螺旋桨铜合金的微观结构定量解析及深海压力下的失效动力学机制

doi:10.11900/0412.1961.2024.00279

金属学报

2026, Vol. 62

Issue (9): 1591-1605 DOI: 10.11900/0412.1961.2024.00279

研究论文

本期目录 | 过刊浏览

螺旋桨铜合金的微观结构定量解析及深海压力下的失效动力学机制

杨慧敏¹, 李瑞雪¹, 周晨曦¹, 马宇轩¹, 赵旭辉¹, 雍兴跃²(

), 刘景军¹(

)

1 北京化工大学材料科学与工程学院北京 100029
2 北京化工大学化学工程学院北京 100029

Effect of Seawater Pressures on Microstructure Quantitative Analysis and Failure Dynamics Mechanism of Copper Alloys for Ship Propellers

YANG Huimin¹, LI Ruixue¹, ZHOU Chenxi¹, MA Yuxuan¹, ZHAO Xuhui¹, YONG Xingyue²(

), LIU Jingjun¹(

)

1 School of Materials Science and Engineering, Beijing University of Chemical Technology, Beijing 100029, China
2 School of Chemical Engineering, Beijing University of Chemical Technology, Beijing 100029, China

引用本文:

杨慧敏, 李瑞雪, 周晨曦, 马宇轩, 赵旭辉, 雍兴跃, 刘景军. 螺旋桨铜合金的微观结构定量解析及深海压力下的失效动力学机制[J]. 金属学报, 2026, 62(9): 1591-1605.
Huimin YANG, Ruixue LI, Chenxi ZHOU, Yuxuan MA, Xuhui ZHAO, Xingyue YONG, Jingjun LIU. Effect of Seawater Pressures on Microstructure Quantitative Analysis and Failure Dynamics Mechanism of Copper Alloys for Ship Propellers[J]. Acta Metall Sin, 2026, 62(9): 1591-1605.

全文: PDF(5303 KB) HTML

摘要:

在深海环境中，特别是在海水压力作用下，微观结构演变及其应力耦合失效是铜合金加速破坏的主要原因。本工作选择舰船螺旋桨常用的锰铝青铜(MAB)材料作为研究对象，采用模拟计算与实验相结合的方法，建立了具有Al原子表面偏析的MAB合金原子结构模型和不同海水压力作用下的应变耦合模型，进一步对不同压力下的失效机制进行了研究，并预测了腐蚀速率。采用分子动力学(MD)方法，研究了深海压力下Cl^-在合金表面的吸附行为及其对腐蚀的影响。结果表明，随着海水压力从0.1 MPa增加至10.0 MPa，MAB合金的位错密度和应变水平不断增大。当压力超过6.0 MPa时，合金位错密度和应变水平显著升高，(111)晶面的位错密度比初始条件下增加了6.08 × 10^-3 nm^-2，弹性微应变水平增大了0.79%。铜合金失重速率随压力的增加不断增大。腐蚀产物的形貌由麻点状转变为鳞片状。密度泛函理论(DFT)计算结果表明，海水压力对合金结构稳定性具有显著影响，当海水压力大于临界压力(6.0 MPa)时，Cu原子的空位形成能与迁移-溶解活化能垒明显下降，溶解速率显著加快。压力的增加促进了Cl^-的化学吸附，但在10.0 MPa时，饱和吸附的Cl^-对溶解速率影响并不显著。

关键词 ：螺旋桨铜合金, 内应力, 深海压力, 失效动力学, 金属溶解, 迁移-溶解能垒

Abstract：

The microstructure evolution and stress-coupling failure of copper alloys are the primary factors contributing to their accelerated degradation in deep-sea environments, particularly under seawater pressure. In this study, high-manganese aluminum bronze (MAB), a material commonly used in ship propellers, is selected as the research subject. The atomic structure model of MAB alloy with aluminum atomic surface segregation and the strain-coupling model under varying seawater pressures are established through a combination of simulation and experimentation. The failure mechanism under different pressures is further examined, and the corrosion rate is predicted. As seawater pressure increases from 0.1 MPa to 10.0 MPa, the alloy's dislocation density and strain level progressively rise. When the pressure exceeds 6.0 MPa, these increases become more pronounced. The dislocation density of the alloy's (111) crystal surface increases by 6.08 × 10^-3 nm^-2, while the elastic micro-strain level rises by 0.79%. Experimental results indicate that the mass loss rate of copper alloys escalates with increasing pressure. Additionally, the morphology of the corrosion products transitions from a spot-like to a lamellar structure. Density functional theory calculations reveal that seawater pressure significantly affects the stability of the alloy structure. When seawater pressure surpasses the critical threshold of 6.0 MPa, the copper vacancy formation energy and migration-dissolution activation barrier decrease substantially, leading to a notable increase in the dissolution rate. The molecular dynamics method is employed to investigate the adsorption behavior of Cl^- on the alloy surface under deep-sea pressure and its influence on corrosion. The results demonstrate that increasing pressure enhances the chemical adsorption of Cl^-. However, at 10.0 MPa, the saturated adsorption of Cl^- on the surface does not significantly affect the dissolution rate.

