Please wait a minute...
Acta Metall Sin  2017, Vol. 53 Issue (4): 455-464    DOI: 10.11900/0412.1961.2016.00462
Orginal Article Current Issue | Archive | Adv Search |
Life Prediction for Stress Corrosion Behavior of 316L Stainless Steel Elbow of Nuclear Power Plant
Shu GUO,En-Hou HAN(),Haitao WANG,Zhiming ZHANG,Jianqiu WANG
Key Laboratory of Nuclear Materials and Safety Assessment, Institute of Metal Research, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shenyang 110016, China
Cite this article: 

Shu GUO,En-Hou HAN,Haitao WANG,Zhiming ZHANG,Jianqiu WANG. Life Prediction for Stress Corrosion Behavior of 316L Stainless Steel Elbow of Nuclear Power Plant. Acta Metall Sin, 2017, 53(4): 455-464.

Download:  HTML  PDF(3893KB) 
Export:  BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)      
Abstract  

Stress corrosion cracking (SCC) is one of the main ageing mechanism in light water reactor (LWR). 316L austenitic stainless steel was adopted in nuclear industry for its relatively high corrosion resistance. The SCC of austenitic stainless steel may occur as it is subjected to both the tensile stress and the caustic medium, with regard to maintaining the structural integrity of components in nuclear power plant, an accurate prediction and efficient assessment of the component lifetime is significant and necessary. The stress corrosion crack propagation behavior of the 316L stainless steel elbow of nuclear power plant was investigated through a numerical simulation method. Firstly a finite element (FE) model was created for the stainless steel thick-walled elbow (the outer diameter is 355.6 mm, the inner diameter is 275.6 mm), with a semi-elliptical shaped 3D defect introduced at the internal surface of the elbow as the geometry of the crack, which was consistent with a practical crack, the crack opening displacement (δi) was determined by the calculations through the Dugdale model; subsequently, according to the FE calculation results, establish the fitting formula of the stress intensity factor (K) varying with the crack depth (a) and additional stress (P), and the fitting formula of the stress corrosion crack propagation rate (da/dt) for elbows under two types of cold work deformation was deduced through the combination with the experimental data, the crack propagation time was then calculated using a iterative method for cracks which evolved from different initial crack depth values to certain crack depth values. The calculation results provided effective reference criterion for the nuclear power plant safety assesment. This investigation demonstrated that, when the cold deformation extent of the elbow part is relatively small ( with the hardness of 230~245 HV) and it is under the ideal condition (no initial additional stress), it takes around 57 a for the stress corrosion crack to penetrate the elbow, when the initial additional stress was elevated to 200 MPa, the elbow failure time was shrinked to 1/5 (no stress release), 2/7 (half-stress release) and 3/7 (total stress release) of the former; keep the same initial additional stress (200 MPa) and increase the cold work deformation extent (the hardness was increased from 230~245 HV to 275~300 HV), the elbow failure time was shortened to 2/5 (no stress release), 3/8 (half-stress release) and 1/3 (total stress release) for the elbow part with higher cold deformation extent compared to the part with lower cold deformation extent, thus it was observed that both the decrease of the extent of stress relaxation and the increase of the extent of cold work deformation contributed to the reduction of the residual life of the nuclear power plant 316L stainless steel elbow.

Key words:  316L stainless steel elbow      stress corrosion crack propagation      crack opening displacement      finite element analysis      stress relaxation      cold work deformation     
Received:  18 October 2016     

URL: 

https://www.ams.org.cn/EN/10.11900/0412.1961.2016.00462     OR     https://www.ams.org.cn/EN/Y2017/V53/I4/455

