Acta Metall Sin  2011, Vol. 47 Issue (3): 291-297    DOI: 10.3724/SP.J.1037.2010.00590

论文 Current Issue | Archive | Adv Search |

MATHEMATICAL MODEL AND THEORETICAL RESEARCH OF UNIT ROLLING PRESSURE DISTRIBUTION IN RECTANGULAR GROOVE DURING RHEO–ROLLING OF SEMISOLID ALLOY

HUANG Hongqian, CAO Furong, GUAN Renguo, ZHAO Zhanyong, XING Zhenhuan

College of Materials and Metallurgy, Northeastern University, Shenyang 110819

HUANG Hongqian CAO Furong GUAN Renguo ZHAO Zhanyong XING Zhenhuan. MATHEMATICAL MODEL AND THEORETICAL RESEARCH OF UNIT ROLLING PRESSURE DISTRIBUTION IN RECTANGULAR GROOVE DURING RHEO–ROLLING OF SEMISOLID ALLOY. Acta Metall Sin, 2011, 47(3): 291-297.

Abstract References Related Articles Recommended Metrics Download:  PDF(1279KB)  Export:  BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)       Abstract  Semisolid metal forming (SSF) is recognized as a new forming technology, which has been paid more and more attention by the researchers all over the world. The semisolid rolling process (rheo–rolling) combines the fabrication of semisolid slurry with continuously rolling as an important neoteric means to achieve near–shape forming. Compared with the traditional rolling process, this technology has the features of short machining process, low energy consumption, low cost equipment and high yield. However, one of the difficulties of using this technology to produce strip is that the solid and liquid phases prone to separation with each other during rheo–rolling deformation, especially when the semisolid slurry has a low solid fraction. The phenomenon causes macrosegregation and reduces the quality of the strip, as a result, limiting its industrial application. Using rectangular groove roller may solve this problem. In this paper, the mathematical model of unit rolling pressure distribution in rectangular groove during rheo–rolling was established. AZ91D magnesium alloy was taken as an example, and the effects of rolling strip thickness, width and roller radius on unit pressure were calculated and studied. he calculation results reveal that the smaller the thickness of rheo–rolled strip is, the narrower the width is, the bigger the peak unit rolling pressure is and the larger the average unit rolling pressure is. However, when the strip thickness decreases, the peak unit rolling pressure moves towards the exit while when width decreases, the peak unit rolling pressure moves towards the entrance. The larger the roller radius is, the bigger the peak unit rolling pressure is, the larger the average unit olling pressure is, and the peak value deviates towards the exit. Key words:  semisolid      rheo–rolling      groovrolling      unit rolling pressure      athematical model      AZ91D      Received:  04 November 2010      ZTFLH:  TG33 TG142   Fund:  Supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China (Nos.51034002 and 50974038) and Key China University Basic Scientific Research Expenses (No.090502003) Service E-mail this article Add to citation manager E-mail Alert RSS （） Articles by authors HUANG Hong-Qian CAO Fu-Rong GUAN Ren-Guo DIAO Tie-Yong GENG Zhen-Huan URL:  https://www.ams.org.cn/EN/10.3724/SP.J.1037.2010.00590     OR     https://www.ams.org.cn/EN/Y2011/V47/I3/291 [1] Luo S J, TianWT, Xie S S, MaoWM. Chin J Nonferrous Met, 2000; 10: 765 (罗守靖, 田文彤, 谢水生, 毛卫民. 中国有色金属学报, 2000; 10: 765) [2] Song R B, Kang Y , Zhao A M. J Mater Process Technol, 2008; 198: 291 [3] Haga T. J Mater Process Technol, 2002; 130: 558 [4] Haga T, Kenta T, Masaaki I. J Mater Process Technol, 2004; 153: 42 [5] Haga T, Suzuki S. J Mater Process Technol, 2004; 157–158: 695 [6] Guan R G. Theory and Technology of Metallic Semisolid Forming. Beijing: Metallurgical Industrial Press, 2005: 14 (管仁国. 金属半固态成形理论与技术. 