Key words： copper alloy for ship propeller internal stress deep-sea pressure failure dynamics metal dissolution migration-dissolution barrier

收稿日期: 2024-08-14

ZTFLH:

TG178

通讯作者: 刘景军，liujingjun@mail.buct.edu.cn，主要从事金属材料微观结构与性能强化研究;
雍兴跃，yongxy@mail.buct.edu.cn，主要从事流动海水腐蚀与防护研究

作者简介: 杨慧敏，女，1997年生，硕士

	服务

	把本文推荐给朋友
	加入引用管理器
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	作者相关文章
	杨慧敏
	李瑞雪
	周晨曦
	马宇轩
	赵旭辉
	雍兴跃
	刘景军
44.8K

链接本文:

https://www.ams.org.cn/CN/10.11900/0412.1961.2024.00279 或 https://www.ams.org.cn/CN/Y2026/V62/I9/1591

图1 锰铝青铜(MAB)合金的微观形貌、EDS分析及纯Cu、MAB合金和MAB-Alseg合金结构模型(MAB-Alseg合金为部分表面Cu原子被Al原子替代的MAB合金)

表1 纯Cu、MAB合金和MAB-Alseg合金模型的总能量、键能、形成能及内聚能

图2 MAB合金和MAB-Alseg合金的晶格结构和内应力分析

图3 MAB-Alseg合金表层Cu原子迁移-溶解的动力学过程示意图及各阶段Cu原子溶解的能量图

图4 不同海水压力下MAB合金腐蚀10 h前后的宏观形貌及SEM像

图5 不同海水压力下MAB合金的质量损失、腐蚀速率、XRD谱、(111)晶面微应变水平及位错密度

图6 海水压力下MAB-Alseg合金/海水界面的分子动力学模拟、MAB-Alseg合金表面H2O和Cu2+密度分布、压力作用下MAB-Alseg合金表面Cu原子迁移-溶解的预测模型、Cu原子迁移-溶解过程的能量、金属溶解速率常数预测及腐蚀机制示意图

