Please wait a minute...
Acta Metall Sin  2026, Vol. 62 Issue (1): 173-190    DOI: 10.11900/0412.1961.2025.00239
Research paper Current Issue | Archive | Adv Search |
Phase Field and Crystal Plasticity Simulation of Irradiation-Induced He Bubbles Evolution and Mechanical Behavior in 316H Steel and Weld Metal
WANG Dong1,2,3, XU Lianyong1,2,3(), ZHAO Lei1,2,3(), HAN Yongdian1,2,3, SONG Kai1,2,3
1 School of Materials Science and Engineering, Tianjin University, Tianjin 300350, China
2 Tianjin Key Laboratory of Advanced Joining Technology, Tianjin 300350, China
3 State Key Laboratory of High Performance Roll Materials and Composite Forming, Tianjin 300350, China
Cite this article: 

WANG Dong, XU Lianyong, ZHAO Lei, HAN Yongdian, SONG Kai. Phase Field and Crystal Plasticity Simulation of Irradiation-Induced He Bubbles Evolution and Mechanical Behavior in 316H Steel and Weld Metal. Acta Metall Sin, 2026, 62(1): 173-190.

Download:  HTML  PDF(4190KB) 
Export:  BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)      
Abstract  

316H steel is an important structural material candidate for Generation-IV advanced nuclear reactors. During service, the material operates under conditions of high temperature, irradiation, and complex stress for extended durations, and the working environment is extremely harsh. In particular, He bubbles, generated through nuclear transmutation under irradiation, can cause severe irradiation embrittlement and accelerate the failure of the material. To clarify the role of He bubbles in the degradation of 316H steel and weld metal, this study proposes a coupled computational framework that integrates the phase field model and crystal plasticity. Within this framework, the nucleation, growth, and coalescence of He bubbles in 316H steel and weld metal were simulated, and their mechanical responses were systematically analyzed. The research shows that He bubbles nucleate and grow by absorbing supersaturated vacancies and He atoms. In the later stage, they grow through coalescence and Ostwald ripening processes. As the He bubble size increases, the internal pressure gradually decreases until reaching an equilibrium state. The high density of dislocations in the weld metal, which preferentially absorb interstitial atoms, results in an increased vacancy concentration. Meanwhile, dislocations act as rapid diffusion channels. These two factors together contribute to the rapid growth of He bubbles. An increase in diffusion capacity does not change the final proportion of He bubbles; instead, it accelerates the nucleation and growth processes, thereby promoting the kinetic evolution of He bubbles in the weld metal. At small strains, the stress-strain response is governed by the effects of external strain and the internal pressure of He bubbles, with the macroscopic stress value being negative. As the external strain increases, the stress-strain response becomes influenced by the external strain. During tensile deformation, significant stress concentration arises at the He bubble-matrix interface, leading to considerable plastic deformation in these regions. At 4% applied strain, distinct plastic deformation bands form in both 316H steel and the weld metal. However, due to strain localization in the weld metal, the degree of plastic deformation is greater than that observed in 316H steel.

Key words:  316H steel      weld metal      irradiation      He bubble      phase field simulation     
Received:  20 August 2025     
ZTFLH:  TG47  
Fund: National Funds for Distinguished Young Scholars(52025052)

URL: 

https://www.ams.org.cn/EN/10.11900/0412.1961.2025.00239     OR     https://www.ams.org.cn/EN/Y2026/V62/I1/173

MaterialCrNiMnMoSiCoCNFe
316H17.2412.171.812.560.370.0190.0470.064Bal.
Welding wire18.7012.801.672.320.490.0080.0520.057Bal.
