Please wait a minute...
金属学报  2026, Vol. 62 Issue (6): 1117-1127    DOI: 10.11900/0412.1961.2025.00204
  研究论文 本期目录 | 过刊浏览 |
基于有限元法探究实验条件对一种耐热钢压痕松弛行为的影响
武晓丹, 赵杰, 曹铁山(), 陈家万, 林通, 张浩杰
大连理工大学 材料科学与工程学院 大连 116024
Exploring the Influence of Experimental Conditions on Indentation Relaxation Behavior of a Heat-Resistant Steel Based on the Finite Element Method
WU Xiaodan, ZHAO Jie, CAO Tieshan(), CHEN Jiawan, LIN Tong, ZHANG Haojie
School of Materials Science and Engineering, Dalian University of Technology, Dalian 116024, China
引用本文:

武晓丹, 赵杰, 曹铁山, 陈家万, 林通, 张浩杰. 基于有限元法探究实验条件对一种耐热钢压痕松弛行为的影响[J]. 金属学报, 2026, 62(6): 1117-1127.
Xiaodan WU, Jie ZHAO, Tieshan CAO, Jiawan CHEN, Tong LIN, Haojie ZHANG. Exploring the Influence of Experimental Conditions on Indentation Relaxation Behavior of a Heat-Resistant Steel Based on the Finite Element Method[J]. Acta Metall Sin, 2026, 62(6): 1117-1127.

全文: PDF(3001 KB)   HTML
摘要: 

为优化压痕实验关键参数,提升该方法的可靠性与科学性,本工作通过有限元法研究了实验条件对Sanicro25奥氏体耐热钢压痕松弛行为的影响。模拟结果表明,摩擦系数对测试结果有明显的影响。当摩擦系数从0增加到0.30时,对应的最大力增大了18.41%。同时,摩擦系数会明显改变压痕表面形貌:随着摩擦系数的增大,材料堆积高度递减,但当摩擦系数超过0.15后,堆积高度的变化幅度显著减小,不同摩擦系数下的结果趋于一致;压痕松弛曲线受试样厚度和压入深度之比(厚深比)的影响结果显示,当厚深比≥ 20时,松弛曲线基本一致,进一步增大厚深比不会引起曲线的显著变化;在相同压痕深度条件下,四棱锥压头会产生比圆锥压头更大的等效蠕变应变和更快的初始松弛速率。

关键词 压痕模拟影响因素测量误差压头形状    
Abstract

The indentation technique imposes high requirements on the accuracy of testing equipment in practical applications and is susceptible to disturbances from the testing environment and factors such as sample preparation quality. To optimize the key parameters of indentation experiments and enhance the reliability and scientific validity of this method, this study investigates the influence of experimental conditions on the indentation relaxation behavior of Sanicro25 austenitic heat-resistant steel using the finite element method. The simulation results indicate that the friction coefficient has an obvious impact on the test results. When the friction coefficient increases from 0 to 0.30, the corresponding maximum force increases by 18.41%. At the same time, the surface morphology of the indentation changes significantly. As the friction coefficient increases, the material stacking height decreases. However, when the friction coefficient exceeds 0.15, the change in stacking height becomes less pronounced, and the results under different friction coefficients tend to be consistent; the indentation response is also affected by the ratio of sample thickness to indentation depth (thickness-to-depth ratio). The results show that when the ratio is ≥ 20, the relaxation curves are essentially consistent. Further increasing the thickness-to-depth ratio does not lead to significant changes in the relaxation curve. Under the same indentation depth conditions, a quadrangular pyramid indenter produces a larger equivalent creep strain and a faster initial relaxation rate than a conical indenter.

