Please wait a minute...
Acta Metall Sin  2014, Vol. 50 Issue (10): 1217-1223    DOI: 10.11900/0412.1961.2014.00312
Current Issue | Archive | Adv Search |
RECRYSTALLIZATION BEHAVIOR AND ITS INFLU- ENCES ON MECHANICAL PROPERTIES OF AN ALUMINA-FORMING AUSTENITIC STAINLESS STEELS
ZHOU Deqiang, LIU Xiongjun, WU Yuan, WANG Hui, LV Zhaoping()
State Key Laboratory for Advanced Metals and Materials, University of Science and Technology Beijing,Beijing 100083
Cite this article: 

ZHOU Deqiang, LIU Xiongjun, WU Yuan, WANG Hui, LV Zhaoping. RECRYSTALLIZATION BEHAVIOR AND ITS INFLU- ENCES ON MECHANICAL PROPERTIES OF AN ALUMINA-FORMING AUSTENITIC STAINLESS STEELS. Acta Metall Sin, 2014, 50(10): 1217-1223.

Download:  HTML  PDF(5366KB) 
Export:  BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)      
Abstract  

Energy crisis and global warming demand development of high-performance structural materials to improve energy efficiency. For efficient energy conversion, the operating temperature and pressure of a heat engine used in boiler/steam turbine power plants should be as high as possible and materials used for the engine components must be able to withstand the high operating temperature. As such, next-generation structural materials simultaneously possessing higher creep strength and larger oxidation-resistance at elevated temperatures than those currently used are required. The conventional austenitic stainless steels, which rely on the formation of a tenacious Cr2O3 scale, would lose its protection capability at temperatures above 923 K, in particular in the presence of sulfur and water vapor. The alumina-forming austenitic (AFA) stainless steels are a relatively new class of dispersion-strengthened austenitic steels which showed superior oxidation-resistance to conventional stainless steels due to formation of the Al2O3-based protective scale at high temperatures. Recently, research focuses in this field have been mainly placed on high temperature oxidation-resistance, while little attention was paid to the mechanical property of these steels, particularly at elevated temperatures. In order to fully understand the deformation mechanisms at high temperatures, the recrystallization behavior in a typical AFA stainless steel under different conditions, including different annealing temperatures and durations, were investigated. The high-temperature mechanical properties of the AFA stainless steel samples heat-treated under different conditions were also studied. The sample was fully recrystallized upon heat treatment at 1473 K for at least 2 h and showed tensile strength about 130 MPa when tested at 1023 K with a strain rate 6.4×10-7 s-1. The specimen was partially recrystallized upon heat treatment at 1373 K for 0.5 h and exhibited a higher tensile strength of 150 MPa with decreased plasticity when tested under the same condition. Further investigation shows that the grain growth was influenced by the precipitation of NbC. The grain growth exponent, n, was determined to be 3 and the apparent activation energy for grain growth is 234.7 kJ/mol, which is consistent with that of the Nb diffusion along the grain boundary in the austenite.

Key words:  alumina-forming austenitic stainless steel      grain growth      grain boundary migration      NbC precipitation     
Received:  17 June 2014     
ZTFLH:  TG142.1  
Fund: Supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China (Nos.51010001 and 51001009)

URL: 

https://www.ams.org.cn/EN/10.11900/0412.1961.2014.00312     OR     https://www.ams.org.cn/EN/Y2014/V50/I10/1217

