Please wait a minute...
Acta Metall Sin  2017, Vol. 53 Issue (11): 1427-1444    DOI: 10.11900/0412.1961.2017.00145
Orginal Article Current Issue | Archive | Adv Search |
Micromechanism of Cleavage Fracture of Weld Metals
Jianhong CHEN1,2(), Rui CAO1,2
1 State Key Laboratory of Advanced Processing and Recycling of Nonferrous Metal, Department of Materials Science and Engineering, Lanzhou University of Technology, Lanzhou 730050, China
2 Department of Materials Science and Engineering, Lanzhou University of Technology, Lanzhou 730050, China
Download:  HTML  PDF(20132KB) 
Export:  BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)      
Abstract  

Cleavage fracture is the most dangerous form of fracture. Cleavage fracture usually happens well before general yielding at low nominal fracture stress and strain. Cleavage fracture is often spurred by low temperature and determines the toughness in the lower shelf temperature region. This paper describes a new framework for the micromechanism of cleavage fracture of high strength low alloy (HSLA) steel weld metals. Cleavage fracture not only determines the impact toughness in the lower shelf but also plays a decisive role on the impact toughness in the transition temperature region. The toughness is determined by the extending length of a preceding fibrous crack which is terminated by cleavage fracture. Three non-stop successive stages, i.e. crack nucleation, propagation of a second phase particle-sized crack across the particle/grain boundary, propagation of a grain-sized crack across the grain/grain boundary are explained. The "critical event" of cleavage fracture is emphasized which offers the greatest difficulty during crack formation and controls the cleavage process. The critical event indicates the weakest microstructural component and its critical size which specifies the local cleavage fracture stress σf for cleavage fracture. In toughness-study it is paramount important to reveal the critical events for various test specimens. Three criteria for crack nucleation, for preventing crack nucleus from blunting and for crack propagation are testified. An active region specified by these criteria is suggested where the combined stress and strain are sufficient to trigger the cleavage fracture. It can be used in statistical analyses. A case study, using the new framework of micromechanism for analyzing toughness of 8%Ni steel welding metals is presented to analyze the experimental results.

Key words:  cleavage fracture      fracture process      critical event      fracture criteria     
Received:  24 April 2017     
ZTFLH:  TG111  
Fund: Supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China (Nos.51675255 and 51761027)

Cite this article: 

Jianhong CHEN, Rui CAO. Micromechanism of Cleavage Fracture of Weld Metals. Acta Metall Sin, 2017, 53(11): 1427-1444.

URL: 

https://www.ams.org.cn/EN/10.11900/0412.1961.2017.00145     OR     https://www.ams.org.cn/EN/Y2017/V53/I11/1427

Fig.1  Appearance of cleavage crack[8]
(a) metallographic section (b) fracture surface
Fig.2  Impact toughness-temperature transition curves[8] (Et—total charpy energy, T—test temperature, (a)—upper shelf, (b)—transition region, (c)—lower shelf, 1—material with the test temperature of -50 ℃ higher than the "transition temperature" notified by the red bar on curve 1, 2—the material with the test temperature of -50 ℃ near to the "transition temperature" notified by the black bar on the red transition curve 2, 3—the material with the test temperature of -50 ℃ lower than the "transition temperature" notified by the black bar on the blue transition curve 3)
Fig.3  Microscopic fracture surface
(a) dimples of ductile rupture fracture on the upper shelf
(b) cleavage fracture on the lower shelf[8] (Arrow denotes the initiation origins of cleavage fracture, red region denotes critical facet of cleavage fracture)
Fig.4  Crack and fracture surface in the transition region
(a) a fibrous crack on the metallographic sec-tion
(b) a fibrous crack extending to certain length then transiting to cleavage fracture on the fracture surface
(c) stretch zone width (SZW), ductile cracking extension length (SCL), and the cleavage fracture distance (Xf) from cleavage fracture initiation origins to the blunted crack tip[11]
Fig.5  Plots of the total impact energy with SZW+SCL (a), crack initiation energy with SZW (b), crack propagation energy with SCL (c) measured at various temperatures in welding metal specimens with various heat input[11]
Fig.6  Schematics of normal stress (σyy) distribution along y direction in front of a notch root (a) and different lateral deformations (reductions) along y direction (b)
Fig.7  Schematic of stress distribution of normal stress ahead of a notch and a precrack (dy—plastic zone size; σ—stress; σy—yield strength; σnom—nominal tensile stress; L—bending load, LGY—general yielding bending load, n—hardening exponents; εp—plastic strain; the values of R are normalized by a parameter "δt=b" which is equal to the crack-tip opening displacement b)
(a) stress distribution of normal stress ahead of a notch without stress triaxiality
(b) stress distribution ahead of a notch with stress triaxiality[8]
(c) stress distribution ahead of a precrack with stress triaxiality[8]
Material C Mn Si Mo S P Ti V B O N Fe
WCF62 0.06 1.36 0.23 0.21 0.009 0.02 - 0.03 0.0017 - - Bal.
