Strengthening and Plastifying Mechanisms of a Novel High-Strength Low-Density Austenitic Steel
LI Fushun, LIU Zhipeng, DING Cancan, HU Bin(), LUO Haiwen()
School of Metallurgical and Ecological Engineering, University of Science and Technology Beijing, Beijing 100083, China
Cite this article:
LI Fushun, LIU Zhipeng, DING Cancan, HU Bin, LUO Haiwen. Strengthening and Plastifying Mechanisms of a Novel High-Strength Low-Density Austenitic Steel. Acta Metall Sin, 2025, 61(6): 909-916.
High-strength low-density steels are strongly recommended in the automotive industry because they can reduce weight and CO2 emissions without affecting structural safety. In this study, a novel Cr-alloyed austenitic steel with a low density of 6.50 g/cm3 was designed. It was subjected to two types of processing routes. One includes cold rolling with a thickness reduction of 35% followed by aging at 450 oC for 1.5 h (known as 35CR-T). The other route includes cold rolling by 75%, short annealing at 925 oC for 10 s, and final aging at 450 oC for 1.5 h (known as 75CR-AT). Both resultant specimens exhibited excellent tensile properties; the specific yield strength and total elongation of the 35CR-T and 75CR-AT specimens reached 211.5 MPa·cm3/g, 15.6% and 210.0 MPa·cm3/g3, 21.5%, respectively. The microstructure of the former comprises relatively coarse austenite grains with high-density dislocations as the matrix and coarse κ-carbides, whereas that of the latter comprises fine recrystallized austenite grains and more extensive intragranular κ-carbides with a finer size. Consequently, greater dislocation strengthening contributes to the yield strength (YS) of the former, whereas more significant grain refinement and precipitation strengthening contribute to the YS of the latter. Therefore, both specimens have the same YS after considering all strengthening contributors. Moreover, the recrystallized austenite grains in 75CR-AT allow the sequential evolution of the dislocation substructure from planar-slip dislocations, Taylor lattice, and high-density dislocation wall to the microband during tensile deformation. By contrast, the dislocation microbands formed in the austenite grains of 35CR-T specimen suppress the dislocation multiplication and sequential evolution of dislocation substructures, resulting in poorer ductility compared with that of 75CR-AT specimen.
Fund: Yunnan Key Research and Development Program(202403AA080013);National Natural Science Foundation of China(52233018);National Natural Science Foundation of China(51831002);Beijing Municipal Natural Science Foundation(2242048)
Corresponding Authors:
HU Bin, associate professor, Tel: (010)62332911, E-mail: hubin@ustb.edu.cn; LUO Haiwen, professor, Tel: (010)62332911, E-mail: luohaiwen@ustb.edu.cn
Fig.1 Tensile properties of experimental steel subjected to the different processing routes and comparision with literature data[5,7-19] (a) engineering stress-strain curves (b) comparison on tensile properties of the steel and other alloy[5,7-19], including Cr-alloyed[5,9], Ni-alloyed[7], and Si-alloyed[13] Fe-Mn-Al-C low-density steels
Specimen
Processing route
YS
MPa
SYS
MPa·cm3·g-1
UTS
MPa
SUTS
MPa·cm3·g-1
TE
%
35CR
CR by 35%
1260
193.9
1405
216.2
20.4
35CR-T
CR by 35% + aging at 450 oC for 1.5 h
1375
211.5
1425
219.2
15.6
75CR
CR by 75%
1605
246.9
1855
285.4
5.4
75CR-T
CR by 75% + aging at 450 oC for 1.5 h
2085
320.8