Table 1  Chemical compositions of the 316H base metal and welding wuire
Fig.1  Microstructures of 316H base metal and weld metal (WM)
(a, b) EBSD inverse pole figures (IPFs) of 316H steel (a) and 316H WM (b) (c, d) TEM images of dislocations in 316H steel (c) and in 316H WM (d) (e) TEM image of δ-ferrites in 316H WM
Fig.2  Equilibrium concentration of He atoms in the bubble vs bubble radius of 316H steel at the temperature (T) of 550 oC
ParameterValueUnit
Va[32]7.06cm3·mol-1
Evf[12]3.2 × 10-19J
Egf[12]6.4 × 10-19J
Ω[32]1.17 × 10-29m3
bv[33]0.039nm3·atom-1
a[33]0.0034J·m3·mol-2
γs[34]1.82J·m-2
Table 2  Thermodynamic parameters used in phase field simulation[12,32-34]
Fig.3  Free energy densities of matrix (a) and He bubble (b) at 550 oC in the phase field model of He bubble evolution
Fig.4  Flow chart of phase field and crystal plasticity simulation of He bubbles
ParameterValueUnit
KHP[39]1.1MPa·m
dgrain50 (base), 100 (weld)μm
ρ1 × 1012 (base), 6 × 1013 (weld)m-2
γ˙0[24]1 × 10-3s-1
n[53]5-
kmul0.03 (base), 0.02 (weld)-
Rcp2 × 10-9nm
βp0.015 (base), 0.01 (weld)
krecov200
C11, C12, C44157, 114, 99GPa
μ[39]88 - 3 × 10-5T2 - 5.6 × 10-3TGPa
Table 3  Parameters used in crystal plasticity model
Fig.5  Evolution of a single bubble in the supersaturated matrix (The color bar implies the values of He concentration (cg) and vancay concentration (cv), the same in Fig.6; Δx*—dimexsionless length scale)
(a-c) He concentration fields under t* = 0 (a), t* = 10 (b), and t* = 80 (c) (t*—dimensionless time) (d-f) vacancy concentration fields under t* = 0 (d), t* = 10 (e), and t* = 80 (f) (g-i) profiles of He and vacancy concentrations across the He bubble under t* = 0 (g), t* = 10 (h), and t* = 80 (i)
Fig.6  Evolutions of multiple He bubbles under irradiation
(a-d) He concentration fields under He concentrations of 0.007 (a), 0.01 (b), 0.015 (c), and 0.04 (d) (e-h) vacancy concentration fields under He concentrations of 0.007 (e), 0.01 (f), 0.015 (g), and 0.04 (h) (The circular area B in Fig.6g implies the Ostwald ripening and the elliptical area A in Fig.6h implies the coalescence)
Fig.7  Evolution of porosity and number of He bubbles under irradiation (The area Ⅰ is nucleation incubation stage, area Ⅱ is nucleation and growth stage, and Ⅲ is coarsening stage. JMAK—Johnson-Mehl-Avrami-Kolmogorov)
Fig.8  Pressure evolution (a) and He concentration evoution (b) inside the He bubble during the growth of He bubble (EOS—equation of state)
Fig.9  Comparison of He bubble microstructures between experiment (a-d) and phase field simulation (a1-d1)
(a, a1, b, b1) He bubble in 316H steel under the He concentrations of 0.01 (a, a1) and 0.04 (b, b1)
(c, c1, d, d1) He bubble in 316H WM under the He concentrations of 0.01 (c, c1) and 0.04 (d, d1)
Fig.10  Quantitative statistical comparisons of diameter evolution (a, c) and diameter distribution (He concentration is 0.04) (b, d) of He bubbles in 316H steel (a, b) and 316H WM (c, d)
Fig.11  He bubble under different ratios of vacancy to He concentration and diffusion conditions ((Mv,g)base and (Mv,g)weld are the chemical mobilities of vacancy and He atom in 316H steel and 316H WM, respecyively; gv0 and gg0 are the production rates of vacancy and He atom during irradiation, respectively)
(a-d) He bubble evolutions under the values of gv0 / gg0 are 6 (a), 9 (b), 12 (c), and 15 (d) with (Mv,g)weld = 6(Mv,g)base (e-h) He bubble evolutions under the values of gv0 / gg0 are 6 (e), 9 (f), 12 (g), and 15 (h) with (Mv,g)weld = (Mv,g)base (i, j) porosity (i) and diameter (j) under different conditions
Fig.12  Microstructures of system with the He bubble porosities of 0.6% (a), 5% (b), and 10% (c) and system with the He bubble diameters of 1.1 nm (d), 1.4 nm (e), and 2 nm (h)