图7 基于不同海水压力下H2O分子与合金表面距离变化建立的Cl-吸附的MAB-Alseg合金模型及溶解过程腐蚀动力学参数分析

图8 10.0 MPa海水压力下不同浓度Cl-在MAB-Alseg合金表面吸附的模型、电荷密度分布图及腐蚀动力学参数预测

[1]	Cobo I, Biezma-Moraleda M V, Linhardt P. Corrosion evaluation of welded nickel aluminum bronze and manganese aluminum bronze in synthetic sea water [J]. Mater. Corros., 2022, 73: 1788
[2]	Linhardt P, Strobl S, Böhm J, et al. Heat treatment effect on the microstructure and the corrosion resistance of manganese-aluminum bronzes [J]. Prakt. Metallogr., 2021, 58: 72
[3]	Ocejo I C, Moraleda M V B, Linhardt P. Corrosion behavior of heat-treated nickel-aluminum bronze and manganese-aluminum bronze in natural waters [J]. Metals, 2022, 12: 380 doi: 10.3390/met12030380
[4]	Feng X W, Zheng Z B, Feng B, et al. Microstructure and corrosion properties of nickel aluminum bronze (NAB) [J]. Corros. Prot., 2022, 43(10): 84
[4]	冯晓伟, 郑志斌, 冯波等. 镍铝青铜(NAB)的微观组织及腐蚀性能 [J]. 腐蚀与防护, 2022, 43(10): 84
[5]	Zhang C D, Liu B, Shi Z Y, et al. Research progress in corrosion behavior of nickel aluminum bronze alloys in seawater [J]. J. Chin. Soc. Corros. Prot., 2022, 42: 25
[5]	张赪栋, 刘斌, 石泽耀等. 镍铝青铜合金海水腐蚀行为研究进展 [J]. 中国腐蚀与防护学报, 2022, 42: 25 doi: 10.11902/1005.4537.2020.221
[6]	Sun F L, Li X G, Lu L, et al. Corrosion behavior of copper alloys in deep ocean environment of south China sea [J]. Acta Metall. Sin., 2013, 49: 1211 doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1037.2013.00142
[6]	孙飞龙, 李晓刚, 卢琳等. 铜合金在中国南海深海环境下的腐蚀行为研究 [J]. 金属学报, 2013, 49: 1211 doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1037.2013.00142
[7]	Song Q N, Li H L, Zhang H N, et al. Correlation between microstructure and corrosion and cavitation erosion behaviors of nickel aluminum bronze [J]. Trans. Nonferrous Met. Soc. China, 2022, 32: 2948 doi: 10.1016/S1003-6326(22)65995-8
[8]	Yi X N. Study on the relationship between microstructure and corrosion behavior of typical marine copper alloys [D]. Shenyang: University of Science and Technology of China, 2022
[8]	衣雪宁. 典型船用铜合金微观组织与腐蚀行为关系研究 [D]. 沈阳: 中国科学技术大学, 2022
[9]	Tan Y X, Xie H F, Feng X, et al. Effect of Al / Ni ratio on the microstructure and properties of nickel-aluminum bronze alloys [J]. Materials, 2024, 17: 1330 doi: 10.3390/ma17061330
[10]	Chen K X, Li Z H, Wang Z D, et al. Morphological evolution of Fe-rich precipitates in a Cu-2.0Fe alloy during isothermal treatment [J]. Acta Metall. Sin., 2023, 59: 1665 doi: 10.11900/0412.1961.2021.00568
[10]	陈凯旋, 李宗烜, 王自东等. Cu-2.0Fe合金等温处理过程中富Fe析出相的形态演变 [J]. 金属学报, 2023, 59: 1665 doi: 10.11900/0412.1961.2021.00568
[11]	Liu M Z, Zhou L L, Zuo P C, et al. Preparation and corrosion behavior of additive manufactured nickel-aluminum bronze alloys [J]. Copper Eng., 2024, (1): 54
[11]	刘明泽, 周礼龙, 左鹏程等. 增材制造镍铝青铜合金的制备与腐蚀行为研究进展 [J]. 铜业工程, 2024, (1): 54
[12]	Liu Y X, Zhu W W, Qi S G. Study on welding and heat treatment technology of nickel-aluminium bronze C63000 [J]. Power Stn. Aux. Equip., 2023, 44(1): 15
[12]	刘玉祥, 朱伟伟, 齐淑改. 镍铝青铜C63000材料的焊接及热处理工艺研究 [J]. 电站辅机, 2023, 44(1): 15
[13]	Zong L. Effect of hot treatment on microstructure and corrosion resistance of NAB alloy [D]. Ganzhou: Jiangxi University of Science and Technology, 2023
[13]	宗林. 热处理对镍铝青铜合金组织和耐蚀性的影响研究 [D]. 赣州: 江西理工大学, 2023
[14]	Tong Y, Song Q N, Li H L, et al. A comparative assessment on cavitation erosion behavior of typical copper alloys used for ship propeller [J]. J. Chin. Soc. Corros. Prot., 2021, 41: 639
[14]	佟瑶, 宋亓宁, 李慧琳等. 三种典型船舶螺旋桨用铜合金的空蚀行为对比研究 [J]. 中国腐蚀与防护学报, 2021, 41: 639
[15]	Wu S X, Gao Z M, Jia H, et al. Effect of hydrostatic pressure on the anodic dissolution process of X80 steel [J]. J. Mater. Res. Technol., 2024, 30: 4786 doi: 10.1016/j.jmrt.2024.04.174
[16]	Xiong X L, Ban X J, Yan Y, et al. Hydrostatic pressure effect on double layer capacity of iron [J]. J. Electroanal. Chem., 2020, 871: 114306 doi: 10.1016/j.jelechem.2020.114306
[17]	Liu R, Cui Y, Liu L, et al. Study on the mechanism of hydrostatic pressure promoting electrochemical corrosion of pure iron in 3.5% NaCl solution [J]. Acta Mater., 2021, 203: 116467 doi: 10.1016/j.actamat.2020.11.009
[18]	Ma R Y, Zhao L, Wang C G, et al. Influence of hydrostatic pressure on the thermodynamics and kinetics of metal corrosion [J]. Acta Metall. Sin., 2019, 55: 281 doi: 10.11900/0412.1961.2018.00215
[18]	马荣耀, 赵林, 王长罡等. 静水压力对金属腐蚀热力学及动力学的影响 [J]. 金属学报, 2019, 55: 281 doi: 10.11900/0412.1961.2018.00215