2210
340.0
2.3
75CR-AT
CR by 75% + annealing at 925 oC for 10 s +
1365
210.0
1425
219.2
21.5
aging at 450 oC for 1.5 h
Table 1 Tensile properties of the experimental steel subjected to different processing routes
Fig.2 EBSD phase distribution (a-e) and grain reference orientation deviation (GROD) (f-j) maps (Note that the red areas in Figs.2c and d are the highly dislocated regions that cannot be indexed; RD, TD, and ND represent rolling direction, transverse direction, and normal direction, respectively) (a, f) 35CR (b, g) 35CR-T (c, h) 75CR (d, i) 75CR-T (e, j) 75CR-AT
Specimen
Austenite area
fraction / %
Ferrite area
fraction / %
Austenite grain size
μm
Recrystallization austenite fraction
%
35CR
98.9
1.1
6.51
10.6
35CR-T
98.2
1.8
6.02
13.3
75CR
96.2
3.8
1.48
1.8
75CR-T
96.8
3.2
1.20
12.5
75CR-AT
92.6
7.4
1.65
98.6
Table 2 Statistic results on the microstructural constitutens in all the specimens based on EBSD data
Fig.3 Brigth-field TEM images showing the microbands (a), κ-carbides (b), and the recrystallized austenite grains (c); and dark-field TEM image showing κ-carbides (d) of specimens (a, b) 35CR-T (c, d) 75CR-AT
Fig.4 EBSD-KAM maps (a, b) and XRD spectra (c, d) of 35CR-T (a, c) and 75CR-AT (b, d) specimens (The color in Figs.4a and b represents the kernel average misorientation (KAM). αγ —austenite lattice constant; ακ —κ-carbide lattice constant)
Fig.5 Comparison on the contribution of three strengthening mechanisms to increment of yield strength in 35CR-T and 75CR-AT specimens (Δσg—grain refinement strengthening increment, Δσd—dislocation hardening increment, Δσp—precipitation hardening increment)
Fig.6 Bright-field TEM images of the microstructures of 75CR-AT (a-d) and 35CR-T (e-g) specimens tensile deformed to different true strains (a, e) 0.02 (b, f) 0.08 (c, g) 0.11 (d) 0.20
1
Moon J, Ha H Y, Park S J, et al. Effect of Mo and Cr additions on the microstructure, mechanical properties and pitting corrosion resistance of austenitic Fe-30Mn-10.5Al-1.1C lightweight steels [J]. J. Alloys Compd., 2019, 775: 1136
2
Liu C Q, Peng Q C, Xue Z L, et al. Research situation of Fe-Mn-Al-C system low-density high-strength steel [J]. Mater. Rep., 2019, 33: 2572
Chen S P, Rana R, Haldar A, et al. Current state of Fe-Mn-Al-C low density steels [J]. Prog. Mater. Sci., 2017, 89: 345
4
Huang Z Y, Hou A L, Jiang Y S, et al. Rietveld refinement, microstructure, mechanical properties and oxidation characteristics of Fe-28Mn-xAl-1C (x = 10 and 12 wt. %) low-density steels [J]. J. Iron Steel Res. Int., 2017, 24: 1190
5
Sutou Y, Kamiya N, Umino R, et al. High-strength Fe-20Mn-Al-C-based alloys with low density [J]. ISIJ Int., 2010, 50: 893
6
Chen X P, Xu Y P, Ren P, et al. Aging hardening response and β-Mn transformation behavior of high carbon high manganese austenitic low-density Fe-30Mn-10Al-2C steel [J]. Mater. Sci. Eng., 2017, A703: 167
7
Kim S H, Kim H, Kim N J. Brittle intermetallic compound makes ultrastrong low-density steel with large ductility [J]. Nature, 2015, 518: 77
8
Yoo J D, Hwang S W, Park K T. Factors influencing the tensile behavior of a Fe-28Mn-9Al-0.8C steel [J]. Mater. Sci. Eng., 2009, A508: 234
9
Frommeyer G, Brüx U. Microstructures and mechanical properties of high-strength Fe-Mn-Al-C light-weight TRIPLEX steels [J]. Steel Res. Int., 2006, 77: 627
10
Raabe D, Springer H, Gutierrez-Urrutia I, et al. Alloy design, combinatorial synthesis, and microstructure-property relations for low-density Fe-Mn-Al-C austenitic steels [J]. JOM, 2014, 66: 1845
11
Yang F Q, Song R B, Li Y P, et al. Tensile deformation of low density duplex Fe-Mn-Al-C steel [J]. Mater. Des., 2015, 76: 32
12
Hwang S W, Ji J H, Lee E G, et al. Tensile deformation of a duplex Fe-20Mn-9Al-0.6C steel having the reduced specific weight [J]. Mater. Sci. Eng., 2011, A528: 5196
13
Ha M C, Koo J M, Lee J K, et al. Tensile deformation of a low density Fe-27Mn-12Al-0.8C duplex steel in association with ordered phases at ambient temperature [J]. Mater. Sci. Eng., 2013, A586: 276
14
Ren P, Chen X P, Cao Z X, et al. Synergistic strengthening effect induced ultrahigh yield strength in lightweight Fe-30Mn-11Al-1.2C steel [J]. Mater. Sci. Eng., 2019, A752: 160
15
Yoo J D, Park K T. Microband-induced plasticity in a high Mn-Al-C light steel [J]. Mater. Sci. Eng., 2008, A496: 417
16
Gutierrez-Urrutia I, Raabe D. Influence of Al content and precipitation state on the mechanical behavior of austenitic high-Mn low-density steels [J]. Scr. Mater., 2013, 68: 343
17
Lee J, Park S, Kim H, et al. Simulation of κ-carbide precipitation kinetics in aged low-density Fe-Mn-Al-C steels and its effects on strengthening [J]. Met. Mater. Int., 2018, 24: 702
18
Wu Z Q, Ding H, An X H, et al. Influence of Al content on the strain-hardening behavior of aged low density Fe-Mn-Al-C steels with high Al content [J]. Mater. Sci. Eng., 2015, A639: 187
19
Jiang Z H, Jin J J, Wang X Z, et al. Microstructure and properties of a low-density steel with high strength of 1350 MPa [J]. J. Aeronaut. Mater., 2018, 38(5): 67
Seward G G E, Celotto S, Prior D J, et al. In situ SEM-EBSD observations of the hcp to bcc phase transformation in commercially pure titanium [J]. Acta Mater., 2004, 52: 821
21
Humphreys F J. Review Grain and subgrain characterisation by electron backscatter diffraction [J]. J. Mater. Sci., 2001, 36: 3833
22
Wang Y J, Sun J J, Jiang T, et al. A low-alloy high-carbon martensite steel with 2.6 GPa tensile strength and good ductility [J]. Acta Mater., 2018, 158: 247
23
He B B, Hu B, Yen H W, et al. High dislocation density-induced large ductility in deformed and partitioned steels [J]. Science, 2017, 357: 1029
doi: 10.1126/science.aan0177
pmid: 28839008
24
Wang Z W, Lu W J, Zhao H, et al. Ultrastrong lightweight compositionally complex steels via dual-nanoprecipitation [J]. Sci. Adv., 2020, 6: eaba9543
25
Ardell A J. Precipitation hardening [J]. Metall. Trans., 1985, 16A: 2131
26
Zhao Y L, Li Y R, Yeli G M, et al. Anomalous precipitate-size-dependent ductility in multicomponent high-entropy alloys with dense nanoscale precipitates [J]. Acta Mater., 2022, 223: 117480
27
Yang T, Zhao Y L, Tong Y, et al. Multicomponent intermetallic nanoparticles and superb mechanical behaviors of complex alloys [J]. Science, 2018, 362: 933
doi: 10.1126/science.aas8815
pmid: 30467166
28
Wang Z W, Lu W J, Zhao H, et al. Formation mechanism of κ- carbides and deformation behavior in Si-alloyed FeMnAlC lightweight steels [J]. Acta Mater., 2020, 198: 258
29
Zhang J L, Raabe D, Tasan C C. Designing duplex, ultrafine-grained Fe-Mn-Al-C steels by tuning phase transformation and recrystallization kinetics [J]. Acta Mater., 2017, 141: 374
30
Yoo J D, Hwang S W, Park K T. Origin of extended tensile ductility of a Fe-28Mn-10Al-1C steel [J]. Metall. Mater. Trans., 2009, 40A: 1520