Fig.13  Effects of He bubble porosity (a, c) and size (b, d) in 316H steel (a, b) and 316H WM (c, d) on stress-strain curves unde 550 oC (The circular areas in Figs.13a and c imply the applied strain begins to dominate the mechanical response)
Fig.14  Stress (S22, GPa) (a, b, e, f) and plastic strain (ε22pl) (c, d, g, h) distributions during the deformation process of 316H steel (a-d) and 316H WM (e-h) (The elliptical areas A and B in Figs.14d and h imply the bands of plastic deformation)
(a, c, e, g) 0.04% strain (b, d, f, h) 4% strain
[1] Li Y, Wang F, Zheng Y M, et al. Multiaxial isothermal and thermomechanical fatigue behavior of 316H stainless steel welded joint and life prediction [J]. Int. J. Fatigue, 2026, 203: 109295
[2] Gu Z M, Zhong M, Gong Y, et al. Tracking martensitic substructure evolution in the heat-affected zone of P91 steel: Integrating CSLM observation and post-mortem microstructural analysis [J]. Metall. Mater. Trans., 2025, 56A: 4744
[3] Lin Y R, Chen W Y, Tan L Z, et al. Bubble formation in helium-implanted nanostructured ferritic alloys at elevated temperatures [J]. Acta Mater., 2021, 217: 117165
[4] Li J T, Beyerlein I J, Han W Z. Helium irradiation-induced ultrahigh hardening in niobium [J]. Acta Mater., 2022, 226: 117656
[5] Jublot-Leclerc S, Lescoat M L, Fortuna F, et al. TEM study of the nucleation of bubbles induced by He implantation in 316L industrial austenitic stainless steel [J]. J. Nucl. Mater., 2015, 466: 646
[6] Chen Y, Li Y P, Ran G, et al. In-situ TEM observation of the evolution of dislocation loops and helium bubbles in a pre helium irradiated FeCrAl alloy during annealing [J]. Prog. Nucl. Energy, 2020, 129: 103502
[7] Villacampa I, Chen J C, Spätig P, et al. Helium bubble evolution and hardening in 316L by post-implantation annealing [J]. J. Nucl. Mater., 2018, 500: 389
[8] Judge C D, Gauquelin N, Walters L, et al. Intergranular fracture in irradiated Inconel X-750 containing very high concentrations of helium and hydrogen [J]. J. Nucl. Mater., 2015, 457: 165
[9] Miura T, Fujii K, Fukuya K. Micro-mechanical investigation for effects of helium on grain boundary fracture of austenitic stainless steel [J]. J. Nucl. Mater., 2015, 457: 279
[10] Fu C L, Li J J, Bai J J, et al. Evolution of helium bubbles in SLM 316L stainless steel irradiated with helium ions at different temperatures [J]. J. Nucl. Mater., 2022, 562: 153609
[11] Bai J J, Li J J, Fu C L, et al. Effect of He ion irradiation on the GH3535 weld metal at high temperature [J]. Acta Metall. Sin., 2024, 60: 299
白菊菊, 李健健, 付崇龙 等. GH3535合金焊缝高温氦离子辐照效应 [J]. 金属学报, 2024, 60: 299
[12] Wang D, Xu L Y, Zhao L, et al. Microstructural and mechanical responses of 316H and weld metal under Helium irradiation at 550 oC [J]. J. Nucl. Mater., 2025, 605: 155564
[13] Jelea A. Molecular dynamics modeling of helium bubbles in austenitic steels [J]. Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. Sect., 2018, 425B: 50
[14] Stan M, Ramirez J C, Cristea P, et al. Models and simulations of nuclear fuel materials properties [J]. J. Alloys Compd., 2007, 444-445: 415
[15] Hu S Y, Henager Jr C H, Heinisch H L, et al. Phase-field modeling of gas bubbles and thermal conductivity evolution in nuclear fuels [J]. J. Nucl. Mater., 2009, 392: 292
[16] Millett P C, El-Azab A, Rokkam S, et al. Phase-field simulation of irradiated metals: Part I: Void kinetics [J]. Comput. Mater. Sci., 2011, 50: 949
[17] Millett P C, El-Azab A, Wolf D. Phase-field simulation of irradiated metals: Part II: Gas bubble kinetics [J]. Comput. Mater. Sci., 2011, 50: 960
[18] Li Y L, Hu S Y, Montgomery R, et al. Phase-field simulations of intragranular fission gas bubble evolution in UO2 under post-irradiation thermal annealing [J]. Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. Sect., 2013, 303B: 62
[19] Hu S Y, Burkes D E, Lavender C A, et al. Formation mechanism of gas bubble superlattice in UMo metal fuels: Phase-field modeling investigation [J]. J. Nucl. Mater., 2016, 479: 202
