STUDY ON ADSORPTION AND DISSOCIATION OF WATER MOLECULE ON Au, Cu AND THEIR ALLOYS' SURFACES BY DFT CALCULATIONS
Zongyou JIANG1,2,Zongyan ZHAO1,2()
1 School of Materials Science and Engineering, Kunming University of Science and Technology, Kunming 650093, China 2 Yunnan Key Laboratory of Micro/Nano Materials & Technology, School of Materials Science and Engineering, Yunnan University, Kunming 650504, China;
Cite this article:
Zongyou JIANG,Zongyan ZHAO. STUDY ON ADSORPTION AND DISSOCIATION OF WATER MOLECULE ON Au, Cu AND THEIR ALLOYS' SURFACES BY DFT CALCULATIONS. Acta Metall Sin, 2016, 52(12): 1586-1594.
In order to reduce the amount and cost of gold catalyst in practical application, it is an effective technical strategy to construct binary metal alloy with gold and transition metals. In this work, the adsorption behaviors and dissociation reaction path of water on the different surfaces of Au, Cu, and AuCu binary alloy were studied by using DFT calculations. Based on the calculations, the corresponding catalytic performance of each model was further analyzed. The calculated results showed that the catalytic activity of the considered four surface models is on the following order: Au(111) < AuCu(111)-Cu < AuCu(111)-Au < Cu(111), if using the active energy as comparison standard. The underlying reason of this phenomenon is closely related with the adsorption behavior: the molecular adsorptions of water on Cu(111) and AuCu(111)-Au surfaces have relatively small adsorption energies; while at the same time, the dissociation adsorptions of water on these two surfaces have relatively large adsorption energies. Based on the electron transfer and bonding electronic structure, it could be found that the more electrons transfer between surface and water or H+OH groups, the more strong interaction between catalyst and adsorbate. Furthermore, the overlapping or hybridization between the d states of metal atoms on the surface and the 1b1 states of water or lb1-like states of H+OH groups also determines this interaction. Therefore, using AuCu binary alloy to replace Au as catalyst or co-catalyst reduces cost, and enhances the catalytic activity.
Fund: Supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China (No.21263006) and 18th Young Academic and Technical Leaders Reserve Talent Project of Yunnan Province (No.2015HB015)
Fig.1 Different adsorption states and reaction path of water on Au(111) surface (a), and the local configurations of molecular adsorption (b) and dissociation adsorption (c) (SS—separated state, IS—initial state, TS—transit state, FS—final state)
Model
State
dOW-HW/ nm
∠HW-OW-HW/(°)
dM-HW/ nm
dM-OW/ nm
∠W-S /(°)
Au(111)
IS
0.0984
0.0985
104.587
0.3276
0.3185
0.2571
4.375
TS
0.0983
0.1883
154.758
0.3768
0.1641
0.2125
78.141
FS
0.0986
0.2237
153.875
0.3664
0.1619
0.2113
57.029
Cu(111)
IS
0.0988
0.0988
105.354
0.2857
0.2858
0.2168
15.190
TS
0.0987
0.1569
126.960
0.2778
0.1773
0.1968
41.649
FS
0.0981
0.3866
95.969
0.2731
0.1735
0.1997
88.792
AuCu(111)-Au
IS
0.0983
0.0985
105.055
0.3646
0.3135
0.2646
13.405
TS
0.0986
0.1503
141.136
0.2922a
0.1839a
0.2310a
38.957
0.2992b
0.1915b
0.2314b
FS
0.0982
0.3077
95.809
0.1972a
0.1762a
0.1745a
83.432
0.2527b
0.1727b
0.1874b
AuCu(111)-Cu
IS
0.0987
0.0988
105.907
0.3226
0.3053
0.2136
20.408
TS
0.0975
0.2211
127.245
0.2931a
0.1624a
0.1852a
21.010
0.3097b
0.2483b
0.2997b
FS
0.0987
0.4212
114.274
0.2587a
0.1914a
0.1905a
22.745
0.2872b
0.1755b
0.2328b
Table 1 Structural parameters of water adsorption and dissociation on different materials surfaces in this work
Fig.2 Different adsorption states and reaction path of water on Cu(111) surface (a), and the local configurations of molecular adsorption (b) and dissociation adsorption (c)
Fig.3 Different adsorption states and reaction path of water on AuCu(111)-Au surface (a), and the local configurations of molecular adsorption (b) and dissociation adsorption (c)
Fig.4 Different adsorption states and reaction path of water on AuCu(111)-Cu surface (a), and the local configurations of molecular adsorption (b) and dissociation adsorption (c)
Fig.5 Profile of mean electron density difference of water on Au(111), Cu(111), AuCu(111) surfaces by the different adsorption states
Fig.6 Local and partial density of states of water on Au(111) surface (a), Cu(111) surface (b), AuCu(111)-Au surface (c) and AuCu(111)-Cu surface (d) at the present of molecular adsorption or dissociation adsorption (EF—Fermi level)
[1]
Benton A F, Elgin J C.J Am Chem Soc, 1926; 48: 3027
[2]
Hutchings G J.J Catal, 1985; 96: 292
[3]
Haruta M, Kobayashi T, Sano H, Yamada N.Chem Lett, 1987; 16: 405
[4]
Haruta M, Yamada N, Kobayashi T, Iijima S.J Catal, 1989; 115: 301
[5]
Friend C M, Hashmi A S K.Accounts Chem Res, 2014; 47: 729
[6]
Wu C Y, Horibe T, Jacobsen C B, Toste F D.Nature, 2015; 517: 449
[7]
Qiao B T, Lin J, Wang A Q, Chen Y, Zhang T, Liu J Y.Chin J Catal, 2015; 36: 1505
[7]
(乔波涛, 林坚, 王爱琴, 陈洋, 张涛, 刘景月. 催化学报, 2015; 36: 1505)
[8]
Dai W J, Yan J Q, Dai K, Li L D, Guan N J. Chin J Catal, 2015; 36: 1968
[8]
(代卫炯, 闫俊青, 戴珂, 李兰冬, 关乃佳. 催化学报, 2015; 36: 1968)
[9]
Du C, Gao X H, Chen W.Chin J Catal, 2016; 37: 1049(杜诚, 高小惠, 陈卫. 催化学报, 2016; 37: 1049)
[10]
Wang J, Cui D M.Chin J Org Chem, 2016; 36: 1163(王剑, 崔冬梅. 有机化学, 2016; 36: 1163)
[11]
Yan K, Liao J Y, Wu X, Xie X N.RSC Adv, 2013; 3: 3853
[12]
Konkolewicz D, Schr?der K, Buback J, Bernhard S, Matyjaszewski K.ACS Macro Lett, 2012; 1: 1219