Fig.1  Schematic geometry of a crack (a) and schematic for crack propagation at the inner surface of the elbow (b) (a—crack depth, δi —crack opening displacement at the middle of the crack)
Fig.2  Schematic for δi, δ and ry[11] (δi—crack opening displacement, δ—crack tip opening displacement, ry—plastic zone at the crack tip, l—crack length, α—the inclination angle of plastic zone radius ry, σ—stress distribution at the crack tip)
Fig.3  Schematic for mesh
(a) elbow part with a crack embedded
(b) enlarged area around the crack
(c) nodes setting along the crack boundary line
Fig.4  True stress-true plastic strain curve for 316L stainless steel elbow
Fig.5  Stress distributions of the elbow with the crack depth of 20 mm, under 100 MPa additional stress
(a) whole elbow
(b) enlarged area around the crack
(c) sectional view at 1/2 crack length
(d) enlarged area at the 1/2 crack length
Fig.6  Comparision between the assumed and the calculated value of crack opening displacement (δi) under different additional stresses (0~300 MPa) for cracks with different depth (20~30 mm) (The maximum inaccuracy between these two values is less than 3%)
Fig.7  Variation of stress intensity factor (K) with crack depth under different additional stresses
SCC
test step
Small deformation (230~245 HV) Large deformation (275~300 HV)
K
MPam0.5
da/dt
10-7 mms-1
Duration
h
Δa
μm
K
MPam0.5
da/dt
10-7 mms-1
Duration
h
Δa
μm
1 20 1.40 256.1 98.5 20 4.28 536.8 699.0
2 25 1.84 216.8 149.0 25 4.83 519.0 921.0
3 30 2.24 232.0 192.0 33 5.97 144.9 313.0
4 40 2.65 195.1 189.8 40 7.42 498.1 1338.5
Table 1  Parameters at different SCC test steps for both small deformation and large deformation parts of 316L stainless steel (Temperature is 310 ℃,concentration of dissolved oxygen is 0.1 mg/L, concentration of dissolved hydrogen<3×10-4 mg/L)
Fig.8  Variation of crack propagation time with crack depth for the elbow part with hardness of 230~245 HV
(a) under 200 MPa constant additional stress, 0 MPa constant additional stress, and 200 MPa initial additional stress~0 MPa ultimate released stress, respectively
(b) under 200 MPa constant additional stress, 100 MPa constant additional stress, and 200 MPa initial additional stress~100 MPa ultimate released stress, respectively
Fig.9  Variation of crack propagation time with crack depth for the elbow part with hardness of 275~300 HV
(a) under 200 MPa constant additional stress, 0 MPa constant additional stress, and 200 MPa initial additional stress~0 MPa ultimate released stress, respectively
(b) under 200 MPa constant additional stress, 100 MPa constant additional stress, and 200 MPa initial additional stress~100 MPa ultimate released stress, respectively
[1] Han E-H, Wang J Q, Wu X Q, et al.Corrosion mechanisms of stainless steel and nickel base alloys in high temperature high pressure water[J]. Acta Metall. Sin., 2010, 46: 1379
[1] (韩恩厚, 王俭秋, 吴欣强等. 核电高温高压水中不锈钢和镍基合金的腐蚀机制[J]. 金属学报, 2010, 46: 1379)
[2] Pan P L, Zhong Y X, Ma Q X, et al.Development of manufacture technology for main pipe of large-sized nuclear power[J]. China Metal Form. Equip. Manuf. Technol., 2011, 46(1): 13
[2] (潘品李, 钟约先, 马庆贤等. 大型核电主管道制造技术的发展[J]. 锻压装备与制造技术, 2011, 46(1): 13)
[3] Li Y K, Lu S P, Li D Z, et al.Life prediction of welded joint in core shroud of BWR due to SCC failure[J]. Trans. China Weld. Inst., 2013, 34(9): 33
[3] (李永奎, 陆善平, 李殿中等. 核反应堆关键焊接结构应力腐蚀裂纹失效评估[J]. 焊接学报, 2013, 34(9): 33)
[4] Terachi T, Yamada T, Miyamoto T, et al.SCC growth behaviors of austenitic stainless steels in simulated PWR primary water[J]. J. Nucl. Mater., 2012, 426: 59
[5] Zhang L T, Wang J Q.Stress corrosion crack propagation behavior of domestic forged nuclear grade 316L stainless steel in high temperature and high pressure water[J]. Acta Metall. Sin., 2013, 49: 911
[5] (张利涛, 王俭秋. 国产锻造态核级管材316L不锈钢在高温高压水中的应力腐蚀裂纹扩展行为[J]. 金属学报, 2013, 49: 911)
[6] Huang Y Z, Titchmarsh J M.TEM investigation of intergranular stress corrosion cracking for 316 stainless steel in PWR environment[J]. Acta Mater., 2006, 54: 635
[7] Fujii T, Tohgo K, Kenmochi A, et al.Experimental and numerical investigation of stress corrosion cracking of sensitized type 304 stainless steel under high-temperature and high-purity water[J]. Corros. Sci., 2015, 97: 139
[8] Jivkov A P, Stevens N P C, Marrow T J. A two-dimensional mesoscale model for intergranular stress corrosion crack propagation[J]. Acta Mater., 2006, 54: 3493
[9] Wenman M R, Trethewey K R, Jarman S E, et al.A finite-element computational model of chloride-induced transgranular stress-corrosion cracking of austenitic stainless steel[J]. Acta Mater., 2008, 56: 4125
[10] Zhu X K, Joyce J A.Review of fracture toughness (G, K, J, CTOD, CTOA) testing and standardization[J]. Eng. Fract. Mech., 2012, 85: 1
[11] Werner K.The fatigue crack growth rate and crack opening displacement in 18G2A-steel under tension[J]. Int. J. Fatigue, 2012, 39: 25
[12] Chen X D, Chen X Z, Cui H X.Analysis of elastic-plastic stress on surge-line nozzle of RCS in Qinshan phase II NPP project[J]. Nucl. Pow. Eng., 2003, 24(S1): 122
[12] (陈学德, 陈晓舟, 崔赪昕. 秦山核电二期工程反应堆主冷却剂管道系统辅助接管嘴的弹塑性分析[J]. 核动力工程, 2003, 24(S1): 122)
[13] Chen A J, Xu C, Hu X Q.Several methods for calculating stress intensity factors of thick walled cylinder with cracks[J]. J. Nanjing Univ. Sci. Technol., 2002, 26: 430
[13] (陈爱军, 徐诚, 胡小秋. 带裂纹厚壁圆筒应力强度因子的几种计算方法[J]. 南京理工大学学报, 2002, 26: 430)
[14] Galvele J R.1999 W.R. Whitney Award Lecture: Past, present, and future of stress corrosion cracking[J]. Corrosion, 1999, 55: 723
[15] Gutman E M.An inconsistency in "film rupture model" of stress corrosion cracking[J]. Corros. Sci., 2007, 49: 2289
[16] Scully J C.The Theory of Stress Corrosion Cracking in Alloys[M]. Brussels: NATO, 1971: 21
[17] Chu W Y.Hydrogen Damage and Delayed Fracture [M]. Beijing: Metallurgical Industry Press, 1988: 1
[17] (褚武扬. 氢损伤和滞后断裂 [M]. 北京: 冶金工业出版社, 1988: 1)
[18] Xiao J M.Metallic Corrosion under Stress [M]. Beijing: Chemical Industry Press, 1990: 1
[18] (肖纪美. 应力作用下的金属腐蚀 [M]. 北京: 化学工业出版社, 1990: 1)
[19] Chu W Y.Latest progress in hydrogen induced cracking and stress corrosion cracking[J]. Prog. Nat. Sci., 1991, (5): 393
[19] (褚武扬. 氢致开裂和应力腐蚀机理新进展[J]. 自然科学进展, 1991, (5): 393)
[20] Hou X Z, Zheng W J, Song Z G, et al.Effect of cold work on structure and mechanical behavior of 316L stainless steel[J]. J. Iron Steel Res., 2013, 25(7): 53
[20] (侯小振, 郑文杰, 宋志刚等. 冷加工对316L不锈钢力学行为和组织的影响[J]. 钢铁研究学报, 2013, 25(7): 53)
[21] Song R B, Xiang J Y, Hou D P.Microstructure characteristics and work-hardening mechanism of 316L austenitic stainless steel during cold deformation[J]. J. Univ. Sci. Technol. Beijing, 2013, 35: 55
[21] (宋仁伯, 项建英, 侯东坡. 316L不锈钢冷变形加工硬化机制及组织特征[J]. 北京科技大学学报, 2013, 35: 55)
[22] Sui S H, Song T G, Sui L H.Effect of deformation on semi-solid structure evolution of LC9 aluminum alloy[J]. Foundry, 2006, 55: 683
[22] (隋少华, 宋天革, 隋鲁华. 冷变形对LC9铝合金等温转变半固态组织的影响[J]. 铸造, 2006, 55: 683)
[23] He D F, Wang J Y.Cold work-caused detriment of corrosion resistance of stainless steel tube and preventative controls[J]. Steel Pipe, 2015, 44: 1
[23] (何德孚, 王晶滢. 冷加工对不锈钢钢管耐蚀性的损害及其控制[J]. 钢管, 2015, 44: 1)
