The effect of Cu content on the corrosion resistance of Zr-0.8Sn-0.34Nb-0.39Fe-0.1Cr-xCu alloys (x=0.05-0.5, mass fraction, %) was investigated in superheated steam at 500 ℃ and10.3 MPa by autoclave tests. The microstructures of the alloys are observed by TEM. The results show that (0.05-0.5)Cu addition has little effect on the corrosion resistance of the alloys. When x is below 0.2, the precipitates Zr(Fe, Cr, Nb)2 with hcp structure and Zr3Fe containing Cu with orthorhombic structure are detected. When x is above 0.2, besides Zr(Fe, Cr, Nb)2 and Zr3Fe containing Cu, the precipitate of Zr2Cu with tetragonal structure is also detected. Zr(Fe, Cr, Nb)2 precipitates are smaller than the precipitates containing Cu in size. The precipitates containing Cu are found in the alloy even with 0.05Cu, indicating that the Cu content in α-Zr matrix is very small. Therefore, the reason that the Cu content has little effect on the corrosion resistance of the alloys is maybe related to the lower Cu content in α-Zr matrix.
YAO Mei-Yi
,
ZHANG Yu
,
LI Shi-Lu
,
ZHANG Xin
,
ZHOU Jun
,
ZHOU Bang-Xin
. EFFECT OF Cu CONTENT ON THE CORROSION RESISTANCE OF Zr-0.80Sn-0.34Nb-0.39Fe-0.10Cr-xCu ALLOY IN SUPERHEATED STEAM AT 500 ℃[J]. Acta Metall Sin, 2011
, 47(7)
: 872
-876
.
DOI: 10.3724/SP.J.1037.2011.00236
[1] IAEA–TECDOC–996, IAEA, Vienna, 1998, ISSN 1011–4289, January, 1998
[2] Garzarolli F, Broy Y, Busch R A. In: Bradley E R, Sabol G P, eds., Zirconium in the Nuclear Industry: 11th International Symposium, ASTM STP 1295, Garmisch–Partenkirchen, Germany: ASTM International, 1996: 850
[3] Isobe T, Matsuo Y. In: Eucken C M, Garde A M, eds., Zirconium in the Nuclear Industry: Ninth International Symposium, ASTM STP 1132, Philadelphia: ASTM International, 1991: 346
[4] Takeda K, Anada H. In: Sabol G P, Moan G D, eds., Zirconium in the Nuclear Industry: Twelfth International Symposium, ASTM STP 1354, West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM International, 2000: 592
[5] Broy Y, Garzarolli F, Seibold A, Van Swam L F. In: Sabol G P, Moan G D, eds., Zirconium in the Nuclear Industry: Twelfth International Symposium, ASTM STP 1354, West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM International, 2000: 609
[6] Yueh H K, Kesterson R L, Comstock R J, Shah H H, Colburn D J, Dahlback M, Hallstadius L. J ASTM Int, 2005; 2: 330
[7] Park J Y, Choi B K, Yoo S J, Jeong Y H. J Nucl Mater, 2006; 359: 59
[8] Jung Y H, Lee M H, Kim H G, Park J Y, Jeong Y H. J Alloys Compd, 2009; 479: 423
[9] Li S L, Yao M Y, Zhang X, Geng J Q, Peng J C, Zhou B X. Acta Metall Sin, 2011; 47: 163
(李士炉, 姚美意, 张欣, 耿建桥, 彭剑超, 周邦新. 金属学报, 2011; 47: 163)
[10] Hong H S, Moon J S, Kim S J, Lee K S. J Nucl Mater, 2001; 297: 113
[11] Mardon J P, Charquet D, Senevat J. In: Sabol G P, Moan G D, eds., Zirconium in the Nuclear Industry: Twelfth International Symposium, ASTM STP 1354, West Conshohocken,
PA: ASTM International, 2000: 505
[12] Yao M Y. PhD Thesis. Shanghai University, 2007
(姚美意. 上海大学博士论文, 2007)
[13] Jeong Y H, Lee K O, Kim H G. J Nucl Mater, 2002; 302: 9
[14] Kim H G, Jeong Y H, Kim T H. J Nucl Mater, 2004; 326: 125
[15] Jeong Y H, Kim H G, Kim D J. J Nucl Mater, 2003; 323: 72
[16] Yao M Y, Zhou B X, Li Q, Liu W Q, Geng X, Lu Y P. J Nucl Mater, 2008; 374: 197