Key wordsindentation simulation    influencing factor    measurement error    indenter shape
收稿日期: 2025-07-12     
ZTFLH:  TB302  
基金资助:国家科技重大专项项目(MGT2023001)
通讯作者: 曹铁山,tieshan@dlut.edu.cn,主要从事高温材料性能分析及评估研究
Corresponding author: CAO Tieshan, associate professor, Tel: 13354054601, E-mail: tieshan@dlut.edu.cn
作者简介: 武晓丹,女,2001年生,硕士
图1  圆锥形和四棱锥形压头的示意图
图2  试件三维剖面和表面的有限元计算网格
图3  Sanicro25钢在圆锥形压头和四棱锥形压头在最大压痕深度0.1 mm下的压痕模拟结果与实验结果对比
Indenter
shape
Force at 1500 s / NError
%
Curvature
difference
(STDEV)
ExperimentSimulation
Conical276.36270.282.204.55
Quadrangular pyramid335.21329.571.686.90
表1  Sanicro25钢在不同压头作用下的实验与模拟结果对比
图4  试样模型网格密度对松弛曲线的影响
图5  厚深比对松弛曲线和最大力的影响
图6  摩擦系数对松弛曲线的影响
图7  不同摩擦系数下根据红色路径提取的压痕表面轮廓
图8  圆锥形和四棱锥形压头在最大压痕深度(0.1 mm)下试样表面压痕Mises应力分布
图9  圆锥形和四棱锥形压头完全卸载后试样表面压痕Mises应力分布
图10  圆锥形压头和四棱锥形压头作用下Sanicro25钢在压痕最大深度和完全卸载后的剖面Mises应力分布云图(最大压深0.1 mm)
图11  圆锥形压头和四棱锥形压头作用下Sanicro25钢在压头完全卸载后沿不同路径的残余应力分布曲线
图12  圆锥形压头和四棱锥形压头作用下Sanicro25钢在压痕最大深度(0.1 mm)和完全卸载后表面的等效塑性应变和等效蠕变应变云图
图13  Sanicro25钢在两种形状压头完全卸载后沿不同路径的等效塑性应变和等效蠕变应变分布曲线
图14  两种压头在0.1 mm最大压深下的松弛曲线
[1] Chen W Z. Advances and trends of testing technology of mechanical properties of materials[J]. Phys. Test. Chem. Anal., 2010, 46A: 102
[1] 陈文哲. 材料力学性能测试技术的进展与趋势[J]. 理化检验(物理分册), 2010, 46A: 102
[2] Tang J, Wang W Q. The application of stress-strain microscopic probe technology in pipeline safety and inspection[A]. Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Petroleum & Gas Pipeline Safety and the 5th Natural Gas Pipeline Technology Symposium[C]. Beijing: Chinese Petroleum Society, Beijing Petroleum Society, 2012: 5
[2] 汤 杰, 王威强. 应力应变显微探针技术在管道安全与检测中的应用[A]. 第五届石油天然气管道安全国际会议暨第五届天然气管道技术研讨会[C]. 北京: 中国石油学会 北京石油学会, 2012: 5
[3] Vanlandingham M R. Review of instrumented indentation[J]. J. Res. Natl. Inst. Stand. Technol., 2003, 108: 249
doi: 10.6028/jres.108.024 pmid: 27413609
[4] Oliver W C, Pharr G M. An improved technique for determining hardness and elastic modulus using load and displacement sensing indentation experiments[J]. J. Mater. Res., 1992, 7: 1564
doi: 10.1557/JMR.1992.1564
[5] Zhang X Y, Zhang Y S, Chen G L. On-line weld quality inspection based on weld indentation by using servo gun[J]. Trans. China Weld. Inst., 2006, 27(10): 57
[5] 张小云, 张延松, 陈关龙. 基于焊点压痕的伺服焊枪点焊质量在线检测方法[J]. 焊接学报, 2006, 27(10): 57
[6] Oliver W C, Pharr G M. Measurement of hardness and elastic modulus by instrumented indentation: Advances in understanding and refinements to methodology[J]. J. Mater. Res., 2004, 19: 3
doi: 10.1557/jmr.2004.19.1.3
[7] Huang K Z, Zhao S W, Zhang J W, et al. Experimental investigation on the effect of indenter shape on indentation and scratching behaviour of polymer materials[J]. J. Exp. Mech., 2021, 36: 334
[7] 黄科臻, 赵思伟, 张建伟 等. 压头形状对高分子材料压痕和刮擦行为影响的实验研究[J]. 实验力学, 2021, 36: 334
[8] Xue H, Li M, Li F Q, et al. Hardening index and elastic modulus calculation method of material based on indentation test[J]. China Meas. Test, 2020, 46(3): 26
[8] 薛 河, 李 萌, 李富强 等. 基于压入试验的材料硬化指数及弹性模量计算方法[J]. 中国测试, 2020, 46(3): 26
[9] Cui H, Chen H N, Chen J, et al., FEA of evaluating material yield strength and strain hardening exponent using a spherical indentation[J]. Acta Metall. Sin., 2009, 45: 189
[9] 崔 航, 陈怀宁, 陈 静 等. 球形压痕法评价材料屈服强度和应变硬化指数的有限元分析[J]. 金属学报, 2009, 45: 189
[10] Peng G J, Liu Y, Xu F L, et al. On determination of elastic modulus and indentation hardness by instrumented spherical indentation: Influence of surface roughness and correction method[J]. Mater. Res. Express, 2023, 10: 086503
[11] Yue Z F, Wan J S, Lü Z Z. Determination of creep parameters from indentation creep experiments[J]. Appl. Math. Mech., 2003, 24: 275
[11] 岳珠峰, 万建松, 吕震宙. 由压痕蠕变试验确定材料的蠕变性能参数[J]. 应用数学和力学, 2003, 24: 275