[20] Liang L Y, Mei Z G, Soo Kim Y, et al. Three-dimensional phase-field simulations of intragranular gas bubble evolution in irradiated U-Mo fuel [J]. Comput. Mater. Sci., 2018, 145: 86
[21] Jiang Y B, Sun Z P, Wang D J, et al. Effects of grain boundaries on the evolution of radiation-induced bubbles in polycrystalline tungsten: A phase-field simulation [J]. J. Nucl. Mater., 2024, 588: 154757
[22] Liu C Y, Feng Z H, Zhang Y P, et al. Phase field simulation of bubble evolution dynamics in Fe-Cr alloys [J]. Acta Metall. Sin., 2024, 60: 1279
刘彩艳, 冯泽华, 张云鹏 等. Fe-Cr合金气泡演化动力学的相场法模拟 [J]. 金属学报, 2024, 60: 1279
[23] Hu S Y, Beeler B. Gas bubble evolution in polycrystalline UMo fuels under elastic-plastic deformation: A phase-field model with crystal-plasticity [J]. Front. Mater., 2021, 8: 682667
[24] Demir E, Horton E W, Mokhtarishirazabad M, et al. Grain size and shape dependent crystal plasticity finite element model and its application to electron beam welded SS316L [J]. J. Mech. Phys. Solids, 2023, 178: 105331
[25] Gan L F, Zhu B Y, Ling C, et al. Micro-mechanics investigation of heterogeneous deformation fields and crack initiation driven by the local stored energy density in austenitic stainless steel welded joints [J]. J. Mech. Phys. Solids, 2024, 188: 105652
[26] Jiang H, Yang Z Y, Guo Z F, et al. Interpretation of mechanical properties gradient in laser-welded joints: Experiments and grain morphology-dependent crystal plasticity modeling [J]. J. Mater. Res. Technol., 2024, 33: 5934
[27] Wang D, Zhao L, Xu L Y, et al. A microstructure-based study of irradiation hardening in stainless steel: Experiment and phase field modeling [J]. J. Nucl. Mater., 2022, 569: 153940
[28] Xiao Z H, Wang Y F, Hu S Y, et al. A quantitative phase-field model of gas bubble evolution in UO2 [J]. Comput. Mater. Sci., 2020, 184: 109867
[29] Jiang Y B, Xin Y, Liu W B, et al. Phase-field simulation of radiation-induced bubble evolution in recrystallized U-Mo alloy [J]. Nucl. Eng. Technol., 2022, 54: 226
[30] Wang Y F, Xiao Z H, Hu S Y, et al. A phase field study of the thermal migration of gas bubbles in UO2 nuclear fuel under temperature gradient [J]. Comput. Mater. Sci., 2020, 183: 109817
[31] Wang Y F, Xiao Z H, Shi S Q. Xe gas bubbles evolution in UO2 fuels—A phase field simulation [J]. Sci. Sin. Phys. Mech. Astron., 2019, 49: 114607
王亚峰, 肖知华, 石三强. UO2核燃料中Xe气泡演化的相场模型与分析 [J]. 中国科学: 物理学 力学 天文学, 2019, 49: 114607
[32] Magomedov M N. Parameters of the vacancy formation and self-diffusion in the iron [J]. J. Phys. Chem. Solids, 2023, 172: 111084
[33] Wen P, Tonks M R, Phillpot S R, et al. The effect of stress on the migration of He gas bubbles under a thermal gradient in Fe by phase-field modeling [J]. Comput. Mater. Sci., 2022, 209: 111392
[34] Caro A, Schwen D, Hetherly J, et al. The capillarity equation at the nanoscale: Gas bubbles in metals [J]. Acta Mater., 2015, 89: 14
[35] Khachaturyan A G. Theory of Structural Transformations in Solids [M]. New York: John Wiley Sons, 1983: 201
[36] Jiang W, Hu T C, Aagesen L K, et al. Three-dimensional phase-field modeling of porosity dependent intergranular fracture in UO2 [J]. Comput. Mater. Sci., 2020, 171: 109269
[37] Li Y L, Hu S Y, Barker E, et al. Effect of grain structure and strain rate on dynamic recrystallization and deformation behavior: A phase field-crystal plasticity model [J]. Comput. Mater. Sci., 2020, 180: 109707
[38] Demir E, Martinez-Pechero A, Hardie C, et al. OXFORD-UMAT: An efficient and versatile crystal plasticity framework [J]. Int. J. Solids Struct., 2025, 307: 113110
[39] Monnet G, Mai C. Prediction of irradiation hardening in austenitic stainless steels: Analytical and crystal plasticity studies [J]. J. Nucl. Mater., 2019, 518: 316
[40] Kubin L, Devincre B, Hoc T. Modeling dislocation storage rates and mean free paths in face-centered cubic crystals [J]. Acta Mater., 2008, 56: 6040