16MnR 0.18 1.40 0.36 - 0.018 0.02 - - - - - Bal.
16Mn 0.14 1.37 0.32 0.014 0.02 - - - - - Bal.
Ti-B weld 0.06 1.45 0.48 - 0.020 0.01 0.03 - 0.0040 0.03 0.019 Bal.
C-Mn weld 0.07 1.24 0.28 - 0.020 0.01 0.03 - - 0.03 0.019 Bal.
Table 1  Chemical compositions of used materials (mass fraction / %)
Fig.8  Fracture surface of a C-Mn steel crack opening displacement (COD) specimen fractured at -130 ℃[8]
(a) a crack nucleus (1.5 μm×2 μm, pointed by an arrow) initiated at a grain boundary carbide particle and propagated through boundaries between particle and contiguous ferrite grains 1 and 2
(b) grain 2-sized crack propagating into contiguous grains 3~7
(c) grain-sized cracks 1~7 form a cracking terrace
(d) the formed cracking terrace acting as a Griffith's crack around 100 μm×200 μm in size and triggering the global cleavage fracture of entire specimen
Fig.9  Schematics showing the cleavage fracture process[8]
(a, b) nucleation and extension of a microcrack in a second-phase particle at the end of a dislocation pileup
(c) propagation of the just nucleated second-phase particle-sized crack into the matrix grain
(d) propagation of the grain-sized crack into contiguous grains and then throughout the entire specimen
Fig.10  The procedure for locating the crack initiation particle
(a) under low magnification trailing Chevron strips to the crack initiation region[8]
(b) tracing back the river pattern strips on the fracture facets to find the origin particle of cracking initiation[8]
(c) measuring its distance Xf from the notch root
Fig.11  Several types of entities of crack initiation[8](a) plastic slip-induced cracking martensite-austenite (M-A) block(b) shear stress-induced fiber-loading cracking M-A flake(c) blocky M-A constituent-induced ferrite delamination(d) decohesion of an inclusion(e) cracking induced by carbide particle(f) cracking induced by pearlite column
Fig.12  Schematic manifesting of the mechanisms of crack initiation[8]
(a) dislocation pileup-induced cracking in a second-phase particle (L—length of dislocation pileup, σe—equivalent stress inducing dislocation pileup, c—carbide second phase particle, r—length of carbide second phase particle cracking, σn—a normal stress which produced a crack nucleus in a second phase particle, σ11 —applied tensile normal stress)
(b) surface shear stress (τ) induced fiber-loading cracking in a flaky M-A
(c) surface shear stress-induced decohesion of inclusion
(d) stress triaxiality-induced delamination of ferrite matrix near boundary of M-A block (σzz—tensile stress along crack tip, i.e. along the thickness)
Fig.13  A typical fracture surface showing the case of cleavage microcracking nucleated by stress triaxiality-induced delamination induced by a blocky M-A[8](a) river-pattern strips originating from the blocky M-A that initiates the cleavage fracture(b) close look of the M-A with a thin foil of bainite matrix on its surface(c) M-A block and thin foil on it(d) carbon map by scanning Auger electron probe
Fig.14  Schematics of metallographic section cut perpendicularly to the fracture surface (a) and the crack retained close to the fracture surface (b)[8]
Fig.15  Schematics of metallographic section for observing microstructure around the crack initiation site (a) and microstructure around the crack initiation showing large ferrite grains (b)[8]
Fig.16  Retained crack in ferrite grain for notched specimen (a), retained crack in bainite packet for notched specimen (b) and retained cracks confined in second phase particles in precracked specimens (c)[8]
Fig.17  Crack initiated in the coarsest grains in notched specimen[8](a) coarse grain in the cleavage fracture initiation origins in four point bending specimen(b) coarse grain in the cleavage fracture initiation origins in Charpy toughness specimen
Fig.18  Measured σf and the histogram of grain size distributions for Ti-B weld metal (a) and C-Mn weld metal (b)[8] (σf max—maximum σf, σf min—minimum σf)
Fig.19  Schematics of measuring σf (a) and measuring εpc (b)[8] (σyymax—maximum tensile normal stress, σf—cleavage fracture stress, σyyi—tensile normal stress at initiation origin location, Xma—the location of maximum tensile normal stress, εpc—critical plastic strain)
Fig.20  Distribution of σyy ahead of a crack tip[8] (X—distance from precrack tip, σf′—assumed cleavage fracture stress)
Fig.21  Results of three point bending (3PB) precracked specimens unloaded at applied load of 6.86 kN[8]
(a) precrack tip configuration observation
(b) FEM simulations of fracture behavior at precrack tip
(c) FEM calculations of stress and strain distributions (σm/σe—stress triaxiality, Tc—critical stress triaxiality, vertical line I—drawn from the intersection of the curve εp and the horizontal bar εpc, vertical line P—drawn from the intersection of the curve σyy and the horizontal bar σf (almost the same line through the intersection of σm/σe and the horizontal bar Tc), Xs—distance between I line and P line)
Fig.22  Results of 3PB precracked specimens unloaded at applied load of 9.80 kN[8]
(a) precrack tip configuration observation
(b) FEM simulations of fracture behavior at precrack tip
(c) FEM calculations of stress and strain distributions
Fig.23  Results of 3PB precracked specimens unloaded at applied load of 12.74 kN[8]
(a) precrack tip configuration observation
(b) FEM simulations of fracture behavior at precrack tip
(c) FEM calculations of stress and strain distributions
Fig.24  An active zone (with shaded area) satisfied with three criteria (a) (B—specimen breadth, σ?—average stress), variation of the active zone width with applied load (Pf) (b) and the variation of the probability (Pir) of fracture with applied load (c)[8]
Fig.25  Microstructures of weld metals DM4-1 (a) and T5-21(b)[8]
Material Mass fraction / % D σf Fb Cv(-50 ℃)
Ni Cr C Si+Mo+Mn+Cu+Nb+V Fe μm MPa % J
BM 7.58 0.60 0.08 1.77 Bal. 20 2705 42 177.3
T5-21 6.34 0.73 0.05 2.46 Bal. 30 61 163.0
DM4-1 3.09 0.69 0.06 2.71 Bal. 60 1591 74 24.5
Table 2  Compositions, micro-parameters and mechanical properties of base metal (BM) and weld metals
Fig.26  Retained cracks in base metal (a) and DM4-1 (b)[8]
Fig.27  Random measure retained crack and bainite colony sizes in base metal (a) and DM4-1 (b)[8]
Fig.28  Histogram of bainite colony size in DM4-1 (a) and T5-21 (b) [8]
Fig.29  EBSD maps (a, b) and grain misorientations (c, d) in DM4-1 (a, c) and T5-21 (b, d) [8] (Blue line in Figs.29a and b presenting the misorientation angles larger than 15°)
Fig.30  Width of bainitic laths in DM4-1 (a) and T5-21 (b) measured by TEM[20]
Fig.31  Locating the crack initiation site (a), stress and strain distributions in front of the notch root by FEM calculation (b)
[1] Hahn G T.The influence of microstructure on brittle fracture toughness[J]. Metall. Trans., 1984, 15A: 947
[2] Stroh A N.The formation of cracks as a result of plastic flow[J]. Proc. Roy. Soc. Math. Phys. Eng. Sci., 1954, 223A: 404
