金属学报  2012, Vol. 48 Issue (4): 385-392    DOI: 10.3724/SP.J.1037.2011.00697

论文 本期目录 | 过刊浏览 |

Fe-C-Mn-Si钢中奥氏体共格孪晶界对贝氏体铁素体变体选择的影响

王西霞,郭晖, 王鼎, 白银, 杨善武, 贺信莱

北京科技大学材料科学与工程学院, 北京 100083

INFLUENCE OF COHERENT AUSTENITE TWIN BOUNDARIES ON THE VARIANT SELECTION OF BAINITIC FERRITE IN Fe-C-Mn-Si STEELS

WANG Xixia, GUO Hui, WANG Ding, BAI Yin, YANG Shanwu, HE Xinlai

School of Materials Science and Engineering, University of Science and Technology Beijing, Beijing 100083

王西霞,郭晖, 王鼎, 白银, 杨善武, 贺信莱. Fe-C-Mn-Si钢中奥氏体共格孪晶界对贝氏体铁素体变体选择的影响[J]. 金属学报, 2012, 48(4): 385-392.
, , , , , . INFLUENCE OF COHERENT AUSTENITE TWIN BOUNDARIES ON THE VARIANT SELECTION OF BAINITIC FERRITE IN Fe-C-Mn-Si STEELS[J]. Acta Metall Sin, 2012, 48(4): 385-392.