[19]	Ma H Y, Liu R, Cui Y, et al. The effect law of different hydrostatic pressures on the failure of multilayer Cr/GLC coatings in 3.5 wt% NaCl solution [J]. Corros. Sci., 2023, 217: 111120 doi: 10.1016/j.corsci.2023.111120
[20]	Song Z Q, Tegus O. The corrosion properties of bronze alloys in NaCl solutions [J]. Materials, 2023, 16: 5144 doi: 10.3390/ma16145144
[21]	Hu S B, Liu L, Cui Y, et al. Influence of hydrostatic pressure on the corrosion behavior of 90/10 copper-nickel alloy tube under alternating dry and wet condition [J]. Corros. Sci., 2019, 146: 202 doi: 10.1016/j.corsci.2018.10.036
[22]	Song Y S, Liu R, Cui Y, et al. Stress corrosion behavior of Ni-Cr-Mo-V steel in 3.5%NaCl solution under the interaction of hydrostatic pressure and tensile stress [J]. Acta Metall. Sin., 2025, 61: 309
[22]	宋昱杉, 刘叡, 崔宇等. 静水压力和拉伸应力交互作用下Ni-Cr-Mo-V钢在3.5%NaCl溶液中的应力腐蚀行为 [J]. 金属学报, 2025, 61: 309 doi: 10.11900/0412.1961.2023.00087
[23]	Hájek J, Kříž A, Chocholaty O, et al. Effect of heat treatment on microstructural changes in aluminium bronze [J]. Arch. Metall. Mater., 2016, 61: 925
[24]	Ding Y, Zhao R, Qin Z B, et al. Evolution of the corrosion product film on nickel-aluminum bronze and its corrosion behavior in 3.5 wt% NaCl solution [J]. Materials, 2019, 12: 209 doi: 10.3390/ma12020209
[25]	Punburi P, Tareelap N, Srisukhumbowornchai N, et al. De-alloying corrosion in the heat-affected zone in Mn-Al bronze weld [J]. Mater. Chem. Phys., 2018, 212: 471 doi: 10.1016/j.matchemphys.2018.03.065
[26]	Song Q N, Wang Y, Jin Z T, et al. Comparison of the corrosion and cavitation erosion behaviors of the cast and surface-modified manganese-aluminum bronzes in sodium chloride solution [J]. J. Mater. Res. Technol., 2024, 30: 4310 doi: 10.1016/j.jmrt.2024.04.140
[27]	Yi X N, Ma A L, Zheng Y G, et al. Elucidating different selective corrosion behavior of two typical marine aluminum bronze alloys from the perspective of constituent phases [J]. Corros. Sci., 2024, 235: 112167 doi: 10.1016/j.corsci.2024.112167
[28]	Zak A K, Majid W H A, Abrishami M E, et al. X-ray analysis of ZnO nanoparticles by Williamson-Hall and size-strain plot methods [J]. Solid State Sci., 2011, 13: 251 doi: 10.1016/j.solidstatesciences.2010.11.024
[29]	Aigbodion V S, Ozor P O, Eke M N, et al. Explicit microstructure, corrosion, and stress analysis of value-added Al-3.7%Cu-1.4%Mg/1.5% rice husk ash nanoparticles for pump impeller application [J]. Chem. Data Collect., 2021, 33: 100675 doi: 10.1016/j.cdc.2021.100675
[30]	Delley B. An all-electron numerical method for solving the local density functional for polyatomic molecules [J]. J. Chem. Phys., 1990, 92: 508
[31]	Saavedra-Torres M, Escobar C A, Ocayo F, et al. 1,2,3-Benzotriazole derivatives adsorption on Cu(111) surface: A DFT study [J]. Chem. Phys. Lett., 2017, 689: 128 doi: 10.1016/j.cplett.2017.09.067
[32]	Straumanis M E, Yu L S. Lattice parameters, densities, expansion coefficients and perfection of structure of Cu and of Cu-In α phase [J]. Acta Cryst., 1969, 25A: 676
[33]	Chen Z M, Jin C, Ji X Y, et al. Atomistic understanding of Pt-based medium entropy alloys for oxygen reduction electrocatalysis based on first principles [J]. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy, 2023, 48: 160 doi: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2022.09.247
[34]	Liu M, Jin Y, Zhang C H, et al. Density-functional theory investigation of Al pitting corrosion in electrolyte containing chloride ions [J]. Appl. Surf. Sci., 2015, 357: 2028 doi: 10.1016/j.apsusc.2015.09.180
[35]	Wang H B, Hao Y L, Chen S H, et al. DFT study of imidazoles adsorption on the grain boundary of Cu (100) surface [J]. Corros. Sci., 2018, 137: 33 doi: 10.1016/j.corsci.2018.03.009
[36]	Luo H, Dong C F, Xiao K, et al. Characterization of passive film on 2205 duplex stainless steel in sodium thiosulphate solution [J]. Appl. Surf. Sci., 2011, 258: 631 doi: 10.1016/j.apsusc.2011.06.077
[37]	Mosleh-Shirazi S, Hua G M, Akhlaghi F, et al. Interfacial valence electron localization and the corrosion resistance of Al-SiC nanocomposite [J]. Sci. Rep., 2015, 5: 18154 doi: 10.1038/srep18154 pmid: 26667968
[38]	Li Q Y, Lu H, Cui J, et al. Understanding the low corrosion potential and high corrosion resistance of nano-zinc electrodeposit based on electron work function and interfacial potential difference [J]. RSC Adv., 2016, 6: 97606 doi: 10.1039/C6RA19563F