[3] Knott J F.Some effects of hydrostatic tension on the fracture behaviour of mild steel[J]. J. Iron Steel Inst., 1966, 204: 104
[4] Brozzo P, Buzzichelli G, Mascanzoni A, et al.Microstructure and cleavage resistance of low-carbon bainitic steels[J]. Met. Sci., 1977, 11: 123
[5] Curry D A.Cleavage micromechanisms of crack extension in steels[J]. Met. Sci., 1980, 14: 319
[6] Yang W J, Lee B S, Oh Y T, et al.Microstructural parameters governing cleavage fracture behaviors in the ductile-brittle transition region in reactor pressure vessel steels[J]. Mater. Sci. Eng., 2004, A379: 17
[7] Ritchie R O, Knott J F, Rice J R.On the relationship between critical tensile stress and fracture toughness in mild steel[J]. J. Mech. Phys. Solids, 1973, 21: 395
[8] Chen J H, Cao R.Micromechanism of Cleavage Fracture of Metals—A Comprehensive Microphysical Model for Cleavage Cracking in Metals[M]. Waltham, MA, USA: Butterworth-Heinemann, 2014: 3
[9] Chen J H, Wang G Z, Wang H J.A statistical model for cleavage fracture of low alloy steel[J]. Acta Metall., 1996, 44: 3979
[10] Cao R, Yan Y J, Du W S, et al.Fracture behaviour of 8%Ni 980 MPa high strength steel at various temperatures Part 2—COD tests[J]. Mater. Sci. Technol., 2011, 27: 145
[11] Cao R, Li J, Liu D S, et al.Micromechanism of decrease of impact toughness in coarse-grain heat-affected zone of HSLA steel with increasing welding heat input[J]. Metall. Mater. Trans., 2015, 46A: 2999
[12] Griffiths J R, Owen D R J. An elastic-plastic stress analysis for a notched bar in plane strain bending[J]. J. Mech. Phys. Solids, 1971, 19: 419
[13] McMeeking R M. Finite deformation analysis of crack-tip opening in elastic-plastic materials and implications for fracture[J]. J. Mech. Phys. Solids, 1977, 25: 357
[14] Chen J H, Kikuta Y, Araki T, et al.Micro-fracture behaviour induced by M-A constituent (island martensite) in simulated welding heat affected zone of HT80 high strength low alloyed steel[J]. Acta Metall., 1984, 32: 1779
[15] Smith E.The nucleation and growth of cleavage microcracks in mild steel [A]. Proceedings of Conference on Physical Basis of Yield and Fracture[C]. London: Institute of Physics and Physical Society, 1996: 36
[16] Chen J H, Wang G Z, Wang Q.Change of critical events of cleavage fracture with variation of microscopic features of low-alloy steels[J]. Metall. Mater. Trans., 2002, 33A: 3393
[17] Chen J H, Zhu L, Ma H.On the scattering of the local fracture stress σf[J]. Acta Metall. Mater., 1990, 38: 2527
[18] Chen J H, Wang Q, Wang G Z, et al.Fracture behavior at crack tip—A new framework for cleavage mechanism of steel[J]. Acta Metall., 2003, 51: 1841
[19] Chen J H, Yan C, Sun J.Further study on the mechanism of cleavage fracture at low temperatures[J]. Acta Metall. Mater., 1994, 42: 251
[20] Chen J H, Cao R.Scatter of measured KIC related to the scatters of local parameters Xf, σf and εpc [A]. ICF2013[C]. Beijing: Chinese Society of Theoretical and Applied Mechanics, Chinese Society for Corrosion and Protection, China Mechanical Engineering Society, 2013: M10
[21] Cao R, Zhang X B, Wang Z, et al.Investigation of microstructural features determining the toughness of 980 MPa bainitic weld metal[J]. Metall. Mater. Trans., 2014, 45A: 815
[1] Xu ZHANG, Yumin WANG, Qing YANG, Jiafeng LEI, Rui YANG. STUDY ON TENSILE BEHAVIOR OF SiCf/TC17 COMPOSITES[J]. 金属学报, 2015, 51(9): 1025-1037.
