Z Y, et al. Microstructural characteristics with various cooling paths and the mechanism of embrittlement and toughening in low-carbon high performance bridge steel [J]. Mater. Sci. Eng., 2013, A559: 241
[19]
Luo Z J, Shen J C, Su H, et al. Effect of substructure on toughness of lath martensite/bainite mixed structure in low-carbon steels [J]. J. Iron Steel Res. Int., 2010, 17: 40
[20]
Zheng Y X, Wang F M, Li C R, et al. Effect of microstructure and precipitates on mechanical properties of Cr-Mo-V Alloy steel with different austenitizing temperatures [J]. ISIJ Int., 2018, 58: 1126
doi: 10.2355/isijinternational.ISIJINT-2017-531
[21]
Naylor J P. The influence of the lath morphology on the yield stress and transition temperature of martensitic- bainitic steels [J]. Metall. Mater. Trans., 1979, 10A: 861
[22]
Kestenbach H J, Gallego J. On dispersion hardening of microalloyed hot strip steels by carbonitride precipitation in austenite [J]. Scr. Mater., 2001, 44: 791
doi: 10.1016/S1359-6462(00)00660-6
[23]
Lee K H, Kim M C, Yang W J, et al. Evaluation of microstructural parameters controlling cleavage fracture toughness in Mn-Mo-Ni low alloy steels [J]. Mater. Sci. Eng., 2013, A565: 158
[24]
Kang J, Li C N, Yuan G, et al. Improvement of strength and toughness for hot rolled low-carbon bainitic steel via grain refinement and crystallographic texture [J]. Mater. Lett., 2016, 175: 157
doi: 10.1016/j.matlet.2016.04.007
[25]
Mao G J, Cayron C, Cao R, et al. The relationship between low-temperature toughness and secondary crack in low-carbon bainitic weld metals [J]. Mater. Charact., 2018, 145: 516
doi: 10.1016/j.matchar.2018.09.012
[26]
Díaz-Fuentes M, Iza-Mendia A, Gutiérrez I. Analysis of different acicular ferrite microstructures in low-carbon steels by electron backscattered diffraction. Study of their toughness behavior [J]. Metall. Mater. Trans., 2003, 34A: 2505
[27]
Brozzo P, Buzzichelli G, Mascanzoni A, et al. Microstructure and cleavage resistance of low-carbon bainitic steels [J]. Met. Sci., 1977, 11: 123
[28]
Wang C F, Wang M Q, Shi J, et al. Effect of microstructural refinement on the toughness of low carbon martensitic steel [J]. Scr. Mater., 2008, 58: 492
doi: 10.1016/j.scriptamat.2007.10.053