[41] Patra A, McDowell D L. Crystal plasticity-based constitutive modelling of irradiated bcc structures [J]. Philos. Mag., 2012, 92: 861
[42] Cahn J W, Hilliard J E. Free energy of a nonuniform system. I. Interfacial free energy [J]. J. Chem. Phys., 1958, 28: 258
[43] Cahn J W. On spinodal decomposition [J]. Acta Metall., 1961, 9: 795
[44] Cahn J W, Allen S M. A microscopic theory for domain wall motion and its experimental verification in Fe-Al alloy domain growth kinetics [J]. J. Phys. Colloq., 1977, 38: C7-51
[45] Jokisaari A M, Permann C, Thornton K. A nucleation algorithm for the coupled conserved-nonconserved phase field model [J]. Comput. Mater. Sci., 2016, 112: 128
[46] Aagesen L K, Jokisaari A, Schwen D, et al. A phase-field model for void and gas bubble superlattice formation in irradiated solids [J]. Comput. Mater. Sci., 2022, 215: 111772
[47] Chen L Q, Shen J. Applications of semi-implicit Fourier-spectral method to phase field equations [J]. Comput. Phys. Commun., 1998, 108: 147
[48] Moulinec H, Suquet P. A numerical method for computing the overall response of nonlinear composites with complex microstructure [J]. Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng., 1998, 157: 69
[49] Lebensohn R A, Kanjarla A K, Eisenlohr P. An elasto-viscoplastic formulation based on fast Fourier transforms for the prediction of micromechanical fields in polycrystalline materials [J]. Int. J. Plast., 2012, 32-33: 59
[50] Aagesen L K, Schwen D, Tonks M R, et al. Phase-field modeling of fission gas bubble growth on grain boundaries and triple junctions in UO2 nuclear fuel [J]. Comput. Mater. Sci., 2019, 161: 35
[51] Kohnert A A, Capolungo L. The kinetics of static recovery by dislocation climb [J]. npj Comput. Mater., 2022, 8: 104
[52] Stechauner G, Kozeschnik E. Self-diffusion in grain boundaries and dislocation pipes in Al, Fe, and Ni and application to AlN precipitation in steel [J]. J. Mater. Eng. Perform., 2014, 23: 1576
[53] Chen W B, Ding X B, Zhai L H, et al. Effect of δ-ferrite decomposition on the tensile properties of one modified 316H stainless steel: Experimental investigations and crystal plastic finite element simulations [J]. Mater. Sci. Eng., 2024, A915: 147224
[54] Sedighiani K, Diehl M, Traka K, et al. An efficient and robust approach to determine material parameters of crystal plasticity constitutive laws from macro-scale stress-strain curves [J]. Int. J. Plast., 2020, 134: 102779
[55] Schroeder H, Fichtner P F P. On the coarsening mechanisms of helium bubbles—Ostwald ripening versus migration and coalescence [J]. J. Nucl. Mater., 1991, 179-181: 1007
[56] Ding X J, Zhao J J, Huang H, et al. Effect of damage rate on the kinetics of void nucleation and growth by phase field modeling for materials under irradiations [J]. J. Nucl. Mater., 2016, 480: 120
[57] Stoller R E, Osetsky Y N. An atomistic assessment of helium behavior in iron [J]. J. Nucl. Mater., 2014, 455: 258
[58] Sun T Y, Niu T J, Shang Z X, et al. An in situ study on the effect of grain boundaries on helium bubble formation in dual beam irradiated FeCrAl alloy [J]. Acta Mater., 2023, 245: 118613
[59] Pavan A R, Sakthivel T, Arivazhagan B, et al. A comparative study on the microstructural evolution and mechanical behavior of 316LN stainless steel welds made using hot-wire tungsten inert gas and activated tungsten inert gas process [J]. J. Mater. Eng. Perform., 2024, 33: 13618
[60] Patra A, McDowell D L. Crystal plasticity investigation of the microstructural factors influencing dislocation channeling in a model irradiated bcc material [J]. Acta Mater., 2016, 110: 364
[1] LU Shanping, SUN Jian. Research Progress on Microstructural Design and Strengthening-Toughening Mechanisms of Weld Metal in High-Strength Steels[J]. 金属学报, 2026, 62(1): 1-16.
[2] CAO Rui, LIU Zishen. Research Progress on the Strength and Toughness of High-Strength Steel Weld Metal[J]. 金属学报, 2026, 62(1): 64-80.
[3] XIE Xu, WAN Yibo, ZHONG Ming, ZOU Xiaodong, WANG Cong. Optimizing Microstructures and Mechanical Properties of Electro-Gas Welded Metals for EH36 Shipbuilding Steel Treated by CaF2-TiO2 Fluxes[J]. 金属学报, 2025, 61(7): 998-1010.
[4] ZHOU Tingting, ZHAO Fuqi, ZHOU Hongqiang, ZHANG Fengguo, YIN Jianwei. Mechanism and Damage Model for the Dynamic Tensile Fracture of Liquid Aluminum Containing He Bubbles[J]. 金属学报, 2025, 61(4): 643-652.
[5] HU Fusheng, WANG Zhihui, SONG Fengyu, WU Kaiming. See Water Corrosion Resistance Performance of Acicular Ferrite in a Low-Alloy High-Strength Steel Weld Metal[J]. 金属学报, 2025, 61(11): 1727-1737.
[6] LIU Caiyan, FENG Zehua, ZHANG Yunpeng, YU Kang, WU Lu, MA Cong, ZHANG Jing. Phase Field Simulation of Bubble Evolution Dynamics in Fe-Cr Alloys[J]. 金属学报, 2024, 60(9): 1279-1288.
[7] BAI Juju, LI Jianjian, FU Chonglong, CHEN Shuangjian, LI Zhijun, LIN Jun. Effect of He Ion Irradiation on the GH3535 Weld Metal at High Temperature[J]. 金属学报, 2024, 60(3): 299-310.
[8] GUO Songyuan, LIU Wenbo, YANG Qingcheng, QI Xiaoyong, YUN Di. Phase Field Simulation of Viscous Sintering[J]. 金属学报, 2024, 60(12): 1691-1700.
[9] CHEN Jia, GUO Min, YANG Min, LIU Lin, ZHANG Jun. Effects of W Concentration on Creep Microstructure and Property of Novel Co-Based Superalloys[J]. 金属学报, 2023, 59(9): 1209-1220.
[10] LIU Wei, CHEN Wanqi, MA Menghan, LI Kailun. Review of Irradiation Damage Behavior of Tungsten Exposed to Plasma in Nuclear Fusion[J]. 金属学报, 2023, 59(8): 986-1000.
[11] HAN En-Hou, WANG Jianqiu. Effect of Surface State on Corrosion and Stress Corrosion for Nuclear Materials[J]. 金属学报, 2023, 59(4): 513-522.
[12] LI Sai, YANG Zenan, ZHANG Chi, YANG Zhigang. Phase Field Study of the Diffusional Paths in Pearlite-Austenite Transformation[J]. 金属学报, 2023, 59(10): 1376-1388.
[13] ZHU Xiaohui, LIU Xiangbing, WANG Runzhong, LI Yuanfei, LIU Wenqing. Effects of Ar Ion Irradiation on Microstructure of Fe-Cu Alloys at 290oC[J]. 金属学报, 2022, 58(7): 905-910.
[14] ZHANG Jinyu, QU Qimeng, WANG Yaqiang, WU Kai, LIU Gang, SUN Jun. Research Progress on Irradiation Effects and Mechanical Properties of Metal/High-Entropy Alloy Nanostructured Multilayers[J]. 金属学报, 2022, 58(11): 1371-1384.
[15] LIU Jizhao, HUANG Hefei, ZHU Zhenbo, LIU Awen, LI Yan. Numerical Simulation of Nanohardness in Hastelloy N Alloy After Xenon Ion Irradiation[J]. 金属学报, 2020, 56(5): 753-759.
No Suggested Reading articles found!