Fig.1  OM image of the alumina-forming austenitic (AFA) stainless steel after being cold-rolled 20%
Fig.2  OM images of the AFA stainless steel recrystallized at 1373 K for 0.5 h (a), 1 h (b), 2 h (c) and 4 h (d)
Fig.3  OM images of the AFA stainless steel recrystallized at 1423 K for 0.5 h (a), 1 h (b) and 2 h (c)
Fig.4  OM images of the AFA stainless steel recrystallized at 1473 K for 0.5 h (a), 1 h (b) and 2 h (c)
Fig.5  XRD spectra of the AFA stainless steel as-cast (a), 20% cold rolled (b), recrystallized at 1373 K for 0.5 h (c) and recrystallized at 1473 K for 2 h (d)
Fig.6  Bright-field (a) and dark-field (b) TEM images of the AFA stainless steel recrystallized at 1373 K for 0.5 h
Temperature / K Time / h Grain size / mm
1373 0.5 13.3
1 60.9
2 67.0
4 91.3
1423 0.5 59.7
1 85.2
2 98.3
1473 0.5 75.2
1 101.2
2 118.8
Table 1  Grain sizes of the AFA stainless steel recrystallized at 1373, 1423 and 1473 K for different times
Fig.7  Mechanical properties of the AFA stainless steel recrystallized at 1373 K for 0.5 h (a), and 1473 K for 2 h (b)
Fig.8  Grain size as a function of the heat treatment time for the AFA stainless steel (D is the instantaneous grain size and D0 is the initial grain size)
Fig.9  Grain-growth constant C as a function of the reciprocal of absolute temperature 1/T (Apparent activation energy Q for the grain growth can be deduced from the slope of this curve, Q=234.7 kJ/mol)
[1] Viswanathan R, Bakker W J. J Mater Eng Perf, 2001; 10: 81
[2] Maziasz P J, Swindeman R W, Shingledcker J P, More K L, Pint B A, Curzio E L. In: Strang A, Conroy R D, Banks W M, Blackler M, Leggett J, McColvin G M eds., Proc Sixth International Charles Parsons Turbine Conference, London: Maney, 2003: 1057
[3] Pint B A, Peraldi R, Maziasz P J. Mater Sci Forum, 2004; 461-464: 815
[4] Yamamoto Y, Brady M P, Lu Z P, Maziasz P J, Liu C T, Pint B A, More K L, Meyer H M, Payzant E A. Science, 2007; 316: 433
[5] Brady M P, Yamamoto Y, Santella M L, Walker L R. Oxid Met, 2009; 72: 311
[6] Yamamoto Y, Takeyama A, Lu Z P, Liu C T, Evans N D, Maziasz P J, Brady M P. Intermetallics, 2008; 16: 453
[7] Yamamoto Y, Brady M P, Santella M L, Bei H, Maziasz P J, Pint B A. Metall Mater Trans, 2011; 42A: 922
[8] Bei H, Yamamoto Y, Brady M P, Santella M L. Mater Sci Eng, 2010; A527: 2079
[9] Pint B A, Haynes J A, Besmann T M. Surf Coat Technol, 2010; 204: 3287
[10] Brady M P, Yamamoto Y, Santella M L, Pint B A. Scr Mater, 2007; 57: 1117
[11] Xu X Q, Zhang X F, Chen G L, Lu Z P. Mater Lett, 2011; 65: 3285
[12] Xu X Q, Zhang X F, Sun X Y, Lu Z P. Corros Sci, 2012; 65: 317
[13] Xu X Q, Zhang X F, Sun X Y, Lu Z P. Oxid Met, 2012; 78: 349
[14] Wu T Y, Wu Q B, Riquier Y. Acta Metall Sin, 1993; 29: 79
(吴惕言, 吴启白, Riquier Y. 金属学报, 1993; 29: 79)
[15] Chen L, Wang L M, Du X J, Chen X. Acta Metall Sin, 2010; 46: 52
(陈 雷, 王龙妹, 杜晓健, 陈 晓. 金属学报, 2010; 46: 52)
[16] Zhou D Q, Xu X Q, Mao H H, Yan Y F, Nieh T G, Lu Z P. Mater Sci Eng, 2014; A594: 246
[17] Fernández A I, López B, Rodriguez-Ibabe J M. Metall Mater Trans, 2002; 33A: 3089
[18] Han K H. Mater Sci Eng, 2000; A279: 1
[19] Burke J E. Trans Metall Soc AIME, 1949; 180: 73
[20] Beck P A, Kremer J C, Pemer L H, Holzworth M L. Trans Metall Soc AIME, 1948; 175: 372
[21] Atkinson H V. Acta Metall, 1988; 36: 469
[22] Liu W H, Wu Y, He J Y, Nieh T G, Lu Z P. Scr Mater, 2013; 68: 526
[23] Burke J E, Turnbull D. Prog Met Phys, 1952; 3: 220
[24] Liu W J. Metall Mater Trans, 1995; 26A: 1641
[25] Dutta B, Sellars C M. Mater Sci Technol, 1987; 3: 197
[26] Dutta B, Valdes E, Sellars C M. Acta Metall Mater, 1992; 40: 653
[27] Yamamoto S, Ouchi C, Osuka T. In: Wray P J, DeArdo A J eds., Thermomechanical Processing of Microalloyed Austenite. Warrendale: AIME, 1982: 613
[1] WANG Jiangwei, CHEN Yingbin, ZHU Qi, HONG Zhe, ZHANG Ze. Grain Boundary Dominated Plasticity in Metallic Materials[J]. 金属学报, 2022, 58(6): 726-745.
[2] HAN Ruyang, YANG Gengwei, SUN Xinjun, ZHAO Gang, LIANG Xiaokai, ZHU Xiaoxiang. Austenite Grain Growth Behavior of Vanadium Microalloying Medium Manganese Martensitic Wear-Resistant Steel[J]. 金属学报, 2022, 58(12): 1589-1599.
[3] ZHANG Xiaoli, FENG Li, YANG Yanhong, ZHOU Yizhou, LIU Guiqun. Influence of Secondary Orientation on Competitive Grain Growth of Nickel-Based Superalloys[J]. 金属学报, 2020, 56(7): 969-978.
[4] SUN Zhengyang, WANG Yutian, LIU Wenbo. Phase-Field Simulation of the Interaction Between Pore and Grain Boundary[J]. 金属学报, 2020, 56(12): 1643-1653.
[5] Jincheng WANG, Chunwen GUO, Junjie LI, Zhijun WANG. Recent Progresses in Competitive Grain Growth During Directional Solidification[J]. 金属学报, 2018, 54(5): 657-668.
[6] Feng LIU, Linke HUANG, Yuzeng CHEN. Concurrence of Phase Transition and Grain Growth in Nanocrystalline Metallic Materials[J]. 金属学报, 2018, 54(11): 1525-1536.
[7] Yajun HUI,Hui PAN,Wenyuan LI,Kun LIU,Bin CHEN,Yang CUI. Study on Heating Schedule of 1000 MPa Grade Nb-Ti Microalloyed Ultra-High Strength Steel[J]. 金属学报, 2017, 53(2): 129-139.
[8] Jianguo WANG,Dong LIU,Yanhui YANG. MECHANISMS OF NON-UNIFORM MICROSTRUC-TURE EVOLUTION IN GH4169 ALLOYDURING HEATING PROCESS[J]. 金属学报, 2016, 52(6): 707-716.
[9] ZHANG Hang, XU Qingyan, SHI Zhenxue, LIU Baicheng. NUMERICAL SIMULATION OF DENDRITE GRAIN GROWTH OF DD6 SUPERALLOY DURING DIRECTIONAL SOLIDIFICATION PROCESS[J]. 金属学报, 2014, 50(3): 345-354.
[10] WU Yan, ZONG Yaping,ZHANG Xiangang. MICROSTRUCTURE EVOLUTION OF NANOCRYSTALLINE AZ31 MAGNESIUM ALLOY BY PHASE FIELD SIMULATION[J]. 金属学报, 2013, 49(7): 789-796.
[11] ZHANG Zhuanzhuan WU Chuansong Gao Jinqiang. PREDICTION OF GRAIN GROWTH IN HYBRID WELDING HAZ OF TCS STAINLESS STEEL[J]. 金属学报, 2012, 48(2): 199-204.
[12] ZHOU Guangzhao WANG Yongxin CHEN Zheng. PHASE–FIELD METHOD SIMULATION OF THE EFFECT OF HARD PARTICLES WITH DIFFERENT SHAPES ON TWO–PHASE GRAIN GROWTH[J]. 金属学报, 2012, 48(2): 227-234.
[13] CAO Yu DI Hongshuang ZHANG Jiecen ZHANG Jingqi MA Tianjun. RESEARCH ON DYNAMIC RECRYSTALLIZATION BEHAVIOR OF INCOLOY 800H[J]. 金属学报, 2012, 48(10): 1175-1185.
[14] CHEN Weiye TONG Weiping ZHANG Hui ZHAO Xiang ZUO Liang. TEXTURE EVOLUTION AND GROWTH OF DIFFERENTLY SIZED GRAINS IN IF STEEL DURING ANNEALING[J]. 金属学报, 2010, 46(9): 1055-1060.
[15] FU Liming SHAN Aidang WANG Wei. EFFECT OF Nb SOLUTE DRAG AND NbC PRECIPITATE PINNING ON THE RECRYSTALLIZATION GRAIN GROWTH IN LOW CARBON Nb-MICROACLOYED STEEL[J]. 金属学报, 2010, 46(7): 832-837.
No Suggested Reading articles found!