MICROSTRUCTURE EVOLUTION OF LEAN DUPLEX STAINLESS STEEL 2101 DURING HOT DEFORMATION
FANG Yiliu1; LIU Zhenyu1; ZHANG Weina1; WANG Guodong1; SONG Hongmei2; JIANG Laizhu2
1.State Key Laboratory of Rolling and Automation; Northeastern University; Shenyang 110819
2.Research Institute for Stainless Steels; R&D Center; Baosteel Co.; Shanghai 201900
Cite this article:
FANG Yiliu LIU Zhenyu ZHANG Weina WANG Guodong SONG Hongmei JIANG Laizhu. MICROSTRUCTURE EVOLUTION OF LEAN DUPLEX STAINLESS STEEL 2101 DURING HOT DEFORMATION. Acta Metall Sin, 2010, 46(6): 641-646.
Duplex stainless steels (DSSs) were processed to have a balanced microstructure containing approximately equal amounts of ferrite and austenite, which exhibit exceptional mechanical properties and corrosion resistance. Lean duplex stainless steel (LDX) 2101 with lower contents of Ni and Mo had been developed in order to further reduce the cost. The coexistence of ferrite and austenite during hot deformation led to a complicated deformation behavior. However, little research had been dedicated to studying the microstructure evolution in LDX 2101 compared with traditional DSSs. In addition, the reported results of microstructure evolution both in ferrite and austenite phases of traditional DSSs exhibited obvious controversy. In the present paper, the microstructure evolution of the LDX 2101 during hot compression at a strain rate of 5 s−1 and 1000 ℃ was studied by electron backscatter diffraction (EBSD) together with TEM. The results showed that continuous dynamic recrystallization (CDRX) occurred both in ferrite and austenite phases by gradual transformation of ow angle grain boundary into high angle rain boundary. In addition, a large number of Σ3 twins appeared after solution anneaing treatment. The hot deformation resulted in a progressive disappearance of the Σ3 twin boundaries in austenite phase. Flow curve characteristics of the LDX 211 during hot deformation were interpreted by the coupling behaviors of the microstructure evolution of its both phases.
[1] Iza–Mendia A, Pinol–Juez A, Urcola J J, Gutierrez I. Metall Mater Trans, 1998; 29A: 2975
[2] Balancin O, Hoffmann W A M, Jonas J J. Metall Mater Trans, 2000; 31A: 1353
[3] Fan G W, Liu J, Han P D, Qiao G J. Mater Sci Eng, 2009; A515: 108
[4] Dehghan–Manshadi A, Hodgson P D. J Mater Sci, 2008; 43: 6272
[5] Cizek P, Wynne B P. Mater Sci Eng, 1997; A230: 88
[6] Liljas M, Johansson P, Liu H P, Olsson C A. Steel Res Int, 2008; 79: 466
[7] Li L F, Yang W Y, Sun Z Q. Metall Mater Trans, 2006; 37A: 609
[8] Eghbali B, Abdollah–Zadeh A, Beladi H, Hodgson P D. Mater Sci Eng, 2006; A435–436: 499
[9] Wan J L, Sun X J, Gu J L, Chen N P. Acta Metall Sin, 1999; 35: 1031
(万菊林, 孙新军, 顾佳琳, 陈南平. 金属学报, 1999; 35: 1031)
[10] Li L F, Yang W Y, Sun Z Q. Acta Metall Sin, 2003; 39: 419
(李龙飞, 杨王玥, 孙祖庆. 金属学报, 2003; 39: 419)
[11] Gertsman V Y, Tangri K. Philos Mag, 1991; 64A: 1319
[12] Beladi H, Cizek P, Hodgson P D. Metall Mater Trans, 2006; 37A: 2975
[13] Jorge–Badiola D, Iza–Mendia A, Gutierrez I. Mater Sci Eng, 2005; A394: 445
[14] Poulat S, Decamps B, Priester L. Philos Mag, 1999; 79A: 2655
[15] Priester L. Mater Sci Eng, 2001; A309–310: 430
[16] Belyakov A, Gao W, Miura H, Sakai T. Metall Mater Trans, 1998; 29A: 1073
[17] Jinmenze J A, Carreno F, Ruano O A. Mater Sci Technol, 1999; 15: 127
[18] Duprez L, De Cooman B C, Akdut N. Metall Mater Trans, 2002; 33A: 1931