[24] Xu C C, Zhang X S, Hu G.Microstructure change of AISI304 stainless steel in the course of cold working[J]. J. Beijing Univ. Chem. Technol., 2002, 29(6): 27
[24] (许淳淳, 张新生, 胡钢. AISI304不锈钢在冷加工过程中的微观组织变化[J]. 北京化工大学学报, 2002, 29(6): 27)
[25] Ghosh S, Kain V.Effect of surface machining and cold working on the ambient temperature chloride stress corrosion cracking susceptibility of AISI 304L stainless steel[J]. Mater. Sci. Eng., 2010, A527: 679
[26] García C, Martín F, De Tiedra P, et al.Effects of prior cold work and sensitization heat treatment on chloride stress corrosion cracking in type 304 stainless steels[J]. Corros. Sci., 2001, 43: 1519
[27] Sáez-Maderuelo A, Gómez-Brice?o D.Stress corrosion cracking behavior of annealed and cold worked 316L stainless steel in supercritical water[J]. Nucl. Eng. Des., 2016, 307: 30
[1] ZHAO Yuhong, JING Jianhui, CHEN Liwen, XU Fanghong, HOU Hua. Current Research Status of Interface of Ceramic-Metal Laminated Composite Material for Armor Protection[J]. 金属学报, 2021, 57(9): 1107-1125.
[2] LI Suo, CHEN Weiqi, HU Long, DENG Dean. Influence of Strain Hardening and Annealing Effect on the Prediction of Welding Residual Stresses in a Thick-Wall 316 Stainless Steel Butt-Welded Pipe Joint[J]. 金属学报, 2021, 57(12): 1653-1666.
[3] JIANG He,DONG Jianxin,ZHANG Maicang,YAO Zhihao,YANG Jing. Stress Relaxation Mechanism for Typical Nickel-Based Superalloys Under Service Condition[J]. 金属学报, 2019, 55(9): 1211-1220.
[4] Junqin SHI,Kun SUN,Liang FANG,Shaofeng XU. Stress Relaxation and Elastic Recovery of Monocrystalline Cu Under Water Environment[J]. 金属学报, 2019, 55(8): 1034-1040.
[5] Weifeng HE, Xiang LI, Xiangfan NIE, Yinghong LI, Sihai LUO. Study on Stability of Residual Stress Induced by Laser Shock Processing in Titanium Alloy Thin-Components[J]. 金属学报, 2018, 54(3): 411-418.
[6] FENG Rui, ZHANG Meihan, CHEN Nailu, ZUO Xunwei, RONG Yonghua. FINITE ELEMENT SIMULATION OF THE EFFECT OF STRESS RELAXATION ON STRAIN-INDUCED MARTENSITIC TRANSFORMATION[J]. 金属学报, 2014, 50(4): 498-506.
[7] CAO Tieshan, FANG Xudong, CHENG Congqian, ZHAO Jie. CREEP BEHAVIOR OF TWO KINDS OF HR3C HEAT RESISTANT STEELS BASED ON STRESS RELAXATION TESTS[J]. 金属学报, 2014, 50(11): 1343-1349.
[8] XU Hengdong ZHAO Haiyan S¨orn Ocylok Igor Kelbassa. STUDY ON CRACKS IN LASER DIRECT–CLADDED TITANIUM LAYER ON LOW CARBON STEEL[J]. 金属学报, 2012, 48(2): 142-147.
[9] FANG Chenfu CHEN Zhiwei XU Guoxiang HU Qingxian ZHOU Hangyu. STUDY ON THE PROCESS OF CTWW CO2 GAS SHIELDED WELDING[J]. 金属学报, 2012, 48(11): 1299-1305.
[10] LANG Wenchang XIAO Jinquan GONG Jun SUN Chao HUNG Rongfang WEN Lishi. INFLUENCE OF AXISYMMETRIC MAGNETIC FIELD ON CATHODE SPOTS MOVEMENT IN ARC ION PLATING[J]. 金属学报, 2010, 46(3): 372-379.
[11] CUI Hang CHEN Huaining CHEN Jing HUANG Chunling WU Changzhong. FEA OF EVALUATING MATERIAL YIELD STRENGTH AND STRAIN HARDENING EXPONENT USING A SPHERICAL INDENTATION[J]. 金属学报, 2009, 45(2): 189-194.
[12] TAN Jun LI Cong SUN Chao YING Shihao LIAN Shanshan KAN Xiwu FENG Keqin. THERMALLY ACTIVATED DEFORMATION AND DYNAMIC STRAIN AGING OF Zr–4 ALLOY DURING STRESS RELAXATION[J]. 金属学报, 2009, 45(2): 173-177.
[13] ZHANG Jiwang LU Liantao ZHANG Weihua. ANALYSIS ON FATIGUE PROPERTY OF MICROSHOT PEENED MEDIUM CARBON STEEL[J]. 金属学报, 2009, 45(11): 1378-1383.
[14] Guo-Dong ZHANG. Finite Element Simulation for Welding Residual Stress and Creep Damage of Welded Joint[J]. 金属学报, 2008, 44(7): 848-852 .
[15] ;. Finite Element Analysis on Compressive Property of a New Type of Porous Magnesium[J]. 金属学报, 2008, 44(2): 237-242 .
No Suggested Reading articles found!