[12] Haušild P, Čech J, Merle B, et al. Effect of temperature and strain rate on indentation size effect at shallow indentation depths[J]. Mater. Des., 2025, 255: 114196
doi: 10.1016/j.matdes.2025.114196
[13] Zhu W B, Tan J P, Sun B Z, et al. The influence of nanoindentation measurement factors on the test results of the mechanical behavior of IN718[J]. China Meas. Test, 2023, 49(6): 30
[13] 朱文波, 谈建平, 孙伯仲 等. 纳米压痕测量因素对IN718力学行为测试结果的影响[J]. 中国测试, 2023, 49(6): 30
[14] Fischer-Cripps A C, Nicholson D W. Nanoindentation. Mechanical engineering series[J]. Appl. Mech. Rev., 2004, 57: B12
doi: 10.1115/1.1704625
[15] Intarit P T, Senjuntichai T, Rungamornrat J, et al. Influence of frictional contact on indentation of elastic layer under surface energy effects[J]. Mech. Res. Commun., 2020, 110: 103622
doi: 10.1016/j.mechrescom.2020.103622
[16] Du R, Song H X, Liu X M, et al. Using spherical indentation to determine creep behavior with considering empirical friction coefficient[J]. Eur. J. Mech., 2024, 105A: 105276
[17] Lee J H, Kim T, Lee H. A study on robust indentation techniques to evaluate elastic-plastic properties of metals[J]. Int. J. Solids Struct., 2010, 47: 647
doi: 10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2009.11.003
[18] Yang F Q. Thickness effect on the indentation of an elastic layer[J]. Mater. Sci. Eng., 2003, A358: 226
[19] Qu L Z, Wu Y W, Shan Q Q, et al. Finite element simulation of tensile properties of power law hardening metal materials evaluated by continuous ball indentation technique[J]. Mater. Mech. Eng., 2019, 43(11): 47
doi: 10.11973/jxgccl201911011
[19] 瞿力铮, 吴益文, 单清群 等. 连续球压痕法表征幂硬化金属材料拉伸性能的有限元模拟[J]. 机械工程材料, 2019, 43(11): 47
doi: 10.11973/jxgccl201911011
[20] Pan G J, Cao Z H, Shi J, et al. Different mechanical response of Ti-Ni film induced by the shape of indenter during nanoindentation[J]. Sens. Actuators, 2014, 217A: 75
[21] Li Y L, Yang X J, Deng J Y, et al. Effect of indenter radius on mechanical properties of B3-GaN in nanoindentation based on molecular dynamics[J]. Mater. Today Commun., 2023, 35: 106134
[22] Lim Y Y, Chaudhri M M. Indentation of elastic solids with a rigid Vickers pyramidal indenter[J]. Mech. Mater., 2006, 38: 1213
doi: 10.1016/j.mechmat.2006.04.006
[23] Song K, Zhao L, Xu L Y, et al. Dislocation creep modelling of Sanicro 25 based on microstructural evolution and particle hardening mechanism[J]. Theor. Appl. Fract. Mech., 2021, 112: 102893
doi: 10.1016/j.tafmec.2021.102893
[24] Zhao B, Bao H S, Li L. Hot deformation behavior of Sanicro25 steel[J]. Hot Work. Technol., 2014, 43(10): 26
[24] 赵 博, 包汉生, 李 莉. Sanicro25钢热变形行为的研究[J]. 热加工工艺, 2014, 43(10): 26
[25] Du Q R, Yu M, Chen L. Effect of geometry angle on mechanical properties of Inconel 718 subsurface characterized by nanoindentation[J]. Tool Eng., 2021, 55: 54
[25] 杜启睿, 于 淼, 陈 领. 纳米压痕几何角度对Inconel 718亚表面力学性能的影响[J]. 工具技术, 2021, 55: 54
[26] Yan Z Z, Shi Y L, Fan X T, et al. A study on the landform evolution of Danxia hillslope using numerical simulation[J]. Prog. Geophys., 2012, 27: 2429
[26] 严珍珍, 石耀霖, 范湘涛 等. 利用数值模拟方法研究宏观丹霞地貌坡地的演化过程[J]. 地球物理学进展, 2012, 27: 2429
[27] Xi C Y. Two-stage SPS sintering preparation of ultrafine-grained Sialon-based ceramics and study on the microstructure and properties[D]. Qinhuangdao: Yanshan University, 2023
[27] 郗晨阳. 超细晶Sialon基陶瓷两段式SPS烧结制备及组织性能研究[D]. 秦皇岛: 燕山大学, 2023
[28] Zhao B, Xu B Z, Yue Z F. A numerical study of indentation creep using indenters of different geometry[J]. Chin. Q. Mech., 2008, 29(1): 144
[28] 赵 彬, 许宝星, 岳珠峰. 不同形状压头作用下的压痕蠕变数值研究[J]. 力学季刊, 2008, 29(1): 144
[1] 于化顺; 陈熙琛; 赵生旭; 闵光辉 . 复合材料凝固过程中颗粒推移距离及其影响因素[J]. 金属学报, 1999, 35(7): 781-784 .