摘要 参考文献 相关文章 Metrics 全文: PDF(1160 KB)   摘要: 将C含量(质量分数)分别为0.05%和0.4%的Fe-C-Mn-Si钢进行等温处理得到贝氏体组织, 采用EBSD技术对奥氏体共格孪晶界上形成的贝氏体铁素体变体进行分析. 结果表明, 2种钢中的贝氏体铁素体与母相奥氏体均成近似K-S取向关系. 奥氏体孪晶界两侧形成取向相同的变体对.此变体对形成后, 孪晶界基本不再显现. 晶体学分析表明, 共格孪晶界两侧可能出现的变体对最多不超过3组, 且这3组变体对的惯习面均与孪晶界平行,因此, 贝氏体铁素体变体都将沿孪晶界生长. 含C量为0.05%的Fe-C-Mn-Si钢中奥氏体孪晶界上只观察到一组贝氏体铁素体变体对的形成, 这是因为C含量较低,贝氏体铁素体生长速度较快, 消除了其它变体对的形核机会, 先形核的变体对一旦形核就迅速覆盖整个孪晶面. 而在含C量为0.4%的Fe-C-Mn-Si钢中,由于C含量较高, 贝氏体铁素体生长速度较慢, 3组变体对均有机会形核,因此, 在孪晶界上可以观察到这3组变体对同时出现. 关键词 ： Fe-C-Mn-Si钢,  奥氏体孪晶,  变体选择,  贝氏体铁素体,  K-S取向关系     Abstract：To develop higher performance steels the requirements of the control of the microstructure is increasingly enhanced. The crystallographic orientation characteristics in the microstructure attract more and more attention because the mechanical properties are usually determined by the grain boundary density, especially high angle grain boundary density. So far researchers have conducted comprehensive investigation of the variant selection during the phase transformation. To decrease the nucleation barrier, the new phase usually chooses a specific orientation (variant) to decrease the interfacial energy between the parent and new phases. The variant selection occurs on the grain boundaries has been well studied. The nucleation and variant selection on austenite twin boundaries, however, are seldom reported, especially in the low carbon steels in which austenite can hardly be retained to the room temperature. In this work, the variant selection of bainitic ferrite on coherent austenite twin boundaries was studied using electron back scattering diffraction (EBSD) in Fe-C-Mn-Si steels with 0.05%C or 0.4%C (mass fraction). The orientation relationship between bainitic ferrite and austenite is close to K-S relationship in both steels. It was observed that the variant pairs with the similar crystallographic orientation nucleated on both sides of austenite twin boundaries. The twin grain boundaries were erased after the bainitic ferrite variants grew up. Crystallographic analysis showed that no more than three pairs of variants could be formed on one austenite twin boundary, the habit planes of which were all parallel to the twin boundary. As a result, the bainitic ferrite variant nucleated first would grow and expand along the twin boundary. In 0.05C steel, only one pair of variants was observed on the austenite twin boundary because the first nucleated bainitic ferrite variant pair grew fast due to the low carbon content which covers the twin boundary very soon and leaves no chance for the other variant pairs to nucleate on this twin boundary. In 0.4C steel, all three pairs of variants could be formed on one twin boundary because the higher carbon content slowed down the growth of first nucleated bainitic ferrite and more variant pairs could be nucleated on the twin boundary. Key words： Fe-C-Mn-Si steel    austenite twin    variant    selection    bainitic ferrite    K-S orientation relationship 收稿日期: 2011-11-09      基金资助: 国家自然科学基金项目50601002和50971028资助 作者简介: 王西霞, 女, 1985年生, 硕士生 服务 把本文推荐给朋友 加入引用管理器 E-mail Alert RSS 作者相关文章 王西霞 郭晖 王鼎 白银 杨善武 贺信莱 44.8K 链接本文: https://www.ams.org.cn/CN/10.3724/SP.J.1037.2011.00697      或      https://www.ams.org.cn/CN/Y2012/V48/I4/385 [1] Guo Z, Lee C S, Morris J W.  Acta Mater, 2004; 52: 5511 [2] Kitahara H, Ueji R, Ueda M, Tsuji N, Minamino Y.  Mater Charact,2005; 54: 378 [3] Kitahara H, Ueji R, Tsuji N, Minamino Y.  Acta Mater, 2006; 54: 1279 [4] Kitahara H, Ueda M, Tsuji N, Minamino Y.  Mater Sci Forum, 2006; 512: 117 [5] Sandvik B P J.  Metall Trans, 1982; 13A: 77 [6] Furuhara T, Kawata H, Morito S, Maki T.  Mater Sci Eng, 2006; A431: 228 [7] Pancholi V, Krishnan M, Samajdar I S, Yadav V, Ballal N B. Acta Mater, 2008; 56: 2037 [8] Furuhara T, Kawata H, Morito S, Miyamoto G, Maki T.  Metall Mater Trans, 2008; 39A: 1003 [9] Furuhara T, Maki T.  Mater Sci Eng, 2001; A312: 146 [10] Babu S S, Bhadeshia H K D H.  Mater Sci Eng, 1991; A142: 209 [11] Cho J Y, Suh D W, Kang J H, Lee H C.  ISIJ Int, 2002; 42: 1321 [12] Suh D W, Kang J H, Oh K H, Lee H C.  Scr Mater, 2002; 46: 375 [13] Kim D W, Suh D W, Qin R S, Bhadeshia H K D H.  J Mater Sci,2010; 45: 4126 [14] Cui G B, Guo H, Yang S W, He X L.  Acta Metall Sin,2009; 45: 680      (崔桂彬, 郭晖, 杨善武, 贺信莱. 金属学报, 2009; 45: 680) [15] Guo H, Bai Y, Yang S W, He X L.  Mater Sci Forum,2010; 654-656: 2326 [16] Hackenber R E, Nordstrom D P, Shiflet G J.  Scr Mater,2002; 47: 357 [17] Hackenber R E, Shiflet G J.  Philos Mag, 2003; 83: 3367 [18] Hackenberg R E, Shiflet G J.  Acta Mater, 2003; 51: 2131 [19] Miyamoto G, Takayama N, Furuhara T.  Scr Mater,2009; 60: 1113 [20] Luo C P, Liu J W, Xiao X L.  Acta Metall Sin, 1998; 34: 1009      (罗承萍, 刘江文, 肖晓玲. 金属学报, 1998; 34: 1009) [21] Liu Z C, Wang H Y.  Heat Treat Technol Equip, 2009; 30(5); 1      (刘宗昌, 王海燕. 热处理技术与装备, 2009; 30(5): 1) [22] Fang H S, Bo X Z, Zheng Y K, Huang J F.  Heat Treat Met,1998; 11: 1       (方鸿生, 薄祥正, 郑燕康, 黄进峰. 金属热处理, 1998; 11: 1) [23] Yang P.  EBSD Technique and its Application. Beijing: Metallurgy Industry Press, 2007: 55      (杨 平. 电子背散射衍射技术及其应用. 北京: 冶金工业出版社, 2007: 55) [24] Lee J K, Aaronson H I.  Acta Metall, 1979; 23: 799 [25] Lee J K, Aaronson H I.  Acta Metall, 1979; 23: 809 [26] Ameyama K, Maki T, Tamura I.  J Jpn Inst Met, 1986; 50: 602 [27] Furuhara T, Takage S, Watanabe H, Maki T.  Metall Mater Trans, 1996; 27A: 1635   [1] 王丽娜,杨平,毛卫民. 高锰TRIP钢高速拉伸时的马氏体转变行为分析*[J]. 金属学报, 2016, 52(9): 1045-1052. [2] 张金虎,徐东生,王云志,杨锐. 位错对Ti-6Al-4V合金α相形核及微织构形成的影响*[J]. 金属学报, 2016, 52(8): 905-915. [3] 黄洪涛 刘伟 A. Godfrey 唐瑞鹤 刘庆. AZ31镁合金单轴压缩中孪生行为研究[J]. 金属学报, 2012, 48(3): 357-362. [4] 李凤照;敖青;顾英妮;姜江;孙东升;戴吉岩;彭红樱. 贝氏体精细结构的透射电镜观察[J]. 金属学报, 1997, 33(3): 241-247. [5] 杨柳;朱德贵;张筠;陈荐. Fe-Ni合金贝氏体长大原位观察[J]. 金属学报, 1994, 30(8): 344-347. [6] 金强;方鸿生;曹建军;郑燕康;陈秀云. 下贝氏体铁素体宽面上的台阶结构[J]. 金属学报, 1990, 26(6): 5-9. Viewed Full text Abstract Cited   Shared      Discussed