[39]	Delley B. The conductor-like screening model for polymers and surfaces [J]. Mol. Simul., 2006, 32: 117 doi: 10.1080/08927020600589684
[40]	Halgren T A, Lipscomb W N. The synchronous-transit method for determining reaction pathways and locating molecular transition states [J]. Chem. Phys. Lett., 1977, 49: 225 doi: 10.1016/0009-2614(77)80574-5
[41]	Canneaux S, Bohr F, Henon E. KiSThelP: A program to predict thermodynamic properties and rate constants from quantum chemistry results [J]. J. Comput. Chem., 2014, 35: 82 pmid: 24190715
[42]	Lebègue E. Allen J. Bard, Larry. R. Faulkner, Henry S. White: Electrochemical methods: Fundamentals and applications [J]. Transit. Met. Chem., 2023, 48: 433 doi: 10.1007/s11243-023-00555-6
[43]	Magnussen O M, Groß A. Toward an atomic-scale understanding of electrochemical interface structure and dynamics [J]. J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2019, 141: 4777 doi: 10.1021/jacs.8b13188 pmid: 30768905
[44]	Spohr E. Molecular dynamics simulations of water and ion dynamics in the electrochemical double layer [J]. Solid State Ionics, 2002, 150: 1 doi: 10.1016/S0167-2738(02)00275-8
[45]	Feng L J, Yang H Y, Wang F H. Experimental and theoretical studies for corrosion inhibition of carbon steel by imidazoline derivative in 5% NaCl saturated Ca(OH)₂solution [J]. Electrochim. Acta, 2011, 58: 427 doi: 10.1016/j.electacta.2011.09.063
[46]	Kornherr A, Nauer G E, Sokol A A, et al. Adsorption of organosilanes at a Zn-terminated ZnO (0001) surface: Molecular dynamics study [J]. Langmuir, 2006, 22: 8036 pmid: 16952238
[47]	Byrne C, Brady A, Walsh L, et al. Chemical and electrical characterisation of the segregation of Al from a CuAl alloy (90% :10% wt) with thermal anneal [J]. Thin Solid Films, 2016, 599: 59 doi: 10.1016/j.tsf.2015.12.056
[48]	Dai Y, Ou L H, Liang W, et al. Efficient and superiorly durable Pt-lean electrocatalysts of Pt-W alloys for the oxygen reduction reaction [J]. J. Phys. Chem., 2011, 115C: 2162
[49]	Yin X H, Li Y K, Zhou R F, et al. Microstructure and properties of QAl10-4-4 alloy fabricated by rheological squeeze casting [J]. J. Mater. Res., 2023, 38: 2453 doi: 10.1557/s43578-023-00975-1
[50]	Deng J, Wang C, Guan G Z, et al. The deformations of carbon nanotubes under cutting [J]. ACS Nano, 2017, 11: 8464 doi: 10.1021/acsnano.7b04130 pmid: 28767215
[51]	Bryzgalov V, Kistanov A A, Khafizova E, et al. Experimental study of corrosion rate supplied with an ab-initio elucidation of corrosion mechanism of biodegradable implants based on Ag-doped Zn alloys [J]. Appl. Surf. Sci., 2024, 652: 159300 doi: 10.1016/j.apsusc.2024.159300
[52]	Ma H, Chen X Q, Li R H, et al. First-principles modeling of anisotropic anodic dissolution of metals and alloys in corrosive environments [J]. Acta Mater., 2017, 130: 137 doi: 10.1016/j.actamat.2017.03.027
[53]	Fischer S, Karplus M. Conjugate peak refinement: An algorithm for finding reaction paths and accurate transition states in systems with many degrees of freedom [J]. Chem. Phys. Lett., 1992, 194: 252 doi: 10.1016/0009-2614(92)85543-J
[54]	Sun M, Nelson A E, Adjaye J. Ab initio DFT study of hydrogen dissociation on MoS₂, NiMoS, and CoMoS: Mechanism, kinetics, and vibrational frequencies [J]. J. Catal., 2005, 233: 411 doi: 10.1016/j.jcat.2005.05.009
[55]	Li R X, Zhou C X, Yang H M, et al. Microstructural evolution and dynamic failure mechanism of B10 Cu-Ni alloy under multiple stress coupling in flowing seawater [J]. Acta Metall. Sin., 2026, 62: 1273 doi: 10.11900/0412.1961.2024.00323
[55]	李瑞雪, 周晨曦, 杨慧敏等. 流动海水中多重应力耦合作用下B10 Cu-Ni合金的微观结构演变与动态失效机制 [J]. 金属学报, 2026, 62: 1273 doi: 10.11900/0412.1961.2024.00323
[56]	Lück J, Latz A. Modeling of the electrochemical double layer and its impact on intercalation reactions [J]. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 2018, 20: 27804 doi: 10.1039/c8cp05113e pmid: 30379165
[57]	Xu K, Wang B J, Sun J. Research progress on the influence of anions in typical corrosive media on corrosion behavior of magnesium alloys [J]. Mater. Prot., 2022, 55(12): 166
[57]	许凯, 王保杰, 孙杰. 典型腐蚀介质中阴离子对镁合金腐蚀行为影响的研究进展 [J]. 材料保护, 2022, 55(12): 166
[58]	Zhang C H, Liu M, Jin Y, et al. The corrosive influence of chloride ions preference adsorption on α-Al₂O₃ (0 0 0 1) surface [J]. Appl. Surf. Sci., 2015, 347: 386 doi: 10.1016/j.apsusc.2015.04.088