北京: 冶金工业出版社, 2005: 14) [7] Ji Z S, Yan H H, Zheng X P, Sugiyama S O, Yanagimoto J. J Mater Process Technol, 2008; 202: 412 [8] Kang C G, Yoon J H. J Mater Process Technol, 1997; 66: 76 [9] Xie S S, Yang H Q, Huang G J, Li L. J Plast Eng, 2007; 14: 80 (谢水生, 杨浩强, 黄国杰, 李雷. 塑性工程学报, 2007; 14: 80) [10] Kang C G, Kim Y D. J Mater Process Technol, 1997; 67: 71 [11] Zhu Z H, Xiao W F, LI X Q, Hu S C. Chin J Mech Eng, 2002; 38(7): 153 (朱志华, 肖文峰, 李晓谦, 胡仕成. 机械工程学报, 2002; 38(7): 153) [12] Zhao D W. Mechanics of Materials Forming. Shenyang: Northeastern University Press, 2002: 115 (赵德文. 材料成形力学. 沈阳: 东北大学出版社, 2002: 115) [13] Wei L . Principle of Metal Forming. Beijing: Metallurgical Industrial Press, 2008: 55 (魏立群. 金属压力加工原理. 冶金工业出版社, 2008: 55) [14] Yan H, Xia J C, Wang G C, Hu G A, Li H J. Mater Rev, 2002; 16(11): 8 (闫洪, 夏巨谌, 王高潮, 胡国安, 李海江. 材料导报, 2002; 16(11): 8) [15] Pan H P, Ding Z Y, Dong Y S, Xie S X. Acta Metall Sin, 2003; 39: 369 (潘洪平,丁志勇, 董原生, 谢水生. 金属学报, 2003; 39: 369) [16] Xing Z H. Master Dessertation, Northeastern University, Shenyang, 2007 (邢振环. 东北大学硕士论文, 沈阳, 2007) [17] Seheil E. Z Metallkd, 1942; 34: 70 [1] Zheng LIU, Zhiping CHEN, Tao CHEN. Effects of Crucible Size and Electromagnetic Frequency on Flow During Fabrication of Semisolid A356 Al Alloy Slurry[J]. 金属学报, 2018, 54(3): 435-442. [2] Dunming LIAO, Liu CAO, Fei SUN, Tao CHEN. Research Status and Prospect on Numerical Simulation Technology of Casting Macroscopic Process[J]. 金属学报, 2018, 54(2): 161-173. [3] Zheng LIU,Jiayi ZHANG,Haolin LUO,Keyue DENG. RESEARCH ON MORPHOLOGY EVOLUTION OF PRIMARY PHASE IN SEMISOLID A356 ALLOY UNDER CHAOTIC ADVECTION[J]. 金属学报, 2016, 52(2): 177-183. [4] Kaiwen WEI,Zemin WANG,Xiaoyan ZENG. ELEMENT LOSS OF AZ91D MAGNESIUM ALLOY DURING SELECTIVE LASER MELTING PROCESS[J]. 金属学报, 2016, 52(2): 184-190. [5] Mingfan QI, Yonglin KANG, Bing ZHOU, Guoming ZHU, Huanhuan ZHANG. MICROSTRUCTURES AND PROPERTIES OF AZ91D MAGNESIUM ALLOY PRODUCED BY FORCED CONVECTION MIXING RHEO-DIECASTING PROCESS[J]. 金属学报, 2015, 51(6): 668-676. [6] LIU Zheng, LIU Xiaomei, ZHU Tao, CHEN Qingchun. EFFECTS OF ELECTROMAGNETIC STIRRING WITH LOW CURRENT FREQUENCY ON RE DISTRIBUTION IN SEMISOLID ALUMINUM ALLOY[J]. 金属学报, 2015, 51(3): 272-280. [7] Xuewei YAN,Ning TANG,Xiaofu LIU,Guoyan SHUI,Qingyan XU,Baicheng LIU. MODELING AND SIMULATION OF DIRECTIONAL SOLIDIFICATION BY LMC PROCESS FOR NICKEL BASE SUPERALLOY CASTING[J]. 金属学报, 2015, 51(10): 1288-1296. [8] GUAN Renguo ZHANG Qiusheng DAI Chunguang ZHAO Zhanyong LIU Chunming. SIMULATION AND OPTIMIZATION OF THERMAL FIELD DURING CONTINUOUS CONSTRAINED RHEO-ROLLING OF AZ31 ALLOY[J]. 金属学报, 2011, 47(9): 1167-1173. [9] ZHAO Lining LIN Xin HUANG Weidong. FORMATION AND EVOLUTION OF THE NON-DENDRITIC MORPHOLOGY IN UNDERCOOLING MELT WITH LOWER SHEARING RATE[J]. 金属学报, 2011, 47(4): 403-409. [10] ZHAO Junwen WU Shusen WAN Li CHEN Qihua AN Ping. EVOLUTION OF MICROSTRUCTURE OF SEMISOLID METAL SLURRY IN ULTRASOUND FIELD[J]. 金属学报, 2009, 45(3): 314-319. [11] XiaoGuang Zhou. Modelling of Dynamic Recrystallization　for Nb Bearing Steels on Flexible Thin Slab Rolling[J]. 金属学报, 2008, 44(10): 1188-1192 . [12] . Modeling of Three-Phase Flows and Slag Layer Behavior in an Argon Gas Stirred Ladle[J]. 金属学报, 2008, 44(10): 1198-1202 . [13] ZHOU Jixue; WANG Bin; TONG Wenhui; YANG Yuansheng. Effect of Strontium Addition on Dendrite Growth and Phase Precipitation in AZ91D Magnesium Alloy[J]. 金属学报, 2007, 43(11): 1171-1175 . [14] LI Weibiao; WANG Fang; QI Fengsheng; LI Baokuan. Mathematical Model on Steel Strip--Feeding of Mold in Continuous Casting Process[J]. 金属学报, 2007, 43(11): 1191-1194 . [15] Weichao Zheng; shuangshou li. EFFECT OF MISCHMETAL ON SOLIDIFICATION MICROSTRUCTURE OF AZ91D MAGNESIUM ALLOY[J]. 金属学报, 2006, 42(8): 835-842 . No Suggested Reading articles found! Viewed Full text Abstract Cited   Shared      Discussed