[2] Xinning ZHANG,Yingdong QU,Rongde LI,Junhua YOU. MECHANISM OF CRACK NUCLEATION AND PROPA- GATION OF FERRITE DUCTILE IRON DURING IMPACT FRACTURE UNDER LOW TEMPERATURES[J]. 金属学报, 2015, 51(11): 1333-1340.
[3] WANG Guozhen WANG Yuliang XUAN Fuzhen TU Shantung WANG Zhengdong. EFFECTS OF LOADING RATE, NOTCH GEOMETRY AND LOADING MODE ON THE CLEAVAGE FRACTURE BEHAVIOR OF 16MnR STEEL[J]. 金属学报, 2009, 45(7): 866-872.
[4] WANG Daifeng; LI Geyang; LI Pengxing; WU Renjie(State Key Laboratory for MMCs; Shanghai Jiaotong University; Shanghai 200030)(Manuscript received 1995-04-14; in revised form 1995-09-14). CREEP FRACTURE PROCESS COUPLED WITH CAVITATION IN SiC_p-Al COMPOSITE[J]. 金属学报, 1996, 32(4): 433-437.
[5] AI Suhua; GUAN Shaoxuan (State Key Laboratory Fatigue and Fracture of Materials; Institute of Metal Research; Chinese Academy of Sciences; Shenyang 110015)FENG Zemin; GE Jingyan(Department Science and EngineeringNortheastern University; Shenyang 110006). TENSILE DEFORMATION AND FRACTURE OF Ti_3Al BASED ALLOY[J]. 金属学报, 1995, 31(6): 286-288.
[6] ZHANG Yue; CHU Wuyang; WANG Yanbin; QIAO Lijie; XIAO Jimei(Universityof Science and Technology Beijing; Beijing 100083); WANG Zhonghuai; BAI Chunli)(Institute of Chemistry; Chinese Academy of Sciences; Beijing 100080). STUDY OF CLEAVAGE FRACTURE SURFACE OF TiAl ALLOYS IN NANOMETER SCALE[J]. 金属学报, 1995, 31(5): 191-196.
[7] HUANG Zheng;YAO Mei Institute of Physics; Academia Sinica; Beijing Harbin Institute of Technology Institute of Physics;Academia Sinica;Beijing 100080. CHARACTERISTIC TRANSITION TEMPERATURE OF BRITTLENESS OF LOW CARBON STEEL[J]. 金属学报, 1990, 26(2): 31-36.
[8] XU Xiangxing;SU Yi;ZHOU Wei;CAI Qigong Tsinghua University; Beijing; Central Iron and Steel Research Institute; Ministry of Metallurgical Industry; Beijing. RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN M-A CONSTITUENT AND CLEAVAGE FRACTURE BEHAVIOUR OF ACICULAR BAINITIC WELD METAL[J]. 金属学报, 1988, 24(5): 361-365.
No Suggested Reading articles found!