[1]	郭腾, 李洪涛, 蒋百灵, 邢益彬, 张新宇. 离子镀过程中基体“热影响区”的演变及其对镀层的影响[J]. 金属学报, 2018, 54(3): 463-469.
[2]	章海霞, 李中奎, 周廉, 许并社, 王永祯. 氧化膜结构及内应力对新锆合金腐蚀机理的影响[J]. 金属学报, 2014, 50(12): 1529-1537.
[3]	刘杰李相波王佳. 模拟深海压力对2种低合金钢腐蚀行为的影响[J]. 金属学报, 2011, 47(6): 697-705.
[4]	姜传海; 程凡雄; 吴建生 . 双相材料中相间内应力的X射线测量与表征[J]. 金属学报, 2004, 40(4): 351-354 .
[5]	李启楷; 张跃; 郭献忠; 褚武扬 . Cu3Au中脱合金层产生内应力的分子动力学模拟[J]. 金属学报, 2003, 39(1): 51-54 .
[6]	杨继红; 李勇; 李守新; 马常祥; 王刚; 柯伟 . 疲劳Cu单晶驻留滑移带的演化及其内应力场[J]. 金属学报, 2001, 37(5): 507-511 .
[7]	张定铨;何家文. 关于X射线衍射法测定微观应力的表征值的讨论[J]. 金属学报, 1998, 34(12): 1273-1278.
[8]	岳珠峰;郑长卿. 考虑热不协调性的镍基单晶合金细观力学分析[J]. 金属学报, 1994, 30(3): 124-132.
[9]	柴惠芬;阮征;范群成. 滑移模式对预变形材料循环力学行为的影响[J]. 金属学报, 1993, 29(4): 7-12.

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed